On 05/28/2010 02:58 AM, Toby Corkindale wrote:
On 28/05/10 05:55, Matt Bailey wrote:
/usr/sbin/ethtool -K br0 sg off
/usr/sbin/ethtool -K br0 tso off
Might fix your problem, YMMV; this worked for me.
Bam! Problem fixed.
All I needed was the 'sg' option - tso wasn't enabled anyway.
Now
On 05/27/2010 10:21 AM, Toby Corkindale wrote:
On 27/05/10 18:06, atp wrote:
As requested:
ifconfig br0 from the host
br0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1e:37:4d:8c:d8
inet addr:192.168.1.206 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr:
On 05/27/2010 12:05 PM, Yanick Emiliano wrote:
Hi everybody
I would like know if lxc at this stage suppots centralization network
storage. I mean a Storage Filer , iSCSI, or *AoE storage*,For example can I
have all my rootfs on a network filer and start each VM on a specific device
storage
On 05/26/2010 11:07 AM, atp wrote:
Thanks to both for the replies.
This now makes sense. I've specified the rootfs.mount in the container
config, and it gets past there and boots ok.
Just in case anyone else cares, a very handy debug log can be had by
using this command.
lxc-start
On 05/13/2010 02:22 PM, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
[ ... ]
I attached a proof-of-concept patch which seems to work good enough for
me. The function names are somewhat off now, but I leave that for later
Ferenc,
do you have definitive version for this ?
I have some modifications in the start
On 05/26/2010 08:10 PM, Brian K. White wrote:
On 5/26/2010 4:54 AM, Ralf Schmitt wrote:
Daniel Lezcanodlezc...@fr.ibm.com writes:
This is internal stuff of lxc. Before this commit, several temporary
directories were created and never destroyed, polluting '/tmp'.
In order to do
On 05/17/2010 05:00 PM, Bodhi Zazen wrote:
Sorry for the delay, I missed your mail in the spam filter :/
--
___
Lxc-users mailing list
Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Actually, I'm not sure you can fully solve
On 05/13/2010 06:17 PM, Christian Haintz wrote:
Hi,
At first LXC seams to be a great work from what we have read already.
There are still a few open questions for us (we are currently running
dozens of OpenVZ Hardwarenodes).
1) OpenVZ in the long-term seams to be a dead end. Will LXC be a
Osvaldo Filho wrote:
I get this error on thinclient boot: PXE-E32: TFTP open timeout
Can you give the version and the configuration of lxc, the host
configuration, the kernel version, and the circumstances of the problem ?
Thanks
-- Daniel
Osvaldo Filho wrote:
Host Environment:
Linux ltspserver01 2.6.32-22-generic #33-Ubuntu SMP Wed Apr 28
13:28:05 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux
lxc 0.6.5-1
Linux containers userspace tools
===
lxc.utsname = ltsp2
lxc.tty = 4
lxc.pts = 1024
lxc.network.type = veth
-unreachable
REJECT all -- anywhere anywhere
reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
=
The problem, perhaps, is with openbsd-inetd.
2010/5/12 Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr:
Osvaldo Filho
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Actually, I'm not sure you can fully solve this. If rootfs is a
separate file system
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Ferenc Wagner wf...@niif.hu writes:
Daniel Lezcano dlezc...@fr.ibm.com writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr writes
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Ferenc Wagner wf...@niif.hu writes:
Daniel Lezcano dlezc...@fr.ibm.com writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
While playing with lxc-start, I noticed that /tmp is infested
Yanick Emiliano wrote:
Hi everybody,
I have just started playing with lxc and having some difficulties to set cpu
and memory on my guests. After my searches, seems that resources controlling
is managing in cgroup files and I think that I missed something or I didn't
understand how deal with
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
While playing with lxc-start, I noticed that /tmp is infested by
empty lxc-r* directories: [...] Ok, this name comes from lxc-rootfs
in conf.c:setup_rootfs. After setup_rootfs_pivot_root returns
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
I'd like to use lxc-start as a wrapper, invisible to the parent and
the (jailed) child. Of course I could hack around this by not
exec-ing lxc-start but keeping the shell around, trap all
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Ferenc Wagner wf...@niif.hu writes:
Daniel Lezcano dlezc...@fr.ibm.com writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
While playing with lxc-start, I noticed that /tmp is infested by
empty lxc-r* directories
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
I'd like to use lxc-start as a wrapper, invisible to the parent and
the (jailed) child
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
I can see that lxc-unshare isn't for me: I wanted to use it to avoid
adding the extra lxc-start process between two daemons communicating via
signals, but it's impossible to unshare PID namespaces, so
Przemysław Knycz wrote:
Hi!
At the first glance I would say it is not supported by the kernel yet.
Is there support for IFB or IMQ in container? 2.6.33 can support this?
IFB and IMQ are out of kernel tree, right ?
I am discovering IFB / IMQ. Are you asking if we can move a
stephane.rivi...@regis-dgac.net wrote:
Hi,
I'm using LXC to run Perl scripts that generate network traffic, using the
Net::RawIP package.
The scripts work perfectly well on a real host, but fail inside an LXC
container.
After a few hours of testing/debuging, the origin of the problem is
Roman Yepishev wrote:
Hello, Daniel.
Thanks for your reply!
On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 09:41 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
When the container starts, it setup the root filesystem. The rootfs is
done with the pivot_root syscall, hence the old rootfs contains the
mount points which
Hi all,
did someone experienced the X server consuming 100% of CPU after
launching a container on Ubuntu 9.10 ?
Thanks
-- Daniel
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself.
Roman Yepishev wrote:
Hello all,
I am trying to use LXC to run Ubuntu Lucid Lynx containers on Lucid Lynx
hosts. I have succeeded in configuring the container properly so it
starts, connects to the network etc.
However, as described in [1], my container can remount the /srv
partition
Osvaldo Filho wrote:
I this:
...
mountall: mount /dev/pts [25] terminated with status 1
mount: according to mtab, none is already mounted on /dev/shm
mountall: mount /dev/shm [26] terminated with status 1
mount: according to mtab, varrun is already mounted on /var/run
mountall: mount
Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
Twas brillig at 09:47:33 01.04.2010 UTC-05 when se...@us.ibm.com did gyre and
gimble:
Here process drops root privileges, setuids to uid=103 and limits itself
to 3 processes with this uid. Clone fails due to fact there are two
processes with uid=103 running in
Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
Hi.
I have tried to run lxc tools from git and got the following output:
[dotted...@vertex:~]% sudo lxc-start --logfile=/dev/stderr
--logpriority=TRACE -n cf
lxc-start 1270236851.229 INFO lxc_conf - tty's configured
lxc-start 1270236851.229 ERROR
Michael B. Trausch wrote:
On 02/11/2010 03:46 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
If you do not set a mac address in the container configuration file, the
kernel will choose one for you preventing duplicate mac address on the
host.
Will it pick something that is static for each container? I'd like
Daniel Lezcano wrote:
Michael B. Trausch wrote:
Hello,
I am running LXC version 0.6.5, with kernel 2.6.32.7. I am having some
pretty significant troubles getting networking to reliably work with the
containers. That is to say, the host name is doing just fine, and
answers network
Michael H. Warfield wrote:
I mentioned this in an earlier posting that I was using the veth method
with bridges because I could NOT get macvlan to work. Problem is that
the containers will come up and will talk on the network but the host
can not talk to any of the guest containers. Ping
Kumar L Srikanth-B22348 wrote:
Hi,
I am new to Linux Containers and Libvirt.
Recently, I installed Linux Container tools on my Fedora Core 12 (64
bit) machine and able to create/start/destroy my own containers using
the following commands:
lxc-create
lxc-sshd
lxc-start
lxc-destroy
And
set the target directory to '/'?
By the way, I am using libvirt version o.7.6.
I won't be able to answer as I don't know libvirt, it's better you ask
to the libvirt mailing list. This mailing list is for the lxc container
tools.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Lezcano
Kumar L Srikanth-B22348 wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Please see my inline comments.
Regards,
Srikanth
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Lezcano [mailto:daniel.lezc...@free.fr]
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 5:40 PM
To: Kumar L Srikanth-B22348
Cc: lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Jean-Marc Pigeon (j...@safe.ca):
Hello,
I was wondering out loud about the best design to solve his problem.
If we try to redirect kernel-generated messages
atp wrote:
Hi,
There is a /proc virtualization layer prototype with fuse which needs to
be enhanced but it's not for the short term as there are several issues
with the container itself to be solved before adding it.
But any volunteer is welcome ;)
I hacked up a quick
Matteo Ghezzi wrote:
2010/1/29 Daniel Lezcano dlezc...@fr.ibm.com:
Thanks for your answer.
Can you send the config file of the container ? it should be in
/var/lib/lxc/container_name/config or /etc/lxc/container_name.
The config file of the container
Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 21:50 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
apologies for the length, but how is everyone else handling this?
this is the last thing i need to solve before i actually start running
all my services on this setup.
I was wondering
Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 21:50 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
apologies for the length, but how is everyone else handling this?
this is the last thing i need to solve before i actually start running
all my services on this setup.
I was wondering
Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 23:39 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 21:50 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
apologies for the length, but how is everyone else handling this?
this is the last thing i need
301 - 341 of 341 matches
Mail list logo
