Re: [Lxc-users] Bug discussion: implementing high virtual device MAC addresses

2011-10-24 Thread Derek Simkowiak
Hello, Just following up re: this bug. I think it's a pretty serious issue. I am looking to work on this, but I am seeking some feedback and direction from one of the core LXC devs. - Do you agree with my analysis? - Has anyone else worked on this already? etc. Thanks, Derek

Re: [Lxc-users] Bug discussion: implementing high virtual device MAC addresses

2011-10-24 Thread Francois-Xavier Bourlet
Hi, Here we are using lxc intensively with bridges. Since we don't use STP, the downtime for each a mac@ change is unnoticeable. In fact, we discovered it when reading this mailinglist. After some test I can confirm that most of the time we are spawning/destroying a container, the bridge's mac@

Re: [Lxc-users] Bug discussion: implementing high virtual device MAC addresses

2011-10-24 Thread Derek Simkowiak
Francois-Xavier, Thank you for your feedback. I have seen the issue on two systems where STP is turned off. Here is the /etc/network/interfaces entry for the particular bridge where I've seen it the most; note the last line: iface br0 inet dhcp bridge_ports eth0

[Lxc-users] Bug discussion: implementing high virtual device MAC addresses

2011-10-18 Thread Derek Simkowiak
There is a behavior in the Linux kernel which can cause a bridge device to change MAC address, thus causing a network blackout of several seconds (while everybody ARPs the new MAC address flushes the old one). This happens when bridging an enslaved interface, like we do with LXC.