I have had good luck with ext4 on multi-terabyte systems the last 3
years or so. These systems run regular rsync (using rsnapshot) with no
filesystem problems. I also have a ~30 TB system with xfs, no
problems. (I switched to ext4 when I read benchmarks showing that it
was on par with
2011/12/16 Ulli Horlacher frams...@rus.uni-stuttgart.de:
On Tue 2011-12-13 (18:43), Zhu Yanhai wrote:
My concern is deploying Btrfs only for COW is a really heavy solution
for this...Is Btrfs ready for production system?
I have tested Btrfs with kernel 2.6.38: copying 30 GB with rsync
On Tue 2011-12-13 (18:43), Zhu Yanhai wrote:
My concern is deploying Btrfs only for COW is a really heavy solution
for this...Is Btrfs ready for production system?
I have tested Btrfs with kernel 2.6.38: copying 30 GB with rsync corrupted
the file system completely and the kernel run into an
Zhu Yanhai (2011-12-13 12:00:20 +0800) wrote:
On 12/12/2011 09:47 AM, István Király - LaKing wrote:
As next step I would like to minimize container size. My question is, what
the best, most elegant and fail proof technique for that?
It's not only an issue about disk space, it's about
2011/12/13 Ivan Vilata i Balaguer i...@selidor.net:
Zhu Yanhai (2011-12-13 12:00:20 +0800) wrote:
On 12/12/2011 09:47 AM, István Király - LaKing wrote:
As next step I would like to minimize container size. My question is, what
the best, most elegant and fail proof technique for that?
Zhu Yanhai (2011-12-13 18:43:41 +0800) wrote:
2011/12/13 Ivan Vilata i Balaguer i...@selidor.net:
I've carried out some tests with union mount points and Btrfs seeds and CoW
copies, and all of them seem to work without problems with LXC.
Thank you Ivan.
My concern is deploying Btrfs
Hi folks.
I'm trying to compose a system, where lxc containers behave like virtual hosts
for a web server.
As next step I would like to minimize container size. My question is, what the
best, most elegant and fail proof technique for that?
At this moment I'm thinking of a master container
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, István Király - LaKing wrote:
Hi folks.
I'm trying to compose a system, where lxc containers behave like virtual
hosts for a web server.
As next step I would like to minimize container size. My question is,
what the best, most elegant and fail proof technique for
/I'm trying to compose a system, where lxc containers behave like
virtual hosts for a web server./
It is possible to use shared, read-only mounts between the host and
containers. However, you will need to carefully consider your security
requirements and maintenance procedures.
If
2011/12/13 Zhu Yanhai zhu.yan...@gmail.com:
Hi,
2011/12/13 Derek Simkowiak de...@simkowiak.net:
I'm trying to compose a system, where lxc containers behave like virtual
hosts for a web server.
It is possible to use shared, read-only mounts between the host and
containers. However, you
10 matches
Mail list logo
