Re: [Lxc-users] Fwd: RE: Price Request For lxc.org

2011-10-11 Thread Brian K. White
On 10/11/2011 6:37 PM, Brian K. White wrote: > IEEE "does not honor requests" for applicant requested id's, but even > for the locally administered, > > lxc 6c:78:63 > and > LXC 4c:58:43 > > are both out. l (6c) and L (4c) both have a second nibble c which has a > second-least-significant bit 0 > >

Re: [Lxc-users] Fwd: RE: Price Request For lxc.org

2011-10-11 Thread Brian K. White
IEEE "does not honor requests" for applicant requested id's, but even for the locally administered, lxc 6c:78:63 and LXC 4c:58:43 are both out. l (6c) and L (4c) both have a second nibble c which has a second-least-significant bit 0 1100 --^- Too bad, it's nice and high to avoid the bridge lo

Re: [Lxc-users] Fwd: RE: Price Request For lxc.org

2011-10-11 Thread Derek Simkowiak
> /Add it to the possible wish list along with the MAC address prefix/ If there is interest in an official LXC vendor MAC address prefix, I'd like to call your attention to this Linux kernel bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/584048 https://www.redhat.com/archives/

Re: [Lxc-users] Fwd: RE: Price Request For lxc.org

2011-10-11 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 09:03:41AM -0400, Brian K. White wrote: > On 10/11/2011 8:40 AM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:14:55AM +0200, Papp Tamas wrote: > >> FYI, already it's much cheaper:D > What Are you talking about? > That message was perfectly topical. > > M

Re: [Lxc-users] Fwd: RE: Price Request For lxc.org

2011-10-11 Thread Brian K. White
That's a pretty substantial reduction. Add it to the possible wish list along with the MAC address prefix. Sadly I never finished the research to get that. The $600 is easy, the time to figure out what you're supposed to do is not ;) -- bkw On 10/11/2011 5:14 AM, Papp Tamas wrote: > FYI, alre

Re: [Lxc-users] Fwd: RE: Price Request For lxc.org

2011-10-11 Thread Brian K. White
On 10/11/2011 8:40 AM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:14:55AM +0200, Papp Tamas wrote: >> FYI, already it's much cheaper:D > > [Snip junk mail with some sort of business proposition] > > Please don't quote the full contents of junk mail if you actually decide > to answer

Re: [Lxc-users] Fwd: RE: Price Request For lxc.org

2011-10-11 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
Hi, On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:14:55AM +0200, Papp Tamas wrote: > FYI, already it's much cheaper:D [Snip junk mail with some sort of business proposition] Please don't quote the full contents of junk mail if you actually decide to answer them on-list. You have just helped that specific one bypas

[Lxc-users] Fwd: RE: Price Request For lxc.org

2011-10-11 Thread Papp Tamas
Title: Price Request For lxc.org FYI, already it's much cheaper:D tamas Original Message Subject: RE: Price Request For lxc.org Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 14:50:23 +