Re: [Lxc-users] LXC a feature complete replacement of OpenVZ?

2010-06-01 Thread Christian Haintz
Hi, At first, thanks for all the great feedback and the quickly ongoing development to lxc. On May 13, 2010, at 11:22 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: On 05/13/2010 06:17 PM, Christian Haintz wrote: 6) is LXC production ready? yes and no :) If you plan to run several webserver (not a full

Re: [Lxc-users] LXC a feature complete replacement of OpenVZ?

2010-05-14 Thread Ahrenholz, Jeffrey M
3) Is there support for tun/tap device The drivers are ready to be used in the container but not sysfs and that unfortunately prevent to create a tun/tap in a container. sysfs per namespace is on the way to be merged upstream. The workaround here is to create a TUN/TAP on the host and

[Lxc-users] LXC a feature complete replacement of OpenVZ?

2010-05-13 Thread Christian Haintz
Hi, At first LXC seams to be a great work from what we have read already. There are still a few open questions for us (we are currently running dozens of OpenVZ Hardwarenodes). 1) OpenVZ in the long-term seams to be a dead end. Will LXC be a feature complete replacement for OpenVZ in the

Re: [Lxc-users] LXC a feature complete replacement of OpenVZ?

2010-05-13 Thread Gordon Henderson
On Thu, 13 May 2010, Christian Haintz wrote: Hi, At first LXC seams to be a great work from what we have read already. There are still a few open questions for us (we are currently running dozens of OpenVZ Hardwarenodes). I can't answer for the developers, but here's my

Re: [Lxc-users] LXC a feature complete replacement of OpenVZ?

2010-05-13 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 05/13/2010 06:17 PM, Christian Haintz wrote: Hi, At first LXC seams to be a great work from what we have read already. There are still a few open questions for us (we are currently running dozens of OpenVZ Hardwarenodes). 1) OpenVZ in the long-term seams to be a dead end. Will LXC be a