Hi Gary
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 06:38 +1200, Gary Ballantyne wrote:
Unfortunately, I am still getting the same errors with a little over 40
containers.
I also had this problem. It was solved after Daniel suggested me to
increase the following sysctl setting:
fs.inotify.max_user_instances
On 08/15/2011 10:05 PM, Gary Ballantyne wrote:
On 16/08/11 06:52, Andre Nathan wrote:
Hi Gary
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 06:38 +1200, Gary Ballantyne wrote:
Unfortunately, I am still getting the same errors with a little over 40
containers.
I also had this problem. It was solved after Daniel
On 03/02/2011 02:46 PM, Andre Nathan wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 14:24 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
I could paste my configuration files if you think it'd help you
reproducing the issue.
Yes, please :)
Ok. The test host has a br0 interface which is not attached to any
physical interface:
On 02/28/2011 01:55 AM, Trent W. Buck wrote:
Daniel Lezcanodaniel.lezc...@free.fr writes:
I was using dnsmasq as a dns and a dhcp server and sending the
hostname as an identifier for the dhcp protocol, so I was able to
reach the container without taking care of the ip address / mac
address.
Hi Daniel
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 18:34 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
The neighbor table still overflows though. Do you think increasing the
number even more would be worth a try?
I don't know. Are message occurrences the same ? You can try to
increase the number to see if it finish to
On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 13:19 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
Hmm, that sounds really weird ... What is the kernel version ?
I tried on 2.6.35 (ubuntu 10.10 server kernel) and 2.6.38 (recompiled
from the ubuntu natty package).
Daniel,
Do you think trying a different network configuration for the containers
could help? I'm trying to get macvlan to work right now...
Thanks
Andre
--
Free Software Download: Index, Search Analyze Logs and other
On 02/28/2011 03:22 PM, Andre Nathan wrote:
Daniel,
Do you think trying a different network configuration for the containers
could help? I'm trying to get macvlan to work right now...
Maybe but I think the table overflow should not happen in general, I
would like to understand what is
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr writes:
I was using dnsmasq as a dns and a dhcp server and sending the
hostname as an identifier for the dhcp protocol, so I was able to
reach the container without taking care of the ip address / mac
address. But I noticed dnsmasq was collapsing and
Hi Daniel
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 08:06 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
I did exactly the same configuration and ran 1024 containers.
I hadn't to modify any ulimits for the container AFAIR, but just to
tweak /proc/sys limits.
Other than /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_instances, do you remember
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 08:06 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
I did exactly the same configuration and ran 1024 containers.
By the way, how did you handle the start-up of that many containers? The
load average goes up very quickly unless I add a sleep 1 between
lxc-start calls...
Did you have
On 02/25/2011 03:39 PM, Andre Nathan wrote:
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 08:06 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
I did exactly the same configuration and ran 1024 containers.
By the way, how did you handle the start-up of that many containers? The
load average goes up very quickly unless I add a sleep 1
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 20:06 +0100, Geordy Korte wrote:
Maybee a really stupid question... but why would you want to run that many
containers?
The idea is to use containers as a lighter-weight approach to provide
isolation between customers (compared to hardware virtualization).
Andre
On 02/25/2011 08:06 PM, Geordy Korte wrote:
Maybee a really stupid question... but why would you want to run that many
containers?
What is interesting with the containers is the scalability. The more
CPU/memory you have, the more you can add containers.
AFAIK, sourceforge provides a shell
14 matches
Mail list logo
