On 09/13/2010 02:43 PM, Ralf Schmitt wrote:
> Daniel Lezcano writes:
>
>>> yes, I think it would be a worthwhile addition. I've had problems with a
>>> centos guest, which started downloading 64 bit packages instead of the
>>> 32 bit ones. And I can also imagine some autoconf configure scripts
>>>
Daniel Lezcano writes:
>> yes, I think it would be a worthwhile addition. I've had problems with a
>> centos guest, which started downloading 64 bit packages instead of the
>> 32 bit ones. And I can also imagine some autoconf configure scripts
>> might get confused.
>>
>
> Does it make sense
On 09/07/2010 11:34 AM, Ralf Schmitt wrote:
> Daniel Lezcano writes:
>
>
>> On 09/07/2010 11:05 AM, Ralf Schmitt wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm running a 32 bit container on a 64 bit host system. Is there a
>>> configuration option to set the architecture? Currently I'm using
>>> 'lin
On 09/07/2010 11:28 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 09/07/2010 11:05 AM, Ralf Schmitt wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm running a 32 bit container on a 64 bit host system. Is there a
>> configuration option to set the architecture? Currently I'm using
>> 'linux32 lxc-start -n NAME' to set the architecture
Daniel Lezcano writes:
> On 09/07/2010 11:05 AM, Ralf Schmitt wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm running a 32 bit container on a 64 bit host system. Is there a
>> configuration option to set the architecture? Currently I'm using
>> 'linux32 lxc-start -n NAME' to set the architecture.
>>
>
> hum, no.
On 09/07/2010 11:05 AM, Ralf Schmitt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm running a 32 bit container on a 64 bit host system. Is there a
> configuration option to set the architecture? Currently I'm using
> 'linux32 lxc-start -n NAME' to set the architecture.
>
hum, no. Maybe that would be worth to add a
Hi all,
I'm running a 32 bit container on a 64 bit host system. Is there a
configuration option to set the architecture? Currently I'm using
'linux32 lxc-start -n NAME' to set the architecture.
Cheers,
- Ralf
--
This SF.
