Re: [Lxc-users] lxc macvlan bridge problem
Please keep to/cc to the list On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:42 PM, 宣铭艺 xuanmin...@gmail.com wrote: hi guys I use veth mode now container-left and container-right can ping each other left ip is 10.0.0.2 right ip is 10.0.0.3 did you use static IP host: br0 10.0.2.15 Did you know that if you use netmask /24, 10.0.0.x and 10.0.2.x is on different network? eth0 0.0.0.0 and how to configure containers let container ping www.google.com? short version: if you don't know much about networking or bridge, better use the default lxcbr0 or virbr0 (whichever you have on your system) and use DHCP on the guest container. -- Fajar 2012/9/24 Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net Why not just use veth + bridge, which is the default (at least the default on Ubuntu)? -- Fajar On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 1:48 PM, 宣铭艺 xuanmin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys I have a host machine and want to create 3 containers on it. Containers should can ping each other,but can't communicate with the host. All containers shoud surf the Internet. Should I use macvlan bridge mode?And how to set the host's and containers' network environment the goal blow My Host: eth0 192.168.1.23 gateway 192.168.1.1 It connects to the Internet lxcbr0?? bridge? need it? Containers: c1: 192.168.2.45 ? how to configure c2: 192.168.2.46 ? how to configure c3: 192.168.2.47 ? how to configure -- 樱宝宝: http://www.xuanmingyi.com -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Lxc-users mailing list Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
Re: [Lxc-users] lxc macvlan bridge problem
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 7:59 PM, 宣铭艺 xuanmin...@gmail.com wrote: yes I used static ip. I seted the static ip 10.0.0.2 in the config file. It can't ping www.google.com Read my previous response about don't know much about networking or bridge. Today I don't set the static ip?Will that use dhcp? Depends on how you create and configure the container. If you use templates, and your host environment and lxc installation is sane-enough, and you don't configure any networking settings inside the container, then yes, it will use DHCP. Now It can ping each other and ping www.google.com In containers: Then I traceroute the packages I find a gateway.I think it's a dhcp and router That's how dhcp works. -- Fajar -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Lxc-users mailing list Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
Re: [Lxc-users] lxc macvlan bridge problem
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 14:48 +0800, 宣铭艺 wrote: Hi guys I have a host machine and want to create 3 containers on it. Containers should can ping each other,but can't communicate with the host. All containers shoud surf the Internet. Should I use macvlan bridge mode?And how to set the host's and containers' network environment Geeze, this sounds like an OLD problem. What distribution and what version? What version of the kernel? What version of lxc (which really shouldn't matter - it's a kernel problem). I honestly don't know if it's been ever fixed but macvlan use to always have this problem and I finally threw up my hands and went straight bridging. I have not looked back or tested macvlan on any containers since. Regards, Mike the goal blow My Host: eth0 192.168.1.23 gateway 192.168.1.1 It connects to the Internet lxcbr0?? bridge? need it? Containers: c1: 192.168.2.45 ? how to configure c2: 192.168.2.46 ? how to configure c3: 192.168.2.47 ? how to configure Thanks -- 樱宝宝: http://www.xuanmingyi.com -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Lxc-users mailing list Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users -- Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985-6132 | m...@wittsend.com /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/ NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all PGP Key: 0x674627FF| possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- How fast is your code? 3 out of 4 devs don\\\'t know how their code performs in production. Find out how slow your code is with AppDynamics Lite. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219672;13503038;z? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html___ Lxc-users mailing list Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
[Lxc-users] lxc macvlan bridge problem
Hi guys I have a host machine and want to create 3 containers on it. Containers should can ping each other,but can't communicate with the host. All containers shoud surf the Internet. Should I use macvlan bridge mode?And how to set the host's and containers' network environment the goal blow My Host: eth0 192.168.1.23 gateway 192.168.1.1 It connects to the Internet lxcbr0?? bridge? need it? Containers: c1: 192.168.2.45 ? how to configure c2: 192.168.2.46 ? how to configure c3: 192.168.2.47 ? how to configure Thanks -- 樱宝宝: http://www.xuanmingyi.com -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___ Lxc-users mailing list Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
Re: [Lxc-users] lxc macvlan bridge problem
Why not just use veth + bridge, which is the default (at least the default on Ubuntu)? -- Fajar On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 1:48 PM, 宣铭艺 xuanmin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys I have a host machine and want to create 3 containers on it. Containers should can ping each other,but can't communicate with the host. All containers shoud surf the Internet. Should I use macvlan bridge mode?And how to set the host's and containers' network environment the goal blow My Host: eth0 192.168.1.23 gateway 192.168.1.1 It connects to the Internet lxcbr0?? bridge? need it? Containers: c1: 192.168.2.45 ? how to configure c2: 192.168.2.46 ? how to configure c3: 192.168.2.47 ? how to configure -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Lxc-users mailing list Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
