Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-23 Thread Stéphane Graber
On 10/23/2012 12:05 AM, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 16:21 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: >> Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): >>> On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 15:14 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > > How about just a devtmpfs? We actually now do this by default (as

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-22 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 18:37 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 18:05 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 16:21 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): > > > > On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 15:14 -0500, Serge Hallyn wro

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-22 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 18:05 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 16:21 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): > > > On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 15:14 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > > > > > > How about just a devtmpfs? We actually now do th

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-22 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 18:05 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 16:21 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): > > > On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 15:14 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > > > > > > How about just a devtmpfs? We actually now do th

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-22 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 16:21 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): > > On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 15:14 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > > How about just a devtmpfs? We actually now do this by default (as of very > > > recently) in ubuntu by adding > > > > > dev

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-22 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): > On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 16:21 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): > > > On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 15:14 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > > > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): > > > > > Serge, > > >

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-22 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 16:21 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): > > On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 15:14 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): > > > > Serge, > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 09:12 -0500, Serge Hallyn

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-22 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): > On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 15:14 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): > > > Serge, > > > > > > On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 09:12 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > > > Quoting Serge Hallyn (serge.hal...@canonical.com):

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-22 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 15:14 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): > > Serge, > > > > On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 09:12 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > > Quoting Serge Hallyn (serge.hal...@canonical.com): > > > > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): > >

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-22 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): > Serge, > > On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 09:12 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > Quoting Serge Hallyn (serge.hal...@canonical.com): > > > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): > > > > On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 14:49 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > > >

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-22 Thread Michael H. Warfield
Serge, On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 09:12 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Serge Hallyn (serge.hal...@canonical.com): > > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): > > > On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 14:49 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > > > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): > > > > > Se

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-22 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 09:12 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Serge Hallyn (serge.hal...@canonical.com): > > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): > > > On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 14:49 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > > > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): > > > > > Serge, > >

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-22 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Serge Hallyn (serge.hal...@canonical.com): > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): > > On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 14:49 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): > > > > Serge, > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > Short of building a custom system

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-22 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): > On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 14:49 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): > > > Serge, > > > > > ... > > > > Short of building a custom systemd, I don't know how to fix that problem > > > and I suspect this OP i

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-21 Thread Michael H. Warfield
Serge, On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 22:21 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 14:49 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): > > > Serge, > > > > > ... > > > > Short of building a custom systemd, I don't know how to fix that problem > > > an

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-21 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 14:49 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): > > Serge, > > ... > > Short of building a custom systemd, I don't know how to fix that problem > > and I suspect this OP is going to run into this same thing (container > > taking over host

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-21 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 14:49 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): > > Serge, > > > > I'm going to top post here simply because this is going to go off in a > > different direction and bringing in an old thread but it is related... > > > > Back on February 1

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-21 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting John (l...@jelmail.com): > On 19/10/12 16:51, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > > > Add: > > > > lxc.network.type = empty > > > > If you don't have any lxc.network.type sections, then the container > > shares network with the host, and so the container talks to the host's > > systemd. (same with ups

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-21 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): > Serge, > > I'm going to top post here simply because this is going to go off in a > different direction and bringing in an old thread but it is related... > > Back on February 14 you responded to a message about Fedora 16 in a > container, which

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-21 Thread John
On 19/10/12 16:51, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > Add: > > lxc.network.type = empty > > If you don't have any lxc.network.type sections, then the container > shares network with the host, and so the container talks to the host's > systemd. (same with upstart) > > Thanks for the reply, I will try that tom

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-20 Thread Michael H. Warfield
Serge, I'm going to top post here simply because this is going to go off in a different direction and bringing in an old thread but it is related... Back on February 14 you responded to a message about Fedora 16 in a container, which is something I've been trying to do and I had run into that pos

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-19 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting John (l...@jelmail.com): > Hello, I'm in the middle of a migration from init to systemd. I've > completed the transition of my host environment and my 6 existing > containers continue to work as expected (they all use sysvinit > internally). I've started work on a systemd container and a

[Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-19 Thread John
Hello, I'm in the middle of a migration from init to systemd. I've completed the transition of my host environment and my 6 existing containers continue to work as expected (they all use sysvinit internally). I've started work on a systemd container and am getting some odd effects. First off,