RE: [Lynx-dev] HTML 5

2007-08-13 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Larson, Timothy E. wrote: Philip Webb wrote: The following mb of interest to Lynx programmers & users : http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/x-html5/?ca=dgr-lnxw97NewHTML I remember reading about the HTML5 effort a year or two ago. I think taking the best of both

RE: [Lynx-dev] HTML 5

2007-08-13 Thread Larson, Timothy E.
Philip Webb wrote: > The following mb of interest to Lynx programmers & users : > > http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/x-html5/?ca=dgr-lnxw97NewHTML I remember reading about the HTML5 effort a year or two ago. I think taking the best of both WhatWG's efforts and the XHTML2 proposals make

Re: [Lynx-dev] SSL certificate validation support *broken* in 2.8.7dev.7

2007-08-13 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Dixi: >Didn’t see that before. WTF? Okay, this is a local problem: our porting infrastructure always integrates a libtool.m4 1.5.23a which has been hacked to work with both autoconf 2.59+ and autoconf 2.13, and thusly defines m4_version_compare. //mirabilos -- I believe no one can invent an alg

Re: [Lynx-dev] SSL certificate validation support *broken* in 2.8.7dev.7

2007-08-13 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Dixi: Yeah, I saw that. Should be ok with the diff below. It isn’t: ../LYStrings.c: In function `expand_tiname': ../LYStrings.c:955: error: `strnames' undeclared (first use in this function) ../LYStrings.c:955: error: (Each undeclared identifier i

Re: [Lynx-dev] SSL certificate validation support *broken* in 2.8.7dev.7

2007-08-13 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Thomas Dickey dixit: > I recall some problem with the X509 definition, but it did work on my machine > (unsure about portability though...) > >> >> $ fgrep -n USE_OPENSSL_INCL configure >> 11076:#if defined(USE_OPENSSL_INCL) >> 11202:#if defined(USE_OPENSSL_INCL) >> 11265:#if defined(USE_OPENSSL_I

Re: [Lynx-dev] SSL certificate validation support *broken* in 2.8.7dev.7

2007-08-13 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Dixi: >Yeah, I saw that. Should be ok with the diff below. It isn’t: ./LYStrings.c: In function `expand_tiname': ./LYStrings.c:955: error: `strnames' undeclared (first use in this function) ./LYStrings.c:955: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once ./LYStrings.c:955: error: for

[Lynx-dev] Re: SSL certificate validation support *broken* in 2.8.7dev.7

2007-08-13 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Dixi: >• the check is bogus > >- X509_verify_cert_error_string(X509_STORE_CTX_get_error(X509_STORE_CTX *0)) >fails. >+ X509_verify_cert_error_string(X509_STORE_CTX_get_error(NULL)) >succeeds. It gets worse: /tmp//ccq32398.o: In function `main': conftest.c:(.text+0x6): undefined reference to `X50

Re: [Lynx-dev] SSL certificate validation support *broken* in 2.8.7dev.7

2007-08-13 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Thorsten Glaser wrote: USE_OPENSSL_INCL is used FOUR times before it's being defined, which leads to USE_X509_SUPPORT being not defined. I recall some problem with the X509 definition, but it did work on my machine (unsure about portability though...) $ fgrep -n USE_O

[Lynx-dev] Re: SSL certificate validation support *broken* in 2.8.7dev.7

2007-08-13 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Dixi: >For now, I'll build with -DUSE_OPENSSL_INCL in CPPFLAGS… On second thoughts: • how about a warning message (logged to “your recent statusline messages”) if validation support is off? I'll produce a diff. • the check is bogus - X509_verify_cert_error_string(X509_STORE_CTX_get_error(X509

[Lynx-dev] SSL certificate validation support *broken* in 2.8.7dev.7

2007-08-13 Thread Thorsten Glaser
USE_OPENSSL_INCL is used FOUR times before it's being defined, which leads to USE_X509_SUPPORT being not defined. $ fgrep -n USE_OPENSSL_INCL configure 11076:#if defined(USE_OPENSSL_INCL) 11202:#if defined(USE_OPENSSL_INC