On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Larson, Timothy E. wrote:
Philip Webb wrote:
The following mb of interest to Lynx programmers & users :
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/x-html5/?ca=dgr-lnxw97NewHTML
I remember reading about the HTML5 effort a year or two ago. I think
taking the best of both
Philip Webb wrote:
> The following mb of interest to Lynx programmers & users :
>
>
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/x-html5/?ca=dgr-lnxw97NewHTML
I remember reading about the HTML5 effort a year or two ago. I think
taking the best of both WhatWG's efforts and the XHTML2 proposals make
Dixi:
>Didn’t see that before. WTF?
Okay, this is a local problem: our porting infrastructure always integrates
a libtool.m4 1.5.23a which has been hacked to work with both autoconf 2.59+
and autoconf 2.13, and thusly defines m4_version_compare.
//mirabilos
--
I believe no one can invent an alg
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Dixi:
Yeah, I saw that. Should be ok with the diff below.
It isn’t:
../LYStrings.c: In function `expand_tiname':
../LYStrings.c:955: error: `strnames' undeclared (first use in this function)
../LYStrings.c:955: error: (Each undeclared identifier i
Thomas Dickey dixit:
> I recall some problem with the X509 definition, but it did work on my machine
> (unsure about portability though...)
>
>>
>> $ fgrep -n USE_OPENSSL_INCL configure
>> 11076:#if defined(USE_OPENSSL_INCL)
>> 11202:#if defined(USE_OPENSSL_INCL)
>> 11265:#if defined(USE_OPENSSL_I
Dixi:
>Yeah, I saw that. Should be ok with the diff below.
It isn’t:
./LYStrings.c: In function `expand_tiname':
./LYStrings.c:955: error: `strnames' undeclared (first use in this function)
./LYStrings.c:955: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
./LYStrings.c:955: error: for
Dixi:
>• the check is bogus
>
>- X509_verify_cert_error_string(X509_STORE_CTX_get_error(X509_STORE_CTX *0))
>fails.
>+ X509_verify_cert_error_string(X509_STORE_CTX_get_error(NULL))
>succeeds.
It gets worse:
/tmp//ccq32398.o: In function `main':
conftest.c:(.text+0x6): undefined reference to `X50
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
USE_OPENSSL_INCL is used FOUR times before it's being defined, which
leads to USE_X509_SUPPORT being not defined.
I recall some problem with the X509 definition, but it did work on my
machine (unsure about portability though...)
$ fgrep -n USE_O
Dixi:
>For now, I'll build with -DUSE_OPENSSL_INCL in CPPFLAGS…
On second thoughts:
• how about a warning message (logged to “your recent statusline messages”)
if validation support is off? I'll produce a diff.
• the check is bogus
- X509_verify_cert_error_string(X509_STORE_CTX_get_error(X509
USE_OPENSSL_INCL is used FOUR times before it's being defined, which
leads to USE_X509_SUPPORT being not defined.
$ fgrep -n USE_OPENSSL_INCL configure
11076:#if defined(USE_OPENSSL_INCL)
11202:#if defined(USE_OPENSSL_INC
10 matches
Mail list logo