Re: [Lynx-dev] [Patch] Lynx won't compile against zlib 1.2.5.1

2011-09-19 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 09/19/2011 11:18 AM, Thomas Dickey wrote: On Mon, 19 Sep 2011, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 09/19/2011 04:35 AM, Thomas Dickey wrote: The BOOL vs BOOLEAN stuff is in an area where glib fails to help (native Win32 ports). The best idea IMO is to check for "bool". If it's not there, typedef

Re: [Lynx-dev] Apostrophe replacement in def7_uni.tbl

2011-09-19 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Ralph Babel dixit: >May I suggest that the classic ASCII apostrophe (0x27) >be used instead of the backtick (grave accent, 0x60) for Yesplease! U+0060 should never be seen because it’s really a combining character which only wasn’t as ASCII doesn’t know about those. bye, //mirabilos -- 08:05⎜ m

[Lynx-dev] Google working to improve its accessibility (fwd)

2011-09-19 Thread Karen Lewellen
All, I am sharing this s I think it critical that Google know you are still out here developing lynx, and that it is important for access that they maintain a structure that functions with you. Feel free to share widely. I can say that the sign up process works just fine in lynx. Karen -

Re: [Lynx-dev] Apostrophe replacement in def7_uni.tbl

2011-09-19 Thread Larson, Timothy E.
> May I suggest that the classic ASCII apostrophe (0x27) be used instead of > the backtick (grave accent, 0x60) for > U+02bc (Unicode apostrophe) in src/chrtrans/def7_uni.tbl? As someone who's done a lot of work in def7_uni to try to make these transliterations useful, I concur. :) Tim ___

[Lynx-dev] Apostrophe replacement in def7_uni.tbl

2011-09-19 Thread Ralph Babel
May I suggest that the classic ASCII apostrophe (0x27) be used instead of the backtick (grave accent, 0x60) for U+02bc (Unicode apostrophe) in src/chrtrans/def7_uni.tbl? ___ Lynx-dev mailing list Lynx-dev@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listi

Re: [Lynx-dev] [Patch] Lynx won't compile against zlib 1.2.5.1

2011-09-19 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Keith Bowes dixit: >Curious: a lot of programs use glib to get around this kind of thing I absolutely refuse to allow anything using libglib in base. bye, //mirabilos -- [...] if maybe ext3fs wasn't a better pick, or jfs, or maybe reiserfs, oh but what about xfs, and if only i had waited until

Re: [Lynx-dev] [Patch] Lynx won't compile against zlib 1.2.5.1

2011-09-19 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 09/19/2011 04:35 AM, Thomas Dickey wrote: On Mon, 19 Sep 2011, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 09/19/2011 04:13 AM, Thomas Dickey wrote: On Sun, 18 Sep 2011, Keith Bowes wrote: Je 2011-Sep-17 je 08:09, Thomas Dickey skribis: ON/OFF are on the