On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 08:51:00PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Dixi:
Walter Ian Kaye dixit:
There are no links for Mac OS X either.
Oops. Does Mac OSX come shipped without lynx?
This cries for a lynx port in the MirPorts Framework.
I now did one, and all I get is:
internal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
If it's true, the binary with GnuTLS is inferior to the one with OpenSSL
on this point.
Like I said. (And the other issue with the DN format is still open,
although I've sent a patch to Tom about it which none of you GNU
users seems to have tested.)
//mirabile
--
I
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK. I went back through my notes and patches and did some more testing.
Here is a step-by-step guide to building a statically compiled lynx
under
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
May I ask you the concrete steps to compile Lynx under Cygwin with
-mno-cygwin? Do you mean running configure make on Cygwin bash?
OK. I went back through my notes and patches and did some more
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
May I ask you the concrete steps to compile Lynx under Cygwin with
-mno-cygwin? Do you mean running configure make on Cygwin bash?
OK. I went back through my notes and patches and did some more testing.
Here is a step-by-step guide to building a
At 08:15p -0500 07/28/2006, Stef Caunter didst inscribe upon an
electronic papyrus:
Debatable.
You think it's debatable whether being unable to use to Yahoo or
SourceForge or do any e-commerce is crippling? Wow.
Getting a binary up this quickly is quite convenient.
Yeah, but if it
You think it's debatable whether being unable to use to Yahoo or SourceForge
or do any e-commerce is crippling? Wow.
Hardly relevant since you can't ship lynx with ssl so the experience is
consistent and obvious everywhere. A binary without ssl is what it is; add it
in using source and a
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Henry Nelson wrote:
I think I saw somewhere that the gettext tools (what you want if you're
going to get into translating the messages) had been ported to Windows, but
unfortunately I don't have the slightest idea how they work on Windows.
The MingW version of lynx which
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Stegozor wrote:
On 7/28/06, Thomas Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more thing: As you may have guessed, English is not my native
tongue: in exchange, I'd gladly do my best to translate any Lynx
related file into French and/or Turkish. Just realise that you'll have
Walter Ian Kaye dixit:
There are no links for Mac OS X either.
Oops. Does Mac OSX come shipped without lynx?
This cries for a lynx port in the MirPorts Framework.
//mirabile
--
I believe no one can invent an algorithm. One just happens to hit upon it
when God enlightens him. Or only God
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The MingW version of lynx which I have been porting (but not yet
distributing) is compiled with NLS and seems to work fine. I linked
it with gettext-0.11.5 which I ported to MingW last year. I generally
compile MingW programs under Cygwin with
Lynxlet, while not ssl-capable, is an excellent and very quick OS X app which
obviates the need to install XCode since it just unpacks and runs in Terminal.
Walter Ian Kaye dixit:
There are no links for Mac OS X either.
Oops. Does Mac OSX come shipped without lynx?
I believe there's a
At 12:44a + 07/28/2006, Thorsten Glaser didst inscribe upon an
electronic papyrus:
Walter Ian Kaye dixit:
There are no links for Mac OS X either.
Oops. Does Mac OSX come shipped without lynx?
This cries for a lynx port in the MirPorts Framework.
//mirabile
I think the original
That would, I guess, be UKansas and a few individuals.
Including important contributors who are no longer traceable,
like Foteos. A long time ago the FSF wanted Lynx to have the
copyrights assigned to single organisation. It couldn't be
done then, because it was impossible to track down
Debatable. Getting a binary up this quickly is quite convenient. To add any ssl
functionality to lynx requires a compile and always has in my experience. Even
without ssl you still get that 'real view' of the web, scriptable, customizable
and fast.
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Walter Ian Kaye wrote:
David Woolley dixit:
They are only free to choose the SSL implementation because the code
is legitimately distributable for use on, say, Linux. The FSF take a
True, but what does Lynx consist of?
Lynx + pdcurses + OpenSSL
So all that is required is to ask the Lynx copyright holder
for an
OpenSSL works really well with lynx, restrictive license.
GnuTLS isn't as good with lynx.
There have been several discussions about OpenSSL and this over the years,
which are all available in the archives; or I suppose it could get restated
again for this go round.
| Stef -
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Stef Caunter wrote:
OpenSSL works really well with lynx, restrictive license.
It's not that restrictive - simply requires attribution. And the comments
about being only allowed on Linux and *BSD's are inaccurate (though this
is not unusual ;-)
--
Thomas E. Dickey
On 7/26/06, Stef Caunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But lynx.isc.org is current and quite acceptable. There is plenty of evidence
of active development and code maintenance in both the readable text and
breakout subdirectory date stamps.
Indeed, and that's how I ended up in this mailing list and
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Stegozor wrote:
One more thing: As you may have guessed, English is not my native
tongue: in exchange, I'd gladly do my best to translate any Lynx
related file into French and/or Turkish. Just realise that you'll have
to cope with a newbie and that I'll need time. Apart
On 7/28/06, Thomas Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more thing: As you may have guessed, English is not my native
tongue: in exchange, I'd gladly do my best to translate any Lynx
related file into French and/or Turkish. Just realise that you'll have
to cope with a newbie and that I'll
At 12:14a +0200 07/28/2006, Stegozor didst inscribe upon an
electronic papyrus:
On 7/26/06, Stef Caunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But lynx.isc.org is current and quite acceptable. There is plenty
of evidence
of active development and code maintenance in both the readable text and
breakout
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, David Woolley wrote:
on the other hand, anyone is free to build and use lynx with whatever
implementation of SSL they choose.
But this thread is about typical Windows users, who don't have development
tools and wouldn't know how to use them if they did (probably applies
20060726 00:26 -0500, Stef Caunter
But lynx.isc.org is current and quite acceptable. There is plenty of
evidence of active development and code maintenance in both the readable
text and breakout subdirectory date stamps.
It's common for external links to degrade over time, but putting energy
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
- change the compiler from Borland's bcc32 to MingW's gcc
Why?
It depends on SSL library. I think it's easier to compile with GnuTLS
using the MingW's compiler than using Borland's one.
- change the SSL library
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
- change the compiler from Borland's bcc32 to MingW's gcc
Why?
- change the SSL library from OpenSSL to GnuTls
NO! That'd be BAD!
- write the English project page
You could at least add an (international) behind the link on the page.
bye,
//mirabile
--
I
On 7/25/06, Henry Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
there is a binary of 2.8.5rel1 with an installer available from
Takeshi Hataguchi. That installer is primarily in Japanese, but the
binary and documentation are fine in English. You can get it from
- change the SSL library from OpenSSL to GnuTls
NO! That'd be BAD!
But Lynx on Windows or MS-DOS isn't legally distributable with OpenSSL
because it is not GPL compatible except when it forms a library normally
supplied with the operating system.
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, David Woolley wrote:
- change the SSL library from OpenSSL to GnuTls
NO! That'd be BAD!
But Lynx on Windows or MS-DOS isn't legally distributable with OpenSSL
because it is not GPL compatible except when it forms a library normally
supplied with the operating system.
But lynx.isc.org is current and quite acceptable. There is plenty of evidence
of active development and code maintenance in both the readable text and
breakout subdirectory date stamps.
It's common for external links to degrade over time, but putting energy into
maintaining clean code should
On 7/22/06, David Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's available at
http://lynx.isc.org/lynx2.8.5/
Someone asking this question is likely to be completely thrown by this
page as the only sort of software they are likely to be able to handle
is an executable Windows binary install
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Stegozor wrote:
On 7/22/06, David Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's available at
http://lynx.isc.org/lynx2.8.5/
Someone asking this question is likely to be completely thrown by this
page as the only sort of software they are likely to be able to handle
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 04:00:00PM +0100, PAT OGILVIE wrote:
I am trying to test my web site and in google guidleines it suggests: Use a
text browser such as Lynx to examine your site, because most search engine
spiders see your site much as Lynx would.
I can't find how to access and
060722 David Woolley wrote:
It's available at http://lynx.isc.org/lynx2.8.5/
Someone asking this question is likely to be completely thrown by this page
as the only sort of software they are likely to be able to handle
is an executable Windows binary install package! They will probably
not
34 matches
Mail list logo
