Re: BUGS.lyx

1998-12-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
*Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes: | 1/ make markLyXClean() set bak_clean to true (if the .lyx file is | clean, we don't need a backup, after all) | | 2/ Call markBakClean() in bufferlist::write(). | | I think the first solution is the right one. I am not sure how the code goes...but When we

Re: BUGS.lyx

1998-12-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
*Asger K Alstrup Nielsen writes: | Argh, when you think a bit about it, you'll reach this conclusion: | | After we have auto-saved, the LyX clean flag should not be set to | true. Thus, we will keep auto-saving. | | We need a special auto-save-clean flag. This flag should be set | after

Re: First version of graphical tutorial

1998-12-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
* writes: | Hello, The only thing useful about this stupid cold I caught is | that it gave me 7 uninterrupted hours to play with the "graphical | tutorial" today. So, 82 screenshots later, I have something I am | willing to have other people look at. However, I don't have a Web | site I can

Re: Scroll mouse support

1998-12-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
*Mark Huang writes: | Thought I'd submit this simple patch to get scroll mice | (Intellimouse, Logitech First Mouse+, etc.) to work in LyX. I don't | know anything about configuring X servers other than XFree86 to | recognize buttons 4 and 5. Colas Nahaboo's X mouse wheel scroll | page has mo

Re: BUGS.lyx

1998-12-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
*Amir Karger writes: | recreating the web site. (Although, as a rough draft for this | particular page, you could always just use the raw text of | LyX3-Tasks.) That is exactly what I did in the first place. Lgb

Scroll mouse support

1998-12-04 Thread Mark Huang
Hi, Thought I'd submit this simple patch to get scroll mice (Intellimouse, Logitech First Mouse+, etc.) to work in LyX. I don't know anything about configuring X servers other than XFree86 to recognize buttons 4 and 5. Colas Nahaboo's X mouse wheel scroll page has more info (http://www.inria.f

First version of graphical tutorial

1998-12-04 Thread mressler
Hello, The only thing useful about this stupid cold I caught is that it gave me 7 uninterrupted hours to play with the "graphical tutorial" today. So, 82 screenshots later, I have something I am willing to have other people look at. However, I don't have a Web site I can legitimately put this stu

Re: linuxdoc legacy (II)

1998-12-04 Thread Alejandro Aguilar Sierra
On Fri, 4 Dec 1998, José Abílio de Oliveira Matos wrote: > I'm open to suggestion since I do not see other alternatives, and to do > that with the present lexical analyser seems to be very tricky. Am I wrong > here? IMO you are right. If you write the script I'd update the internal devs linuxd

linuxdoc legacy (II)

1998-12-04 Thread José Abílio de Oliveira Matos
Hi, One of the main problem with linuxdoc is the use in in the lyxformat of the LatexDel inset. For example, I want to translate: \begin_inset LatexDel \ref{ \end_inset amigo \begin_inset LatexDel }{ \end_inset friends \begin_inset LatexDel } \end_inset to ---

test message number

1998-12-04 Thread Mate Wierdl
If all is well, there should be a header field on this message X-num: number where number is the message number you can use to retrieve the message from the archive. Mate--- Mate Wierdl | Dept. of Math. Sciences | University of Memphis

Re: layout files change?

1998-12-04 Thread Amir Karger
On Fri, Dec 04, 1998 at 05:50:21PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > My energy level is approaching rapidly zero. Wow. Someone really needs a weekend. Speaking of insults, I haven't gotten a single one from Asger yet today. I'm feeling abandoned... -Amir ps as far as José's response (which I

Re: layout files change?

1998-12-04 Thread José Abílio de Oliveira Matos
Amir Karger wrote: > ps it being friday, I'll remind you that you should be using a mailer that > doesn't send a cc: back to me... > pps it being friday, you can respond very rudely, if you'd like. I've got my > asbestos suit on. Please don't do that, asbesto is a cancerous produt, look for you

Re: layout files change?

1998-12-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Amir> On Fri, Dec 04, 1998 at 05:44:38PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Amir> wrote: >> Agreed. I'll put them back in. Amir> Yay! I didn't even have to send fifteen long e-mails to win the Amir> argument! My energy level is approaching rapidl

Re: layout files change?

1998-12-04 Thread Amir Karger
On Fri, Dec 04, 1998 at 05:44:38PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Agreed. I'll put them back in. Yay! I didn't even have to send fifteen long e-mails to win the argument! -Amir ps it being friday, I'll remind you that you should be using a mailer that doesn't send a cc: back to me... pps i

Re: layout files change?

1998-12-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Amir> I'm sure you're familiar with my bias now, but I'd rather be Amir> correct. If LaTeX allows it, and it's not hard to let LyX allow Amir> it, then why *not* allow it? I have said "why would someone do Amir> that" and not bothered to cod

Re: layout files change?

1998-12-04 Thread Amir Karger
On Fri, Dec 04, 1998 at 05:33:32PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > In fact, the change has been made because, under reasonable > conditions, paragraphs and subparagraphs are not numbered. However, > now that I think a bit more about it, they will be numbered provided > that secnumdepth is

Re: layout files change?

1998-12-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Amir> When I load up a revtex file with the latest lyx, I get an error Amir> message that it can't delete the Subparagraph* style. Which Amir> makes sense, because there's a NoStyle Subparagraph* in Amir> revtex.layout, but stdstarsections.i

layout files change?

1998-12-04 Thread Amir Karger
When I load up a revtex file with the latest lyx, I get an error message that it can't delete the Subparagraph* style. Which makes sense, because there's a NoStyle Subparagraph* in revtex.layout, but stdstarsections.inc no longer contains the Subparagraph* environment. I checked CVSweb, but I gues

Re: BUGS.lyx

1998-12-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Asger" == Asger K Alstrup Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Asger> Argh, when you think a bit about it, you'll reach this Asger> conclusion: Asger> After we have auto-saved, the LyX clean flag should not be set Asger> to true. Thus, we will keep auto-saving. Right, of course. Asger>

Re: BUGS.lyx

1998-12-04 Thread Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
> Well, it seems that BakClean() is only set/tested individually in this > autosave thing. Otherwise, the Buffer::bak_clean boolean is only > set/reset together with lyx_clean. So I think that I will > > 1/ Use isLyXClean in autosave now. > > 2/ Later (after 1.0.0 or even in 1.1) get rid of this

Re: BUGS.lyx

1998-12-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Asger" == Asger K Alstrup Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Asger> IMO, we should use "isLyxClean()", and "isReadonly()" (it's Asger> possible to change the status of a changed document to make it Asger> read-only, but then I don't think we should autosave it...) Asger> I don't know wha

Re: linuxdoc legacy!

1998-12-04 Thread José Abílio de Oliveira Matos
José Abílio de Oliveira Matos wrote: > > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > > > "José" == José Abílio de Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > José> I have Jean-Marc's writing syndrome ;-), so this sentence is > > José> incomplete. It should be read as: > > > > Ah, you noticed

Re: linuxdoc legacy!

1998-12-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "José" == José Abílio de Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: José> I have Jean-Marc's writing syndrome ;-), so this sentence is José> incomplete. It should be read as: Ah, you noticed that too? Maybe I should really re-read things before sending them, then. %-| JMarc

Re: linuxdoc legacy!

1998-12-04 Thread José Abílio de Oliveira Matos
"Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" wrote: > > > > How do you use it? > > > > sgmltools --backend=foo doc.sgml > > > > where foo is the available backend to transform the docbook document. In a > > simple way is this, it is also possible to change the stylesheets to change > > the final output, but th

Re: linuxdoc legacy!

1998-12-04 Thread Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
> > How do you use it? > > sgmltools --backend=foo doc.sgml > > where foo is the available backend to transform the docbook document. In a > simple way is this, it is also possible to change the stylesheets to change > the final output, but that is another story... Maybe you can provide an

Re: linuxdoc legacy!

1998-12-04 Thread José Abílio de Oliveira Matos
"Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" wrote: [...] > > There are only three places where the, latex related, source needs to be > > changed: > > * The form that reads the reference, needs an extra field to read the > > extra parameter for SGML based outputs. -- this is the step that most scare

Re: using .sty files

1998-12-04 Thread Mate Wierdl
Mate>The idea is that you should create a directory texinputs/ in Mate> you home dir (or any other name, of course), and add to your Mate> startup files setenv TEXINPUTS ${HOME}/texinputs/:$TEXINPUTS Mate> No, this is not good (or unpredictable: it assumes TEXINPUTS is

Re: BUGS.lyx

1998-12-04 Thread Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
> In lyx_cb.C, AutoSave() has the following code, > > if (current_view->currentBuffer()->isBakClean() > || current_view->currentBuffer()->isReadonly()) > return; > while in BufferList::QwriteAll(), we have a test like: > > if (!b->isLyxCl

Re: BUGS.lyx

1998-12-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Bug 7: I fixed this some time ago, can people check that it Lars> works, please? Yes, it seems to work. I did not remove it at the time because I was not quite sure. Lars> Bug 24: I am not able to reproduce this, and it seems

Re: BUGS.lyx

1998-12-04 Thread Amir Karger
I was looking at bug 23, which is subfigures. I actually was trying to use subfigures yesterday, except with tables, and it failed completely. The basic issue is that subfigures shouldn't be in the figure popup. Subfigures are really sub*floats*, because you're allowed to have subfigures and subt

BUGS.lyx

1998-12-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Bug 7: I fixed this some time ago, can people check that it works, please? Bug 24: I am not able to reproduce this, and it seems to work correctly. Lgb

Re: linuxdoc legacy!

1998-12-04 Thread Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
> I have played a little with \ref and now, after the enlightment that > reading the source always offers ;-) I know the answer. > > There are only three places where the, latex related, source needs to be > changed: > * The form that reads the reference, needs an extra field to read the

Re: linuxdoc legacy!

1998-12-04 Thread José Abílio de Oliveira Matos
José Abílio de Oliveira Matos wrote: > > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > > > "José" == José Abílio de Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > José> Is it possible/desirable to have an extra field within the > > José> \ref inset? The goal is to have a unique interface for > > J

Re: using .sty files

1998-12-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Mate" == Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "Garst" == Richard E Hawkins Esq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> writes: Garst> Does the sun shine there?:) Sorry if that's just an American Garst> joke. My question is, what is the best way to incorporate this Garst> into the docs, and/o