Hi,
I have now built lyx-1.0.4pre8 and tested DocBook support again. I am now
also using the cvs version of sgmltools (pre 2.0.3).
1) The Code environment now works for me.
2) Nested lists still cause trouble, as Jose said in his email.
3) Double quotes use the wrong iso-entities: They
Hi,
I send a patch against the latest cvs source to fix a bug
where if the some nested list were in the end of the document
their tags weren't correctly closed.
Even if this bug is very rare, since the lists should be the
last element in the document, it happens and so it should be
fixed.
I just built lyx-1.0.4pre8 under RedHat-6.0. Using the scroll wheel in
the main buffer scrolls the wrong way (compared to emacs, gnome-terminal
and MS Windows). It is also different from the behaviour in lyx-1.0.1.
Horst
The lyx.spec file in the devel subdirectory is not up to date.
The version number in the .spec file should be the correct lyx version.
That way one could simply build a binary rpm with
rpm -tb lyx-*.tar.gz
Is it possible to update the version number from the configure script?
Also, I have
On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 12:51:49PM +0100, Horst G Kausch wrote:
Hi,
I have now built lyx-1.0.4pre8 and tested DocBook support again. I am now
also using the cvs version of sgmltools (pre 2.0.3).
1) The Code environment now works for me.
Great.
2) Nested lists still cause trouble,
PS: Could someone, please, commit this?
--
José
Thx, but I am not maintaining the lyx rpm anymore. Try:
ftp://ftp.sylvan.com/pub/lyx
Mate
"Steffen" == Steffen Moeller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Steffen * \to (\rightarrow) and \gets (\leftarrow) are not recognized
Steffen as math symbols
Yes, they should be recognized as equivalent to the LaTeX forms.
Alejandro, is this possible?
Steffen * \models (|==) is not recognized as a
Hi!
I just got xforms 0.89 as I've seen that it was now officially
released! I've seen some of the new stuff and I think we should
really add support for that in the lyx-devel version and drop our
workarounds for missing features! So I opt for the proposal of
Lars (now that 0.89 is official)
"Juergen" == Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Juergen Hi! I just got xforms 0.89 as I've seen that it was now
Juergen officially released! I've seen some of the new stuff and I
Juergen think we should really add support for that in the lyx-devel
Juergen version and drop our workarounds
On 28-Sep-99 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Two things:
1/ 0.89 is ot out for all architectures and is probably a bit unstable
now.
You're right, but by the time we are finished with lyx-devel and release
v1.2 it will :)
2/ We have various things to do before switching to 0.89. As far as
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| You can get the latest spec file and rpm files from my site and I've been
| trying to get the LyX developers to put these RPMS up on the web site,
| but have not been successful. I think there might be a link to the
| ftp site somewhere on the LyX
On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 06:03:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| You can get the latest spec file and rpm files from my site and I've been
| trying to get the LyX developers to put these RPMS up on the web site,
| but have not been
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Putting pre-releases out there as well (with a notice saying "This is
| pre-release software, please test this!") means that installing and testing
| the latest would be easier for a large number of Redhat users.
|
| I see that as a win-win for the
On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 06:16:47PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Putting pre-releases out there as well (with a notice saying "This is
| pre-release software, please test this!") means that installing and testing
| the latest would be
I like to build my own RPMS from the sources, especially when testing
pre-releases. So I was not looking for prebuilt RPMS for lyx-1.0.4pre8.
However, I would appreciate an uptodate .spec file within the tarball.
That allows to build a binary RPM by simply saying "rpm -ta tarball".
You still only
Horst G Kausch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I had not been paying much attention, so I wasn't aware of Kayvan's .spec
| file. The one contained in the tarball is from 1.0.2. So my suggestion is
| to include Kayvan's .spec file instead of the current .spec file. Maybe
| one could even autogenerate
On 28 Sep 1999, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Horst G Kausch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I had not been paying much attention, so I wasn't aware of Kayvan's .spec
| file. The one contained in the tarball is from 1.0.2. So my suggestion is
| to include Kayvan's .spec file instead of the
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 06:09:51PM +0100, Horst G Kausch wrote:
|
| [...] So my suggestion is
| to include Kayvan's .spec file instead of the current .spec file. Maybe
| one could even autogenerate the correct version number for the .spec file
|
On Sun, 26 Sep 1999 18:46:00 +0100, Arnd Hanses wrote:
Just a question here:
Can I avoid ERT:
/pagenumbering{none} ...
/pagenumbering{roman} ...
/pagenumbering{arabic} ...
etc.
in LyX somehow (without changing basic LaTeX classes), or is it needed?
A correction:
If there are no last minute objections I will release 1.0.4 later
today, in the early afternoon.
I have updated the documentation and the text file. Gotten en new spec
file. So I think everything should be ready now.
The 1.0.4 to be is in cvs now. Please do a last minute check of it so
that I
Hi,
I have now built lyx-1.0.4pre8 and tested DocBook support again. I am now
also using the cvs version of sgmltools (pre 2.0.3).
1) The Code environment now works for me.
2) Nested lists still cause trouble, as Jose said in his email.
3) Double quotes use the wrong iso-entities: They
Hi,
I send a patch against the latest cvs source to fix a bug
where if the some nested list were in the end of the document
their tags weren't correctly closed.
Even if this bug is very rare, since the lists should be the
last element in the document, it happens and so it should be
fixed.
I just built lyx-1.0.4pre8 under RedHat-6.0. Using the scroll wheel in
the main buffer scrolls the wrong way (compared to emacs, gnome-terminal
and MS Windows). It is also different from the behaviour in lyx-1.0.1.
Horst
The lyx.spec file in the devel subdirectory is not up to date.
The version number in the .spec file should be the correct lyx version.
That way one could simply build a binary rpm with
rpm -tb lyx-*.tar.gz
Is it possible to update the version number from the configure script?
Also, I have
On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 12:51:49PM +0100, Horst G Kausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have now built lyx-1.0.4pre8 and tested DocBook support again. I am now
> also using the cvs version of sgmltools (pre 2.0.3).
>
> 1) The Code environment now works for me.
Great.
> 2) Nested lists still cause
PS: Could someone, please, commit this?
--
José
Thx, but I am not maintaining the lyx rpm anymore. Try:
ftp://ftp.sylvan.com/pub/lyx
Mate
> "Steffen" == Steffen Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steffen> * \to (\rightarrow) and \gets (\leftarrow) are not recognized
Steffen> as math symbols
Yes, they should be recognized as equivalent to the LaTeX forms.
Alejandro, is this possible?
Steffen> * \models (|==) is not
Hi!
I just got xforms 0.89 as I've seen that it was now officially
released! I've seen some of the new stuff and I think we should
really add support for that in the lyx-devel version and drop our
workarounds for missing features! So I opt for the proposal of
Lars (now that 0.89 is official)
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Hi! I just got xforms 0.89 as I've seen that it was now
Juergen> officially released! I've seen some of the new stuff and I
Juergen> think we should really add support for that in the lyx-devel
Juergen> version and drop our
On 28-Sep-99 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Two things:
>
> 1/ 0.89 is ot out for all architectures and is probably a bit unstable
> now.
>
You're right, but by the time we are finished with lyx-devel and release
v1.2 it will :)
> 2/ We have various things to do before switching to 0.89. As
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| You can get the latest spec file and rpm files from my site and I've been
| trying to get the LyX developers to put these RPMS up on the web site,
| but have not been successful. I think there might be a link to the
| ftp site somewhere on the LyX
On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 06:03:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> "Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | You can get the latest spec file and rpm files from my site and I've been
> | trying to get the LyX developers to put these RPMS up on the web site,
> | but have not been
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Putting pre-releases out there as well (with a notice saying "This is
| pre-release software, please test this!") means that installing and testing
| the latest would be easier for a large number of Redhat users.
|
| I see that as a win-win for
On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 06:16:47PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> "Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Putting pre-releases out there as well (with a notice saying "This is
> | pre-release software, please test this!") means that installing and testing
> | the latest would
I like to build my own RPMS from the sources, especially when testing
pre-releases. So I was not looking for prebuilt RPMS for lyx-1.0.4pre8.
However, I would appreciate an uptodate .spec file within the tarball.
That allows to build a binary RPM by simply saying "rpm -ta ".
You still only need
Horst G Kausch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I had not been paying much attention, so I wasn't aware of Kayvan's .spec
| file. The one contained in the tarball is from 1.0.2. So my suggestion is
| to include Kayvan's .spec file instead of the current .spec file. Maybe
| one could even
On 28 Sep 1999, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Horst G Kausch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | I had not been paying much attention, so I wasn't aware of Kayvan's .spec
> | file. The one contained in the tarball is from 1.0.2. So my suggestion is
> | to include Kayvan's .spec file instead of
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 06:09:51PM +0100, Horst G Kausch wrote:
|
| > [...] So my suggestion is
| > to include Kayvan's .spec file instead of the current .spec file. Maybe
| > one could even autogenerate the correct version number for the .spec
On Sun, 26 Sep 1999 18:46:00 +0100, Arnd Hanses wrote:
>>Just a question here:
>>
>>Can I avoid ERT:
>>
>> /pagenumbering{none} ...
>> /pagenumbering{roman} ...
>> /pagenumbering{arabic} ...
>> etc.
>>
>>in LyX somehow (without changing basic LaTeX classes), or is it
If there are no last minute objections I will release 1.0.4 later
today, in the early afternoon.
I have updated the documentation and the text file. Gotten en new spec
file. So I think everything should be ready now.
The 1.0.4 to be is in cvs now. Please do a last minute check of it so
that I
42 matches
Mail list logo
