On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Marko Vendelin wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> the first part of this patch adds TOC, ViewFormats, UpdateFormats, and
> ExportFormats to Gnome menu. TOC is updated by "Refresh" button, as
> suggested by Jürgen earlier.
Can't you just make it that this menu can't be torn off?
[...]
>
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Marko Vendelin wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > Actually, I've been trying to figure out how to fit everything into the
> > tabbed area without requiring a dialog that is 2048pixels wide. I'm very,
> > very slowly getting there. At present it loo
Hi!
the first part of this patch adds TOC, ViewFormats, UpdateFormats, and
ExportFormats to Gnome menu. TOC is updated by "Refresh" button, as
suggested by Jürgen earlier.
The second part of this patch resulted from the discussion on LyX user
interface. I've added a possibility to ask user for
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Allan Rae wrote:
> Actually, I've been trying to figure out how to fit everything into the
> tabbed area without requiring a dialog that is 2048pixels wide. I'm very,
> very slowly getting there. At present it looks like I'll switch to a
> nested tabbed dialog scheme and
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, R. Lahaye wrote:
> "Garst R. Reese" wrote:
> > The Opions->Preferences dialog is too narrow on 800x600.
> > The tab that is labeled Pri??? is cutoff. Clicking on the part remaining
> > causes a
> > SIGSEV.
> > Garst
>
> Indeed, it would be better if the default width include
"Garst R. Reese" wrote:
> The Opions->Preferences dialog is too narrow on 800x600.
> The tab that is labeled Pri??? is cutoff. Clicking on the part remaining
> causes a
> SIGSEV.
> Garst
Indeed, it would be better if the default width includes the
second half of the "Printer" tab and the "Path" t
Allan Rae wrote:
>
> On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, R. Lahaye wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've just downloaded the latest CVS and I noticed
> > that many dialogs have a limited "resizeability".
> > I wonder wether that is on purpose, or that this
> > is a "under-construction" feature.
>
> On purpose.
>
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, R. Lahaye wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've just downloaded the latest CVS and I noticed
> that many dialogs have a limited "resizeability".
> I wonder wether that is on purpose, or that this
> is a "under-construction" feature.
On purpose.
> For example the Citation, Reference, U
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 18-Sep-2000 Allan Rae wrote:
> >
> > I'm sure we've had more than occasion where contributors have forgotten
> > those new files simply because they expected diff would add the new files
> > to the patch for them. Sure they should have checked thei
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Amir Karger wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 02:41:03PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Amir Karger wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 01:48:42PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I have modified GNU diff to be able to emulate `cvs diff`. This
Kevin Atkinson wrote:
>
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Garst R. Reese wrote:
>
> > "Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote:
> > >
> > > "Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > spellchecker put up an error box saying "unable to load the aspell
> > module."
>
> That is probably because you don't have Pspell
Kevin Atkinson wrote:
>
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Garst R. Reese wrote:
>
> > spellchecker put up an error box saying "unable to load the aspell
> > module."
>
> That is probably because you don't have Pspell compiled correctly. If you
> are using Linux the easiest thing to do is compile Pspell w
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> "Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote:
> >
> > "Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > | > Fixed as Kevin said (word.c_str())!
> > | >
> > | > Jürgen
> > | >
> > | Did you commit that? I don't see any changes to spellchecker.C in 4PM
> > | c
"Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote:
>
> "Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > Fixed as Kevin said (word.c_str())!
> | >
> | > Jürgen
> | >
> | Did you commit that? I don't see any changes to spellchecker.C in 4PM
> | cvs update.
>
> I'll commit some stuff to fix this right away.
>
"Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote:
>
> "Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > Fixed as Kevin said (word.c_str())!
> | >
> | > Jürgen
> | >
> | Did you commit that? I don't see any changes to spellchecker.C in 4PM
> | cvs update.
>
> I'll commit some stuff to fix this right away.
T
"Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Fixed as Kevin said (word.c_str())!
| >
| > Jürgen
| >
| Did you commit that? I don't see any changes to spellchecker.C in 4PM
| cvs update.
I'll commit some stuff to fix this right away.
btw. Have you tried the current cvs with xforms 0.
Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 16-Sep-2000 Garst R. Reese wrote:
> > pspell-.11.2
> > aspell-.32.5
> > gzipped log attached.
> > cvs 1900h ADT Sep 15
> > Garst
>
> Fixed as Kevin said (word.c_str())!
>
> Jürgen
>
Did you commit that? I don't see any changes to spellchecker.C in 4PM
cvs upda
Jürgen, can you make a task list on what needs to be fixed with
tabular?
Lgb
Lior Silberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I meant to ask whether some version of imacro->SetName(emptystring);
| is the correct syntax. Anyway: the following implements the first
| option.
I already did it with the last option. (+ another memory leak fix)
Lgb
On 18 Sep 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Lior Silberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | I think this should say one of:
> | imacro->SetName(string());
> | imacro->SetName(string(""));
> | imacro->SetName("");
>
> Either of the above should work.
> (First or last looks best)
>
Lior Silberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| This also happens in xforms. The culprit appears to be the following line
| (line 787 of mathed/math_cursor.C):
|
| imacro->SetName(0);
I really wonder why gcc accepts that.
| which is:
|
| void MathedInset::SetName(string const & n) { name =
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Lior Silberman wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Marko Vendelin wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > I would like to report the following bug in the mathmode:
> >
> > 1. create a new document (File/New)
> > 2. open math-mode by clicking on the toolbar or by selecting Math/Math
> >
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Marko Vendelin wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I would like to report the following bug in the mathmode:
>
> 1. create a new document (File/New)
> 2. open math-mode by clicking on the toolbar or by selecting Math/Math
>Mode in menu
> 3. type "\alpha " and enjoy LyX dumping a core.
Hi.
On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 05:49:19PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Gordon Fox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) entered the
> following feedback message on the LyX home page:
>
>
> Reading LaTeX command syntax
> (quiz1.te
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Amir Karger wrote:
> I don't understand why the shell script you described required changing
> diffultils.
>
> Alternatively, if you're worrying about ignoring the right files, why not
> write a script that creates a file of files to ignore in the diff, and then
> call diff
On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 02:41:03PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Amir Karger wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 01:48:42PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> > >
> > > I have modified GNU diff to be able to emulate `cvs diff`. This allows
> > > anyone with two copies of a cvs snapshot
Marko Vendelin wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I would like to report the following bug in the mathmode:
>
> 1. create a new document (File/New)
> 2. open math-mode by clicking on the toolbar or by selecting Math/Math
>Mode in menu
> 3. type "\alpha " and enjoy LyX dumping a core.
>
> Marko
>
> PS: I
Gordon Fox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) entered the
following feedback message on the LyX home page:
Importing some LaTeX files fails on my machine, and I\'m not quite sure why.
The messages I get are:
reLyX, the LaTeX to Ly
Has anyone tried to use slides-only or notes-only in the slides class?
I've tried a few times, but never succeeded in getting it to work.
The errors are "undefined control sequence" Since I can'tselect from
the lyx merror windows, I've exported to latex:
...
(/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/con
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 01:13:22PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> the vi pervert Andre audiated
>
> >The problem is that there are quite a few things missing from the
> >LyX kernel to make such a thing viable. I don't think it is possible
> >at all to simulate vi's modes by fiddling with
Marko Vendelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 18 Sep 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > Marko Vendelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
| > |
| > | > BTW.: I got a bit out of sync with KDE/GNOME patches as I had to wait
| > | > for Lar
On 18 Sep 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Marko Vendelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> |
> | > BTW.: I got a bit out of sync with KDE/GNOME patches as I had to wait
> | > for Lars to have a look at one of them, could you please tell me
On 18-Sep-2000 Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> I need help for this as otherwise it might take some time!
>
Replying to myself ;)
There are a lot of functions in lyxfunc which modify or do something
with LyXText (bv->text!). Now all this functions should be handled
also by the text-inset. I now woul
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 15-Sep-2000 John Levon wrote:
>
> > You are right, I have added the moc files to the make clean target in the
> > attached patch, incremental to my previous one today.
> >
>
> IMO moc files should only be removed on a distclean not on a simple
On 18-Sep-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Sure... it is ok for you if I do this now?
> And also remove table.C and table.h?
>
I guess yes, but IMO we should ask the others.
We have seen that there ARE problems with the new tabular inset
(especially with the text-inset) so before removing
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 18-Sep-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| >| I fixed this and IMO they still should be part of the build process
| >| at least until we remove all references to them in the LyX-Source and
| >| remove them from the repository!
| >
| > The only reas
On 18-Sep-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel%40lists.lyx.org/msg14247.html
>
> I have not looked at this.
Well as this one depends on the first one IMO we cannot include this
too.
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Marko Vendelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
|
| > BTW.: I got a bit out of sync with KDE/GNOME patches as I had to wait
| > for Lars to have a look at one of them, could you please tell me
| > (John & Marko) which ones haven't been aplied?
|
On 18-Sep-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| I fixed this and IMO they still should be part of the build process
>| at least until we remove all references to them in the LyX-Source and
>| remove them from the repository!
>
> The only reason why I haven't done that already is that you might nee
Tommy Sjögren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) entered the
following feedback message on the LyX home page:
Hi there,
I\'m trying to compile LyX, but I don\'t have Perl on my system, I guess
this is the main problemanyway
I t
Hi!
I would like to report the following bug in the mathmode:
1. create a new document (File/New)
2. open math-mode by clicking on the toolbar or by selecting Math/Math
Mode in menu
3. type "\alpha " and enjoy LyX dumping a core.
Marko
PS: I hope it is not only in my build (Gnome frontend)
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> BTW.: I got a bit out of sync with KDE/GNOME patches as I had to wait
> for Lars to have a look at one of them, could you please tell me
> (John & Marko) which ones haven't been aplied?
Gnome patches are
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-d
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 18-Sep-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > "Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| >| Hi folk,
| >|
| >| This small patch fixes a ``make dist'' oversight (and lets my auto-compile
| >| and RPM generation proceed). However, even with th
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 15-Sep-2000 John Levon wrote:
|
| > You are right, I have added the moc files to the make clean target in the
| > attached patch, incremental to my previous one today.
| >
|
| IMO moc files should only be removed on a distclean not on a simple
| c
On 18-Sep-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> "Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>| Hi folk,
>|
>| This small patch fixes a ``make dist'' oversight (and lets my auto-compile
>| and RPM generation proceed). However, even with this, I get the following
>| errors on compilation:
>|
>|
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi folk,
|
| This small patch fixes a ``make dist'' oversight (and lets my auto-compile
| and RPM generation proceed). However, even with this, I get the following
| errors on compilation:
|
| table.C:791: new declaration `class string LyXTable::
On 15-Sep-2000 John Levon wrote:
> You are right, I have added the moc files to the make clean target in the
> attached patch, incremental to my previous one today.
>
IMO moc files should only be removed on a distclean not on a simple
clean, but if you insist that it should be done also on a m
On 16-Sep-2000 Garst R. Reese wrote:
> pspell-.11.2
> aspell-.32.5
> gzipped log attached.
> cvs 1900h ADT Sep 15
> Garst
Fixed as Kevin said (word.c_str())!
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 16-Sep-2000 Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> Hi folk,
>
> This small patch fixes a ``make dist'' oversight (and lets my auto-compile
> and RPM generation proceed). However, even with this, I get the following
> errors on compilation:
Applied!
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-
On 16-Sep-2000 Dekel Tsur wrote:
> I've created a list of bugs/problems with the new table inset.
> This should keep Juergen busy for a while (I suppose I should help with
> items 19 and 20).
>
Well I guess you're right ;)
> 1. The most annoying problem is that the cursor can be placed outside
On 18-Sep-2000 Allan Rae wrote:
>
> I'm sure we've had more than occasion where contributors have forgotten
> those new files simply because they expected diff would add the new files
> to the patch for them. Sure they should have checked their patch and
> noticed this but getting a patch and a
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> >
> > Nothing, as I said above in the first case. The only problem comes with
> > the fact that new files are not included by the -N. Only new files that
> > have been added to cvs using `cvs add` are actually caught by the -N flag.
> > To be able to
52 matches
Mail list logo