John Levon wrote:
> It's friday, so I can ask you why you didn't bother reading what I told
> you to fix last time you complained about this ?
>
> .cvsrc must have :
>
> update -dP
>
> at the least in it.
Sorry, I've got that now!
However, since then I get the following lines when I do "cvs u
This fixes two issues
1) no XPM converters defined by default, so inline display was crapping out
2) nasty segfault on XPM read
I don't know what Baruch was planning, but as he's away I think this should go in
so people can actually use it.
There are still some serious problems :
1) load of
SMiyata wrote:
> So I guess (I don't have access to FreeBSD at the moment)
> C++ wrapper is only missing:
>
> #include
>
> instead of
>
> #include
No, wchar.h is also missing on a FreeBSD system,
all others, such as wctype.h etc., are missing as well.
So on a "proper" FreeBSD one needs to a
Patch below works for me.
Justification: just because the inset wants to lose the focus lock (FINISHED*) doesn't
mean that the func is DISPATCHED. If this is no good, then we need to split the state
into two, one for FINISHED* and one for (UN)DISPATCHED
thanks
john
Index: lyxfunc.C
==
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 09:44:46PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > - In the paragraph layout dialog, it is possible to enter text in the
> > "Below"/"Above" boxes even if the space is fixed (the text
> > is swallowed immediately but nevertheless...)
>
> Let me see.
fixed (waiting for apply)
thanks
john
--
"I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept
responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate
everyone else's."
- Kee Hinckley
Index: ChangeLog
===
dekel, you commented out some code in FormParagraph.C. Why ?
How come you didn't fix the bug I made (which seems to be :
if (space.getSpace() == Spacing::Other) {
should be doing :
if (linespacing == 5) {
??? Have I miseed something else ?
john
--
"I'm not sure which upsets me more: that
The policy was wrong.
thanks
john
--
"I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept
responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate
everyone else's."
- Kee Hinckley
Index: ChangeLog
Better behaviour reported by Michael
thanks
john
--
"I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept
responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate
everyone else's."
- Kee Hinckley
diff -u -r1.142 ChangeLog
--- ChangeLog 2001
ok, here it is.
Note that kde 2.2 supports -paper btw
thanks
john
--
"I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept
responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate
everyone else's."
- Kee Hinckley
Index: lyxrc.C
=
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:01:27PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> - Create a note inset and fill it with text until its content cannot be
> fully displayed on screen. Add some text in front and after the note.
> Then, move the cursor in front of the note, press CursorDown (you are now
> sc
Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 11:17:49AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 06:10:28AM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> > > 1. Loading the UG kills lyx
>
> Fixed.
Yup, but Find & Replace still locks it up.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 11:17:49AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 06:10:28AM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> > 1. Loading the UG kills lyx
Fixed.
apply it will ya !
thanks
john
--
"I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept
responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate
everyone else's."
- Kee Hinckley
Index: ChangeLog
===
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 05:07:01PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Currently, I get:
> aleem> cd /usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm
> aleem> mkfontdir .
> aleem> more fonts.dir
> 0
> aleem>
That's exactly what I get, so maybe we should simply wait for
enlightenment.
Or read some
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 05:36:59PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 05:10:06PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj&resh;nnes wrote:
> > I am getting more and more reluctant to this symbol change...
> > how much manual config does the user have to do to make this wor
On Friday 31 August 2001 16:05, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:18:15PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > what do I need to do to get the new symbols stuff working in mathed?
>
> Good question. I don't know ;-)
>
> > I have teTeX installed here. Do I need to download fonts and if
* Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-08-31 17:10] wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:18:15PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> | > what do I need to do to get the new symbols stuff working in mathed?
> |
> | Good question. I don't know ;-)
On Friday 31 August 2001 16:40, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Friday 31 August 2001 16:01, John Levon wrote:
> | > On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 04:31:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | >
> | > > | But this is a democracy I opt for reverting yo
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 05:40:20PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I guess that what we will do is to leave the tuples in, but add the
> tie back into boost/utility.hpp (unless the boost folks come up with
> something clever)
Do we need 'tie' or does boost need it itself?
Andre'
--
André P
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 05:10:06PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I am getting more and more reluctant to this symbol change...
> how much manual config does the user have to do to make this work?
I don't know. I guess it's about four or five lines
mkdir $1
cd $1
somehow create fonts.dir
#
On 31-Aug-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
> Jürgen,
>
> you asked for feedback, so...
>
> The new banner is VERY bright IMO. Moreover, the background of the "1.2.0cvs"
> clashes badly with that of banner.xpm.
>
> Personally, I reckon that the "LYX" is sufficiently striking that you simply
> make t
On Friday 31 August 2001 16:01, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 04:31:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> > | But this is a democracy I opt for reverting your boost changes, let's
see
> > | what others say.
> >
> > but it isn't really... and as always when we stumble onto bad
Jürgen,
you asked for feedback, so...
The new banner is VERY bright IMO. Moreover, the background of the "1.2.0cvs"
clashes badly with that of banner.xpm.
Personally, I reckon that the "LYX" is sufficiently striking that you simply
make the background transparent.
Angus
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:18:15PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> what do I need to do to get the new symbols stuff working in mathed?
Good question. I don't know ;-)
> I have teTeX installed here. Do I need to download fonts and if so,
> what and where from?
You do not need to download anything
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 04:31:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | But this is a democracy I opt for reverting your boost changes, let's see
> | what others say.
>
> but it isn't really... and as always when we stumble onto bad
> compilers we wait a bit... calm down... and try to realize _
On 31-Aug-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| Well Lars I really have to say that Angus is right we ARE in codefreeze and
>| you are still adding new stuff!
>
> New stuff??
Did you add new files? Yes! Well than that's what you did! We don't care
about a new boost version if the actual works jus
Amir admitted
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 11:30:32AM +0100, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 05:18:49PM -0400, Amir Karger wrote:
> > > Right. So it's just that Perl didn't have the sophisticated understanding of
> > > $foo(bar) beforehand. (Of course, this opens up t
All is now fine with CXXFLAGS. Thanks, John.
Angus
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik =?iso-8859-1?q?Bj=F8nnes?=) wrote:
> are there wide string/char support in FreeBSD at all?
Yes. The rune_t concept is a far much superior implementation
of the 32 bit width character support in libc than the traditional
wchar_t con
what do I need to do to get the new symbols stuff working in mathed? I have
teTeX installed here. Do I need to download fonts and if so, what and where
from?
Maybe this info should go in the INSTALL?
Angus
On Friday 31 August 2001 14:54, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 31-Aug-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> > This is acutyually no real change, but an upgrade of the boost code.
> >
> > hmm... you are not using the latest version of the cxx compiler are
> > you?
> >
> > most likely a compiler deficie
On 31-Aug-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> This is acutyually no real change, but an upgrade of the boost code.
>
> hmm... you are not using the latest version of the cxx compiler are
> you?
>
> most likely a compiler deficiency...
We don't care about this NOW, we are in codefreeze so your c
On 31-Aug-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
> I thought we were in a code-freeze, bug fix mode? Well, as of today, it
> appears that I cannot contribute. My compiler appears not to be up to this
> tuple stuff.
Well Lars I really have to say that Angus is right we ARE in codefreeze and
you are still ad
Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 30-Aug-2001 Baruch Even wrote:
> > I'm away from my home computer and will not be reading the lists, I will
> > be back in two weeks (14th or so).
> >
> > If there is anything of import to me, please cc me or send me a link to
> > the discussion.
>
> Same for me! I'm
I thought we were in a code-freeze, bug fix mode? Well, as of today, it
appears that I cannot contribute. My compiler appears not to be up to this
tuple stuff.
Angus
cxx -std strict_ansi -nocleanup -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I.. -I..
-I../boost -I../src/cheaders -I/usr/local/include -msg_d
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:01:27PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
>
> Friday, finally!
>
> It's time for an updated bug list (with 64 entries!)
Michael do you have problems with the last reLyX?
What was the symbolic link that you added wednesday to fix it?
> Michael
>
> --
>
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 11:30:32AM +0100, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 05:18:49PM -0400, Amir Karger wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 04:50:48PM +0100, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 08:49:49AM -0400, Amir Karger wrote:
> > >
> > Y
poenitz@millo:/usr/src/lyx/lyx-devel/src > ./lyx /tmp/de_UserGuide
LyX: Bad integer `cong' [around line 422 of file
/usr/src/lyx/lyx-devel/lib/symbols]
LyX: Bad integer `surd' [around line 423 of file
/usr/src/lyx/lyx-devel/lib/symbols]
LyX: Bad integer `cmex' [around line 423 of file
/usr/src/ly
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 11:30:32AM +0100, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
[snip]
> >
> > Yeah, that's OK too.
>
> Actually I have choosen your alternative, I really dislike the ()->, grrr...
> (sorry Yves, nothing personal, on the other hand since today is friday it
> is after all).
Ok. Wa
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 12:32:48PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> "R. Lahaye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Hi,
> |
> | I'm running FreeBSD 4.3 (lattest official release) and there are problems
> | with the "#include " lines in boost/boost/detail/limits.hpp.
> | All the wide character f
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 05:18:49PM -0400, Amir Karger wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 04:50:48PM +0100, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 08:49:49AM -0400, Amir Karger wrote:
> >
> > > I'm pretty sure that the problem here is that you're missing a &.
> > > I think you
On 31-Aug-2001 Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Hi Juergen and all others,
>
>> Same for me! I'm on an italian beach next week to get some sea-air ;)
>
> What impact does Baruch's and your vacation have on the release of 1.2.0?
> Currently, I have a large list of small and bigger bugs, and as far as I
Hi Juergen and all others,
> Same for me! I'm on an italian beach next week to get some sea-air ;)
What impact does Baruch's and your vacation have on the release of 1.2.0?
Currently, I have a large list of small and bigger bugs, and as far as I
can see many of these require your assistance (in
Hi,
I'm running FreeBSD 4.3 (lattest official release) and there are problems
with the "#include " lines in boost/boost/detail/limits.hpp.
All the wide character files are not available on a FreeBSD OS and may
not be included for quite some time. Therefore LyX needs to fix this for
a FreeBSD OS.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 06:10:28AM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> 1. Loading the UG kills lyx
For those interested:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x4015adfd in XTextWidth () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0 0x4015adfd in XTextWidth () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11
Hi,
the following bug has slipped into the repository by the code committed
yesterday:
ABR: Array bounds read (263 times)
This is occurring while in:
lyxfont::width(const char*,unsigned int,const LyXFont&)
[FontLoader.h:46]
LyXText::singleWidth(BufferView*,Par
1. Loading the UG kills lyx
2. Trying to move the Find and Replace box gives a trail of boxes and
renders LyX inoperable. (Mouse clicks useless).
Garst
On 30-Aug-2001 Baruch Even wrote:
> I'm away from my home computer and will not be reading the lists, I will
> be back in two weeks (14th or so).
>
> If there is anything of import to me, please cc me or send me a link to
> the discussion.
Same for me! I'm on an italian beach next week to get s
49 matches
Mail list logo
