Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thomas == Thomas Anders [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Thomas Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Is
| Thomas there a way around this? FWIW, linking also fails on a decent
| Thomas Tru64 Unix 5.1A machine (ld 5.1 while 4.0D has ld
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars The rest of the lines changed:
| Lars 3615409 827848 52084 4495341 4497ed src/lyx
| All of these are with gcc 3.2?
Yes, it seems that the GC folks has a boo-boo that makes the binary
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jean-Marc == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| [Nothing]
| Hmm, sending the patch but not the message is a new interesting thing
| to do... I wonder why this happened. Here it is anyway.
Seems ok to me.
--
Lgb
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 07:18:22PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Of course, buffer loading is something as 20% of total time when the
reformatingof paragraph takes place. This part is more difficult to
improve, unless we have a working paragraph iterator which can cache
current font.
I
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 03:41:20PM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src -I./../ -I../.. -I../../boost -isystem
+/usr/X11R6/include -O2 -m486 -fno-strength-reduce -W -Wall -c formula.C
+-Wp,-MD,.deps/formula.TPlo
formula.C:45: preview.h: No such file or
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| So I take it my only chance to get WorkArea accepted is to make it a
| pimpl ?
No what about split implementation similar to Dialogs.h Dialogs.C
and xforms/Dialogs.C?
You only have to explore the different possibilities a bit, and do a
real argument
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Well I read both documents, and they both say that :
| cvs rtag MERGE_1_TO_GUII lyx-devel (in HEAD)
| cvs update -j BRANCH_POINT_GUII -j MERGE_1_TO_GUII lyx-devel (in branch)
| should work for the first merge. I get :
| cvs [server aborted]: no such tag
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 01:00:09PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
Unrelated question: Why are there boost::shared_ptr al over the place?
Sort of 'pimpl'?
Where. I don't have the source to hand remember.
|
| /// The cache contains data of this
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, 22 May 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Boost signals however delegates creation of functions objects and
binding to two other libs, with sigc++ this is integrated in the
signal/slot code.
| Not quite as nice then.
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 09:48:47AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
I think that this means that the file is not in Makefile.am.
Bingo.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 09:50:36AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
No what about split implementation similar to Dialogs.h Dialogs.C
and xforms/Dialogs.C?
There is no Dialogs.C there is only xforms/Dialogs.C
All you're asking for is pimpl with a slightly different layout, since
xforms
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 01:24:05PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I commited yesterday a patch to lyxserver for fix a problem reported
on the lyx-docs (why?) list, which was basically that it did not work
with sixpack.
Why did it break ? I tested it the last time I broke lyxserver (with
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 09:50:36AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
No what about split implementation similar to Dialogs.h Dialogs.C
and xforms/Dialogs.C?
| There is no Dialogs.C there is only xforms/Dialogs.C
frontends/Dialogs.C is there.
| All
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 01:29:22PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| There is no Dialogs.C there is only xforms/Dialogs.C
frontends/Dialogs.C is there.
oops oh yes. I see, you want to split a single class over two C files.
OK
| You've nowhere to put it under your scheme with out
John == John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 01:24:05PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John wrote:
I commited yesterday a patch to lyxserver for fix a problem
reported on the lyx-docs (why?) list, which was basically that it
did not work with sixpack.
John Why did
On Wednesday 29 May 2002 12:39 pm, John Levon wrote:
(And a bit worried I can't merge changes to the branch :)
You mean merge changes in the trunk into the branch? I found that following
Lars' prescription worked perfectly for me with BRANCH_NATBIB. I think I kept
a log; will dig it out and
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 01:03:25PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
You mean merge changes in the trunk into the branch? I found that following
Lars' prescription worked perfectly for me with BRANCH_NATBIB. I think I kept
a log; will dig it out and post it on.
Please do: I must be doing
On Wednesday 29 May 2002 1:22 pm, John Levon wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 01:03:25PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
You mean merge changes in the trunk into the branch? I found that
following Lars' prescription worked perfectly for me with BRANCH_NATBIB.
I think I kept a log; will dig it
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Can somebody with such a lyxserver-aware program tell me whether
current 1.3.0cvs works?
Pybliographer - LyX works here via pipe
But it works with 1.2.0, too
Regards,
Juergen.
JMarc
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 01:25:57PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
cvs rtag TAG_HEAD_MERGE_TO_branch name lyx-devel
cvs update -jHEAD
Ah, this is different from the instructions recently sent. This seems to
be working.
Step 5. Merge changes in the HEAD that occurred between your last merge
and
Only white spaces and comment changes, but I thought I'd better ask, lest
somebody else is working in that area...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
? graphics/.GraphicsCache.h.swp
Index:
Juergen == Juergen Spitzmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Juergen Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Can somebody with such a lyxserver-aware program tell me whether
current 1.3.0cvs works?
Juergen Pybliographer - LyX works here via pipe But it works with
Juergen 1.2.0, too
Ahh, you mean I was too
Juergen == Juergen Spitzmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Juergen Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I _think_ the preamble is saved in there. It is a document
property, after all.
Juergen Well, I don't dare to argue against you, because you know the
Juergen internals better than me ;-) It was you
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 01:29:41PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
Log message:
remove unneeded #include and part of comment that's no in insets/
ChangeLogs ? :)
Yesterday's entry still applies. Shall I duplicate that?
Andre'
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 02:44:29PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Yesterday's entry still applies. Shall I duplicate that?
Oh OK, sorry
john
--
Time is a great teacher, but unfortunately it kills all its pupils.
- Hector Louis Berlioz
On Wednesday 29 May 2002 1:33 pm, John Levon wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 01:25:57PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
cvs rtag TAG_HEAD_MERGE_TO_branch name lyx-devel
cvs update -jHEAD
Ah, this is different from the instructions recently sent. This seems to
be working.
Lars, shall I put
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Juergen Pybliographer - LyX works here via pipe But it works with
Juergen 1.2.0, too
Ahh, you mean I was too fast? ;) Could you test whether the current
1.3.0cvs code still work? It seems better to me, but...
Yes, I have tested it with recent CVS (including your
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 01:47:07PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
Yesterday's entry still applies. Shall I duplicate that?
Oh OK, sorry
No, that was a real question. How much trust put people in ChangeLog
entries? I.e. do people think if there is no entry for dd.mm.,
nothing changed on that
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wednesday 29 May 2002 1:33 pm, John Levon wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 01:25:57PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
cvs rtag TAG_HEAD_MERGE_TO_branch name lyx-devel
cvs update -jHEAD
Ah, this is different from the instructions recently sent. This
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Only white spaces and comment changes, but I thought I'd better ask, lest
| somebody else is working in that area...
Fine with me.
--
Lgb
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 02:54:28PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
No, that was a real question. How much trust put people in ChangeLog
entries? I.e. do people think if there is no entry for dd.mm.,
nothing changed on that day?
How silly for them to think that :)
i.e. I hope not. Sometimes
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 01:47:07PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
Yesterday's entry still applies. Shall I duplicate that?
Oh OK, sorry
| No, that was a real question. How much trust put people in ChangeLog
| entries? I.e. do people think if there is no
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Juergen Well, I don't dare to argue against you, because you know the
Juergen internals better than me ;-) It was you after all who created
Juergen the function, while I only moved it into document. But
Juergen actually, it seems not to be saved (at least my test
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 01:57:13PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
... and when does the day start/end anyway ?
From dawn till dusk used to be a quite popular definition for some time...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve,
I think the subject says it all. I think that if we want something in
tomorrow's lwn, for example, we should do it today.
Lars?
JMarc
John
Brwosing through viewcvs, I see that LFUN_AUTOSAVE has disappeared from
commandtags.h et al in BRANCH_GUII. Why?
Regards,
Angus
This tranlates to 15% overall performance boost when simply loading the
UserGuide?
Not bad...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre This tranlates to 15% overall performance boost when simply
Andre loading the UserGuide?
Andre Not bad...
It should. Note that there is a lot of time needed to load the fonts
from the X server that gprof does not take in account. I tried
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 03:45:34PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
Brwosing through viewcvs, I see that LFUN_AUTOSAVE has disappeared from
commandtags.h et al in BRANCH_GUII. Why?
Well two answers ...
1) I accidentally merged a non-GUII change
2) what use is LFUN_AUTOSAVE ?
regards
john
--
A
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:53:56PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
It should. Note that there is a lot of time needed to load the fonts
from the X server that gprof does not take in account. I tried to
install the gprof-aware libc packages, but I do not know how to use
this.
export
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I think the subject says it all. I think that if we want something in
| tomorrow's lwn, for example, we should do it today.
| Lars?
You you will do the announcement, be my guest!
--
Lgb
On Wednesday 29 May 2002 3:56 pm, John Levon wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 03:45:34PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
Brwosing through viewcvs, I see that LFUN_AUTOSAVE has disappeared from
commandtags.h et al in BRANCH_GUII. Why?
Well two answers ...
1) I accidentally merged a non-GUII
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:53:56PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
It should. Note that there is a lot of time needed to load the fonts
from the X server that gprof does not take in account. I tried to
install the gprof-aware libc packages, but I do not know how to use
this.
John == John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:53:56PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John wrote:
It should. Note that there is a lot of time needed to load the
fonts from the X server that gprof does not take in account. I
tried to install the gprof-aware libc
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | I think
Lars the subject says it all. I think that if we want something in |
Lars tomorrow's lwn, for example, we should do it today.
Lars | Lars?
Lars You you will do the announcement,
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:01:02PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
Well don't we use it to save documents automatically every 5 mins or so?
nope, we use autoSave / AutoSave
regards
john
--
A Mini Cooper ? I wouldn't be seen dead in one of those !
- Mickey Finn
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:53:56PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre wrote:
It should. Note that there is a lot of time needed to load the
fonts from the X server that gprof does not take in account. I
tried to install the gprof-aware
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 03:45:34PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
Brwosing through viewcvs, I see that LFUN_AUTOSAVE has disappeared from
commandtags.h et al in BRANCH_GUII. Why?
| Well two answers ...
| 1) I accidentally merged a non-GUII change
| 2)
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:53:56PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
It should. Note that there is a lot of time needed to load the fonts
from the X server that gprof does not take in account. I tried to
install the gprof-aware libc packages, but I
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 05:10:16PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
This would be useful to actually profile libX11, no? All I want is
see the time spent in loading fonts from the server.
Well this will show you where time was spent inside libX11, so if you
only use LyX when you do it,
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 05:12:13PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
run the autosave feature manually?
Can you explain why somebody might want to do this ?
Anyway, I'm not that bothered, it can stay if somebody wants it
john
--
A Mini Cooper ? I wouldn't be seen dead in one of those !
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 05:10:50PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
OK. John, you have an announcement somewhere, don't you?
Below - please fill in the FIXME gaps :)
Now I can stop getting hate mail for not updating freshmeat entry :)
regards
john
After too long a wait, the LyX team are
John == John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 05:10:16PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John wrote:
This would be useful to actually profile libX11, no? All I want is
see the time spent in loading fonts from the server.
John Well this will show you where time was
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 05:28:52PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
This seems realy strange: when eon loads the user guide, I would say
hat the messages about loading fonts are visible more than 0.5% of the
time...
I suppose I should build an optimised build and some X11 libraries with
John == John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 05:28:52PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John wrote:
This seems realy strange: when eon loads the user guide, I would
say hat the messages about loading fonts are visible more than 0.5%
of the time...
John I suppose I
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 05:19:08PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Andre LyXTextClass::operator[] is pretty expensive.
This is because of string comparisons which are done for the cached
value. I do not think we can go much faster, except if we used a
smarter operator== for strings (of
John == John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 05:10:50PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John wrote:
OK. John, you have an announcement somewhere, don't you?
John Below - please fill in the FIXME gaps :)
I filled them, except for the UPGRADING stuff. I know I am lazy
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Andre On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:53:56PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
| Andre wrote:
It should. Note that there is a lot of time needed to load the
fonts from the X server that gprof does not
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 05:12:13PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
run the autosave feature manually?
| Can you explain why somebody might want to do this ?
from the lyxserver perhaps...
| Anyway, I'm not that bothered, it can stay if somebody wants
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 05:14:21PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| I wonder if we should replace the layout vector by a map indexed by the
| layout name...
Can you wait a bit with this one?
Too late.
But it does not improve things, so I won't bother you with a patch...
Andre'
--
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 05:40:06PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
There is not much on this site.
Check the CVS ... it's /very/ simple i.e. just rdtsc calls (only useful
if you've x86/Linux of course ...)
regards
john
--
A Mini Cooper ? I wouldn't be seen dead in one of those !
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 05:40:33PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
If nobody complains, this is what I will send to the lyx lists. Who
else? What is the address of LWN?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://linuxtoday.com/contribute.php3
After too long a wait, the LyX team are pleased to announce the
signals.diff.gz
Description: Change SigC to boost::signals patch.
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You can't be much faster than that, if this is really the bottleneck.
| I think we have a right to use a const_string class...
| Apart from that: Why does a paragraph carry its layout as string and not as
| index in the layout table?
Why does it not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
I see that the text I added got lost... anyway
Unless somebody objects this patch will go in, in just a short while
(minutes, not days).
--
Lgb
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 05:40:33PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
If nobody complains, this is what I will send to the lyx lists. Who
else? What is the address of LWN?
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| http://linuxtoday.com/contribute.php3
After too long a
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: I see that the text
Lars I added got lost... anyway
I am happy to see I am not alone. I reported the problem to mate.
Lars Unless somebody objects this patch will go in, in just a short
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars Let the CJK people announce that one.
Yes, I'll add a separate announcement on the web site.
JMarc
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 05:51:25PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Apart from that: Why does a paragraph carry its layout as string and not as
| index in the layout table?
Why does it not carry a pointer to the actual layout object?
I don't know ;-)
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give
On Wednesday 29 May 2002 4:55 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
I see that the text I added got lost... anyway
Unless somebody objects this patch will go in, in just a short while
(minutes, not days).
Not objecting but could you explain (since
On Wednesday 29 May 2002 5:06 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
On Wednesday 29 May 2002 4:55 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
I see that the text I added got lost... anyway
Unless somebody objects this patch will go in, in just a short while
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 05:51:25PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre wrote:
| Apart from that: Why does a paragraph carry its layout as string
and not as | index in the layout table?
Why does it not carry a pointer to the actual layout
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars We have other thing to do to speed up things before we begin
Lars with tricks like these...
Probably.
Lars _and_ we must assume that the string implementation that we
Lars use will use the fastest way of comparing two strings.
So you
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wednesday 29 May 2002 4:55 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
I see that the text I added got lost... anyway
Unless somebody objects this patch will go in, in just a short while
(minutes, not days).
|
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wednesday 29 May 2002 5:06 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
On Wednesday 29 May 2002 4:55 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
I see that the text I added got lost... anyway
Unless somebody objects this
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Andre On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 05:51:25PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes
| Andre wrote:
| Apart from that: Why does a paragraph carry its layout as string
and not as | index in the layout table?
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars We have other thing to do to speed up things before we begin
| Lars with tricks like these...
| Probably.
| Lars _and_ we must assume that the string implementation that we
| Lars use
The webpage announcement links to 1_1_6.txt
Cut and paste error, sheez :)
john
--
If you look 'round the table and can't tell who the sucker is, it's you.
- Quiz Show
John == John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John The webpage announcement links to 1_1_6.txt
John Cut and paste error, sheez :)
Thanks. And I thought I double-checked everything. Time to go home.
JMarc
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 05:55:46PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
The webpage announcement links to 1_1_6.txt
Although the first sentence still applies :))
john
--
If you look 'round the table and can't tell who the sucker is, it's you.
- Quiz Show
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 06:43:33PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I'd say that the performance hit is negligible, and most of it can be
fixed with some more clever structurs and algorithms.
We spend 25% of the LyX related UserGuide loading time in
LyXTextClass::operator[] if I read the
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 06:43:33PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I'd say that the performance hit is negligible, and most of it can be
fixed with some more clever structurs and algorithms.
| We spend 25% of the LyX related UserGuide loading time
This is the token frequencies I get when loading Userguide.lyx.
3341 \family
1891 \layout
1166 \bar
874 \emph
799 \begin_inset
575 \shape
547 \noun
505 \series
502 \color
492 \SpecialChar
330 \size
107 \end_deeper
107 \begin_deeper
80 \labelwidthstring
68 \backslash
54 \i
39 \hfill
25 \align
21
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 05:52:28PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 09:48:27AM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
A complete nit, but is it the LyX team is pleased to announce? The team
is one entity. Am I wrong?
You're probably right, I can nevner work out the rules for
After too long a wait, the LyX team are pleased to announce the new stable
release, 1.2.0.
This release has far too many bugfixes and new features to list
comprehensively, but some are listed below.
You can download LyX 1.2.0 here :
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.2.0.tar.gz
cghan == [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
cghan Hello, Since there's been no official announcement of lyx-1.2.0
cghan yet, I cannot announce CJK-LyX-1.2.0 now, right?
You can now. Sorry for the delay.
JMarc
The attached patch introduces real insets for font changes for mathed.
This
(a) is not yet fully functional again
(b) is still a bit awkward to navigate (an extra Left or Right)
(c) simplifies the code by removing some not-so-pretty hacks.
Comments?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up
This is following a make clean.
Angus
Making maintainer-clean in lib
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/aleem/lyx/lyx-devel-build/lib'
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `../config.status', needed by `Makefile'.
Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/aleem/lyx/lyx-devel-build/lib'
make: ***
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 07:45:08PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `../config.status', needed by `Makefile'.
You've infected the tree with an automake != 1.5. You usually need a
manual distclean to get yourself out of the hole ...
john
--
If you look 'round
On Wednesday 29 May 2002 7:50 pm, John Levon wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 07:45:08PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `../config.status', needed by
`Makefile'.
You've infected the tree with an automake != 1.5. You usually need a
manual distclean to get
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| The attached patch introduces real insets for font changes for mathed.
| This
| (a) is not yet fully functional again
| (b) is still a bit awkward to navigate (an extra Left or Right)
| (c) simplifies the code by removing some not-so-pretty hacks.
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| This is following a make clean.
| Angus
| Making maintainer-clean in lib
| make[1]: Entering directory `/home/aleem/lyx/lyx-devel-build/lib'
| make[1]: *** No rule to make target `../config.status', needed by `Makefile'.
| Stop.
| make[1]: Leaving
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 06:43:33PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I'd say that the performance hit is negligible, and most of it can be
fixed with some more clever structurs and algorithms.
| We spend 25% of the LyX
? arguments.patch
? build
Index: src/BufferView_pimpl.C
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/BufferView_pimpl.C,v
retrieving revision 1.244
diff -u -p -r1.244 BufferView_pimpl.C
--- src/BufferView_pimpl.C 29 May 2002
Andre Poenitz wrote:
The attached patch introduces real insets for font changes for mathed.
This
(a) is not yet fully functional again
(b) is still a bit awkward to navigate (an extra Left or Right)
(c) simplifies the code by removing some not-so-pretty hacks.
Comments?
(b) is
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 05:52:28PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 09:48:27AM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
A complete nit, but is it the LyX team is pleased to announce? The team
is one entity. Am I wrong?
You're probably right, I can nevner work
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 09:32:38PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
(b) is exactly the problem I have with this font-as-inset approach.
Do we really want, for the sake of good code and intellectual
satisfaction, to have all documents littered with boxen? Even
if these boxen are not
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 09:25:09PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
patch
Great, but please put a comment before the #if 0 if you apply the patch
as is. Just one of my bete noires :)
john
--
If you look 'round the table and can't tell who the sucker is, it's you.
- Quiz Show
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
This is the token frequencies I get when loading Userguide.lyx.
3341 \family
1891 \layout
1166 \bar
874 \emph
799 \begin_inset
575 \shape
547 \noun
505 \series
502 \color
492 \SpecialChar
330 \size
107 \end_deeper
107 \begin_deeper
80 \labelwidthstring
Why just do this half-baked reauire argument thing (which does not buy
us much, unless you have something in mind) instead of trying to specify
better these arguments?
JMarc
1 - 100 of 268 matches
Mail list logo
