On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 07:41:07PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> xforms has a dialog for the mathed label and qt doesn't. I'm
> trying to initiate a discussion on how best to change that.
Ahem... mathed labels do _not_ use the dialog stuff in srd/mathed,
mathed simply reacts to LFUN_INSERT_LABEL
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 10:06:11AM -0400, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 08:56:18PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 11:58:41AM -0400, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> > > I've seen a few varieties of this--the depth cascades rightward instead
> > > of
Hi all,
Just checked the current cvs update, and I still have the problem with
epsi files that I reported a week ago. (i.e. eps2eps seemingly breaking
the files, but being ok when run by hand on them)
I didn't see any response last time, so I thought I had better send a
little reminder, in case
yikes!
--
Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of Economics/"\ ASCII ribbon campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Smeal 178 (814) 375-4700 \ / against HTML mail
These opinions will not be those of Xand postings.
Penn State until it pays my retainer. / \
#LyX 1.2 cr
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 08:56:18PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 11:58:41AM -0400, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> > I've seen a few varieties of this--the depth cascades rightward instead
> > of coming back on old files. I've attached a file that does this.
> Where is the f
On Monday 30 September 2002 7:44 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | On Monday 30 September 2002 7:21 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes
wrote:
> | > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | > | What do the rest of you think? Lars?
> | >
> | > That if you have
My CVS repository sync-up is not happening.
- Forwarded message from Cron Daemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: 30 Sep 2002 16:50:09 -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cron Daemon)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cron cd /cvs/lyx; rsync -aCz --delete baywatch.lyx.org::lyxcvs .
failed to connec
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Monday 30 September 2002 7:21 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | What do the rest of you think? Lars?
| >
| > That if you have this effort to spend, you should spend it on
| > helping the qt stuff.
|
|
On Monday 30 September 2002 7:21 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | What do the rest of you think? Lars?
>
> That if you have this effort to spend, you should spend it on
> helping the qt stuff.
? Experience suggests that we two often talk at cross
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 06:17:33PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
| > > Apropos comments: What about my poll for next year's meeting?
| > > You did not answer that...
| >
| > I think that it's probably about time that I showed up...
|
| Indeed.
|
| Now
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| What do the rest of you think? Lars?
That if you have this effort to spend, you should spend it on helping
the qt stuff.
--
Lgb
Hi everybody,
I am conducting a survey about the way defects (or bugs-I use these two
words interchangeably) are handled in open source software projects. It is
very easy to fill out. It consists of three short sections which can be
completed at once or in different sessions. The survey can be f
On Monday 30 September 2002 6:47 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 06:33:03PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > As for labels within mathed --- well personally, I think
> > that André should move his CommandInset into the outside
> > world and we should use that for the labels in 1.
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 06:33:03PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> As for labels within mathed --- well personally, I think that André
> should move his CommandInset into the outside world and we should use
> that for the labels in 1.3. This code has been working for months
> although few people ha
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 06:33:03PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Ok, then I'll just commit the label patch once I can see
> cvs.lyx.org. That will give us a proper Qt dialog for non-math
> labels.
And then there will be only one bletcherous askForText user left. Good
stuff.
regards
john
--
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 06:32:38PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Now you have the opportunity to state your preferences.
>
> At the moment I'm very flexible since I have no dates in my
> diary for next year yet.
Ok. I'll wait for a few more opinions
> > That does not really matter. Konni
On Monday 30 September 2002 5:59 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> New qt stuff does not really need approval, it is after all qt
> that we are hopeing will catch up.
Ok, then I'll just commit the label patch once I can see
cvs.lyx.org. That will give us a proper Qt dialog for non-math
labels.
On Monday 30 September 2002 6:19 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 06:17:33PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > Apropos comments: What about my poll for next year's
> > > meeting? You did not answer that...
> >
> > I think that it's probably about time that I showed up...
>
> Inde
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 06:17:33PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Apropos comments: What about my poll for next year's meeting?
> > You did not answer that...
>
> I think that it's probably about time that I showed up...
Indeed.
Now you have the opportunity to state your preferences.
> ...abe
On Monday 30 September 2002 5:56 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 05:44:49PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Nothing at all as nobody other than you appears to have
> > looked at them, let alone commented on their quallity (and
> > even your comment was somewhat cryptic ;-)
>
> A
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 05:44:49PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Nothing at all as nobody other than you appears to have looked
>> at them, let alone commented on their quallity (and even your
>> comment was somewhat cryptic ;-)
>
| Ok: I have not ac
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 05:44:49PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Nothing at all as nobody other than you appears to have looked
> at them, let alone commented on their quallity (and even your
> comment was somewhat cryptic ;-)
Apropos comments: What about my poll for next year's meeting?
You di
There is a 60K filesize limit on the docs list; should I raise it? If yes,
to what?
Mate
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 05:44:49PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Nothing at all as nobody other than you appears to have looked
> at them, let alone commented on their quallity (and even your
> comment was somewhat cryptic ;-)
Ok: I have not actually tried them, but they look ok.
As they imple
On Monday 30 September 2002 5:25 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> What happened to the patches that have been sent to the list
> lately?
>
> Andre'
Nothing at all as nobody other than you appears to have looked
at them, let alone commented on their quallity (and even your
comment was somewhat cryptic
What happened to the patches that have been sent to the list lately?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 11:54:19AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Urm... looks as if I was wrong. LaTeX does exactly the same thing...
>
> Andre'
That doesn't make it right though :-)
Martin
msg45378/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Monday 30 September 2002 3:17 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> dns stuff.
>>
>> baywatch had to change its ip address.
| aleem@thorax:devel$ ping baywatch.lyx.org
| PING baywatch.lyx.org (213.203.58.29): 56 data bytes
>
| I take it that this is the
On Monday 30 September 2002 3:17 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> dns stuff.
>
> baywatch had to change its ip address.
aleem@thorax:devel$ ping baywatch.lyx.org
PING baywatch.lyx.org (213.203.58.29): 56 data bytes
I take it that this is the old address and that all will
therefore be fine once t
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Monday 30 September 2002 2:30 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | I meant to reach a point where we can release something. I'm
>> | being realistics - who is going to look at, for example, the
>> | totally fubared accent code on Qt ? Who knows how to
On Monday 30 September 2002 2:30 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | I meant to reach a point where we can release something. I'm
> | being realistics - who is going to look at, for example, the
> | totally fubared accent code on Qt ? Who knows how to solve
> | the font problems that bother Lars ?
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Try
>
| \section 1
| \subsection 1.1
| \subsubsection1.1.1
| \subsubsection1.1.2
>
| \section 2
| % no \subsetion
| \subsubsection2.0.3 which is wrong!
I tought that latex also did some stra
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 01:51:37PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
>> > Yes, we don't need "full" qt support, but we need "complete" support.
>> > I.e. we cannot have some of the most important parts of the gui not
>> > working at all, but it is ok if the su
Urm... looks as if I was wrong. LaTeX does exactly the same thing...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Try
\section 1
\subsection 1.1
\subsubsection1.1.1
\subsubsection1.1.2
\section 2
% no \subsetion
\subsubsection2.0.3 which is wrong!
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do
On Monday 30 September 2002 6:05 am, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've reorganized the spellchecker dialog, so that it does not
> need to popup the additional message window at the end with
> the word count.
Looks good to me.
Angus
36 matches
Mail list logo
