John Levon wrote:
> Appear to have broken Document->Settings->Bullets for Qt (RH9 at least).
> The background is black.
I am seeing this for at least two weeks now.
Jürgen.
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 06:32:29AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
> To: Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: std::string pathc
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes)
> Organization: LyX Developer http://www.lyx.org/
> Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 06
Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hello,
>
| I started with good intentions, was going to clean up bugzilla... but
| I all did for the next two hours was to recompile the whole tree and
| fix compilation errors thanks to the std::string patch. Hmpf... §%§$%§
>
| Lars, how did you manag
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| rest of the evening... here's the patch needed for STLport. Feel free
| to commit, I'm hitting the sack.
Do you really need in all those places? You seem to add it in
more places than I removed "support/std_string.h"
But it shouldn't really matter...
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Thanks...
Early bird get the ...
| when you did this I pretty much knew how I would spend the
| rest of the evening... here's the patch needed for STLport. Feel free
| to commit, I'm hitting the sack.
>
| And *please* Lars, don't do anything yucky bef
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 04:45:30PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
>
>
> Ok if I commit this now?
>
> --
> Lgb
Thanks... when you did this I pretty much knew how I would spend the
rest of the evening... here's the patch needed for STLport. Feel free
to commit, I'm hitting the sa
Hello,
while checking the test case of bug #537 (I was just moving the cursor),
LyX reported the following messages on the console.
buildCursor: 0
dont like 3 please report
buildCursor: 0
buildCursor: 0
dont like 1, pos: 1536 size: 786
buildCursor: 0
buildCursor: 0
dont like 1,
Appear to have broken Document->Settings->Bullets for Qt (RH9 at least).
The background is black.
What changed Angus ?
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Lars, how did you manage to compile LyX? Some #include's are
> missing! Please see the attached patch.
Strange. I only needed the one in LColor.h to compile the Qt frontend.
Nonetheless, the others certainly do no harm, so I've added 'em too.
--
Angus
Hello,
I started with good intentions, was going to clean up bugzilla... but I
all did for the next two hours was to recompile the whole tree and fix
compilation errors thanks to the std::string patch. Hmpf... §%§$%§
Lars, how did you manage to compile LyX? Some #include's are missing!
Please
As discussed.
Lars, could I get you to apply this/contact the boost list as you see
fit?
I note that there are a total of 34 throws in the boost libs
$ grep -r 'throw ' boost | grep -c -v ChangeLog
--
AngusIndex: boost/ChangeLog
=
Boys,
there is abolutely no need to be too emotional about a few changed
shortcuts! After all, we are all longing for the best text processor in
the world, aren't we? Accusing each other doesn't help the project!
I have witnessed the project for about three years and there were a few
people wh
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I am not quite sure what you are refering to, only find a
Lars> Solaris note about lyxstring might be needed. I just removed
Lars> that.
Lars> Did you have other changes in mind?
Well, I would have bet that we did mention --wi
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> But currently, Edit->Math is non-existent when outside Math.
Andre> Same for Edit-> Tabular outside of tables. I don't think either
Andre> of them qualifies as 'Optional feature'.
Andre> This is annoying for
Andre> (a) new users
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> Jean-Marc, Lars:
Andre> Can I please have your confirmation that 'we' decided to remove
Andre> inactive items from the menu instead of graying them out?
Andre> I find this horribly bad UI. A user never gets to know the
Andre> 'thi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
| | Lars> Ok if I commit this now?
>>
| | Yes. Did you remember to modify INSTALL?
>
| No.
>
| I'll have a look at it now.
I am
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> Ok if I commit this now?
>
| Yes. Did you remember to modify INSTALL?
No.
I'll have a look at it now.
--
Lgb
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Ok if I commit this now?
Yes. Did you remember to modify INSTALL?
JMarc
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 04:45:30PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Ok if I commit this now?
Just do it...
Andre'
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 03:37:11PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Log message:
> > * metricsinfo.C: initialize LyXFont before changiging attribute.
> > (fixes the 'math in \emph is upright' bug)
>
> André, this strikes me as a rather fragile fix. If you're saying that
Ok if I commit this now?
--
Lgb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Log message:
> * metricsinfo.C: initialize LyXFont before changiging attribute.
> (fixes the 'math in \emph is upright' bug)
André, this strikes me as a rather fragile fix. If you're saying that
augmentFont actually resets the font, then shouldn't the
font = LyX
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 04:07:39PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
>> void foo(Par pat, bool thisorthat)
>
| I think experience even just with LyX source has shown it's generally a
| bad idea. The preferable refactoring is obviously to share the code in
| com
On Monday 06 October 2003 14:55, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jose'>Please test it. If this proves to be as stable as I expect we
> Jose'> can backport it to 1.3.x completly.
>
> What kind of backporting is necessary? Just copyin
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 04:07:39PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> void foo(Par pat, bool thisorthat)
I think experience even just with LyX source has shown it's generally a
bad idea. The preferable refactoring is obviously to share the code in
common between the two, then have two functions built
Some simplification around the reinit/Reinit business of LyXTabular
which led to the removal of the LyXTabular::owner_ member.
Andre'
PS: Is anybody particular fond of
void foo(Par pat, bool thisorthat)
{
if (thisorthat)
do_this();
else
do_that();
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:48:56AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:30:33AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> | Yes, updated and it compiled fine interesting startup banner btw..
> >> | :-) ... is this the LyX devel team on a mining expedition?
> >>
> >> Ju
> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jose'> Please test it. If this proves to be as stable as I expect we
Jose'> can backport it to 1.3.x completly.
What kind of backporting is necessary? Just copying the files to the
1.3.x branch should be enough, no (since LyX tells lyx2lyx
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> In incoming/ ...
Thanks John.
JMarc
Mate,
The gmane news server should monitor all messages delivered to the lyx list.
The following appears to be a small, but annoying bug in the communication
between gmane news server and lyx lists (well, I only verified it with the
lyx-devel list):
As a non-member of the list, the very first e
Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Ah, false alarm, but there's apparently a little bug in the mailer
> system. The very first email as non-member (which needs
> reconfirmation) will not be forwarded to the gname news server.
> However, after this action has put me on a whitelist, all
> consecutive messages from
> "Rob" == Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[Mate, maybe you can help, is the behaviour that Rob describes normal?
He wanted to be able to post without being subscriber, because he
reads through gname]
>> So I have now unsubscribed from the lyx-devel mailing list. This is
>> what happen
Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Rob Lahaye wrote:
>>
>>>Here is what I got, after subscribing, which doesn't tell me
>>>any webpage for making changes:
>>
>>
>> My apologies then.
>>
>> What happens when you send a mail to
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a help messa
> "Rob" == Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What happens when you send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> for a help message?
Rob> Not useful either.
I really recommand that you unsubscribe from the list and then try to
send a message. After the confirmation step, all should work normal
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Hmmm. Both will be optimized... but which of the two boolean
> expressions is most often false? That one should come first.
> I really wouldn't know.
I believe that they will generate identical assembly code, with or
without optimisation. As I said, "Truly minor".
--
Ang
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 12:48:40PM +0100, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
>
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > OK, attached the patch that I intend to commit this evening if no
> > grave objections are brought forward. It differs only cosmetically
> > from the previous one (order of initializers in InsetBoxP
Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>>It seems to me that, if you are not a subscriber and send a message,
>>all you have to do is send a confirmation to some daemon and then you
>>will be 'whitelisted' and allowed to post.
>>
>>Did you try that?
>>
>>Rob> However, I discovered that
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> It seems to me that, if you are not a subscriber and send a message,
> all you have to do is send a confirmation to some daemon and then you
> will be 'whitelisted' and allowed to post.
>
> Did you try that?
>
> Rob> However, I discovered that my emails do not ar
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> OK, attached the patch that I intend to commit this evening if no
> grave objections are brought forward. It differs only cosmetically
> from the previous one (order of initializers in InsetBoxParams c'tor
> to get rid of warnings; use empty string instead of misleading "box
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:50:34PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
>
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> >> xforms/Dialogs.C is my code that happens to use a different string label
> >> to ascertain which dialog to open.
> >
> > Yes, but where is it actually set?
>
> Remember this?
> string InsetBo
Rob Lahaye wrote:
> If you recommend me to visit certain webpage for this,
> why not you tell me the webpage directly :) ?
Because I can't remember perhaps? I'm not entirely evil...
> However, I think such service doesn't exist for the lyx
> mailing lists! If so, why not?
I think it does. I'm pr
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Rob Lahaye wrote:
>
>>Here is what I got, after subscribing, which doesn't tell me
>>any webpage for making changes:
>
>
> My apologies then.
>
> What happens when you send a mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a help message?
Not useful either.
If you recommend me to vis
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:56:10AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> _I_ndex as it used to be
> _L_abel as it used to be
> List/T_O_C as it used to be.
I obviously have more patience than I thought.
> What's wrong with that?
Look again (or even perhaps read what I said ...). Or try it.
I want to
Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Here is what I got, after subscribing, which doesn't tell me
> any webpage for making changes:
My apologies then.
What happens when you send a mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for a help message?
--
Angus
Rob Lahaye wrote:
Is there a way that allows me to send emails to the devel-list, but
that will not send all lyx-devel emails to my subscription address?
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> It seems to me that, if you are not a subscriber and send a message,
> all you have to do is send a confirmation t
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 10:22:15AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 10:44:15AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > Since I am at it I'd like to pursue my 'childish behaviour' as John put
> > it in his comment to #1420: In the new menu structure 'we' changed a
> > lot of short cuts
> "Rob" == Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rob> Hi,
Rob> I follow the LyX-devel discussion on the gmane news server at the
Rob> time that it suits me. So I do not want to receive instantly any
Rob> new email to lyx-devel list.
It seems to me that, if you are not a subscriber and send
Alain Castera wrote:
>
> Please excuse me if you receive this twice. It seems that TMDA is
> eating the very fisrt message :-(
>
> ---
>
> Hello everybody. I was off for a while, and in the meanwhile crashed
> my machine, but now I want to prepare to migrate towards 1.4.
>
> At the beginni
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:38:26AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >From a quick look this seems to be you defending your decisions, not
> somebody else requesting the change, and certainly not the broad
> agreement 'by the project leaders' you like to cite.
Since when it is necessary for somebody
Please excuse me if you receive this twice. It seems that TMDA is eating
the very fisrt message :-(
---
Hello everybody. I was off for a while, and in the meanwhile crashed my
machine, but now I want to prepare to migrate towards 1.4.
At the beginning of the year, I sent to this list a RF
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 10:05:19AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> Hey, guess what, I've covered it several times !
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lyx-devel&m=105113183526929&w=2
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lyx-devel&m=105062632809542&w=2
>From a quick look this seems to be you defending yo
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 10:13:18AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
>
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 05:05:30PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjxnnes spake thusly:
> >>
> >> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> | ...
> |
> >> --
> >>Lgb
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 10:44:15AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Since I am at it I'd like to pursue my 'childish behaviour' as John put
> it in his comment to #1420: In the new menu structure 'we' changed a
> lot of short cuts in a seemingly randomly fashion, i.e. Insert->Index is
> now - you gue
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 09:57:18AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Can I please have your confirmation that 'we' decided to remove inactive
> items from the menu instead of graying them out?
Despite what you seem to think, I am not a moron. I'm entirely aware of
the spatial stability issues with hi
Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Is there a way that allows me to send emails to the devel-list, but
> that will not send all lyx-devel emails to my subscription address?
>
> (Note that I'm neither interested in subscribing to digest service,
> since I follow the gname news server for that!).
Subscribe tot he
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 10:12:18AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Jean-Marc, Lars:
> >
> | Can I please have your confirmation that 'we' decided to remove inactive
> | items from the menu instead of graying them out?
>
> I thought we only did t
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I am not really planning for any of this to go in now, but I wanted
> to play a bit with boost::filesystem to see how it fit... Not too
> badly it turns out, but the restrictions on filenames might be
> tough.
>
> Anyhow this is the patch... we can actually remove som
Vitaly Lipatov wrote:
> Can anyone see at my patch for latex2rtf support?
> It is attached.
Looks good, Vitaly.
--
Angus
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> I find this horribly bad UI. A user never gets to know the 'thing is
> there' unless he happens to check the menus at the right time.
Agree strongly,
Garst
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 06:15:36PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> I am in the process of converting a bigger document with tex2lyx. In order
> to make it work, I had to do the following changes (see attached patch):
>
> - add \text{] and \fbox{} support to math.C
> - allow parsing of partial documents
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 05:05:30PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
>>
>> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| ...
|
>> --
>> Lgb
>
| New sanitized patch attached. OK to commit?
yes,
--
Lgb
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Jean-Marc, Lars:
>
| Can I please have your confirmation that 'we' decided to remove inactive
| items from the menu instead of graying them out?
I thought we only did that with "optional items"?
--
Lgb
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 05:05:30PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
>
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
> --
> Lgb
New sanitized patch attached. OK to commit?
- Martin
--
Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Helsinki University of Technology
Dept. of Surveying, I
Jean-Marc, Lars:
Can I please have your confirmation that 'we' decided to remove inactive
items from the menu instead of graying them out?
I find this horribly bad UI. A user never gets to know the 'thing is
there' unless he happens to check the menus at the right time.
Andre'
- Forwa
64 matches
Mail list logo
