Re: Hebrew/bidi bugs and fixes

2005-08-15 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 05:07:33PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: ... > > | So, concludingly, I am pretty sure some of this (at least the enum > > | stuff, and appendix number labels, which my patch doesn't even address > > | yet) worked right around version 1.2. I could prepare a patch only fixing

Re: Hebrew/bidi bugs and fixes

2005-08-15 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 03:12:03PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > My main reaons for being so unwilling is the changes to the .layout > format. It really looks like a cludge to me. (even the existing one) > > > -- > Lgb OK, here is one more, the fix for 1975 (cursor positioning in

Re: Better handling of preamble by lyx2lyx.

2005-08-15 Thread Jose' Matos
On Monday 15 August 2005 12:14, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | > | Yes, I have tested the code and I have verified that it works as it > | should. :-) > > sure but it is comming awfully late. For some reason the real fix always eluded me. It was in Paris when I finally found the real culprit.

Re: Hebrew/bidi bugs and fixes

2005-08-15 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 03:12:03PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 12:46:55PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > | ... > > > >> >> If at all possible I'd like to avoid

Re: Hebrew/bidi bugs and fixes

2005-08-15 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 12:46:55PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | ... > >> >> If at all possible I'd like to avoid all layout changes now. >> >> what are the implications? >> > >> | 1) LtR should rema

Re: Hebrew/bidi bugs and fixes

2005-08-15 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 12:46:55PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ... > >> If at all possible I'd like to avoid all layout changes now. > >> what are the implications? > > > | 1) LtR should remain unaffected. Business as usual. > | 2) It will be pos

Re: Better handling of preamble by lyx2lyx.

2005-08-15 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> What are the benefits of doing this now. Why cannot this wait? > | It fixes a class of dormant bugs. Everytime we examine the header files we | are looking in to the preamble and we risk to change it accidentally. This |

Re: Better handling of preamble by lyx2lyx.

2005-08-15 Thread Jose' Matos
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > What are the benefits of doing this now. Why cannot this wait? It fixes a class of dormant bugs. Everytime we examine the header files we are looking in to the preamble and we risk to change it accidentally. This is serious and a blocker to me. I had to fix severa

Re: Hebrew/bidi bugs and fixes

2005-08-15 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 12:09, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> | On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 11:23:11AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> >> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> >> >> >> Also,

Re: Hebrew/bidi bugs and fixes

2005-08-15 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 12:09, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 11:23:11AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> >> Also, you can verify by code inspection or testing (I did bo

Re: Hebrew/bidi bugs and fixes

2005-08-15 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 11:23:11AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> >> Also, you can verify by code inspection or testing (I did both) that all >> >> proposed patches are neutral for ordinary LtR tex

Re: Hebrew/bidi bugs and fixes

2005-08-15 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 11:23:11AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> Also, you can verify by code inspection or testing (I did both) that all > >> proposed patches are neutral for ordinary LtR text, so we won't lose > >> anything by just putting

Re: [Patch] Workaround crash in gtk/xftFontMetrics.C

2005-08-15 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 10:19:59PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> > "John" == John Spray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> John> Hi, Attached patch hacks around a crash I encountered scrolling >> John> through the user guide in lyx-gtk. It wo

Re: Better handling of preamble by lyx2lyx.

2005-08-15 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hi all, | the list seems really quite. :-) > | For sometime I had the idea of separating the handling of the preamble | from the rest of the header. Finally in Paris I have come to the conclusion | that it really should be in a different part of

Re: Outline mode?

2005-08-15 Thread Helge Hafting
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote: This page: http://tinyurl.com/8lyh3 talks about LyX in the following way: Text editor with Outline mode, e.g. MS Word (http://www.microsoft.com/office/), LyX (http://www.lyx.org/) or Emacs (http://www.xemacs.org/). Outline mode enables you to fold headings and move compl

Re: [new PATCH] Re: [PATCH] Re: Reminder: patch for bug 1757, bug 1939

2005-08-15 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 05:28:29PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> And what about the counters patch? > | And what about that inverse-dvi-search patch? > | Shouldn't that have been

Re: Patch for bug #1920

2005-08-15 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Nah... we just special case C-T handling instead. > | C-T? Change Tracking -- Lgb