Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Bo> 2. Why the patch for http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2167
> Bo> is not applied?
>
> It should indeed. At least the ascent/descent part. Enrico, what is
> the rationale for allow
On Thursday 16 February 2006 23:17, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 10:55:58PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > On one hand, IMHO, if released now, 1.4.0 wouldn't bring that much to
> > the final user compared to 1.3.7 and it is much slower. As a user I will
> > stick with 1.3.7.
>
>
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 10:55:58PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>
> > On one hand, IMHO, if released now, 1.4.0 wouldn't bring that much to
> > the final user compared to 1.3.7 and it is much slower. As a user I will
> > stick with 1.3.7.
>
> It's wo
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, John Spray wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 16.02.2006, 23:45 +0100 schrieb
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > > We do have swankier icons; how do we get them used by the wider world?
> >
> > No clue whatsoever :-)
>
> Speaking of icons...
>
> Some folks that package LyX seem to include a
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 10:55:58PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> On one hand, IMHO, if released now, 1.4.0 wouldn't bring that much to
> the final user compared to 1.3.7 and it is much slower. As a user I will
> stick with 1.3.7.
It's worth remembering that one of the reasons that 1.4.0 is
> "Bartek" == Bartek Kostrzewa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bartek> This would potentially solve all problems with interversion
Bartek> communication.. as it stands, I cannot load files created with
Bartek> 1.4.0cvs in 1.3.6 which is bad.
But you can with 1.3.7.
JMarc
> "icebna" == icebna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
icebna> Hello !! The binary lyx-1.3.7 for Mandriva 2006 not seem in
icebna> the mirrors. Why ?
Because nobody prepared it... You may want to ask kindly on the users
list to see if someone can do it for you (and then I'll put it on the
ftp sit
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> No, it's an entirely different kind of problem... generals are
Martin> always fighting the last war ;-)
If it works, I love it !
JMarc
> "christian" == christian ridderstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
christian> I'm very tired and quite stressed and this sounds like very
christian> good material for a good flame fest... Hmm... First I need
christian> to figure out what side to take, or maybe I can just flame
christian> away
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Is it just me, or does the LyX icon here look rubbish?
Angus> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/53215
Angus> Especially when it's compared to Martin's and Jean-Marc's
Angus> rather swizzy ones:
Angus> http://permal
>
> One problem I do see is what to do when back-converting files that
> contain change-tracked paragraph breaks, if that is what we want to do.
> Change-tracking info will "leak" in that case: it will be either be
> forgotten that these para breaks were change tracked, or we should
> forcibly me
Am Donnerstag, den 16.02.2006, 23:45 +0100 schrieb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > We do have swankier icons; how do we get them used by the wider world?
>
> No clue whatsoever :-)
Speaking of icons...
Some folks that package LyX seem to include a .desktop file (as found
in /usr/share/applications and in
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Is it just me, or does the LyX icon here look rubbish?
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/53215
Rubbish..
> Especially when it's compared to Martin's and Jean-Marc's rather swizzy ones:
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.d
Hello,
Just wanted to add my two cents to this debate...
On one hand, IMHO, if released now, 1.4.0 wouldn't bring that much to
the final user compared to 1.3.7 and it is much slower. As a user I will
stick with 1.3.7.
On the other hand, correct me if I am wrong but I have the feeling that
m
Is it just me, or does the LyX icon here look rubbish?
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/53215
Especially when it's compared to Martin's and Jean-Marc's rather swizzy ones:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/53214
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/
Am Mittwoch, den 15.02.2006, 10:59 +0100 schrieb Juergen Spitzmueller:
> This one I like the most. How about the attached patch? Fixes the crash in
> both frontends (John, I guess gtk needs something similar; btw with Bo's
> testcase the gtk citation dialog remains empty).
The dialog was remaini
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 06:07:20PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Martin> Actually, no. It extends the file format in the sense that
> Martin> some files t
Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| >I do not get why you want to delay 1.4.0 because of trivial stuff.
| >
| Trivial stuff? Well, then let's just commit the patches.
You still do not get it. Trivial patches do also delay a release and
do have the potential
Hi
I have setup two mirrors for lyx
Web...: lyx.oss-mirror.org
www.ie.lyx.org
downloads.: lyx.oss-mirror.org/dist/lyxftp
www.ie.lyx.org/dist/lyxftp
IP: 82.195.155.78
Location..: Dublin - Ireland
Connection: 100mbit
Update: da
Jose' Matos wrote:
> One small correction, we require python 1.5.2. There are some bug fixes
> that
> we require that can only be found in 1.5.2 and not in 1.5.0.
I changed that.
Georg
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I do not get why you want to delay 1.4.0 because of trivial stuff.
Trivial stuff? Well, then let's just commit the patches.
However, most of Martin's patches are non-trivial stuff. For instance, I
don't think it is a good idea to postpone the change tracking patc
Michael Gerz wrote:
> Occasional crashes
> are more acceptable than a change tracking feature that is unusable for
> daily work.
I disagree.
Jürgen
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If you now could tell me which of the 74 or 39 bugs that are critical
> > I'd be happy.
>
> No, I'll shut up. I haven't compiled LyX in quite some time so I'm not
> in a position to judge.
Oh, please
On Thursday 16 February 2006 16:42, Georg Baum wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Something that would be nice before 1.4.0 is to update UPGRADING. Any
> > taker?
>
> This is a first try. Please comment.
One small correction, we require python 1.5.2. There are some bug fixes that
we requi
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 06:07:20PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Martin> Actually, no. It extends the file format in the sense that
> Martin> some files t
Andre Poenitz wrote:
I don't like the current release policy at all. 74 bugs targeted for
1.4.1 means that 1.4 is simply not ready fore release.
It seems that the majority of people subscribed to lyx-devel agrees with
you. But it does not seem to make any difference...
I'd rather apply th
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I think it is good enough. You could probably remove all the ".0" from
> version numbers (or replace them with ".x").
I did the latter and committed.
Georg
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Actually, no. It extends the file format in the sense that
Martin> some files that would be illegal now (and couldn't even be
Martin> created) become legal.
M
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Something that would be nice before 1.4.0 is to update UPGRADING.
>> Any taker?
Georg> This is a first try. Please comment.
I think it is good enough. You could probably remove all the ".0" from
version
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Actually, no. It extends the file format in the sense that
Martin> some files that would be illegal now (and couldn't even be
Martin> created) become legal.
Martin> However... we still have some work to do with Paragraph::write
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Something that would be nice before 1.4.0 is to update UPGRADING. Any
> taker?
This is a first try. Please comment.
GeorgIndex: UPGRADING
===
--- UPGRADING (Revision 13242)
+++ UPGRADING (Arbeitskopie)
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 04:34:45PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
...
> Did you actually look at the list?
>
> For example, a wild thought that occured to me this morning: the
> break-paragraph-in-change tracking patch can attach a changed
> attribute to the end of paragraph. I like this id
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 03:38:20PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> > You see, I don't know of any critical bugs as of now.
>>
>> That's good news indeed.
John> I just went through all the 1.4.1 bugs and retargeted a few to
John> 1.4.0 f
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 03:38:20PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > You see, I don't know of any critical bugs as of now.
>
> That's good news indeed.
I just went through all the 1.4.1 bugs and retargeted a few to 1.4.0 for
evaluation.
john
Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you now could tell me which of the 74 or 39 bugs that are critical
> I'd be happy.
No, I'll shut up. I haven't compiled LyX in quite some time so I'm not in a
position to judge.
> You see, I don't know of any critical bugs as of now.
That's go
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> You need to provide more. Which of the 74 bugs are a must for
>> 1.4.0. And and _why_ are they required?
Most of these 74 bugs (in particular those who do not have a patch)
are just thing for which we sais "sure, we should do it in 1.4
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 04:25:01PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> If you really want to open up the door again for trivial patches we
> are IMHO going to delay 1.4.0 for quite some time. Wake me when you
> are done.
FWIW I agree with you. There's a never-ending supply of things that can
be i
> Patch attached, please give it a try.
Same for xforms
- Martin
PS the initial crash problem went too... I think it was due to sometimes
an empty word being handed to the spell checker, at some point in my
experimenting.
Index: FormSpellchecker.C
==
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > You need to provide more. Which of the 74 bugs are a must for 1.4.0.
| > And and _why_ are they required?
|
| What I don't understand is why you're willing to ship a product with 39 known
| bugs for which you already have patches. It's not as if you'r
On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 20:19 +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 05:40:39PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
> > Could you take a look at the spellchecker code and see if you can
> > modify it in the same wa
Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Andre Poenitz ...> writes:
> | > I don't like the current release policy at all. 74 bugs targeted for
> | > 1.4.1 means that 1.4 is simply not ready fore release.
> |
> | FWIW, this is my feelin
Bennett Helm wrote:
> I can confirm the problem on both 1.3.x and 1.4.0. I tried late
> yesterday to apply the patch to 1.4.0 manually, but I got compilation
> errors so I must have done something wrong. Today is out for me,
> though; I'll get to it tomorrow.
You need to include support/lstrings.
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 05:15:20PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
| >
| > There are currently 74 bugs targeted at LyX 1.4.1. This is pure
| > madness.
| >
| > Of these bugs, only 35 have a patch currently. I think I am going to
| > consider only t
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > I don't like the current release policy at all. 74 bugs targeted for
| > 1.4.1 means that 1.4 is simply not ready fore release.
|
| FWIW, this is my feeling too.
I don't care about your feelings.
You need
On Feb 15, 2006, at 5:19 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Matthew" == Matthew Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matthew> Under Mac 10.4.2 and LyX 1.3.6, pasting from an external text
Matthew> editor to LyX does not covert Mac style linebreaks to UNIX
Matthew> style linebreaks. As a result, the
Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Beck, Andrew Thomas - BECAT001 wrote:
| > Personally I think it's madness to release something with
| > known critical bugs that have patches.
|
| which bugs are really "critical"?
That is what I would like to know as well.
--
Lgb
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't like the current release policy at all. 74 bugs targeted for
> 1.4.1 means that 1.4 is simply not ready fore release.
FWIW, this is my feeling too.
Angus
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > > Crashes must be fixed.
> >
> > Are we aware of any reproducible crashes?
>
> That hardly can be the only criterion.
Certainly not. I just want to make sure that people do not have reproducible
crashes which are not filed in bugzilla. And "crashes must be fixed" and "we
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 02:56:28PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Make sense?
> > Perfectly. But wait, are you saying that there is no way to achieve
> > that by directly patching the .ui files?
>
> I may be a "sed master" but I'm a "Qt hacker" ;-
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 05:15:20PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> There are currently 74 bugs targeted at LyX 1.4.1. This is pure
> madness.
>
> Of these bugs, only 35 have a patch currently. I think I am going to
> consider only those (plus the ones for which a patch magically
> appears
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 06:32:41PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Crashes must be fixed.
>
> Are we aware of any reproducible crashes?
That hardly can be the only criterion.
int main() {}
should not crash either, but I wouldn't try to sell it as LyX 1.4.0.
And
Hello !!
The binary lyx-1.3.7 for Mandriva 2006 not seem in the mirrors. Why ?
I am user of the lyx-1.3.6 for Mandriva LE 2005. I shall have the binary
for lyx-1.3.7 ?
Greetings from Spain
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 10:35:34PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Saturday 11 February 2006 21:56, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 10:13:41AM +0100, Michael Gerz wrote:
> > > - svn:ignore (similar to ".cvsignore")
> > > - svn:eol-style (controls eol style when checking out a file
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> IMHO,this should be noted somewhere in the release note. I
Abdelrazak> took me multiple try to figure out there was a problem.
Sure, but we do not have release notes. If some tester could work on
that, it would be nic
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bo> 2. Why the patch for http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2167
Bo> is not applied?
It should indeed. At least the ascent/descent part. Enrico, what is
the rationale for allowing png generation in legacy_lyxpreview2ppm.py?
JMarc
> "christian" == christian ridderstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Something that would be nice before 1.4.0 is to update UPGRADING.
>> Any taker?
christian> I'd do it if I knew what the heck it's supposed to contain
christian> :-/
I am in the same situation...
christian> Btw, these fil
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The nested ifs should only one,
Martin> Cannot parse that ;-)
Just replacing
if (a)
if (b)
foo();
by
if (a&b)
foo();
It makes it easier when reading to see what the alternatives are.
>> but the patch indeed looks g
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> The problem of skipping the first misspelling is apparently
Martin> due to update_contents containing a call to check().
Yes.
Martin> That's what I meant by saying we need a show() method. I tried
Martin> to implement a virtua
58 matches
Mail list logo
