Attached is my latest attempt at this patch. It still proceeds along the
original lines. It may be that the time is being spent creating the
strings, but this still seems to me like the correct approach, in
general. Why update the list of labels if we don't have to do so?
Anyway, it still
I want to eliminate the installer for LyX/Mac. To this end, I have
created a shell script that will:
1. Test if the user's directory exists, and if not then: create a new
user's directory, copy files from the old one (if it exists), and
clean up the preferences file, mostly to point to the
Bennett Helm wrote:
I want to eliminate the installer for LyX/Mac. To this end, I have
created a shell script that will:
Is the idea that this shell script runs instead of the LyX executable?
I.e., that this will run every time someone wants to run LyX? If so,
that seems like a lot to do
Attached is my latest attempt at this patch. It still proceeds along the
original lines. It may be that the time is being spent creating the
strings, but this still seems to me like the correct approach, in
general. Why update the list of labels if we don't have to do so?
Anyway, it still
I want to eliminate the installer for LyX/Mac. To this end, I have
created a shell script that will:
1. Test if the user's directory exists, and if not then: create a new
user's directory, copy files from the old one (if it exists), and
clean up the preferences file, mostly to point to the
Bennett Helm wrote:
I want to eliminate the installer for LyX/Mac. To this end, I have
created a shell script that will:
Is the idea that this shell script runs instead of the LyX executable?
I.e., that this will run every time someone wants to run LyX? If so,
that seems like a lot to do
