I just downloaded and installed LyX via the Windows installer. I've
used LaTeX before (not recently), but never LyX. In playing around
with the LyX Tutorial, I find that after changing some text to red or
green and then generating DVI, I get errors such as this,
LaTeX Error: Undefined color
Bo Peng wrote:
When I open documents using the current trunk, I see a lot of
Warning: Malformed LyX document: No \end_modules.
Should be OK now.
rh
Bo Peng wrote:
When I open documents using the current trunk, I see a lot of
Warning: Malformed LyX document: No \end_modules.
My fault. I'm on it.
rh
When I open documents using the current trunk, I see a lot of
Warning: Malformed LyX document: No \end_modules.
Bo
rgheck wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
1.Document->Settings->Document Class->Available Modules
The first 4 lines are completely empty.
A major re-organization of this stuff is on the way.
That's gone in now. Let me know if you're still having problems.
rh
Pavel Sanda wrote:
1.Document->Settings->Document Class->Available Modules
The first 4 lines are completely empty.
A major re-organization of this stuff is on the way.
2. Click and Add some module; then switch focus to some another application
and get back to lyx. Added module disappear fr
hi,
1.Document->Settings->Document Class->Available Modules
The first 4 lines are completely empty.
2. Click abd Add some module; then switch focus to some another application
and get back to lyx. Added module disappear from the selected box.
pavel
> > ah, you mean we can change func_type too. if i understand correctly this
> > info is used only in shortcut dialog, so Bo could you please look on the
> > current LyXAction.cpp and decide for the few cases?
>
> I would trust your judegement. :-)
i tried to polish it. still some corner cases ex
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008, Horst Schirmeier wrote:
> The attached patch adds reordering capabilities to the GuiBibtex
> dialog, ie. adds "Up"/"Down" buttons which move bibtex entries up/down
> in the list.
I forgot to mention two things:
- The patch works against current lyx-devel r22496.
- I hereby
> ah, you mean we can change func_type too. if i understand correctly this
> info is used only in shortcut dialog, so Bo could you please look on the
> current LyXAction.cpp and decide for the few cases?
I would trust your judegement. :-)
You are right that func_type is just used to categorize sh
Hello LyX developers,
The attached patch adds reordering capabilities to the GuiBibtex
dialog, ie. adds "Up"/"Down" buttons which move bibtex entries up/down
in the list.
The motivation for this patch was the following. In our local bibtex
database directory we keep bibtex macros in different fla
> >> I think that we should harmonize the two classifications.
> >
> > to be frank i dont how to do it.
> > take eg these 2 functions:
> > { LFUN_FILE_INSERT, "file-insert", Noop, Buffer },
> > { LFUN_FILE_INSERT_PLAINTEXT, "file-insert-plaintext", Noop, Edit },
> >
> > do you agree they should be
Pavel Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I think that we should harmonize the two classifications.
>
> to be frank i dont how to do it.
> take eg these 2 functions:
> { LFUN_FILE_INSERT, "file-insert", Noop, Buffer },
> { LFUN_FILE_INSERT_PLAINTEXT, "file-insert-plaintext", Noop, Edit },
>
> do
> >> not in a meticulous way, but in most cases one thematic group
> >> shares its func_type.
>
> I think that we should harmonize the two classifications.
to be frank i dont how to do it.
take eg these 2 functions:
{ LFUN_FILE_INSERT, "file-insert", Noop, Buffer },
{ LFUN_FILE_INSERT_PLAINTEXT,
> Let's propose a different scenario, just to show that there is no
> perfect solution:
This does make sense.
The solutions to the problem I described are then either modifying
what is returned by browseRelFile to a relative filename, or embed the
bib file.
Cheers,
Bo
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The fact that
>> embedding has problems to cope with it is irrelevant here.
>
> If I use ../bib/my.bib in my document under linux, I can not use the
> same file under windows, because it shows up in the document as an
> absolute path which does not exist un
Pavel Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> not in a meticulous way, but in most cases one thematic group
>> shares its func_type.
I think that we should harmonize the two classifications.
> and btw, what is the reason for LFUN_ACCENT_* 'Layout' category
> instead of 'Edit'?
Probably an error.
> The fact that
> embedding has problems to cope with it is irrelevant here.
If I use ../bib/my.bib in my document under linux, I can not use the
same file under windows, because it shows up in the document as an
absolute path which does not exist under windows. This is IMHO a bug.
Embedding did
> > >> Author: sanda
> > >> Date: Fri Jan 11 13:46:12 2008
> > >> New Revision: 22493
> > >>
> > >> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22493
> > >> Log:
> > >> Start of lfun reordering
> > >
> > > i did some basic thematical reorder of lfuns, so the documentation
> > > work will be little less
> >> Author: sanda
> >> Date: Fri Jan 11 13:46:12 2008
> >> New Revision: 22493
> >>
> >> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22493
> >> Log:
> >> Start of lfun reordering
> >
> > i did some basic thematical reorder of lfuns, so the documentation
> > work will be little less chaotical too.
>
>
Gorjanc Gregor schrieb:
Gregor Gorjanc schrieb:
Hi!
does anyone have 1.4 to test if format for 1.5 works?
\format "latex""tex" "LaTeX (plain)""" "editor" "editor" "document"
Hi Gregor,
I'm using 1.4.5 for productive work and have tested it with the
mentioned preference line for form
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > > I would expect ../blah as valid relative file...
>> >
>> > BrowseFile is supposed to return an absolute path.
>
> Can I apply my proposed patch? I do not see any negative side effect of it.
Well, I still prefer the old scheme as a natural separation be
Pavel Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Author: sanda
>> Date: Fri Jan 11 13:46:12 2008
>> New Revision: 22493
>>
>> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22493
>> Log:
>> Start of lfun reordering
>
> i did some basic thematical reorder of lfuns, so the documentation
> work will be little les
This patch does three things:
(1) it switches from rotating.sty to rotfloat.sty, which allows to rotate all
floats (incl. algorithm and evtl. to come custom floats) sideways.
(2) it adds support for sidewaysfigure* and sidewaystable*. This was an
oversight, but enabling requires a file format c
> Author: sanda
> Date: Fri Jan 11 13:46:12 2008
> New Revision: 22493
>
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22493
> Log:
> Start of lfun reordering
i did some basic thematical reorder of lfuns, so the documentation work will be
little less chaotical too.
however i'm not sure that all the l
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > i made a minimalistic backport upon the user request.
>
> Fine with me. Please add the bug number to the status.15x entry, though.
character counting is now in branch too.
pavel
> Gregor Gorjanc schrieb:
>> Hi!
>>
>> does anyone have 1.4 to test if format for 1.5 works?
>>
>> \format "latex""tex" "LaTeX (plain)""" "editor" "editor" "document"
>>
>
> Hi Gregor,
>
> I'm using 1.4.5 for productive work and have tested it with the
> mentioned preference line for format
Gregor Gorjanc schrieb:
Hi!
does anyone have 1.4 to test if format for 1.5 works?
\format "latex""tex" "LaTeX (plain)""" "editor" "editor" "document"
Hi Gregor,
I'm using 1.4.5 for productive work and have tested it with the
mentioned preference line for format latex. I have no pro
Hi!
does anyone have 1.4 to test if format for 1.5 works?
\format "latex""tex" "LaTeX (plain)""" "editor" "editor" "document"
Regards, Gregor
29 matches
Mail list logo
