rgheck wrote:
I think this one got approved a long time ago and held for 1.6.3, but I
thought I'd better ask again.
OK.
Jürgen
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
They just fixed the problem.
Thanks, I reset the links.
Jürgen
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Err, see below/attached.
Oh ... Yes, OK.
Ready for the rest ;-)... ?
Give me some time to breathe...
Jürgen
hi,
i started to use branches lately and i found out that our UI for them
is bit annoying since every other change needs tobe done through
preferences dislog.
the attached patches:
- introduce new menu item for defining new branch, so you can directly
put new branch into the document.
-
On 2009-03-16, Pavel Sanda wrote:
the attached patches:
- introduce new menu item for defining new branch, so you can directly
put new branch into the document.
Great.
- introduce actvation/deactivation through the context menu
Great as well.
How does it behave in a parent/child
On 2009-03-15, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I wonder though if ELyXer should not be integrated into LyX proper.
We distribute a number of python scripts already, IMHO adding yours
which is clearly a LyX spin off would just be natural.
I think we'll of course distribute ELyXer with LyX when it is
Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2009-03-15, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I wonder though if ELyXer should not be integrated into LyX proper.
We distribute a number of python scripts already, IMHO adding yours
which is clearly a LyX spin off would just be natural.
I think we'll of course distribute
On Monday 16 March 2009 10:35:31 Guenter Milde wrote:
I had a look at lyx2lyx (considering to write a reStructuredText
exporter) but badly miss some documentation.
Is there documentation on lyx2lyx or where should I ask my questions?
This list is the best place to ask questions about lyx2lyx.
Am 2009-03-16 schrieb Guenter Milde:
On 2009-03-15, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I wonder though if ELyXer should not be integrated into LyX proper.
We distribute a number of python scripts already, IMHO adding yours
which is clearly a LyX spin off would just be natural.
I think we'll of course
Piero Faustini wrote:
e.g. some stats about program download,
this can't be measured in any reasonable way, since most of downloads
won't go from lyx.org site.
where are those
visitors from, and so on?
this has been done last years and its the results are in the wiki.
pavel
/FuncCode.h (révision 28813)
+++ src/FuncCode.h (copie de travail)
@@ -418,6 +418,12 @@ enum FuncCode
LFUN_VC_COMMAND,
LFUN_MATH_FONT_STYLE,
LFUN_PHANTOM_INSERT,// uwestoehr, 20090130
+ LFUN_INSET_BEGIN, // JMarc, 20090316
+ // 325
+ LFUN_INSET_END
If I use (double) quotes in my document, and I change the quote style in
the document settings later on, I would expect that the quotes that are
already in my document would adapt to this new document default ?
That is what I expect from a document setting. Is this a correct
assumption and is
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
Or is it just a missing feature that would enable the user to specify a
quote style per quote (and then choose between the document default or
override this default) ?
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1499
(btw have a look at the csquotes package,
jean-marc wrote:
the following patch [...] implements inset-begin/end which
do not exactly do what you think they do ;)
perhaps they need different names then? inset-goto-begin/end ...
What you have to do is to add 'id' to the file po/LINGUAS and put id.po
in po/. Then compile and install. After that, you can just run 'make
install' in po/ directory when you have made a modification.
JMarc
I did successfully compile the svn and set the language to ID language
and it
Edwin Leuven edwin.leu...@ensae.fr writes:
jean-marc wrote:
the following patch [...] implements inset-begin/end which
do not exactly do what you think they do ;)
perhaps they need different names then? inset-goto-begin/end ...
Well, they look like buffer-begin or line-begin. The only
Waluyo Adi Siswanto was.u...@gmail.com writes:
I did successfully compile the svn and set the language to ID language
and it looks as what I expected.
After I did make some modification of id.po, then sent a command sudo
make install from po/ directory. But I cannot see any changes in LyX
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 16:58 +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Waluyo Adi Siswanto was.u...@gmail.com writes:
I did successfully compile the svn and set the language to ID language
and it looks as what I expected.
After I did make some modification of id.po, then sent a command sudo
Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2009-03-16, Pavel Sanda wrote:
the attached patches:
- introduce new menu item for defining new branch, so you can directly
put new branch into the document.
Great.
- introduce actvation/deactivation through the context menu
Great as well.
How
Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org writes:
- introduce actvation/deactivation through the context menu
(2 JMarc - i tried your proposal through branch-activate lfun, but
when i come to thepoint when i needed to copy the whole code from
next-inset-toggle lfun i returned to the idea of enhancing
Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org writes:
i started to use branches lately and i found out that our UI for them
is bit annoying since every other change needs tobe done through
preferences dislog.
the attached patches:
- introduce new menu item for defining new branch, so you can directly
put new
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
Or is it just a missing feature that would enable the user to specify a
quote style per quote (and then choose between the document default or
override this default) ?
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1499
(btw have
Richard Heck wrote:
Should we try to get rid of the quote inset and replace it with a
csquote inset? You could ALMOST do it as an InsetFlex, though not quite,
due to drawing issues. But surely it wouldn't be that hard.
I don't think so. Hard-coded quotation marks are valuable in itself
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
Should we try to get rid of the quote inset and replace it with a
csquote inset? You could ALMOST do it as an InsetFlex, though not quite,
due to drawing issues. But surely it wouldn't be that hard.
I don't think so. Hard-coded quotation
sa...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: sanda
Date: Sat Mar 7 22:44:21 2009
New Revision: 28721
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/28721
Log:
Add open/close to context menus, solve some shortcut conflicts
Juergen?
Modified:
lyx-devel/trunk/lib/ui/stdcontext.inc
Modified:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
i started to use branches lately and i found out that our UI for them
is bit annoying since every other change needs tobe done through
preferences dislog.
the attached patches:
- introduce new menu item for defining new branch, so you can directly
put
So this seems to fix this old bug. But I'm thinking there's some reason
it's too easy. Someone want to tell me why?
rh
Index: frontends/qt4/GuiDocument.cpp
===
--- frontends/qt4/GuiDocument.cpp (revision 28820)
+++
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
i started to use branches lately and i found out that our UI for them
is bit annoying since every other change needs tobe done through
preferences dislog.
the attached patches:
- introduce new menu item for defining new branch, so you can
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Rich Shepard wrote:
I copied /usr/local/share/lyx/bind/emacs.bind to ~/.lyx/bind/my.bind and
tested the key bindings against a document. No difference: when I press
[Del] I get the spade playing card symbol to the left of the point rather
than deleting the character to the
Richard Heck wrote:
What does one already do to insert a branch inset? Can't we just use that,
and if the name given isn't already known, add it to the branch list?
the problem here that we dont know the name user has given to us,
so command-sequence etc can't be used.
pavel
Pavel Sanda schreef:
Richard Heck wrote:
What does one already do to insert a branch inset? Can't we just use that,
and if the name given isn't already known, add it to the branch list?
the problem here that we dont know the name user has given to us,
so command-sequence etc can't be
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Pavel Sanda schreef:
Richard Heck wrote:
What does one already do to insert a branch inset? Can't we just use
that, and if the name given isn't already known, add it to the branch
list?
the problem here that we dont know the name user has given to
Pavel Sanda schreef:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Pavel Sanda schreef:
Richard Heck wrote:
What does one already do to insert a branch inset? Can't we just use
that, and if the name given isn't already known, add it to the branch
list?
the problem here that
Well, I guess all I can do is not use the Delete key since no one seems to
know why it won't work since the upgrade to 1.6.1. So, I'll unsubscribe from
this list.
I experienced something like this when I developed the new shortcut
dialog with certain combination of os/qt/lyx but I could not
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Why not branch-new-insert ? This one can fire branch-new.
now you are talking about lfun or parameter name?
LFUNs yes.
hmm i somehow didn't like the overpopulation - we would have
branch-insert, branch-new-insert, branch-new.
pavel
ps: i have limited
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote:
What do you mean with won't display right? When compiling the file to a
PDF using pdflatex, it is correctly shown. (See the PDF here:
http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/DocumentationDevelopment#Math )
Withing LyX it also looks correct -
Rich Shepard wrote:
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Rich Shepard wrote:
When I grepped my.bind for 'Del' and 'Delete' I found no binding for
that
key by itself. There is a C-Delete bound to word-delete-forward, and a
S-KP_Delete bound to cut, but no Delete by itself. As a matter of
fact, the
[Del] key
Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org writes:
What is this branch_inset_insert thing. It looks kind of wrong.
the purpose is to automatically insert the branch inset after establishing
new branch. bit hackish, yes, but i didn't find better way how to do it.
perhaps you have some idea?
I am not so sure
Lars Gullik Bjønnes lar...@lyx.org writes:
We (I) and agreed deadline with trolltech/nokie that aussie will be turned
off the 23. This is in one week.
Before then all services running on aussie must be moved to other places. So
far mail for lyx developers have been moved.
OK
We have got a
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
This is to give you an update on what is happening.
Lars, just a word of thanks for doing all of this. Must be a real pain
in the ())(!
rh
Perfect. So this mean that we abandon sourceforge completely, right?
So far, the plan looks good.
Right, after all the debates, Lars dictates.
Bo
Alex Fernandez schrieb:
The LyX code looked weird to me:
\begin_inset Formula \[
\sum_{\mathclap{\substack{0k1000\\
\\k\,\in\,\mathbb{N}}
}}^{n}k^{-2}\]
What with the double slash in \\k. But if you confirm it is correct
then it must be a parsing error.
The \\ starts a new line. Therefore
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Juergen?
OK.
Jürgen
rgheck wrote:
I'd implement it in the InsetQuote rather.
That seems hard (i.e., nearly impossible), since csquotes provides
commands, with a beginning and an end, whereas InsetQuote is a
standalone thing. You could certainly have InsetQuote sometimes output
\enquote{ and sometimes
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5709
This long standing bug is now easy to fix by means of command-alternatives.
However, the toolbar is not yet prepared to command-alternatives. The
attached patch implements a simple solution: just use the icon for the
rgheck wrote:
> I think this one got approved a long time ago and held for 1.6.3, but I
> thought I'd better ask again.
OK.
Jürgen
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> They just fixed the problem.
Thanks, I reset the links.
Jürgen
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Err, see below/attached.
Oh ... Yes, OK.
> Ready for the rest ;-)... ?
Give me some time to breathe...
Jürgen
hi,
i started to use branches lately and i found out that our UI for them
is bit annoying since every other change needs tobe done through
preferences dislog.
the attached patches:
- introduce new menu item for defining new branch, so you can directly
put new branch into the document.
-
On 2009-03-16, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> the attached patches:
> - introduce new menu item for defining new branch, so you can directly
> put new branch into the document.
Great.
> - introduce actvation/deactivation through the context menu
Great as well.
How does it behave in a parent/child
On 2009-03-15, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > I wonder though if ELyXer should not be integrated into LyX proper.
> > We distribute a number of python scripts already, IMHO adding yours
> > which is clearly a LyX spin off would just be natural.
> I think we'll of course distribute ELyXer with LyX when it
Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2009-03-15, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I wonder though if ELyXer should not be integrated into LyX proper.
We distribute a number of python scripts already, IMHO adding yours
which is clearly a LyX spin off would just be natural.
I think we'll of course distribute
On Monday 16 March 2009 10:35:31 Guenter Milde wrote:
> I had a look at lyx2lyx (considering to write a reStructuredText
> exporter) but badly miss some documentation.
>
> Is there documentation on lyx2lyx or where should I ask my questions?
This list is the best place to ask questions about
Am 2009-03-16 schrieb Guenter Milde:
> On 2009-03-15, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > > I wonder though if ELyXer should not be integrated into LyX proper.
> > > We distribute a number of python scripts already, IMHO adding yours
> > > which is clearly a LyX spin off would just be natural.
>
> > I think
Piero Faustini wrote:
> e.g. some stats about program download,
this can't be measured in any reasonable way, since most of downloads
won't go from lyx.org site.
>where are those
> visitors from, and so on?
this has been done last years and its the results are in the wiki.
pavel
// these are handled in our dispatch()
enable = true;
Index: src/FuncCode.h
===
--- src/FuncCode.h (révision 28813)
+++ src/FuncCode.h (copie de travail)
@@ -418,6 +418,12 @@ enum FuncCode
LFUN_VC_COMMAND,
LFUN_MATH_FONT_STYLE,
LFUN_PHANTOM_INSERT, // uwestoehr, 2009013
If I use (double) quotes in my document, and I change the quote style in
the document settings later on, I would expect that the quotes that are
already in my document would adapt to this new document default ?
That is what I expect from a document setting. Is this a correct
assumption and is
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
> Or is it just a missing feature that would enable the user to specify a
> quote style per quote (and then choose between the document default or
> override this default) ?
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1499
(btw have a look at the csquotes package,
jean-marc wrote:
> the following patch [...] implements inset-begin/end which
> do not exactly do what you think they do ;)
perhaps they need different names then? inset-goto-begin/end ...
>
> What you have to do is to add 'id' to the file po/LINGUAS and put id.po
> in po/. Then compile and install. After that, you can just run 'make
> install' in po/ directory when you have made a modification.
>
> JMarc
I did successfully compile the svn and set the language to ID language
and
Edwin Leuven writes:
> jean-marc wrote:
>> the following patch [...] implements inset-begin/end which
>> do not exactly do what you think they do ;)
>
> perhaps they need different names then? inset-goto-begin/end ...
Well, they look like buffer-begin or line-begin. The
Waluyo Adi Siswanto writes:
> I did successfully compile the svn and set the language to ID language
> and it looks as what I expected.
>
> After I did make some modification of id.po, then sent a command "sudo
> make install" from po/ directory. But I cannot see any changes
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 16:58 +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Waluyo Adi Siswanto writes:
> > I did successfully compile the svn and set the language to ID language
> > and it looks as what I expected.
> >
> > After I did make some modification of id.po, then sent a
Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2009-03-16, Pavel Sanda wrote:
the attached patches:
- introduce new menu item for defining new branch, so you can directly
put new branch into the document.
Great.
- introduce actvation/deactivation through the context menu
Great as well.
How
Pavel Sanda writes:
> - introduce actvation/deactivation through the context menu
> (2 JMarc - i tried your proposal through branch-activate lfun, but
> when i come to thepoint when i needed to copy the whole code from
> next-inset-toggle lfun i returned to the idea of
Pavel Sanda writes:
> i started to use branches lately and i found out that our UI for them
> is bit annoying since every other change needs tobe done through
> preferences dislog.
>
> the attached patches:
> - introduce new menu item for defining new branch, so you can directly
>
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
Or is it just a missing feature that would enable the user to specify a
quote style per quote (and then choose between the document default or
override this default) ?
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1499
(btw have
Richard Heck wrote:
> Should we try to get rid of the quote inset and replace it with a
> csquote inset? You could ALMOST do it as an InsetFlex, though not quite,
> due to drawing issues. But surely it wouldn't be that hard.
I don't think so. Hard-coded quotation marks are valuable in itself
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
Should we try to get rid of the quote inset and replace it with a
csquote inset? You could ALMOST do it as an InsetFlex, though not quite,
due to drawing issues. But surely it wouldn't be that hard.
I don't think so. Hard-coded quotation
sa...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: sanda
> Date: Sat Mar 7 22:44:21 2009
> New Revision: 28721
>
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/28721
> Log:
> Add open/close to context menus, solve some shortcut conflicts
Juergen?
>
> Modified:
> lyx-devel/trunk/lib/ui/stdcontext.inc
>
> Modified:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > i started to use branches lately and i found out that our UI for them
> > is bit annoying since every other change needs tobe done through
> > preferences dislog.
> >
> > the attached patches:
> > - introduce new menu item for defining new branch, so you can
So this seems to fix this old bug. But I'm thinking there's some reason
it's too easy. Someone want to tell me why?
rh
Index: frontends/qt4/GuiDocument.cpp
===
--- frontends/qt4/GuiDocument.cpp (revision 28820)
+++
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
i started to use branches lately and i found out that our UI for them
is bit annoying since every other change needs tobe done through
preferences dislog.
the attached patches:
- introduce new menu item for defining new branch, so you can
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Rich Shepard wrote:
I copied /usr/local/share/lyx/bind/emacs.bind to ~/.lyx/bind/my.bind and
tested the key bindings against a document. No difference: when I press
[Del] I get the spade playing card symbol to the left of the point rather
than deleting the character to the
Richard Heck wrote:
> What does one already do to insert a branch inset? Can't we just use that,
> and if the name given isn't already known, add it to the branch list?
the problem here that we dont know the name user has given to us,
so command-sequence etc can't be used.
pavel
Pavel Sanda schreef:
Richard Heck wrote:
What does one already do to insert a branch inset? Can't we just use that,
and if the name given isn't already known, add it to the branch list?
the problem here that we dont know the name user has given to us,
so command-sequence etc can't be
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Pavel Sanda schreef:
>> Richard Heck wrote:
>>
>>> What does one already do to insert a branch inset? Can't we just use
>>> that, and if the name given isn't already known, add it to the branch
>>> list?
>>>
>>
>> the problem here that we dont know the
Pavel Sanda schreef:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Pavel Sanda schreef:
Richard Heck wrote:
What does one already do to insert a branch inset? Can't we just use
that, and if the name given isn't already known, add it to the branch
list?
the problem here that
> Well, I guess all I can do is not use the Delete key since no one seems to
> know why it won't work since the upgrade to 1.6.1. So, I'll unsubscribe from
> this list.
I experienced something like this when I developed the new shortcut
dialog with certain combination of os/qt/lyx but I could
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>>> Why not branch-new-insert ? This one can fire branch-new.
>>>
>>
>> now you are talking about lfun or parameter name?
>>
> LFUNs yes.
hmm i somehow didn't like the overpopulation - we would have
branch-insert, branch-new-insert, branch-new.
pavel
ps: i
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> What do you mean with "won't display right"? When compiling the file to a
> PDF using pdflatex, it is correctly shown. (See the PDF here:
> http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/DocumentationDevelopment#Math )
> Withing LyX it also looks
Rich Shepard wrote:
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Rich Shepard wrote:
When I grepped my.bind for 'Del' and 'Delete' I found no binding for
that
key by itself. There is a C-Delete bound to word-delete-forward, and a
S-KP_Delete bound to cut, but no Delete by itself. As a matter of
fact, the
[Del] key
Pavel Sanda writes:
>> What is this branch_inset_insert thing. It looks kind of wrong.
>
> the purpose is to automatically insert the branch inset after establishing
> new branch. bit hackish, yes, but i didn't find better way how to do it.
> perhaps you have some idea?
I am not
Lars Gullik Bjønnes writes:
> We (I) and agreed deadline with trolltech/nokie that aussie will be turned
> off the 23. This is in one week.
>
> Before then all services running on aussie must be moved to other places. So
> far mail for lyx developers have been moved.
OK
> We
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
This is to give you an update on what is happening.
Lars, just a word of thanks for doing all of this. Must be a real pain
in the ()&)(!
rh
> Perfect. So this mean that we abandon sourceforge completely, right?
>
> So far, the plan looks good.
Right, after all the debates, Lars dictates.
Bo
Alex Fernandez schrieb:
The LyX code looked weird to me:
\begin_inset Formula \[
\sum_{\mathclap{\substack{0
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Juergen?
OK.
Jürgen
rgheck wrote:
> > I'd implement it in the InsetQuote rather.
> >
> >
>
> That seems hard (i.e., nearly impossible), since csquotes provides
> commands, with a beginning and an end, whereas InsetQuote is a
> standalone thing. You could certainly have InsetQuote sometimes output
> "\enquote{" and
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5709
>
> This long standing bug is now easy to fix by means of command-alternatives.
> However, the toolbar is not yet prepared to command-alternatives. The
> attached patch implements a simple solution: just use the icon for the
90 matches
Mail list logo