Re: r35662 - in lyx-devel/trunk/src: . frontends/qt4

On 10/20/2010 08:59 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote: Am Dienstag, den 19.10.2010, 20:40 -0400 schrieb Richard Heck: I think what's happening is this. If you export pdf (say) without there already being a pdf file there, then everything is fine. But if the pdf file exists, then LyX will try to ask

Re: [RFC] [patch] bug 6944: crash on drag and drop multiple files

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Does this make sense? Nobody? Jürgen

Re: r35760 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4

This does not look ok. If the dialog is on the initial state, the restore button should not be enabled at all. I think the dialog is erroneously is the initial state. Op 21 okt 2010 20:25 schreef rgh...@lyx.org: Author: rgheck Date: Thu Oct 21 20:25:15 2010 New Revision: 35760 URL:

Re: r35760 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4

On 10/21/2010 02:29 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: This does not look ok. If the dialog is on the initial state, the restore button should not be enabled at all. I think the dialog is erroneously is the initial state. Perhaps. It looks like restore() is being called twice. Once at the

Re: r35760 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote: On 10/21/2010 02:29 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: This does not look ok. If the dialog is on the initial state, the restore button should not be enabled at all. I think the dialog is erroneously is the initial state.

Re: r35760 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4

On 10/21/2010 05:03 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Richard Heckrgh...@comcast.net wrote: On 10/21/2010 02:29 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: This does not look ok. If the dialog is on the initial state, the restore button should not be enabled

Re: r35760 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4

Yes. Because paramstodialog made the status change to valid and enabled the restore button even when the user didn't change anything yet. Or we add the same if before bc.restore, or change buttoncontroller to offer the possibility to change some fields without changing its status. Op 21 okt 2010

Re: r35575 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

Stephan Witt wrote: If the principle way is ok I can do the same for the RCS and SVN backend too. One question regarding the View log button of repoUpdate: here on Mac the dialog to display the log is unusable. It is blocked by the next confirmation dialog. Is this platform

Re: r35662 - in lyx-devel/trunk/src: . frontends/qt4

Richard Heck wrote: On 10/20/2010 08:59 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote: Am Dienstag, den 19.10.2010, 20:40 -0400 schrieb Richard Heck: I think what's happening is this. If you export pdf (say) without there already being a pdf file there, then everything is fine. But if the pdf file exists, then

Re: [PATCH] Sweave support (was: Re: Beta plans (again, again))

Gregor GORJANC wrote: I finally found some time for making an infrastructure for running sweave with our own customizations. As you can see the patch is trivial, but I would like to be sure that it works on windows. Can I download somewhere a binary to test this? there will be new

Re: r35662 - in lyx-devel/trunk/src: . frontends/qt4

Status bar: Moving icons. Text. Messages. Op 22 okt 2010 01:13 schreef Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org: Richard Heck wrote: On 10/20/2010 08:59 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote: Am Dienstag, den 19.10.2010, 20... i checked that export works on simple document here too. but now we have new problem - how to

Beta (status update #1, was: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs)

Pavel Sanda wrote: hi, status update #1, the most urgent bug is gone. 1) short resume for things we need before releasing beta - Richard has some pending work on lyx2lyx which will finish some JMarc work. - pending patch from Gregory Jefferis for CT, Vincent might have look on it.

Re: [RFC] [patch] bug 6944: crash on drag and drop multiple files

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: The second thing I did is fixing a thinko (I think). In this thinko-part smells like trunk stuff unless it really fixes something. pavel

Re: r35767 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/doc

sa...@lyx.org wrote: Author: sanda Date: Fri Oct 22 01:34:22 2010 New Revision: 35767 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/35767 Log: (no log message) Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/lib/doc/Additional.lyx i looked why lyx ignored my message and it looks that

Re: r35575 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

Stephan Witt wrote: I made a new patch to implement getDiff() and use it to avoid the query for log message before checkIn() is done and the confirmation on revert when no diff is found. thanks for your patience, i went closely through the patch now and generally liked the approach.

Re: r35662 - in lyx-devel/trunk/src: . frontends/qt4

On 10/20/2010 08:59 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote: Am Dienstag, den 19.10.2010, 20:40 -0400 schrieb Richard Heck: I think what's happening is this. If you export pdf (say) without there already being a pdf file there, then everything is fine. But if the pdf file exists, then LyX will try to ask

Re: [RFC] [patch] bug 6944: crash on drag and drop multiple files

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Does this make sense? Nobody? Jürgen

Re: r35760 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4

This does not look ok. If the dialog is on the initial state, the restore button should not be enabled at all. I think the dialog is erroneously is the initial state. Op 21 okt 2010 20:25 schreef : Author: rgheck Date: Thu Oct 21 20:25:15 2010 New Revision: 35760 URL:

Re: r35760 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4

On 10/21/2010 02:29 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: This does not look ok. If the dialog is on the initial state, the restore button should not be enabled at all. I think the dialog is erroneously is the initial state. Perhaps. It looks like restore() is being called twice. Once at the

Re: r35760 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Richard Heck wrote: > On 10/21/2010 02:29 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: >> >> This does not look ok. If the dialog is on the initial state, the restore >> button should not be enabled at all. >> >> I think the dialog is erroneously is the

Re: r35760 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4

On 10/21/2010 05:03 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Richard Heck wrote: On 10/21/2010 02:29 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: This does not look ok. If the dialog is on the initial state, the restore button should not be enabled

Re: r35760 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4

Yes. Because paramstodialog made the status change to valid and enabled the restore button even when the user didn't change anything yet. Or we add the same "if" before bc.restore, or change buttoncontroller to offer the possibility to change some fields without changing its status. Op 21 okt

Re: r35575 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

Stephan Witt wrote: > >> If the principle way is ok I can do the same for the RCS and SVN backend > >> too. > >> > >> One question regarding the "View log" button of repoUpdate: > >> here on Mac the dialog to display the log is unusable. > >> It is blocked by the next confirmation dialog. >

Re: r35662 - in lyx-devel/trunk/src: . frontends/qt4

Richard Heck wrote: > On 10/20/2010 08:59 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote: >> Am Dienstag, den 19.10.2010, 20:40 -0400 schrieb Richard Heck: >> >>> I think what's happening is this. If you export pdf (say) without there >>> already being a pdf file there, then everything is fine. But if the pdf >>>

Re: [PATCH] Sweave support (was: Re: Beta plans (again, again))

Gregor GORJANC wrote: > > I finally found some time for making an infrastructure for running sweave > > with our own customizations. As you can see the patch is trivial, but > > I would like to be sure that it works on windows. > > Can I download somewhere a binary to test this? there will be

Re: r35662 - in lyx-devel/trunk/src: . frontends/qt4

Status bar: Moving icons. Text. Messages. Op 22 okt 2010 01:13 schreef "Pavel Sanda" : Richard Heck wrote: > On 10/20/2010 08:59 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote: >> Am Dienstag, den 19.10.2010, 20... i checked that export works on simple document here too. but now we have new problem - how

Beta (status update #1, was: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs)

Pavel Sanda wrote: > hi, status update #1, the most urgent bug is gone. > 1) short resume for things we need before releasing beta > - Richard has some pending work on lyx2lyx which will finish some JMarc work. > - pending patch from Gregory Jefferis for CT, Vincent might have look on it.

Re: [RFC] [patch] bug 6944: crash on drag and drop multiple files

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > The second thing I did is fixing a thinko (I think). In this thinko-part smells like trunk stuff unless it really fixes something. pavel

Re: r35767 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/doc

sa...@lyx.org wrote: > Author: sanda > Date: Fri Oct 22 01:34:22 2010 > New Revision: 35767 > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/35767 > > Log: > (no log message) > > Modified: >lyx-devel/trunk/lib/doc/Additional.lyx i looked why lyx ignored my message and it looks that

Re: r35575 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

Stephan Witt wrote: > I made a new patch to implement getDiff() and use it to avoid the query for > log message > before checkIn() is done and the confirmation on revert when no diff is found. thanks for your patience, i went closely through the patch now and generally liked the approach. >