Re: autoconf vs cmake vs scons

Am Sonntag, 11. September 2011 schrieb Julien Rioux: On 11/09/2011 12:02 PM, Kornel wrote: ... With autoconf, when you `make` you get binaries, without suffix, in the src/ subdir of the build dir (and in the case of tex2lyx, in the src/tex2lyx subsubdir). This is the finicky part for me.

Re: drag in outline panel?

Le 11/09/2011 22:37, Xu Wang a écrit : exactly what I was looking for, thanks! I'm guessing if there hasn't been much movement in 3 years then I'm out of luck. Oh well. On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 4:42 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org mailto:sp...@lyx.org wrote: Xu Wang wrote:

Re: autoconf vs cmake vs scons

Le 12/09/2011 08:55, Kornel a écrit : In cmake you get suffixes in build-run, because it is easier to install data without renaming them. The opposite was true for autoconf :) I do not have a preference for any of these, actually. I suspect that changing $PACKAGE in autoconf to add the

Re: About our bug in treating spaces from copied text

Le 29/08/2011 15:40, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : In which sense is the LaTeX list environment designed to show typewriter code? It allows free spacing, so that you can insert multiple spaces and LaTeX will respect them. It moreover allows to format your text in the way you like - like in our case

Re: autoconf vs cmake vs scons

Am Montag, 12. September 2011 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: Le 12/09/2011 08:55, Kornel a écrit : In cmake you get suffixes in build-run, because it is easier to install data without renaming them. The opposite was true for autoconf :) I do not have a preference for any of these,

Re: drag in outline panel?

On 09/12/2011 04:24 AM, Michel Lavaud wrote: Le 11/09/2011 22:37, Xu Wang a écrit : exactly what I was looking for, thanks! I'm guessing if there hasn't been much movement in 3 years then I'm out of luck. Oh well. On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 4:42 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüllersp...@lyx.org

Re: [Pub-forum] ebook follies

Rob Oakes has also done some work along these lines, but starting with LyX's internal XHTML export. Yes, and still working on it. For plain vanilla books, LyX does a fantastic job for exporting to XHTML (and from there to ePub). But there are a couple of sticking points that aren't quite as

Re: autoconf vs cmake vs scons

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: I am going to try scons today and report back. Scons is going to be dropped some time from now. So you might want to spend your time in a more useful way. I do not know the latest plans on the build system front. Is there any reason why it can not be dropped

Re: autoconf vs cmake vs scons

Op 12-9-2011 20:50, Georg Baum schreef: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: I am going to try scons today and report back. Scons is going to be dropped some time from now. So you might want to spend your time in a more useful way. I do not know the latest plans on the build system front. Is there

Re: [Pub-forum] ebook follies

On Monday, September 12, 2011 01:10:07 PM Rob Oakes wrote: Rob Oakes has also done some work along these lines, but starting with LyX's internal XHTML export. Yes, and still working on it. For plain vanilla books, LyX does a fantastic job for exporting to XHTML (and from there to ePub).

Re: [patch] prefs2prefs

On 07/09/2011 3:46 PM, Richard Heck wrote: On 09/07/2011 08:35 AM, Julien Rioux wrote: Richard, ok to modify prefs2prefs so that it corresponds better with how lyx2lyx defines conversions? Any way you want to clean it up is fine with me. I wrote it very quickly, since we really needed it for

Re: [patch] allow to assign several extensions to a file format

On 07/09/2011 11:40 PM, Richard Heck wrote: On 09/07/2011 02:17 PM, Julien Rioux wrote: On 07/09/2011 7:04 PM, Richard Heck wrote: On 09/07/2011 11:51 AM, Julien Rioux wrote: On 07/09/2011 3:37 PM, Richard Heck wrote: bool Format::dummy() const @@ -101,6 +105,20 @@ bool Format::dummy() const

Re: [patch] update and merge lyxpreview mechanisms

On 12/09/2011 7:37 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Julien Rioux wrote: Any reason to keep those \ifpdf etc. around, i.e. were these used for something else besides the color handling? We used it to pass the correct driver (pdftex,dvips,xetex) to preview-latex. You should check the package's

Re: [Pub-forum] ebook follies

On 09/12/2011 01:10 PM, Rob Oakes wrote: Rob Oakes has also done some work along these lines, but starting with LyX's internal XHTML export. Yes, and still working on it. For plain vanilla books, LyX does a fantastic job for exporting to XHTML (and from there to ePub). But there are a couple

Re: [Pub-forum] ebook follies

Hi, On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote: Last time I looked, elyxer did pretty much the same sort of thing, but had footnotes styled with things like float: right;, rather than with the appearing and disappearing act they do in LyX. But the real issue, as we

Re: [Pub-forum] ebook follies

Hi Richard, I'll see if I can't sort out the footnote issue at some point. Last I thought about it, it didn't seem as hard as I'd thought, since we do have a list of all the footnotes in the TOC Let me pack up what I've already written and send it to the list for comment. I've got a

[PATCH] Detect boost_signal with autoconf with a C++ compiler

Hey there, I maintain the LyX port on FreeBSD, and was recently contacted by a user who was not able to built LyX with GCC 4.5 due to autoconf trying to use gcc instead of g++ to build the source code used to link to boost (LyX is built with --without-included-boost). The patch below should fix

Re: Output file-name when exporting from command-line.

Il 11/09/2011 19:24, Tommaso Cucinotta ha scritto: Il 10/09/2011 01:39, Tommaso Cucinotta ha scritto: However, graphics files are not copied, so the exported latex cannot compile unless you copy the additionally needed external files. Independently on whether the output folder is explicitly

Re: drag in outline panel?

Thank you, Richard, for the explanation. It makes sense that convenience feature requests are not high on anyone's priority list. Xu On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote: On 09/12/2011 04:24 AM, Michel Lavaud wrote: Le 11/09/2011 22:37, Xu Wang a écrit :

Re: autoconf vs cmake vs scons

Am Sonntag, 11. September 2011 schrieb Julien Rioux: > On 11/09/2011 12:02 PM, Kornel wrote: ... > > With autoconf, when you `make` you get binaries, without suffix, in the > src/ subdir of the build dir (and in the case of tex2lyx, in the > src/tex2lyx subsubdir). This is the finicky part for

Re: drag in outline panel?

Le 11/09/2011 22:37, Xu Wang a écrit : > exactly what I was looking for, thanks! I'm guessing if there hasn't > been much movement in 3 years then I'm out of luck. Oh well. > > On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 4:42 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller > wrote: > > Xu Wang

Re: autoconf vs cmake vs scons

Le 12/09/2011 08:55, Kornel a écrit : In cmake you get suffixes in build-run, because it is easier to install data without renaming them. The opposite was true for autoconf :) I do not have a preference for any of these, actually. I suspect that changing $PACKAGE in autoconf to add the

Re: About our bug in treating spaces from copied text

Le 29/08/2011 15:40, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : In which sense is the LaTeX list environment designed to show typewriter code? It allows free spacing, so that you can insert multiple spaces and LaTeX will respect them. It moreover allows to format your text in the way you like - like in our case

Re: autoconf vs cmake vs scons

Am Montag, 12. September 2011 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > Le 12/09/2011 08:55, Kornel a écrit : > > In cmake you get suffixes in build-run, because it is easier to install > > data without renaming them. > > The opposite was true for autoconf :) I do not have a preference for any > of these,

Re: drag in outline panel?

On 09/12/2011 04:24 AM, Michel Lavaud wrote: Le 11/09/2011 22:37, Xu Wang a écrit : exactly what I was looking for, thanks! I'm guessing if there hasn't been much movement in 3 years then I'm out of luck. Oh well. On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 4:42 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller

Re: [Pub-forum] ebook follies

> Rob Oakes has also done some work along these lines, but starting with > LyX's internal XHTML export. Yes, and still working on it. For plain vanilla books, LyX does a fantastic job for exporting to XHTML (and from there to ePub). But there are a couple of sticking points that aren't quite as

Re: autoconf vs cmake vs scons

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: >> I am going to try scons today and report back. >> > > Scons is going to be dropped some time from now. So you might want to > spend your time in a more useful way. I do not know the latest plans on the build system front. Is there any reason why it can not be

Re: autoconf vs cmake vs scons

Op 12-9-2011 20:50, Georg Baum schreef: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: I am going to try scons today and report back. Scons is going to be dropped some time from now. So you might want to spend your time in a more useful way. I do not know the latest plans on the build system front. Is there

Re: [Pub-forum] ebook follies

On Monday, September 12, 2011 01:10:07 PM Rob Oakes wrote: > > Rob Oakes has also done some work along these lines, but starting > > with LyX's internal XHTML export. > > Yes, and still working on it. For plain vanilla books, LyX does a > fantastic job for exporting to XHTML (and from there to

Re: [patch] prefs2prefs

On 07/09/2011 3:46 PM, Richard Heck wrote: On 09/07/2011 08:35 AM, Julien Rioux wrote: Richard, ok to modify prefs2prefs so that it corresponds better with how lyx2lyx defines conversions? Any way you want to clean it up is fine with me. I wrote it very quickly, since we really needed it for

Re: [patch] allow to assign several extensions to a file format

On 07/09/2011 11:40 PM, Richard Heck wrote: On 09/07/2011 02:17 PM, Julien Rioux wrote: On 07/09/2011 7:04 PM, Richard Heck wrote: On 09/07/2011 11:51 AM, Julien Rioux wrote: On 07/09/2011 3:37 PM, Richard Heck wrote: bool Format::dummy() const @@ -101,6 +105,20 @@ bool Format::dummy() const

Re: [patch] update and merge lyxpreview mechanisms

On 12/09/2011 7:37 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Julien Rioux wrote: Any reason to keep those \ifpdf etc. around, i.e. were these used for something else besides the color handling? We used it to pass the correct driver (pdftex,dvips,xetex) to preview-latex. You should check the package's

Re: [Pub-forum] ebook follies

On 09/12/2011 01:10 PM, Rob Oakes wrote: Rob Oakes has also done some work along these lines, but starting with LyX's internal XHTML export. Yes, and still working on it. For plain vanilla books, LyX does a fantastic job for exporting to XHTML (and from there to ePub). But there are a couple

Re: [Pub-forum] ebook follies

Hi, On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Richard Heck wrote: > Last time I looked, elyxer did pretty much the same sort of thing, but had > footnotes styled with things like "float: right;", rather than with the > appearing and disappearing act they do in LyX. But the real

Re: [Pub-forum] ebook follies

Hi Richard, > I'll see if I can't sort out the footnote issue at some point. Last I thought > about it, it didn't seem as hard as I'd thought, since we do have a list of > all the footnotes in the TOC Let me pack up what I've already written and send it to the list for comment. I've got a

[PATCH] Detect boost_signal with autoconf with a C++ compiler

Hey there, I maintain the LyX port on FreeBSD, and was recently contacted by a user who was not able to built LyX with GCC 4.5 due to autoconf trying to use gcc instead of g++ to build the source code used to link to boost (LyX is built with --without-included-boost). The patch below should fix

Re: Output file-name when exporting from command-line.

Il 11/09/2011 19:24, Tommaso Cucinotta ha scritto: Il 10/09/2011 01:39, Tommaso Cucinotta ha scritto: However, graphics files are not copied, so the exported latex cannot compile unless you copy the additionally needed external files. Independently on whether the output folder is explicitly

Re: drag in outline panel?

Thank you, Richard, for the explanation. It makes sense that convenience feature requests are not high on anyone's priority list. Xu On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Richard Heck wrote: > On 09/12/2011 04:24 AM, Michel Lavaud wrote: > >> Le 11/09/2011 22:37, Xu Wang a écrit