Re: tar'ed boost headers

Peter Kümmel syntheti...@gmx.net writes: | On 20.11.2011 23:23, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Peter Kümmelsyntheti...@gmx.net writes: | Currently we have 4800 files in trunk. | 1500 file are boost headers. These 1500 | files we never touch, but we check them out, | check them for changes, and

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net writes: | Am 20.11.2011 um 23:16 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes: Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net writes: | Am 08.11.2011 um 22:40 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 08/11/2011 22:10, Peter Kümmel wrote: On 08.11.2011 22:07, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Op 8-11-2011

Re: Some warnings with gcc 4.7

André Pönitz andre.poen...@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de writes: | On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:46:10PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Even if gcc 4.7 has not been released (quite far from), it might be nice to test compile with it anyway. | Sure. | Here are the results: GuiWorkArea.cpp:

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

Peter Kümmel syntheti...@gmx.net writes: | On 21.11.2011 00:02, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: This is boost warning if I am not mistaken. I guess the boost people can trivially change this to std::unique_ptr. Systemcall.cpp: In constructor

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

Peter Kümmel syntheti...@gmx.net writes: | On 21.11.2011 00:02, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: This seems to be our own problem. Unless it is something we inherit from Qt. Ahh nice... it is Qt. And the wonderfull non-c++ parts of Qt. Oh well... I'll wait half a year before repeating that test.

Re: r40211 - in lyx-devel/trunk/src: . insets

Le 21/11/2011 03:20, Richard Heck a écrit : You have to call recordUndoFullDocument (should be recordUndoBufferParams, but alas this does not exist) on the master buffer, then. But I do not see where is the magic code that gives the master buffer. I'll have a look at this. Before I do, is

Re: Re: Trunk not compilable with new boost?

Am Sonntag, 20. November 2011 um 21:51:25, schrieb Peter Kümmel syntheti...@gmx.net On 20.11.2011 21:31, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Sonntag, 20. November 2011 um 20:57:24, schrieb Kornel Benkokor...@lyx.org I get now: ... Linking CXX executable ../bin/lyx ...

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

Am 21.11.2011 um 09:54 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes: Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net writes: | Am 20.11.2011 um 23:16 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes: Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net writes: | Am 08.11.2011 um 22:40 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 08/11/2011 22:10, Peter Kümmel wrote: On

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:11:11AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Peter Kümmel syntheti...@gmx.net writes: | On 21.11.2011 00:02, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: This is boost warning if I am not mistaken. I guess the boost people can trivially change this to std::unique_ptr.

Lyx Mirror on Cybermirror.org in Germany back online

Hi, we had some serious hardware troubles and were forced to change servers. This caused a rather long downtime for the mirror and I'm sorry for any inconvenience this may have brought along. But now we found a reliable provider and the Lyx mirror is back up and running again :-)

Re: Some warnings with gcc 4.7

On 21/11/2011 10:07, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: André Pönitz andre.poen...@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de writes: | On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:46:10PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Even if gcc 4.7 has not been released (quite far from), it might be nice to test compile with it anyway. |

Re: Potential fix for slowness on X11 (Re: r39932 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4

On 21/11/2011 11:28, Helge Hafting wrote: I failed to test the patch. It does not apply to the 2.1 sources, and not 2.0.2 either. There is nothing to apply, you just have to uncomment the definition of USE_QIMAGE at the top of GuiWorkArea_Private.h Abdel.

Re: Some warnings with gcc 4.7

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:07:51AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: André Pönitz andre.poen...@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de writes: | On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:46:10PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Even if gcc 4.7 has not been released (quite far from), it might be nice to test

Re: Some warnings with gcc 4.7

On 21/11/2011 21:24, André Pönitz wrote: On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:07:51AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: André Pönitzandre.poen...@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de writes: | On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:46:10PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Even if gcc 4.7 has not been released (quite far

Re: Lyx Mirror on Cybermirror.org in Germany back online

Sascha Schwarz wrote: Hi, we had some serious hardware troubles and were forced to change servers. This caused a rather long downtime for the mirror and I'm sorry for any inconvenience this may have brought along. But now we found a reliable provider and the Lyx mirror is back up and

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

On 21.11.2011 08:51, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Actaully I would argue that he, and you. are the ones doing it wrong. Wrong? Why? I understand that it's not wise to force everybody to reply-to list. But if I decide to get the reply only once and get it from the list... what's wrong with

Re: tar'ed boost headers

On 21.11.2011 09:51, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Peter Kümmelsyntheti...@gmx.net writes: | On 20.11.2011 23:23, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Peter Kümmelsyntheti...@gmx.net writes: | Currently we have 4800 files in trunk. | 1500 file are boost headers. These 1500 | files we never touch, but

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

On 21.11.2011 10:10, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Peter Kümmelsyntheti...@gmx.net writes: | On 21.11.2011 00:02, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: This seems to be our own problem. Unless it is something we inherit from Qt. Ahh nice... it is Qt. And the wonderfull non-c++ parts of Qt. Oh well... I'll

Re: Trunk not compilable with new boost?

On 21.11.2011 11:29, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Sonntag, 20. November 2011 um 21:51:25, schrieb Peter Kümmelsyntheti...@gmx.net On 20.11.2011 21:31, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Sonntag, 20. November 2011 um 20:57:24, schrieb Kornel Benkokor...@lyx.org I get now: ... Linking CXX executable ../bin/lyx

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

On 21.11.2011 08:28, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 20.11.2011 um 23:16 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes: Stephan Wittst.w...@gmx.net writes: | Am 08.11.2011 um 22:40 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 08/11/2011 22:10, Peter Kümmel wrote: On 08.11.2011 22:07, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Op 8-11-2011

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

On 21.11.2011 11:46, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 21.11.2011 um 09:54 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes: Stephan Wittst.w...@gmx.net writes: | Am 20.11.2011 um 23:16 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes: Stephan Wittst.w...@gmx.net writes: | Am 08.11.2011 um 22:40 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 08/11/2011

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

On 21.11.2011 20:50, André Pönitz wrote: On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:11:11AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Peter Kümmelsyntheti...@gmx.net writes: | On 21.11.2011 00:02, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: This is boost warning if I am not mistaken. I guess the boost people can trivially change

RE: Lyx Mirror on Cybermirror.org in Germany back online

Hi Pavel, files deleted on official ftp were not deleted on cybermirror fixed now? We are using wget currently so old files won't get deleted - but we could set up rsync instead if you provide the command needed. Cheers, Sascha

Re: Some warnings with gcc 4.7

On 21.11.2011 21:24, André Pönitz wrote: First guess: gcc sees 'virtual' on two member functions but no virtual destructor, cannot prove that delete operates only on static type == Yes, seems the warning is completely valid: GuiWorkArea::Private has a virtual table but no virtual destructor.

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

I use thunderbird, and all I know now is that I have to somehow install locally a duplicate filter. I use thunderbird as well. And I didn't install any filter. Maybe its the mailserver. I use gmail (lyx.org) and previously the email of work. Never saw any duplication? Maybe you can try

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:44:04PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: On 21.11.2011 20:50, André Pönitz wrote: On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:11:11AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Peter Kümmelsyntheti...@gmx.net writes: | On 21.11.2011 00:02, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: This is boost warning if I

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: No, because you're forcing your will onto others. If I want to reply to you, I don't want you to overrule me by sending my reply to the list. :) Vincent, you don't want to reply to me. you simply don't have email client (or at least at the time we flamed about it)

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

On 21.11.2011 23:11, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: I use thunderbird, and all I know now is that I have to somehow install locally a duplicate filter. I use thunderbird as well. And I didn't install any filter. Maybe its the mailserver. I use gmail (lyx.org) and previously the email of

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

On 21.11.2011 23:11, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: I use thunderbird, and all I know now is that I have to somehow install locally a duplicate filter. I use thunderbird as well. And I didn't install any filter. And I tought I missed something. My current workflow is: - click reply

Re: Lyx Mirror on Cybermirror.org in Germany back online

Sascha Schwarz wrote: Hi Pavel, files deleted on official ftp were not deleted on cybermirror fixed now? We are using wget currently so old files won't get deleted - but we could set up rsync instead if you provide the command needed. ftp.lyx.org should support rsync as well. Can you try

Re: Some warnings with gcc 4.7

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:53:49PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: On 21.11.2011 21:24, André Pönitz wrote: First guess: gcc sees 'virtual' on two member functions but no virtual destructor, cannot prove that delete operates only on static type == Yes, seems the warning is completely valid:

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

Op 21 nov. 2011 23:17 schreef Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org het volgende: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: No, because you're forcing your will onto others. If I want to reply to you, I don't want you to overrule me by sending my reply to the list. :) Vincent, you don't want to reply to me. you

Re: r40229 - lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_2_0_X/src

Richard Heck wrote: I've convinced myself that this is the correct approach, so I've committed this to branch now. We can test it a bit over the next few days. If we see any more problems, then we will back it out and delay the fix for #7593, as Pavel suggested. I would rather not do that,

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

And won't have, as long as the core steers the gui [ 1/2 ;-) ] Andre' And the core will be steering the GUI as long as we can't use qt signals in the core. Vincent

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:16 PM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: No, because you're forcing your will onto others. If I want to reply to you, I don't want you to overrule me by sending my reply to the list. :) Vincent, you don't want to reply to me. you simply

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: So every poster to our lists must be subscribed to it and should follow the list closely for quite some time to see whether someone answers his question? of course not. but its very easy to distinguish newbie or once-a-year appearing dev and reply appropriately.

RE: Lyx Mirror on Cybermirror.org in Germany back online

Hi Pavel, ftp.lyx.org should support rsync as well. Can you try it? rsync: failed to connect to ftp.lyx.org: Connection refused (111) rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at clientserver.c(122) [receiver=3.0.4] Can you provide the complete rsync-command to use? Couln't find it on the web

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

i actually like your preference of git community model and we shall kill our bug tracker as soon as possible, it just sucks :) pavel Yes, good idea. Our software only looks bad if you tell someone there are over 1000 bugs in it. It becomes even worse if you tell him that noone cares about

tufte-book disables geometry

Hi, I noticed I was unable to change the paper size when I used the tufte-book class, and the reason is this line in tufte-book.layout: Provides geometry 1 I do not know why it should be forbidden to change the paper size in this case. After googling for a while, I found one who had the same

Re: Lyx Mirror on Cybermirror.org in Germany back online

Sascha Schwarz wrote: Hi Pavel, ftp.lyx.org should support rsync as well. Can you try it? rsync: failed to connect to ftp.lyx.org: Connection refused (111) rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at clientserver.c(122) [receiver=3.0.4] Can you provide the complete rsync-command to

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

On 11/21/2011 03:13 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: i actually like your preference of git community model and we shall kill our bug tracker as soon as possible, it just sucks :) pavel Yes, good idea. Our software only looks bad if you tell someone there are over 1000 bugs in it. It

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

Raymond Lillard wrote: Would you rather let someone find them all by themselves and in the process waste a lot of their time on something that is not a usage error on their part? Bugs need to be tracked and published. fortunately the server is so slow that most complaining users disappear

Re: tufte-book disables geometry

OK, now I see the rationale: tufte-book loads geometry by default, so geometry options are easy to clash if we set them directly in LyX. Instead of disabling geometry in LyX document settings, is it possible to disable \usepackage{geometry} in the source in the case of Provides geometry 1 ? I

RE: Lyx Mirror on Cybermirror.org in Germany back online

Hi Pavel, When try to look on _shortened_ names in your web listing of bin/2.0.0/. I changed the column width. Also updated files are replaced on your mirror or remain undetected We are currently using the wget --mirror command and it's an automated process so the files are handled

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

Am 21.11.2011 um 23:34 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Op 21 nov. 2011 23:17 schreef Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org het volgende: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: No, because you're forcing your will onto others. While you are giving me the great opportunity to read your mails twice :)

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

Op 22-11-2011 7:39, Stephan Witt schreef: Am 21.11.2011 um 23:34 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Op 21 nov. 2011 23:17 schreef Pavel Sandasa...@lyx.org het volgende: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: No, because you're forcing your will onto others. While you are giving me the great

Re: tar'ed boost headers

Peter Kümmel writes: | On 20.11.2011 23:23, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> Peter Kümmel writes: >> >> | Currently we have 4800 files in trunk. >> | 1500 file are boost headers. These 1500 >> | files we never touch, but we check them out, >> | check them

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

Stephan Witt writes: | Am 20.11.2011 um 23:16 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes: > >> Stephan Witt writes: >> >> | Am 08.11.2011 um 22:40 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: >>> On 08/11/2011 22:10, Peter Kümmel wrote: > On 08.11.2011 22:07, Vincent van Ravesteijn

Re: Some warnings with gcc 4.7

André Pönitz writes: | On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:46:10PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> >> Even if gcc 4.7 has not been released (quite far from), it might be >> nice to test compile with it anyway. > | Sure. | >> Here are the results: >> >>

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

Peter Kümmel writes: | On 21.11.2011 00:02, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> This is boost warning if I am not mistaken. >> I guess the boost people can trivially change this to std::unique_ptr. >> >> Systemcall.cpp: In constructor >>

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

Peter Kümmel writes: | On 21.11.2011 00:02, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> This seems to be our own problem. >> Unless it is something we inherit from Qt. >> Ahh nice... it is Qt. And the wonderfull non-c++ parts of Qt. >> >> Oh well... I'll wait half a year before repeating

Re: r40211 - in lyx-devel/trunk/src: . insets

Le 21/11/2011 03:20, Richard Heck a écrit : You have to call recordUndoFullDocument (should be recordUndoBufferParams, but alas this does not exist) on the master buffer, then. But I do not see where is the magic code that gives the master buffer. I'll have a look at this. Before I do, is

Re: Re: Trunk not compilable with new boost?

Am Sonntag, 20. November 2011 um 21:51:25, schrieb Peter Kümmel > On 20.11.2011 21:31, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Sonntag, 20. November 2011 um 20:57:24, schrieb Kornel > > Benko > >> I get now: > >> ... > >> Linking CXX executable ../bin/lyx > >> ... > >>

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

Am 21.11.2011 um 09:54 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes: > Stephan Witt writes: > > | Am 20.11.2011 um 23:16 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes: >> >>> Stephan Witt writes: >>> >>> | Am 08.11.2011 um 22:40 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > On 08/11/2011 22:10,

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:11:11AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Peter Kümmel writes: > > | On 21.11.2011 00:02, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > > >> This is boost warning if I am not mistaken. > >> I guess the boost people can trivially change this to std::unique_ptr.

Lyx Mirror on Cybermirror.org in Germany back online

Hi, we had some serious hardware troubles and were forced to change servers. This caused a rather long downtime for the mirror and I'm sorry for any inconvenience this may have brought along. But now we found a reliable provider and the Lyx mirror is back up and running again :-)

Re: Some warnings with gcc 4.7

On 21/11/2011 10:07, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: André Pönitz writes: | On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:46:10PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> >> Even if gcc 4.7 has not been released (quite far from), it might >> be nice to test compile with it

Re: Potential fix for slowness on X11 (Re: r39932 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4

On 21/11/2011 11:28, Helge Hafting wrote: I failed to test the patch. It does not apply to the 2.1 sources, and not 2.0.2 either. There is nothing to apply, you just have to uncomment the definition of USE_QIMAGE at the top of GuiWorkArea_Private.h Abdel.

Re: Some warnings with gcc 4.7

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:07:51AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > André Pönitz writes: > > | On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:46:10PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> > >> Even if gcc 4.7 has not been released (quite far from), it might be > >> nice

Re: Some warnings with gcc 4.7

On 21/11/2011 21:24, André Pönitz wrote: On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:07:51AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: André Pönitz writes: | On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:46:10PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Even if gcc 4.7 has not been released (quite far

Re: Lyx Mirror on Cybermirror.org in Germany back online

Sascha Schwarz wrote: > Hi, > > we had some serious hardware troubles and were forced to change servers. > > This caused a rather long downtime for the mirror and I'm sorry for any > inconvenience this may have brought along. > > But now we found a reliable provider and the Lyx mirror is back

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

On 21.11.2011 08:51, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Actaully I would argue that he, and you. are the ones doing it wrong. Wrong? Why? I understand that it's not wise to force everybody to reply-to list. But if I decide to get the reply only once and get it from the list... what's wrong with

Re: tar'ed boost headers

On 21.11.2011 09:51, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Peter Kümmel writes: | On 20.11.2011 23:23, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Peter Kümmel writes: | Currently we have 4800 files in trunk. | 1500 file are boost headers. These 1500 | files we never touch,

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

On 21.11.2011 10:10, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Peter Kümmel writes: | On 21.11.2011 00:02, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: This seems to be our own problem. Unless it is something we inherit from Qt. Ahh nice... it is Qt. And the wonderfull non-c++ parts of Qt. Oh well...

Re: Trunk not compilable with new boost?

On 21.11.2011 11:29, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Sonntag, 20. November 2011 um 21:51:25, schrieb Peter Kümmel On 20.11.2011 21:31, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Sonntag, 20. November 2011 um 20:57:24, schrieb Kornel Benko I get now: ... Linking CXX executable

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

On 21.11.2011 08:28, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 20.11.2011 um 23:16 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes: Stephan Witt writes: | Am 08.11.2011 um 22:40 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 08/11/2011 22:10, Peter Kümmel wrote: On 08.11.2011 22:07, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Op 8-11-2011

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

On 21.11.2011 11:46, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 21.11.2011 um 09:54 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes: Stephan Witt writes: | Am 20.11.2011 um 23:16 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes: Stephan Witt writes: | Am 08.11.2011 um 22:40 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

On 21.11.2011 20:50, André Pönitz wrote: On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:11:11AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Peter Kümmel writes: | On 21.11.2011 00:02, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: This is boost warning if I am not mistaken. I guess the boost people can trivially

RE: Lyx Mirror on Cybermirror.org in Germany back online

Hi Pavel, >>files deleted on official ftp were not deleted on cybermirror fixed now? We are using wget currently so old files won't get deleted - but we could set up rsync instead if you provide the command needed. Cheers, Sascha

Re: Some warnings with gcc 4.7

On 21.11.2011 21:24, André Pönitz wrote: First guess: gcc sees 'virtual' on two member functions but no virtual destructor, cannot prove that delete operates only on static type == Yes, seems the warning is completely valid: GuiWorkArea::Private has a virtual table but no virtual destructor.

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

> I use thunderbird, and all I know now is that I have to somehow install locally > a duplicate filter. > > I use thunderbird as well. And I didn't install any filter. Maybe its the mailserver. I use gmail (lyx.org) and previously the email of work. Never saw any duplication? Maybe you can try

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:44:04PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: > On 21.11.2011 20:50, André Pönitz wrote: > >On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:11:11AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >>Peter Kümmel writes: > >> > >>| On 21.11.2011 00:02, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >>> >

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > No, because you're forcing your will onto others. If I want to reply to > you, I don't want you to overrule me by sending my reply to the list. :) Vincent, you don't want to reply to me. you simply don't have email client (or at least at the time we flamed about

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

On 21.11.2011 23:11, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: I use thunderbird, and all I know now is that I have to somehow install locally a duplicate filter. I use thunderbird as well. And I didn't install any filter. Maybe its the mailserver. I use gmail (lyx.org) and previously the email of

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

On 21.11.2011 23:11, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: I use thunderbird, and all I know now is that I have to somehow install locally a duplicate filter. I use thunderbird as well. And I didn't install any filter. And I tought I missed something. My current workflow is: - click reply

Re: Lyx Mirror on Cybermirror.org in Germany back online

Sascha Schwarz wrote: > Hi Pavel, > > >>files deleted on official ftp were not deleted on cybermirror fixed now? > > We are using wget currently so old files won't get deleted - but we could > set up rsync instead if you provide the command needed. ftp.lyx.org should support rsync as well. Can

Re: Some warnings with gcc 4.7

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:53:49PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: > On 21.11.2011 21:24, André Pönitz wrote: > > > >First guess: gcc sees 'virtual' on two member functions but no virtual > >destructor, cannot prove that delete operates only on static type == > > > > Yes, seems the warning is

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

Op 21 nov. 2011 23:17 schreef "Pavel Sanda" het volgende: > > Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > No, because you're forcing your will onto others. If I want to reply to > > you, I don't want you to overrule me by sending my reply to the list. > > :) > Vincent, you don't want to

Re: r40229 - lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_2_0_X/src

Richard Heck wrote: > I've convinced myself that this is the correct approach, so I've > committed this to branch now. We can test it a bit over the next few > days. If we see any more problems, then we will back it out and delay > the fix for #7593, as Pavel suggested. I would rather not do that,

Re: Compiling LyX with -std=gnu++1

> > And won't have, as long as the core steers the gui [ 1/2 ;-) ] > > Andre' And the core will be steering the GUI as long as we can't use qt signals in the core. Vincent

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:16 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: >> No, because you're forcing your will onto others. If I want to reply to >> you, I don't want you to overrule me by sending my reply to the list. > > :) > Vincent, you don't want to reply to me.

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > So every poster to our lists must be subscribed to it and should follow the > list closely for quite some time to see whether someone answers his > question? of course not. but its very easy to distinguish newbie or once-a-year appearing dev and reply

RE: Lyx Mirror on Cybermirror.org in Germany back online

Hi Pavel, >>>ftp.lyx.org should support rsync as well. Can you try it? rsync: failed to connect to ftp.lyx.org: Connection refused (111) rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at clientserver.c(122) [receiver=3.0.4] Can you provide the complete rsync-command to use? Couln't find it on the

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

> i actually like your preference of git community model and we shall kill our > bug tracker as soon as possible, it just sucks :) > > pavel Yes, good idea. Our software only looks bad if you tell someone there are over 1000 bugs in it. It becomes even worse if you tell him that noone cares about

tufte-book disables geometry

Hi, I noticed I was unable to change the paper size when I used the tufte-book class, and the reason is this line in tufte-book.layout: Provides geometry 1 I do not know why it should be forbidden to change the paper size in this case. After googling for a while, I found one who had the same

Re: Lyx Mirror on Cybermirror.org in Germany back online

Sascha Schwarz wrote: > Hi Pavel, > > >>>ftp.lyx.org should support rsync as well. Can you try it? > > rsync: failed to connect to ftp.lyx.org: Connection refused (111) > rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at clientserver.c(122) > [receiver=3.0.4] > > Can you provide the complete

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

On 11/21/2011 03:13 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: i actually like your preference of git community model and we shall kill our bug tracker as soon as possible, it just sucks :) pavel Yes, good idea. Our software only looks bad if you tell someone there are over 1000 bugs in it. It

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

Raymond Lillard wrote: > Would you rather let someone find them all by themselves > and in the process waste a lot of their time on something > that is not a usage error on their part? > > Bugs need to be tracked and published. fortunately the server is so slow that most complaining users

Re: tufte-book disables geometry

OK, now I see the rationale: tufte-book loads geometry by default, so geometry options are easy to clash if we set them directly in LyX. Instead of disabling geometry in LyX document settings, is it possible to disable \usepackage{geometry} in the source in the case of Provides geometry 1 ? I

RE: Lyx Mirror on Cybermirror.org in Germany back online

Hi Pavel, >>>When try to look on _shortened_ names in your web listing of bin/2.0.0/. I changed the column width. >>>Also updated files are replaced on your mirror or remain undetected We are currently using the wget --mirror command and it's an automated process so the files are handled

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

Am 21.11.2011 um 23:34 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: > > Op 21 nov. 2011 23:17 schreef "Pavel Sanda" het volgende: > > > > Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > > No, because you're forcing your will onto others. While you are giving me the great opportunity to read your mails

Re: 'Reply' sends to list.

Op 22-11-2011 7:39, Stephan Witt schreef: Am 21.11.2011 um 23:34 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Op 21 nov. 2011 23:17 schreef "Pavel Sanda" het volgende: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: No, because you're forcing your will onto others. While you are giving me the great