Re: [LyX master] An IPA toolbar

2012/8/21 Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org: This is really a big set of translation strings. Yes, and probably not easy to translate for a non-linguist. I suggest you look up for an IPA (or phonetics) website in your language to get the translations. Jürgen Kornel

RE: [PATCH] LFUN_BUFFER_FORALL

From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [lasgout...@lyx.org] Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 4:45 AM The problem is that the LFUN is mixing real hidden buffers (visible nowhere) with the ones that are visible in some other window. I think these two things are very different from a user point of view. Conclusion:

Re: [PATCH] LFUN_BUFFER_FORALL

Le 22/08/2012 09:04, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : I agree with the above points you made. LFUN_BUFFER_FORALL now supports multiple views and I tried to add some structure on the terms visible and hidden, which are now defined in the LFUN documentation. The language is kind of confusing, but I

Re: [LyX master] Fix bug #7741: incorrect locale when starting R from LyX?

Le 21/08/2012 16:59, Richard Heck a écrit : Since bug #7741 is very annoying for all external programs which do not like having weird locale settings, I think this should eventually go to branch. When you feel it's ready. Since getting testers on windows is more difficult, I will apply to

RE: [PATCH] LFUN_BUFFER_FORALL

From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [lasgout...@lyx.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 4:12 AM Le 22/08/2012 09:04, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : + * \li Notion: A buffer is `locally visible' with respect to a view if it + is visible within that view. If not, it is `locally hidden'. +

Re: [PATCH] LFUN_BUFFER_FORALL

Le 22/08/2012 11:06, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Do you really think that 'locally visible' and especially 'locally hidden' have real use cases, or are they just added for the sake of being complete? I would think that all/visible/hidden is good enough. What do you mean by visible here? Are you

RE: [PATCH] LFUN_BUFFER_FORALL

From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [lasgout...@lyx.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 6:27 AM I would revert the definition: a buffer is hidden if it is internally opened in LyX, but not visible in any window (rewritten into proper English) Sounds good. To make things really simple, what if only

Re: [LyX master] An IPA toolbar

2012/8/21 Kornel Benko : > This is really a big set of translation strings. Yes, and probably not easy to translate for a non-linguist. I suggest you look up for an IPA (or phonetics) website in your language to get the translations. Jürgen > Kornel

RE: [PATCH] LFUN_BUFFER_FORALL

From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [lasgout...@lyx.org] Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 4:45 AM >The problem is that the LFUN is mixing real hidden buffers (visible nowhere) >with the ones that are visible in some other window. I think these two things >are very different from a user point of view.

Re: [PATCH] LFUN_BUFFER_FORALL

Le 22/08/2012 09:04, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : I agree with the above points you made. LFUN_BUFFER_FORALL now supports multiple views and I tried to add some structure on the terms "visible" and "hidden", which are now defined in the LFUN documentation. The language is kind of confusing, but I

Re: [LyX master] Fix bug #7741: incorrect locale when starting R from LyX?

Le 21/08/2012 16:59, Richard Heck a écrit : Since bug #7741 is very annoying for all external programs which do not like having weird locale settings, I think this should eventually go to branch. When you feel it's ready. Since getting testers on windows is more difficult, I will apply to

RE: [PATCH] LFUN_BUFFER_FORALL

From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [lasgout...@lyx.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 4:12 AM >Le 22/08/2012 09:04, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >> + * \li Notion: A buffer is `locally visible' with respect to a view if it >> + is visible within that view. If not, it is `locally hidden'. >>

Re: [PATCH] LFUN_BUFFER_FORALL

Le 22/08/2012 11:06, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Do you really think that 'locally visible' and especially 'locally hidden' have real use cases, or are they just added for the sake of being complete? I would think that all/visible/hidden is good enough. What do you mean by "visible" here? Are

RE: [PATCH] LFUN_BUFFER_FORALL

From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [lasgout...@lyx.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 6:27 AM >I would revert the definition: "a buffer is hidden if it is internally >opened in LyX, but not visible in any window" (rewritten into proper >English) Sounds good. >> To make things really simple, what if