Re: [PATCH] LFUN_BUFFER_FORALL

Le 23/08/2012 06:19, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Currently buffer-forall rehides each hidden buffer after the LFUN is applied. Should it not do that? Is it because they had to be made visible earlier? JMarc

Re: Re: [LyX master] An IPA toolbar

Am Mittwoch, 22. August 2012 um 08:31:27, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org 2012/8/21 Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org: This is really a big set of translation strings. Yes, and probably not easy to translate for a non-linguist. I suggest you look up for an IPA (or phonetics) website in

RE: [PATCH] LFUN_BUFFER_FORALL

From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [lasgout...@lyx.org] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 4:41 AM Le 23/08/2012 06:19, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Currently buffer-forall rehides each hidden buffer after the LFUN is applied. Should it not do that? Is it because they had to be made visible earlier? I

[PATCH] Tracking correctly available translations (take 2)

This patch is an alternative to commit ed1515ef69, which introduced the installed_translations file. The new approach is to search for the .mo files. I did not want to do that at first because I feared that in some situations the files could be at some place where we do not expect them. But

Re: [PATCH] Tracking correctly available translations (take 2)

Am Donnerstag, 23. August 2012 um 15:38:29, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org This patch is an alternative to commit ed1515ef69, which introduced the installed_translations file. The new approach is to search for the .mo files. Which mo files are created? We would end with two

Re: [PATCH] Tracking correctly available translations (take 2)

Le 23/08/12 17:22, Kornel Benko a écrit : Am Donnerstag, 23. August 2012 um 15:38:29, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org Which mo files are created? We would end with two lists (automake and cmake) The mo files are the compiled .po file that we always have been installing in

Re: [PATCH] LFUN_BUFFER_FORALL

Le 23/08/2012 06:19, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Currently buffer-forall rehides each hidden buffer after the LFUN is applied. Should it not do that? Is it because they had to be made visible earlier? JMarc

Re: Re: [LyX master] An IPA toolbar

Am Mittwoch, 22. August 2012 um 08:31:27, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > 2012/8/21 Kornel Benko : > > This is really a big set of translation strings. > > Yes, and probably not easy to translate for a non-linguist. I suggest > you look up for an IPA (or phonetics)

RE: [PATCH] LFUN_BUFFER_FORALL

From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [lasgout...@lyx.org] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 4:41 AM >Le 23/08/2012 06:19, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >> Currently buffer-forall rehides each hidden buffer after the LFUN is applied. >> Should it not do that? >Is it because they had to be made visible earlier?

[PATCH] Tracking correctly available translations (take 2)

This patch is an alternative to commit ed1515ef69, which introduced the installed_translations file. The new approach is to search for the .mo files. I did not want to do that at first because I feared that in some situations the files could be at some place where we do not expect them. But

Re: [PATCH] Tracking correctly available translations (take 2)

Am Donnerstag, 23. August 2012 um 15:38:29, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > This patch is an alternative to commit ed1515ef69, which introduced the > installed_translations file. The new approach is to search for the .mo > files. Which mo files are created? We would end with

Re: [PATCH] Tracking correctly available translations (take 2)

Le 23/08/12 17:22, Kornel Benko a écrit : Am Donnerstag, 23. August 2012 um 15:38:29, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Which mo files are created? We would end with two lists (automake and cmake) The mo files are the compiled .po file that we always have been installing in