In article 517ee12b.4040...@lyx.org,
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote:
Le 28/04/2013 13:06, pdv a écrit :
OK, here is a new version. Let me know if you experience anymore
problems.
For the time being I've left the clean-up step of the map as it was,
although I realize it's
In article 5186ae01.4080...@lyx.org,
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote:
Le 05/05/13 20:36, pdv a écrit :
What exactly takes 17.4s?
I suppose that's the time taken by GuiPainter::text(), but I don't know
enough of the Instruments app and it's modules to give any more details.
Le 09/05/2013 09:37, pdv a écrit :
I've moved the code to GuiFontMetrics which is indeed much better.
Solved also a remaining issue with smallcaps.
Very good. Thanks.
JMarc
I have started to think seriously about moving to XML for LyX's native
file format. I doubt that we will want to do this for 2.1, as it is too
late, really, so I am thinking about doing it for some time early in the
2.2 cycle, which means starting now.
First of all, This is a very old
Public release of LyX version 2.0.6
===
We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 2.0.6. This is the sixth
maintenance release in the 2.0.x series.
LyX 2.0.6 is the result of on-going efforts to make our stable version
even more reliable and stable. We have
On Thursday 09 May 2013 09:38:01 Richard Heck wrote:
Public release of LyX version 2.0.6
Hi Richard,
note that the press release at http://www.lyx.org/News#item2 still
refers to the 2.0.5 announcement instead of the 2.0.6 as it should.
Regards,
--
José Abílio
On 05/09/2013 12:00 PM, José Matos wrote:
On Thursday 09 May 2013 09:38:01 Richard Heck wrote:
Public release of LyX version 2.0.6
Hi Richard,
note that the press release at http://www.lyx.org/News#item2 still
refers to the 2.0.5 announcement instead of the 2.0.6 as it should.
Hmm.
On 05/08/2013 06:24 PM, José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 08 May 2013 17:43:41 Richard Heck wrote:
Thinking ahead, however: Should we use some SAX library to read the XML? Or
should we just adapt the Lexer for this purpose?
Richard
Lars had that working for a previous version of lyx with lexer.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
I just had a look at those. He had an XML parser here:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyxsvn/lyx-devel/branches/personal/larsbj/xml/src/support/xmlparser.h?rev=19478
but it appears to be based upon xmlpp, which I cannot get
The link to the announcement on that page still points to
http://www.lyx.org/announce/2_0_5.txt (though the page
http://www.lyx.org/announce/2_0_6.txt exists).
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
On 05/09/2013 12:00 PM, José Matos wrote:
On Thursday 09 May 2013
On 05/09/2013 01:59 PM, Maria Gouskova wrote:
The link to the announcement on that page still points to
http://www.lyx.org/announce/2_0_5.txt (though the page
http://www.lyx.org/announce/2_0_6.txt exists).
Oh, I see. Thanks.
rh
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org
On 05/09/2013 01:39 PM, Rob Oakes wrote:
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
I just had a look at those. He had an XML parser here:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyxsvn/lyx-devel/branches/personal/larsbj/xml/src/support/xmlparser.h?rev=19478
but it appears
Richard Heck wrote:
On Linux, of course, it is different. One would just expect this library
already to be installed. But things do not work that way on the other OSs.
I belive we should actually _include_ some leightweight library in our sources
so it is fixed and we do not rely in any
Dear Lyx-develop,
thank you for your update and for the hard work for producing Lyx, which is a
very useful program.
However, I had some problem that was apparently not present in version 2.0.4
with the HTML export.
When I use the HTML export a window opens and asks the following question:
Dear Lyx-develop,
thank you for your update and for the hard work for producing Lyx, which is a
very useful program.
However, I had some problem that was apparently not present in version 2.0.4
with the HTML export.
When I use the HTML export a window opens and asks the following question:
Nicola Scafetta, Ph. D. wrote:
When I use the HTML export a window opens and asks the following question:
???How do you want to open this type of file (.py)
Does Tools-Reconfigure help?
P
No.
That is the first thing that I did.
nicola
-Original Message-
From: Pavel Sanda
Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2013 2:41 PM
To: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
Cc: nicola.scafe...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug on Lyx 2.0.6?
Nicola Scafetta, Ph. D. wrote:
When I use the HTML export a window opens
Nicola Scafetta, Ph. D. wrote:
No.
That is the first thing that I did.
Seems like python is not installed, I CC Uwe, he prepared windows installer, on
linux everything seems to be fine.
Pavel
I agree that on Linux everything looks fine.
The same problem that I am having with 2.0.6 was also present in 2.0.5.
It seems a problem with python or with elyxer.py
nicola
-Original Message-
From: Pavel Sanda
Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2013 2:51 PM
To: Nicola Scafetta, Ph. D.
Cc:
Nicola Scafetta, Ph. D. wrote:
When I use the HTML export a window opens and asks the following
question:
???How do you want to open this type of file (.py)
Does Tools-Reconfigure help?
P
No.
That is the first thing that I did.
nicola
This is really odd! Since the reconfigure
I simply downloaded this file
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/2.0.6/LyX-2.0.6-Installer-1.exe
and installed it following the default instructions. I did not change
anything.
May the problem be limited to elyxer.py that may be not well linked to
python ?
nicola
-Original Message-
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Alex Vergara Gil a...@cphr.edu.cu wrote:
First of all, This is a very old feature request that will be greatly
appreciated at least from my part!
Me too.
I think there are much work done in this sense, please read Nico Williams'
approach. I think is the
Alternatively, if the problem cannot be fixed, instead of using the
converter command
elyxer.py --directory $$r $$i $$o
may you suggest a different converter command that does not use elyxer.py as
it was with 2.0.4 and earlier version?
thank you.
nicola
-Original Message-
Nicola Scafetta, Ph. D. wrote:
may you suggest a different converter command that does not use elyxer.py
as it was with 2.0.4 and earlier version?
Could you report the bugs you encounter with LyXHTML? It might be they are
easy to fix for future releases.
Pavel
I simply downloaded this file
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/2.0.6/LyX-2.0.6-Installer-1.exe
and installed it following the default instructions. I did not change
anything.
May the problem be limited to elyxer.py that may be not well linked to
python ?
nicola
have you tried to delete all
Alternatively, if the problem cannot be fixed, instead of using the
converter command
elyxer.py --directory $$r $$i $$o
may you suggest a different converter command that does not use elyxer.py
as it was with 2.0.4 and earlier version?
thank you.
nicola
Oh I see now the error, try to
It does not work in both cases.
A windows opens and says: Lyx cannot convert file. An error occurred while
running.
nicola
-Original Message-
From: Alex Vergara Gil
Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2013 5:13 PM
To: Nicola Scafetta, Ph. D. ; lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: bug on Lyx
Hi Nicola,
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Nicola Scafetta, Ph. D.
nicola.scafe...@gmail.com wrote:
It does not work in both cases.
A windows opens and says: Lyx cannot convert file. An error occurred
while running.
If the line that Alex Vergara suggested does not work, it looks like
The bug with LyXHTML, which is different from that encountered with
elyxer.py, is the following.
See the attached files.
In the .xhtml file the reference in the text appears with a symbol after the
year that should not be there.
The reference in the Bibliography starts with [White(2010)]
My Windows version is Windows 8 pro, 64 bit
Should I install
http://www.python.org/ftp/python/2.7.4/python-2.7.4.msi
or
http://www.python.org/ftp/python/2.7.4/python-2.7.4.amd64.msi
to make compatible with Lyx?
nicola
From: Alex Fernandez
Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2013 4:58 PM
To: Nicola
I guess you should be fine with the amd64 version. Otherwise the installer
should tell you. After installing try on the console:
python --version
and see if you get a version number.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Nicola Scafetta, Ph. D.
nicola.scafe...@gmail.com wrote:
My Windows
On 05/09/2013 02:25 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
On Linux, of course, it is different. One would just expect this library
already to be installed. But things do not work that way on the other OSs.
I belive we should actually _include_ some leightweight library in our sources
so
On 05/09/2013 03:57 PM, Nico Williams wrote:
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Alex Vergara Gil a...@cphr.edu.cu wrote:
First of all, This is a very old feature request that will be greatly
appreciated at least from my part!
Me too.
I think there are much work done in this sense, please read
Ok thank you, very much.
It seems that now it works. The only problem is that the Natbib Author-year
does not appear to work. See the attached file where only the numeric style is
present.
On another case.
I tried to export in OpenDocument and a window opened with:
An error occurred while
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Nicola Scafetta, Ph. D.
nicola.scafe...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok thank you, very much.
No problem.
It seems that now it works. The only problem is that the Natbib
Author-year does not appear to work. See the attached file where only the
numeric style is
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
The LyX document is internally a (very complex) tree structure, so I think
this is pretty simple. As Jose mentioned, Lars has the write side of it
pretty much done a long time ago. My sense is that it was so long ago that
it
I should add that while *writing* XML is easy enough (valid XML too),
it's reading that's hard, so you can't avoid using a library.
On 05/09/2013 05:52 PM, Nicola Scafetta, Ph. D. wrote:
Ok thank you, very much.
It seems that now it works. The only problem is that the Natbib
Author-year does not appear to work. See the attached file where only
the numeric style is present.
This works with LyXHTML. If you have other
In article <517ee12b.4040...@lyx.org>,
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 28/04/2013 13:06, pdv a écrit :
> > OK, here is a new version. Let me know if you experience anymore
> > problems.
> > For the time being I've left the clean-up step of the map as it was,
> > although I
In article <5186ae01.4080...@lyx.org>,
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 05/05/13 20:36, pdv a écrit :
> >> What exactly takes 17.4s?
> >
> > I suppose that's the time taken by GuiPainter::text(), but I don't know
> > enough of the Instruments app and it's modules to give any
Le 09/05/2013 09:37, pdv a écrit :
I've moved the code to GuiFontMetrics which is indeed much better.
Solved also a remaining issue with smallcaps.
Very good. Thanks.
JMarc
>
> I have started to think seriously about moving to XML for LyX's native
> file format. I doubt that we will want to do this for 2.1, as it is too
> late, really, so I am thinking about doing it for some time early in the
> 2.2 cycle, which means starting now.
>
First of all, This is a very
Public release of LyX version 2.0.6
===
We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 2.0.6. This is the sixth
maintenance release in the 2.0.x series.
LyX 2.0.6 is the result of on-going efforts to make our stable version
even more reliable and stable. We have
On Thursday 09 May 2013 09:38:01 Richard Heck wrote:
> Public release of LyX version 2.0.6
Hi Richard,
note that the press release at http://www.lyx.org/News#item2 still
refers to the 2.0.5 announcement instead of the 2.0.6 as it should.
Regards,
--
José Abílio
On 05/09/2013 12:00 PM, José Matos wrote:
On Thursday 09 May 2013 09:38:01 Richard Heck wrote:
Public release of LyX version 2.0.6
Hi Richard,
note that the press release at http://www.lyx.org/News#item2 still
refers to the 2.0.5 announcement instead of the 2.0.6 as it should.
Hmm.
On 05/08/2013 06:24 PM, José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 08 May 2013 17:43:41 Richard Heck wrote:
Thinking ahead, however: Should we use some SAX library to read the XML? Or
should we just adapt the Lexer for this purpose?
Richard
Lars had that working for a previous version of lyx with lexer.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
I just had a look at those. He had an XML parser here:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyxsvn/lyx-devel/branches/personal/larsbj/xml/src/support/xmlparser.h?rev=19478
but it appears to be based upon xmlpp, which I cannot
The link to the announcement on that page still points to
http://www.lyx.org/announce/2_0_5.txt (though the page
http://www.lyx.org/announce/2_0_6.txt exists).
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 05/09/2013 12:00 PM, José Matos wrote:
>
>> On Thursday 09
On 05/09/2013 01:59 PM, Maria Gouskova wrote:
The link to the announcement on that page still points to
http://www.lyx.org/announce/2_0_5.txt (though the page
http://www.lyx.org/announce/2_0_6.txt exists).
Oh, I see. Thanks.
rh
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Richard Heck
On 05/09/2013 01:39 PM, Rob Oakes wrote:
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
I just had a look at those. He had an XML parser here:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyxsvn/lyx-devel/branches/personal/larsbj/xml/src/support/xmlparser.h?rev=19478
but it appears
Richard Heck wrote:
> On Linux, of course, it is different. One would just expect this library
> already to be installed. But things do not work that way on the other OSs.
I belive we should actually _include_ some leightweight library in our sources
so it is fixed and we do not rely in any
Dear Lyx-develop,
thank you for your update and for the hard work for producing Lyx, which is a
very useful program.
However, I had some problem that was apparently not present in version 2.0.4
with the HTML export.
When I use the HTML export a window opens and asks the following question:
Dear Lyx-develop,
thank you for your update and for the hard work for producing Lyx, which is a
very useful program.
However, I had some problem that was apparently not present in version 2.0.4
with the HTML export.
When I use the HTML export a window opens and asks the following question:
Nicola Scafetta, Ph. D. wrote:
> When I use the HTML export a window opens and asks the following question:
> ???How do you want to open this type of file (.py)
Does Tools->Reconfigure help?
P
No.
That is the first thing that I did.
nicola
-Original Message-
From: Pavel Sanda
Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2013 2:41 PM
To: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
Cc: nicola.scafe...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug on Lyx 2.0.6?
Nicola Scafetta, Ph. D. wrote:
When I use the HTML export a window opens
Nicola Scafetta, Ph. D. wrote:
> No.
>
> That is the first thing that I did.
Seems like python is not installed, I CC Uwe, he prepared windows installer, on
linux everything seems to be fine.
Pavel
I agree that on Linux everything looks fine.
The same problem that I am having with 2.0.6 was also present in 2.0.5.
It seems a problem with python or with elyxer.py
nicola
-Original Message-
From: Pavel Sanda
Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2013 2:51 PM
To: Nicola Scafetta, Ph. D.
Cc:
Nicola Scafetta, Ph. D. wrote:
When I use the HTML export a window opens and asks the following
question:
???How do you want to open this type of file (.py)
Does Tools->Reconfigure help?
P
No.
That is the first thing that I did.
nicola
This is really odd! Since the reconfigure
I simply downloaded this file
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/2.0.6/LyX-2.0.6-Installer-1.exe
and installed it following the default instructions. I did not change
anything.
May the problem be limited to elyxer.py that may be not well linked to
python ?
nicola
-Original Message-
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote:
> First of all, This is a very old feature request that will be greatly
> appreciated at least from my part!
Me too.
> I think there are much work done in this sense, please read Nico Williams'
> approach. I think is the
Alternatively, if the problem cannot be fixed, instead of using the
converter command
elyxer.py --directory $$r $$i $$o
may you suggest a different converter command that does not use elyxer.py as
it was with 2.0.4 and earlier version?
thank you.
nicola
-Original Message-
Nicola Scafetta, Ph. D. wrote:
> may you suggest a different converter command that does not use elyxer.py
> as it was with 2.0.4 and earlier version?
Could you report the bugs you encounter with LyXHTML? It might be they are
easy to fix for future releases.
Pavel
I simply downloaded this file
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/2.0.6/LyX-2.0.6-Installer-1.exe
and installed it following the default instructions. I did not change
anything.
May the problem be limited to elyxer.py that may be not well linked to
python ?
nicola
have you tried to delete all
Alternatively, if the problem cannot be fixed, instead of using the
converter command
elyxer.py --directory $$r $$i $$o
may you suggest a different converter command that does not use elyxer.py
as it was with 2.0.4 and earlier version?
thank you.
nicola
Oh I see now the error, try to
It does not work in both cases.
A windows opens and says: "Lyx cannot convert file. An error occurred while
running."
nicola
-Original Message-
From: Alex Vergara Gil
Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2013 5:13 PM
To: Nicola Scafetta, Ph. D. ; lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: bug on Lyx
Hi Nicola,
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Nicola Scafetta, Ph. D. <
nicola.scafe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It does not work in both cases.
>
> A windows opens and says: "Lyx cannot convert file. An error occurred
> while running."
If the line that Alex Vergara suggested does not work, it looks
The bug with LyXHTML, which is different from that encountered with
elyxer.py, is the following.
See the attached files.
In the .xhtml file the reference in the text appears with a symbol after the
year that should not be there.
The reference in the Bibliography starts with "[White(2010)]"
My Windows version is Windows 8 pro, 64 bit
Should I install
http://www.python.org/ftp/python/2.7.4/python-2.7.4.msi
or
http://www.python.org/ftp/python/2.7.4/python-2.7.4.amd64.msi
to make compatible with Lyx?
nicola
From: Alex Fernandez
Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2013 4:58 PM
To: Nicola
I guess you should be fine with the amd64 version. Otherwise the installer
should tell you. After installing try on the console:
> python --version
and see if you get a version number.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Nicola Scafetta, Ph. D. <
nicola.scafe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My Windows
On 05/09/2013 02:25 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
On Linux, of course, it is different. One would just expect this library
already to be installed. But things do not work that way on the other OSs.
I belive we should actually _include_ some leightweight library in our sources
so
On 05/09/2013 03:57 PM, Nico Williams wrote:
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote:
First of all, This is a very old feature request that will be greatly
appreciated at least from my part!
Me too.
I think there are much work done in this sense, please read
Ok thank you, very much.
It seems that now it works. The only problem is that the Natbib Author-year
does not appear to work. See the attached file where only the numeric style is
present.
On another case.
I tried to export in OpenDocument and a window opened with:
An error occurred while
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Nicola Scafetta, Ph. D. <
nicola.scafe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok thank you, very much.
>
No problem.
> It seems that now it works. The only problem is that the Natbib
> Author-year does not appear to work. See the attached file where only the
> numeric style
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
> The LyX document is internally a (very complex) tree structure, so I think
> this is pretty simple. As Jose mentioned, Lars has the write side of it
> pretty much done a long time ago. My sense is that it was so long ago that
>
I should add that while *writing* XML is easy enough (valid XML too),
it's reading that's hard, so you can't avoid using a library.
On 05/09/2013 05:52 PM, Nicola Scafetta, Ph. D. wrote:
Ok thank you, very much.
It seems that now it works. The only problem is that the Natbib
Author-year does not appear to work. See the attached file where only
the numeric style is present.
This works with LyXHTML. If you have other
76 matches
Mail list logo