Re: Figure 0

Am 31.03.2014, 01:49 Uhr, schrieb Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de: Am 31.03.2014 00:55, schrieb Jürgen Lange: In document view all figures and tables are labelled Figure 0 and Table 0. The resulting pdf is ok (Figure 1, Figure 2 etc.). I've this problem since I updated to 2.1.0rc1. Does this

Re: Figure 0

Am 31.03.2014, 08:49 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Lange juergen.la...@unitybox.de: Am 31.03.2014, 01:49 Uhr, schrieb Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de: Am 31.03.2014 00:55, schrieb Jürgen Lange: In document view all figures and tables are labelled Figure 0 and Table 0. The resulting pdf is ok (Figure 1,

Re: [LyX/master] partly revert commit a860d18b5a722606c68fb1a4ec22ffe3e99792e6

Am Montag, 31. März 2014 um 00:40:45, schrieb Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de Am 30.03.2014 21:52, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: @@ -227,6 +227,33 @@ svexamplesdir = $(pkgdatadir)/examples/sv dist_svexamples_DATA = \ examples/sv/splash.lyx +springerexamplesdir =

Re: [LyX/master] partly revert commit a860d18b5a722606c68fb1a4ec22ffe3e99792e6

Am Montag, 31. März 2014 um 00:30:13, schrieb Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@lyx.org Am 30.03.2014 19:11, schrieb Richard Heck: svmono and svmult must stay in the examples folder because they include childs Is there some reason they have to include child documents? Yes, the idea of the

Re: [LyX/master] partly revert commit a860d18b5a722606c68fb1a4ec22ffe3e99792e6

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote: Am 30.03.2014 21:52, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: @@ -227,6 +227,33 @@ svexamplesdir = $(pkgdatadir)/examples/sv dist_svexamples_DATA = \ examples/sv/splash.lyx +springerexamplesdir =

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote: Am 30.03.2014 15:38, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: When Implementing support for the new languages in LyX 2.1 I forgot that Urdu and Systriac are RTL-languages: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-to-left The attached simple patch

Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.1.0 (rc1)

Am 30.03.2014 um 23:12 schrieb Smith, Henry h.sm...@neu.edu: That¹s weird - never had that happen before to my knowledgeŠ FWIW I am using my university¹s Outlook server for this, so maybe M$ strikes again? VBG I just now saved the file from the console (~800kB) so I compressed it and I

Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.1.0 (rc1)

I am using “canopy” from Enthought iMac-162:qdp++-1.36.1 hs$ which python /Users/hs/Library/Enthought/Canopy_64bit/User/bin/python And iMac-162:qdp++-1.36.1 hs$ python -V Python 2.7.3 -- 64-bit So I am one dot version beyond what you have in your e-mail… HTH Henry On 3/31/14, 8:39 AM,

Re: Confusing file-open filters in dialog

On 03/30/2014 09:59 PM, Cyrille Artho wrote: At least going back to LyX 1.0, documents saved with those old versions import fine with LyX 2.0. I remember having used LyX prior to version 1.0 but I can't find any older files right now. In any case, I think it's more common to open an old file,

Remove Confusing Filters From File Dialog

Vincent, This patch removes the confusing filters from the file dialog. I suggest it for 2.1.0. Richard From 2cce531b1518b2df0621a22671c26a0586cae3d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 14:32:59 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Remove obsolete formats

Re: [patch] for master - fix for RJournal.layout

On 03/30/2014 08:22 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 31.03.2014 02:15, schrieb Scott Kostyshak: In principle, yes. Scott, can you please have a look and add the sty.files required by the rjournal class? Sure, I don't have experience with this so I have a few questions. Is there any systematic way to

Re: Figure 0

Remark: Rebooting the system (win7) makes Figure 0 problem a lot more reproducible. regards Jürgen

Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.1.0 (rc1)

Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 30.03.2014 12:09, schrieb Georg Baum: The reason is that for beta releases we cannot guarantee that they are stable enough. If you would install a never LyX test version over a beta it might be that you will still see bugs that we already fixed in LyX. Why? See my

Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.1.0 (rc1)

Stephan Witt wrote: One question: what's the output of python in your Terminal? Is it on prupose that LyX prints the detected python version on stderr since a while? I don't like that, this should only be printed if some debug flag is enabled. Georg

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: However, Urdu is still unusable even with your patch. Maybe it's better to drop the support instead of advertising support that is not there ? +1 IMHO we should not add any new language without a test by a native speaker. There are so many languages with

Re: [LyX/master] Fixing #7987: deleted text in change-tracking mode is not found in Advanced FR any more.

On 29/03/14 11:28, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Hmm, I don't see it. I was sure to have pushed, but I didn't ? Check now pls. On a closer look at the patch, I don't think that AS_STR_PLAINTEXT should be an option to asString(). Plain text is an output format. What I did, was just having a

Re: [LyX/master] Fixing #7987: deleted text in change-tracking mode is not found in Advanced FR any more.

On 29/03/14 17:50, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Tomasso's patch was not improving the situation, but was somehow hiding the underlying mess by building some messy function on top of it. well, I have to some-what disagree here: - removing from the program the possibility of an infinite loop

Re: Figure 0

Am 31.03.2014 20:47, schrieb Jürgen Lange: Remark: Rebooting the system (win7) makes Figure 0 problem a lot more reproducible. I found now a recipe to reproduce, see http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9070 I must admit that I don't have any clue what exactly triggers the bug and why it is only

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Am 31.03.2014 09:55, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: You say: I would like to have that in master because otherwise Urdu support will not work as advertised in http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX21; However, Urdu is still unusable even with your patch. How do you come to the conclusion? My

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Uwe Stöhr schreef op 31-3-2014 23:04: Am 31.03.2014 09:55, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: You say: I would like to have that in master because otherwise Urdu support will not work as advertised in http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX21; However, Urdu is still unusable even with your patch. How

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Am 31.03.2014 21:46, schrieb Georg Baum: IMHO we should not add any new language without a test by a native speaker. My experience is that it works the opposite way: people see that LyX supports their language and give it a try. It is only a dream that someone comes to us and say, please

LyX 2.1RC1 tarball on ftp.lyx.org misses 4 image files

The tarball misses the 4 image files tabular-feature_move-*.png (spotted by Koji) regards Uwe

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Op 31 mrt. 2014 23:35 schreef Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de: Am 31.03.2014 23:25, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: How do you come to the conclusion? I draw this conclusion because a user writing Urdu has made a bug report that all characters appear as separate characters and they do not

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Am 31.03.2014 23:43, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: The image has too low resolution to see text. it has 1980 x 1080 pixels at 96 dpi - that is the resolution of my monitor. I'll re-send you the image in a private mail again. maybe your newsreader mangled it. regards Uwe

Re: Regression: macro display issues with 2.1 RC1 (Mac)

On 29/03/2014 6:02 a.m., Marcus Kriele wrote: I have partially repeatable display issues concerning macros. In old documentssome formulas display (some) macros as an empty boxes with blue frames. For instance, I head defined \varexp to be \mathrm{e}. This macro is sometimes displayed as a

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Op 31 mrt. 2014 23:35 schreef Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de: Am 31.03.2014 23:25, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: How do you come to the conclusion? I draw this conclusion because a user writing Urdu has made a bug report that all characters appear as separate characters and they do not

Re: Regression: macro display issues with 2.1 RC1 (Mac)

On 1/04/2014 10:52 a.m., aparsloe wrote: On 29/03/2014 6:02 a.m., Marcus Kriele wrote: I have partially repeatable display issues concerning macros. In old documentssome formulas display (some) macros as an empty boxes with blue frames. For instance, I head defined \varexp to be

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Am 31.03.2014 23:26, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: Am 31.03.2014 21:46, schrieb Georg Baum: IMHO we should not add any new language without a test by a native speaker. My experience is that it works the opposite way: people see that LyX supports their language and give it a try. It is only a dream

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Am 31.03.2014 23:56, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Rtl and contextual characters are separate issues. And what should we do now? Do you see the bug in my screenshot or is this OK for you? regards Uwe

[patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Op 1 apr. 2014 00:19 schreef Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.dejavascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','uwesto...@web.de'); : Am 31.03.2014 23:56, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Rtl and contextual characters are separate issues. And what should we do now? Do you see the bug in my screenshot or is this OK

Re: [LyX/master] Fixing #7987: deleted text in change-tracking mode is not found in Advanced FR any more.

On 03/31/2014 04:40 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: On 29/03/14 17:50, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Tomasso's patch was not improving the situation, but was somehow hiding the underlying mess by building some messy function on top of it. well, I have to some-what disagree here: - removing from

Re: Regression: macro display issues with 2.1 RC1 (Mac)

On 03/31/2014 05:52 PM, aparsloe wrote: On 29/03/2014 6:02 a.m., Marcus Kriele wrote: I have partially repeatable display issues concerning macros. In old documentssome formulas display (some) macros as an empty boxes with blue frames. For instance, I head defined \varexp to be \mathrm{e}.

Re: Figure 0

Am 31.03.2014, 01:49 Uhr, schrieb Uwe Stöhr : Am 31.03.2014 00:55, schrieb Jürgen Lange: In document view all figures and tables are labelled Figure 0 and Table 0. The resulting pdf is ok (Figure 1, Figure 2 etc.). I've this problem since I updated to 2.1.0rc1. Does

Re: Figure 0

Am 31.03.2014, 08:49 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Lange : Am 31.03.2014, 01:49 Uhr, schrieb Uwe Stöhr : Am 31.03.2014 00:55, schrieb Jürgen Lange: In document view all figures and tables are labelled Figure 0 and Table 0. The resulting pdf is ok (Figure

Re: [LyX/master] partly revert commit a860d18b5a722606c68fb1a4ec22ffe3e99792e6

Am Montag, 31. März 2014 um 00:40:45, schrieb Uwe Stöhr > Am 30.03.2014 21:52, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: > > >> @@ -227,6 +227,33 @@ svexamplesdir = $(pkgdatadir)/examples/sv > >> dist_svexamples_DATA = \ > >> examples/sv/splash.lyx > >> +springerexamplesdir =

Re: [LyX/master] partly revert commit a860d18b5a722606c68fb1a4ec22ffe3e99792e6

Am Montag, 31. März 2014 um 00:30:13, schrieb Uwe Stöhr > Am 30.03.2014 19:11, schrieb Richard Heck: > > >> svmono and svmult must stay in the examples folder because they > >> include childs > > > > Is there some reason they have to include child documents? > > Yes,

Re: [LyX/master] partly revert commit a860d18b5a722606c68fb1a4ec22ffe3e99792e6

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 30.03.2014 21:52, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: > > > @@ -227,6 +227,33 @@ svexamplesdir = $(pkgdatadir)/examples/sv >>> dist_svexamples_DATA = \ >>> examples/sv/splash.lyx >>> +springerexamplesdir =

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 30.03.2014 15:38, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: > > When Implementing support for the new languages in LyX 2.1 I forgot that >> Urdu and Systriac are >> RTL-languages: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-to-left >> >> The attached

Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.1.0 (rc1)

Am 30.03.2014 um 23:12 schrieb "Smith, Henry" : > That¹s weird - never had that happen before to my knowledgeŠ > > FWIW I am using my university¹s Outlook server for this, so maybe M$ > strikes again? > > I just now saved the file from the console (~800kB) so I compressed it

Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.1.0 (rc1)

I am using “canopy” from Enthought iMac-162:qdp++-1.36.1 hs$ which python /Users/hs/Library/Enthought/Canopy_64bit/User/bin/python And iMac-162:qdp++-1.36.1 hs$ python -V Python 2.7.3 -- 64-bit So I am one "dot version" beyond what you have in your e-mail… HTH Henry On 3/31/14, 8:39 AM,

Re: Confusing file-open filters in dialog

On 03/30/2014 09:59 PM, Cyrille Artho wrote: At least going back to LyX 1.0, documents saved with those old versions import fine with LyX 2.0. I remember having used LyX prior to version 1.0 but I can't find any older files right now. In any case, I think it's more common to open an old file,

Remove Confusing Filters From File Dialog

Vincent, This patch removes the confusing filters from the file dialog. I suggest it for 2.1.0. Richard >From 2cce531b1518b2df0621a22671c26a0586cae3d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Heck Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 14:32:59 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Remove obsolete formats

Re: [patch] for master - fix for RJournal.layout

On 03/30/2014 08:22 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 31.03.2014 02:15, schrieb Scott Kostyshak: In principle, yes. Scott, can you please have a look and add the sty.files required by the rjournal class? Sure, I don't have experience with this so I have a few questions. Is there any systematic way to

Re: Figure 0

Remark: Rebooting the system (win7) makes Figure 0 problem a lot more reproducible. regards Jürgen

Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.1.0 (rc1)

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 30.03.2014 12:09, schrieb Georg Baum: > >>> The reason is that for beta releases we cannot guarantee that they are >>> stable enough. If you would install a never LyX test version over a beta >>> it might be that you will still see bugs that we already fixed in LyX. >> >>

Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.1.0 (rc1)

Stephan Witt wrote: > One question: what's the output of "python" in your Terminal? Is it on prupose that LyX prints the detected python version on stderr since a while? I don't like that, this should only be printed if some debug flag is enabled. Georg

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > However, Urdu is still unusable even with your patch. Maybe it's better to > drop the support instead of advertising support that is not there ? +1 IMHO we should not add any new language without a test by a native speaker. There are so many languages with

Re: [LyX/master] Fixing #7987: deleted text in change-tracking mode is not found in Advanced F any more.

On 29/03/14 11:28, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Hmm, I don't see it. I was sure to have pushed, but I didn't ? Check now pls. > On a closer look at the patch, I don't think that AS_STR_PLAINTEXT should be > an option to asString(). Plain text is an output format. What I did, was just

Re: [LyX/master] Fixing #7987: deleted text in change-tracking mode is not found in Advanced F any more.

On 29/03/14 17:50, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Tomasso's patch was not improving the situation, but was somehow hiding the > underlying mess by building some messy function on top of it. well, I have to some-what disagree here: - removing from the program the possibility of an infinite loop

Re: Figure 0

Am 31.03.2014 20:47, schrieb Jürgen Lange: Remark: Rebooting the system (win7) makes Figure 0 problem a lot more reproducible. I found now a recipe to reproduce, see http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9070 I must admit that I don't have any clue what exactly triggers the bug and why it is only

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Am 31.03.2014 09:55, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: You say: "I would like to have that in master because otherwise Urdu support will not work as advertised in http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX21; However, Urdu is still unusable even with your patch. How do you come to the conclusion? My

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Uwe Stöhr schreef op 31-3-2014 23:04: Am 31.03.2014 09:55, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: You say: "I would like to have that in master because otherwise Urdu support will not work as advertised in http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX21; However, Urdu is still unusable even with your patch.

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Am 31.03.2014 21:46, schrieb Georg Baum: IMHO we should not add any new language without a test by a native speaker. My experience is that it works the opposite way: people see that LyX supports their language and give it a try. It is only a dream that someone comes to us and say, please

LyX 2.1RC1 tarball on ftp.lyx.org misses 4 image files

The tarball misses the 4 image files tabular-feature_move-*.png (spotted by Koji) regards Uwe

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Op 31 mrt. 2014 23:35 schreef "Uwe Stöhr" : > > Am 31.03.2014 23:25, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: > > >>> How do you come to the conclusion? >> >> >> I draw this conclusion because a user writing Urdu has made a bug report that all characters appear >> as separate characters

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Am 31.03.2014 23:43, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: The image has too low resolution to see text. it has 1980 x 1080 pixels at 96 dpi - that is the resolution of my monitor. I'll re-send you the image in a private mail again. maybe your newsreader mangled it. regards Uwe

Re: Regression: macro display issues with 2.1 RC1 (Mac)

On 29/03/2014 6:02 a.m., Marcus Kriele wrote: I have partially repeatable display issues concerning macros. In old documentssome formulas display (some) macros as an empty boxes with blue frames. For instance, I head defined \varexp to be \mathrm{e}. This macro is sometimes displayed as a

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Op 31 mrt. 2014 23:35 schreef "Uwe Stöhr" : > > Am 31.03.2014 23:25, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: > > >>> How do you come to the conclusion? >> >> >> I draw this conclusion because a user writing Urdu has made a bug report that all characters appear >> as separate characters

Re: Regression: macro display issues with 2.1 RC1 (Mac)

On 1/04/2014 10:52 a.m., aparsloe wrote: On 29/03/2014 6:02 a.m., Marcus Kriele wrote: I have partially repeatable display issues concerning macros. In old documentssome formulas display (some) macros as an empty boxes with blue frames. For instance, I head defined \varexp to be

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Am 31.03.2014 23:26, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: Am 31.03.2014 21:46, schrieb Georg Baum: IMHO we should not add any new language without a test by a native speaker. My experience is that it works the opposite way: people see that LyX supports their language and give it a try. It is only a dream

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Am 31.03.2014 23:56, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Rtl and contextual characters are separate issues. And what should we do now? Do you see the bug in my screenshot or is this OK for you? regards Uwe

[patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Op 1 apr. 2014 00:19 schreef "Uwe Stöhr" >: > > Am 31.03.2014 23:56, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: > > >> Rtl and contextual characters are separate issues. > > > And what should we do now? > Do you see the bug in my screenshot

Re: [LyX/master] Fixing #7987: deleted text in change-tracking mode is not found in Advanced F any more.

On 03/31/2014 04:40 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: On 29/03/14 17:50, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Tomasso's patch was not improving the situation, but was somehow hiding the underlying mess by building some messy function on top of it. well, I have to some-what disagree here: - removing from

Re: Regression: macro display issues with 2.1 RC1 (Mac)

On 03/31/2014 05:52 PM, aparsloe wrote: On 29/03/2014 6:02 a.m., Marcus Kriele wrote: I have partially repeatable display issues concerning macros. In old documentssome formulas display (some) macros as an empty boxes with blue frames. For instance, I head defined \varexp to be \mathrm{e}.