Re: [LyX/master] Fixing #7987: deleted text in change-tracking mode is not found in Advanced FR any more.

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta tomm...@lyx.org wrote: On 29/03/14 17:50, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Tomasso's patch was not improving the situation, but was somehow hiding the underlying mess by building some messy function on top of it. well, I have to some-what

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote: Am 31.03.2014 23:56, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Rtl and contextual characters are separate issues. And what should we do now? Do you see the bug in my screenshot or is this OK for you? regards Uwe I cut out two

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

01/04/2014 09:28, Vincent van Ravesteijn: I cut out two words, both in the wikipedia text, and the text in LyX. Are you sure that the words in the left column are the same as those in the right column ? Especially pay attention to the middle letter of the top word, and the starting letter (the

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.orgwrote: 01/04/2014 09:28, Vincent van Ravesteijn: I cut out two words, both in the wikipedia text, and the text in LyX. Are you sure that the words in the left column are the same as those in the right column ?

[parch] silence boost compiler warnings

The attached patch gets rid of these annoying gcc 4.8 compiler warnings pointing to boost (usued typedefs etc.). I have collected the fixed both from boost itself [1] and from the patchset used by Fedora for their boost RPMs [2]. I propose to commit this to 2.2-staging. The compiler noise is

Re: [parch] silence boost compiler warnings

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote: The attached patch gets rid of these annoying gcc 4.8 compiler warnings pointing to boost (usued typedefs etc.). I have collected the fixed both from boost itself [1] and from the patchset used by Fedora for their boost

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

01/04/2014 10:46, Vincent van Ravesteijn: Currently, we have in the code many if (hebrew) or if (arabic) constructs that should be audited and removed if we want to have a chance to make Urdu work. I somehow remember that Farsi did work ? Or do I remember incorrectly ? Basically

Re: [parch] silence boost compiler warnings

01/04/2014 11:07, Vincent van Ravesteijn: On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org mailto:sp...@lyx.org wrote: I propose to commit this to 2.2-staging. The compiler noise is really annoying. An alternative is an update of our boost sources. These warnings are

Re: [parch] silence boost compiler warnings

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.orgwrote: 01/04/2014 11:07, Vincent van Ravesteijn: On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org mailto:sp...@lyx.org wrote: I propose to commit this to 2.2-staging. The compiler noise is

Re: [parch] silence boost compiler warnings

2014-04-01 11:41 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn: What about scheduling Juergen's patch to some 2.1.x release (maybe not 2.1.1). JMarc Looks sensible. I propose I apply this to my own working branch and see if problems arise. Then we could commit it early in the 2.1.2 or 2.1.3 cycle (if

Re: [parch] silence boost compiler warnings

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote: 2014-04-01 11:41 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn: What about scheduling Juergen's patch to some 2.1.x release (maybe not 2.1.1). JMarc Looks sensible. I propose I apply this to my own working branch and see if

Re: [parch] silence boost compiler warnings

2014-04-01 12:42 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn: Wouldn't git log not be enough to see which patches we applied ? Practically for sure. I was just unsure what the policy is with embedded 3rd-party code. Jürgen Vincent

Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.1.0 (rc1)

Am 31.03.2014 um 21:39 schrieb Georg Baum georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de: Stephan Witt wrote: One question: what's the output of python in your Terminal? Is it on prupose that LyX prints the detected python version on stderr since a while? I don't like that, this should only be printed

Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.1.0 (rc1)

Am 31.03.2014 um 15:05 schrieb Smith, Henry h.sm...@neu.edu: I am using “canopy” from Enthought iMac-162:qdp++-1.36.1 hs$ which python /Users/hs/Library/Enthought/Canopy_64bit/User/bin/python And iMac-162:qdp++-1.36.1 hs$ python -V Python 2.7.3 -- 64-bit So I am one dot

Re: [LyX/master] This is LyX 2.1.0rc1

Shouldn't master be changed back to 2.1.0dev? Stephan Am 24.03.2014 um 20:42 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org: commit fd7c0c299339098d0dbb788c231c4d32e489cd6d Author: Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org Date: Tue Mar 18 16:29:05 2014 +0100 This is LyX 2.1.0rc1 diff

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 31.03.2014 21:46, schrieb Georg Baum: IMHO we should not add any new language without a test by a native speaker. My experience is that it works the opposite way: people see that LyX supports their language and give it a try. It is only a dream that someone comes to

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Uwe Stöhr wrote: I should have also said that personally I would not use a program that does not support my language. I mean how should I use LyX when I cannot write German with it: no German hyphenation, no spell-checker, English terms like Figure, etc. I agree that this is important for

Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.1.0 (rc1)

Stephan Witt wrote: Am 31.03.2014 um 21:39 schrieb Georg Baum georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de: Is it on prupose that LyX prints the detected python version on stderr since a while? I don't like that, this should only be printed if some debug flag is enabled. I tried to verify it and

Re: [LyX/master] This is LyX 2.1.0rc1

Stephan Witt schreef op 1-4-2014 17:02: Shouldn't master be changed back to 2.1.0dev? Stephan I guess so. I did this now. Vincent

Re: LyX 2.1RC1 tarball on ftp.lyx.org misses 4 image files

Uwe Stöhr schreef op 31-3-2014 23:40: The tarball misses the 4 image files tabular-feature_move-*.png (spotted by Koji) regards Uwe I fixed this. Vincent

Re: Remove Confusing Filters From File Dialog

Richard Heck schreef op 31-3-2014 20:34: Vincent, This patch removes the confusing filters from the file dialog. I suggest it for 2.1.0. Richard I applied this patch to master. Vincent

Re: [LyX/master] partly revert commit a860d18b5a722606c68fb1a4ec22ffe3e99792e6

Uwe Stöhr schreef op 31-3-2014 0:40: Am 30.03.2014 21:52, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: @@ -227,6 +227,33 @@ svexamplesdir = $(pkgdatadir)/examples/sv dist_svexamples_DATA = \ examples/sv/splash.lyx +springerexamplesdir = $(pkgdatadir)/examples/springer +dist_springerexamples_DATA =

Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.1.0 (rc1)

On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 09:19:36PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: Stephan Witt wrote: Am 31.03.2014 um 21:39 schrieb Georg Baum georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de: Is it on prupose that LyX prints the detected python version on stderr since a while? I don't like that, this should only be

Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.1.0 (rc1)

Enrico Forestieri wrote: I am not exactly sure in which circumstance you see that output. However, by design, I made sure that if the first python found in PATH is not a version 2 python, LyX prints on stderr the various python programs found. In this way, you are aware that your first python

Re: [LyX/master] This is LyX 2.1.0rc1

Am 01.04.2014 um 21:44 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org: Stephan Witt schreef op 1-4-2014 17:02: Shouldn't master be changed back to 2.1.0dev? I guess so. I did this now. Vincent Thanks. Stephan

Re: [LyX/master] partly revert commit a860d18b5a722606c68fb1a4ec22ffe3e99792e6

Am 01.04.2014 21:57, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Well, I fixed it myself then. Thanks. I just wanted to do this. regards Uwe

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Am 01.04.2014 11:26, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: Indeed Farsi is handled. But what I do not know is what characters have to be handled specially. But indeed it should not be too difficult to add support for Urdu in 2.1.x timeframe by adding some code similar to what is done in Arabic. But

Re: [LyX/master] partly revert commit a860d18b5a722606c68fb1a4ec22ffe3e99792e6

Am 31.03.2014 09:30, schrieb Kornel Benko: In my opinion the real is fix is: - When the user chooses via New from templates a master file, this file is copied to the user folder AND alls its childs will moved automatically to the same older too. And how to name the childs? They get the

Re: Problem forward/inverse searching with Sumatrapdf 2.4

On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org wrote: Andy writes: I am unable to get forward inverse searching working. Have followed instructions at http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/SyncTeX, and have tried reinstalling the Lyx+miktex bundle Generating the PDF is no problem. When

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Am 01.04.2014 21:12, schrieb Georg Baum: I should have also said that personally I would not use a program that does not support my language. I mean how should I use LyX when I cannot write German with it: no German hyphenation, no spell-checker, English terms like Figure, etc. I agree that

Re: Figure 0

Am 31.03.2014 22:50, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: I found now a recipe to reproduce, see http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9070 This bug is now fixed and I prepared an installer for this: https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/TestVersions/LyX-210RC1-Installer-3.exe/download Please give

Re: Problem forward/inverse searching with Sumatrapdf 2.4

On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 07:18:54PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org wrote: Andy writes: I am unable to get forward inverse searching working. Have followed instructions at http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/SyncTeX, and have tried

Re: Problem forward/inverse searching with Sumatrapdf 2.4

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org wrote: On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 07:18:54PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: This problem was also reported here [1] and here [2]. [1] http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/168818/how-to-enbale-synctex-in-lyx/169008#169008 [2]

Re: Figure 0

Report: I can confirm, that the bug is now fixed. Thanks to all participating.

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

OK, except that I never stated that I would find time to work on it soon. Actually the reasanable thing to do is to try to get it right in 2.2. JMarc On 2 avril 2014 00:44:54 UTC+02:00, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote: Am 01.04.2014 11:26, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: Indeed Farsi is

Re: [LyX/master] Fixing #7987: deleted text in change-tracking mode is not found in Advanced F any more.

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > On 29/03/14 17:50, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > Tomasso's patch was not improving the situation, but was somehow hiding > the underlying mess by building some messy function on top of it. > > well, I have to

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 31.03.2014 23:56, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: > > > Rtl and contextual characters are separate issues. >> > > And what should we do now? > Do you see the bug in my screenshot or is this OK for you? > > regards Uwe > I

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

01/04/2014 09:28, Vincent van Ravesteijn: I cut out two words, both in the wikipedia text, and the text in LyX. Are you sure that the words in the left column are the same as those in the right column ? Especially pay attention to the middle letter of the top word, and the starting letter (the

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > 01/04/2014 09:28, Vincent van Ravesteijn: > > I cut out two words, both in the wikipedia text, and the text in LyX. >> Are you sure that the words in the left column are the same as those in >> the right column ?

[parch] silence boost compiler warnings

The attached patch gets rid of these annoying gcc 4.8 compiler warnings pointing to boost (usued typedefs etc.). I have collected the fixed both from boost itself [1] and from the patchset used by Fedora for their boost RPMs [2]. I propose to commit this to 2.2-staging. The compiler noise is

Re: [parch] silence boost compiler warnings

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > The attached patch gets rid of these annoying gcc 4.8 compiler warnings > pointing to boost (usued typedefs etc.). I have collected the fixed both > from boost itself [1] and from the patchset used by Fedora for their

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

01/04/2014 10:46, Vincent van Ravesteijn: Currently, we have in the code many "if (hebrew)" or "if (arabic)" constructs that should be audited and removed if we want to have a chance to make Urdu work. I somehow remember that Farsi did work ? Or do I remember incorrectly ? Basically

Re: [parch] silence boost compiler warnings

01/04/2014 11:07, Vincent van Ravesteijn: On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller > wrote: I propose to commit this to 2.2-staging. The compiler noise is really annoying. An alternative is an update of our boost sources. These warnings

Re: [parch] silence boost compiler warnings

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > 01/04/2014 11:07, Vincent van Ravesteijn: > >> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller > > wrote: >> I propose to commit this to 2.2-staging. The compiler noise

Re: [parch] silence boost compiler warnings

2014-04-01 11:41 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn: > What about scheduling Juergen's patch to some 2.1.x release (maybe not >> 2.1.1). >> >> JMarc >> > > Looks sensible. > I propose I apply this to my own working branch and see if problems arise. Then we could commit it early in the 2.1.2 or

Re: [parch] silence boost compiler warnings

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > 2014-04-01 11:41 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn: > > What about scheduling Juergen's patch to some 2.1.x release (maybe not >>> 2.1.1). >>> >>> JMarc >>> >> >> Looks sensible. >> > > I propose I apply this to my own

Re: [parch] silence boost compiler warnings

2014-04-01 12:42 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn: > Wouldn't "git log" not be enough to see which patches we applied ? > Practically for sure. I was just unsure what the policy is with embedded 3rd-party code. Jürgen > > Vincent >

Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.1.0 (rc1)

Am 31.03.2014 um 21:39 schrieb Georg Baum : > Stephan Witt wrote: > >> One question: what's the output of "python" in your Terminal? > > Is it on prupose that LyX prints the detected python version on stderr since > a while? I don't like that, this should only

Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.1.0 (rc1)

Am 31.03.2014 um 15:05 schrieb "Smith, Henry" : > I am using “canopy” from Enthought > > iMac-162:qdp++-1.36.1 hs$ which python > /Users/hs/Library/Enthought/Canopy_64bit/User/bin/python > > > And > > iMac-162:qdp++-1.36.1 hs$ python -V > Python 2.7.3 -- 64-bit > > > So I

Re: [LyX/master] This is LyX 2.1.0rc1

Shouldn't master be changed back to 2.1.0dev? Stephan Am 24.03.2014 um 20:42 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn : > commit fd7c0c299339098d0dbb788c231c4d32e489cd6d > Author: Vincent van Ravesteijn > Date: Tue Mar 18 16:29:05 2014 +0100 > >This is LyX 2.1.0rc1 >

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 31.03.2014 21:46, schrieb Georg Baum: > >> IMHO we should not add any new language without a test by a native >> speaker. > > My experience is that it works the opposite way: people see that LyX > supports their language and give it a try. It is only a dream that someone >

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > I should have also said that personally I would not use a program that > does not support my language. I mean how should I use LyX when I cannot > write German with it: no German hyphenation, no spell-checker, English > terms like "Figure", etc. I agree that this is important

Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.1.0 (rc1)

Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 31.03.2014 um 21:39 schrieb Georg Baum > : > >> Is it on prupose that LyX prints the detected python version on stderr >> since a while? I don't like that, this should only be printed if some >> debug flag is enabled. > > > I tried to

Re: [LyX/master] This is LyX 2.1.0rc1

Stephan Witt schreef op 1-4-2014 17:02: Shouldn't master be changed back to 2.1.0dev? Stephan I guess so. I did this now. Vincent

Re: LyX 2.1RC1 tarball on ftp.lyx.org misses 4 image files

Uwe Stöhr schreef op 31-3-2014 23:40: The tarball misses the 4 image files tabular-feature_move-*.png (spotted by Koji) regards Uwe I fixed this. Vincent

Re: Remove Confusing Filters From File Dialog

Richard Heck schreef op 31-3-2014 20:34: Vincent, This patch removes the confusing filters from the file dialog. I suggest it for 2.1.0. Richard I applied this patch to master. Vincent

Re: [LyX/master] partly revert commit a860d18b5a722606c68fb1a4ec22ffe3e99792e6

Uwe Stöhr schreef op 31-3-2014 0:40: Am 30.03.2014 21:52, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: @@ -227,6 +227,33 @@ svexamplesdir = $(pkgdatadir)/examples/sv dist_svexamples_DATA = \ examples/sv/splash.lyx +springerexamplesdir = $(pkgdatadir)/examples/springer +dist_springerexamples_DATA =

Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.1.0 (rc1)

On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 09:19:36PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > Stephan Witt wrote: > > > Am 31.03.2014 um 21:39 schrieb Georg Baum > > : > > > >> Is it on prupose that LyX prints the detected python version on stderr > >> since a while? I don't like that, this

Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.1.0 (rc1)

Enrico Forestieri wrote: > I am not exactly sure in which circumstance you see that output. However, > by design, I made sure that if the first python found in PATH is not a > version 2 python, LyX prints on stderr the various python programs found. > In this way, you are aware that your first

Re: [LyX/master] This is LyX 2.1.0rc1

Am 01.04.2014 um 21:44 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn : > Stephan Witt schreef op 1-4-2014 17:02: >> Shouldn't master be changed back to 2.1.0dev? >> > > I guess so. I did this now. > > Vincent Thanks. Stephan

Re: [LyX/master] partly revert commit a860d18b5a722606c68fb1a4ec22ffe3e99792e6

Am 01.04.2014 21:57, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Well, I fixed it myself then. Thanks. I just wanted to do this. regards Uwe

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Am 01.04.2014 11:26, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > Indeed Farsi is handled. But what I do not know is what characters have to be handled specially. > But indeed it should not be too difficult to add support for Urdu in 2.1.x timeframe by adding > some code similar to what is done in Arabic.

Re: [LyX/master] partly revert commit a860d18b5a722606c68fb1a4ec22ffe3e99792e6

Am 31.03.2014 09:30, schrieb Kornel Benko: In my opinion the real is fix is: - When the user chooses via "New from templates" a master file, this file is copied to the user folder AND alls its childs will moved automatically to the same older too. And how to name the childs? They get the

Re: Problem forward/inverse searching with Sumatrapdf 2.4

On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > Andy writes: > >> I am unable to get forward inverse searching working. Have followed >> instructions at http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/SyncTeX, and have tried >> reinstalling the Lyx+miktex bundle >> >> Generating the PDF is no

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Am 01.04.2014 21:12, schrieb Georg Baum: I should have also said that personally I would not use a program that does not support my language. I mean how should I use LyX when I cannot write German with it: no German hyphenation, no spell-checker, English terms like "Figure", etc. I agree that

Re: Figure 0

Am 31.03.2014 22:50, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: I found now a recipe to reproduce, see http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9070 This bug is now fixed and I prepared an installer for this: https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/TestVersions/LyX-210RC1-Installer-3.exe/download Please give

Re: Problem forward/inverse searching with Sumatrapdf 2.4

On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 07:18:54PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > Andy writes: > > > >> I am unable to get forward inverse searching working. Have followed > >> instructions at http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/SyncTeX, and have

Re: Problem forward/inverse searching with Sumatrapdf 2.4

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 07:18:54PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> >> This problem was also reported here [1] and here [2]. >> >> [1] >>

Re: Figure 0

Report: I can confirm, that the bug is now fixed. Thanks to all participating.

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

OK, except that I never stated that I would find time to work on it soon. Actually the reasanable thing to do is to try to get it right in 2.2. JMarc On 2 avril 2014 00:44:54 UTC+02:00, "Uwe Stöhr" wrote: >Am 01.04.2014 11:26, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > >> Indeed Farsi