Re: lyx2lyx roundtrip fails for Embedded Objects manual

2014-05-15 21:56 GMT+02:00 Georg Baum: IMHO we should never try to interpret ERT. In the beamer case, it was necessary, since old ERT arguments cease to work due to the redefinitions. Jürgen

Segfault in comparing documents

[repost as I sent it to the wrong lyx list by mistake] I never use the compare documents feature and while trying it out today I got a segfault. I enclosed what I got in the terminal below. The culprit seems to be the lack of a Title* environment in one of the two layouts. The two papers I

Re: Segfault in comparing documents

16/05/2014 15:33, stefano franchi: [repost as I sent it to the wrong lyx list by mistake] I never use the compare documents feature and while trying it out today I got a segfault. I enclosed what I got in the terminal below. The culprit seems to be the lack of a Title* environment in one of the

Re: [LyX/master] Do not forget last word of paragraph in completion

16/05/2014 15:22, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: commit ee7c4db72a9dd392d7e1e34463c3ae11fce670ee Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org Date: Fri May 16 15:17:10 2014 +0200 Do not forget last word of paragraph in completion With the old code, the last word of a paragraph would not

Re: [LyX/master] Do not forget last word of paragraph in completion

On 05/16/2014 09:42 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: 16/05/2014 15:22, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: commit ee7c4db72a9dd392d7e1e34463c3ae11fce670ee Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org Date: Fri May 16 15:17:10 2014 +0200 Do not forget last word of paragraph in completion With

Re: [LyX/master] Do not forget last word of paragraph in completion

16/05/2014 16:12, Richard Heck: Richard, this is candidate for branch. There is no hurry since nobody ever noticed it :) As you think best. I'll wait for 2.1.2 for this kind of mundane stuff. JMarc

Re: Segfault in comparing documents

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.orgwrote: 16/05/2014 15:33, stefano franchi: [repost as I sent it to the wrong lyx list by mistake] I never use the compare documents feature and while trying it out today I got a segfault. I enclosed what I got in the

Re: [LyX/master] Fix an on-screen representation glitch.

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 03:31:51PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: commit 95787a0a4c3f6c037b22cb4ba8c98f2e8fa988de Author: Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org Date: Fri May 16 15:11:08 2014 +0200 Fix an on-screen representation glitch. If a layout has NextNoIndent set to true,

Re: Re: Re: Re: Plans for python support on lyx-2.2

On Thursday 15 May 2014 21:07:28 Georg Baum wrote: This plan looks sensible. As far as OS X 10.7 is concerned: https://www.python.org/download/mac claims that you can install their binary packages in parallel to the system python, so if anybody really wants to use a current version of LyX

Re: Plans for python support on lyx-2.2

On 05/16/2014 11:10 AM, José Matos wrote: On Thursday 15 May 2014 21:07:28 Georg Baum wrote: This plan looks sensible. As far as OS X 10.7 is concerned: https://www.python.org/download/mac claims that you can install their binary packages in parallel to the system python, so if anybody really

Re: [LyX/master] Fix an on-screen representation glitch.

On 05/16/2014 11:07 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 03:31:51PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: commit 95787a0a4c3f6c037b22cb4ba8c98f2e8fa988de Author: Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org Date: Fri May 16 15:11:08 2014 +0200 Fix an on-screen representation glitch.

Re: Call for testers: the features/str-metrics branch

11/05/2014 23:37, Guy Rutenberg: Hi, On 12 May 2014 00:31, Guy Rutenberg guyrutenb...@gmail.com mailto:guyrutenb...@gmail.com wrote: I did some initial testing and came up with the following wrong behavior: I actually found a more serious bug. When in RTL mode (`language hebrew`) if

Re: [LyX/master] Fix an on-screen representation glitch.

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:50:44AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: On 05/16/2014 11:07 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: Richard, this could go to branch. It's only cosmetic, though. As you think best. I pushed it. However, git told me bad things: $ git push Counting objects: 9, done. Delta

Re: [LyX/master] Fix an on-screen representation glitch.

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 10:37:31PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:50:44AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: On 05/16/2014 11:07 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: Richard, this could go to branch. It's only cosmetic, though. As you think best. I pushed it. However, git

Re: Where is my menubar?

On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote: On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote: Does one have to do this every time? Yes (or use an alias). I guess that's good in the sense that it's 100% reproducible. There appears to be a bug in

Re: [LyX/master] Fix an on-screen representation glitch.

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org wrote: Merge the remote changes (e.g. 'git pull') before pushing again. See the When I get this error, doing a git pull --rebase is usually what I want. Git will not let you push if you do not have the latest version. Even if

Re: Call for testers: the features/str-metrics branch

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: 11/05/2014 23:37, Guy Rutenberg: Hi, On 12 May 2014 00:31, Guy Rutenberg guyrutenb...@gmail.com mailto:guyrutenb...@gmail.com wrote: I did some initial testing and came up with the following wrong

Re: [LyX/master] Fix an on-screen representation glitch.

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 05:45:27PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org wrote: Merge the remote changes (e.g. 'git pull') before pushing again. See the When I get this error, doing a git pull --rebase is usually what I want.

Re: [LyX/master] Fix an on-screen representation glitch.

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org wrote: Now git is still someway trying to also push 2.0.x and I would like to tell it not to do that, but I don't know neither why it still insists on 2.0.x nor what I can do. From what I understand, when you do a git push you

Re: [LyX/master] Fix an on-screen representation glitch.

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 06:09:17PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org wrote: Now git is still someway trying to also push 2.0.x and I would like to tell it not to do that, but I don't know neither why it still insists on 2.0.x

Re: [LyX/master] Fix an on-screen representation glitch.

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org wrote: and I simply plan removing the [branch 2.0.x] stanza. Ah, now I see what you meant above. I am still not used to 2.0.x as being old. I was reading it as I should read 2.1.x. I still put the date as 2013 also :) Scott

Re: [LyX/master] Fix an on-screen representation glitch.

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 06:26:00PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org wrote: and I simply plan removing the [branch 2.0.x] stanza. Ah, now I see what you meant above. I am still not used to 2.0.x as being old. I was reading it

Re: lyx2lyx roundtrip fails for Embedded Objects manual

2014-05-15 21:56 GMT+02:00 Georg Baum: > IMHO we should > never try to interpret ERT. > In the beamer case, it was necessary, since old ERT arguments cease to work due to the redefinitions. Jürgen

Segfault in comparing documents

[repost as I sent it to the wrong lyx list by mistake] I never use the "compare documents" feature and while trying it out today I got a segfault. I enclosed what I got in the terminal below. The culprit seems to be the lack of a "Title*" environment in one of the two layouts. The two papers I

Re: Segfault in comparing documents

16/05/2014 15:33, stefano franchi: [repost as I sent it to the wrong lyx list by mistake] I never use the "compare documents" feature and while trying it out today I got a segfault. I enclosed what I got in the terminal below. The culprit seems to be the lack of a "Title*" environment in one of

Re: [LyX/master] Do not forget last word of paragraph in completion

16/05/2014 15:22, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: commit ee7c4db72a9dd392d7e1e34463c3ae11fce670ee Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Date: Fri May 16 15:17:10 2014 +0200 Do not forget last word of paragraph in completion With the old code, the last word of a paragraph would

Re: [LyX/master] Do not forget last word of paragraph in completion

On 05/16/2014 09:42 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: 16/05/2014 15:22, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: commit ee7c4db72a9dd392d7e1e34463c3ae11fce670ee Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Date: Fri May 16 15:17:10 2014 +0200 Do not forget last word of paragraph in completion

Re: [LyX/master] Do not forget last word of paragraph in completion

16/05/2014 16:12, Richard Heck: Richard, this is candidate for branch. There is no hurry since nobody ever noticed it :) As you think best. I'll wait for 2.1.2 for this kind of mundane stuff. JMarc

Re: Segfault in comparing documents

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > 16/05/2014 15:33, stefano franchi: > > [repost as I sent it to the wrong lyx list by mistake] >> >> I never use the "compare documents" feature and while trying it out >> today I got a segfault. I enclosed what I

Re: [LyX/master] Fix an on-screen representation glitch.

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 03:31:51PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > commit 95787a0a4c3f6c037b22cb4ba8c98f2e8fa988de > Author: Enrico Forestieri > Date: Fri May 16 15:11:08 2014 +0200 > > Fix an on-screen representation glitch. > > If a layout has NextNoIndent set

Re: Re: Re: Re: Plans for python support on lyx-2.2

On Thursday 15 May 2014 21:07:28 Georg Baum wrote: > This plan looks sensible. As far as OS X 10.7 is concerned: > https://www.python.org/download/mac claims that you can install their binary > packages in parallel to the system python, so if anybody really wants to use > a current version of

Re: Plans for python support on lyx-2.2

On 05/16/2014 11:10 AM, José Matos wrote: On Thursday 15 May 2014 21:07:28 Georg Baum wrote: This plan looks sensible. As far as OS X 10.7 is concerned: https://www.python.org/download/mac claims that you can install their binary packages in parallel to the system python, so if anybody really

Re: [LyX/master] Fix an on-screen representation glitch.

On 05/16/2014 11:07 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 03:31:51PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: commit 95787a0a4c3f6c037b22cb4ba8c98f2e8fa988de Author: Enrico Forestieri Date: Fri May 16 15:11:08 2014 +0200 Fix an on-screen representation glitch.

Re: Call for testers: the features/str-metrics branch

11/05/2014 23:37, Guy Rutenberg: Hi, On 12 May 2014 00:31, Guy Rutenberg > wrote: I did some initial testing and came up with the following wrong behavior: I actually found a more serious bug. When in RTL mode (`language

Re: [LyX/master] Fix an on-screen representation glitch.

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:50:44AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > On 05/16/2014 11:07 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > >Richard, this could go to branch. It's only cosmetic, though. > > As you think best. I pushed it. However, git told me bad things: $ git push Counting objects: 9, done. Delta

Re: [LyX/master] Fix an on-screen representation glitch.

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 10:37:31PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:50:44AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > > On 05/16/2014 11:07 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > >Richard, this could go to branch. It's only cosmetic, though. > > > > As you think best. > > I pushed it.

Re: Where is my menubar?

On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Richard Heck wrote: >> Does one have to do this every time? > > Yes (or use an alias). I guess that's good in the sense that it's 100% > reproducible. There appears to

Re: [LyX/master] Fix an on-screen representation glitch.

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: >> Merge the remote changes (e.g. 'git pull') before pushing again. See the When I get this error, doing a git pull --rebase is usually what I want. Git will not let you push if you do not have the latest version. Even

Re: Call for testers: the features/str-metrics branch

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > 11/05/2014 23:37, Guy Rutenberg: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> On 12 May 2014 00:31, Guy Rutenberg > > wrote: >> >> I did some initial testing and came up with

Re: [LyX/master] Fix an on-screen representation glitch.

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 05:45:27PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > >> Merge the remote changes (e.g. 'git pull') before pushing again. See the > > When I get this error, doing a > git pull --rebase > is usually what

Re: [LyX/master] Fix an on-screen representation glitch.

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > Now git is still someway trying to also push 2.0.x and I would > like to tell it not to do that, but I don't know neither why it still > insists on 2.0.x nor what I can do. >From what I understand, when you do a "git

Re: [LyX/master] Fix an on-screen representation glitch.

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 06:09:17PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > Now git is still someway trying to also push 2.0.x and I would > > like to tell it not to do that, but I don't know neither why it still > > insists

Re: [LyX/master] Fix an on-screen representation glitch.

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > and I simply plan removing the [branch "2.0.x"] stanza. Ah, now I see what you meant above. I am still not used to 2.0.x as being "old". I was reading it as I should read 2.1.x. I still put the date as 2013 also :)

Re: [LyX/master] Fix an on-screen representation glitch.

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 06:26:00PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > and I simply plan removing the [branch "2.0.x"] stanza. > > Ah, now I see what you meant above. I am still not used to 2.0.x as > being "old". I