Le 11/11/2014 20:58, Georg Baum a écrit :
commit 8f93600d3fa8182ba43973075cf37e7ecb2be8d3
Author: Georg Baum b...@lyx.org
Date: Tue Nov 11 07:22:14 2014 +0100
Prevent accidental usage of wrong copy constructor
Is this what we use boost:noncopyable for in some places? It would be
nice
Am 14.11.2014 um 11:21 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
commit 81badf8550f2fd5e614a22261c4885d747a72106
Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org
Date: Fri Nov 14 11:13:38 2014 +0100
+ static_castchar_type(row.sel_end),
+
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 11/11/2014 20:58, Georg Baum a écrit :
commit 8f93600d3fa8182ba43973075cf37e7ecb2be8d3
Author: Georg Baum b...@lyx.org
Date: Tue Nov 11 07:22:14 2014 +0100
Prevent accidental usage of wrong copy constructor
Is this what we use boost:noncopyable for
In http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/704 John Levon once complained about
that we allow to insert floats etc. while the cursor is in math.
Currently we still allow this but place the float before the formula.
This might not what the user expects (he might have it behind the
formula or wonders
On 14/11/2014 18:48, Georg Baum wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 11/11/2014 20:58, Georg Baum a écrit :
commit 8f93600d3fa8182ba43973075cf37e7ecb2be8d3
Author: Georg Baum b...@lyx.org
Date: Tue Nov 11 07:22:14 2014 +0100
Prevent accidental usage of wrong copy constructor
Is
Georg Baum wrote:
commit 0f2069b8a5967aac1b4f841214294f1fe21d2cad
Author: Georg Baum b...@lyx.org
Date: Fri Nov 14 21:30:42 2014 +0100
Fix recursive math macro crash (bug #9140)
This is different from bug #8999, since in this case a new macro
instance is created. You
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Nitpick: private stuff is at the end of the class not at the top.
Sure, but the private noncopyable stuff is the only thing I prefer at the
top, since it is then near the other contructors.
Abdel.
PS: I got some nice ideas today about teletext charset handling
On 11/14/2014 08:34 PM, Georg Baum wrote:
Georg Baum wrote:
commit 0f2069b8a5967aac1b4f841214294f1fe21d2cad
Author: Georg Baum b...@lyx.org
Date: Fri Nov 14 21:30:42 2014 +0100
Fix recursive math macro crash (bug #9140)
This is different from bug #8999, since in this case a
On 11/14/2014 09:02 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I agree with you actually. My points were probably:
* we should get rid of the few users of boost::noncopyable
* ot would be better to use the terse style of comments we use elsewhere.
It turns out there are only three places we use it. Now
Le 11/11/2014 20:58, Georg Baum a écrit :
commit 8f93600d3fa8182ba43973075cf37e7ecb2be8d3
Author: Georg Baum
Date: Tue Nov 11 07:22:14 2014 +0100
Prevent accidental usage of wrong copy constructor
Is this what we use boost:noncopyable for in some places? It would be
Am 14.11.2014 um 11:21 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
commit 81badf8550f2fd5e614a22261c4885d747a72106
Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Date: Fri Nov 14 11:13:38 2014 +0100
+ static_cast(row.sel_end),
+
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 11/11/2014 20:58, Georg Baum a écrit :
>> commit 8f93600d3fa8182ba43973075cf37e7ecb2be8d3
>> Author: Georg Baum
>> Date: Tue Nov 11 07:22:14 2014 +0100
>>
>> Prevent accidental usage of wrong copy constructor
>
> Is this what we use
In http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/704 John Levon once complained about
that we allow to insert floats etc. while the cursor is in math.
Currently we still allow this but place the float before the formula.
This might not what the user expects (he might have it behind the
formula or wonders
On 14/11/2014 18:48, Georg Baum wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 11/11/2014 20:58, Georg Baum a écrit :
commit 8f93600d3fa8182ba43973075cf37e7ecb2be8d3
Author: Georg Baum
Date: Tue Nov 11 07:22:14 2014 +0100
Prevent accidental usage of wrong copy constructor
Is
Georg Baum wrote:
> commit 0f2069b8a5967aac1b4f841214294f1fe21d2cad
> Author: Georg Baum
> Date: Fri Nov 14 21:30:42 2014 +0100
>
> Fix recursive math macro crash (bug #9140)
>
> This is different from bug #8999, since in this case a new macro
> instance is
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Nitpick: private stuff is at the end of the class not at the top.
Sure, but the private noncopyable stuff is the only thing I prefer at the
top, since it is then near the other contructors.
> Abdel.
>
> PS: I got some nice ideas today about teletext charset handling
On 11/14/2014 08:34 PM, Georg Baum wrote:
Georg Baum wrote:
commit 0f2069b8a5967aac1b4f841214294f1fe21d2cad
Author: Georg Baum
Date: Fri Nov 14 21:30:42 2014 +0100
Fix recursive math macro crash (bug #9140)
This is different from bug #8999, since in this case
On 11/14/2014 09:02 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I agree with you actually. My points were probably:
* we should get rid of the few users of boost::noncopyable
* ot would be better to use the terse style of comments we use elsewhere.
It turns out there are only three places we use it. Now
18 matches
Mail list logo