On 2015-06-08, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 04.06.2015 um 23:31 schrieb Guenter Milde:
Do you really need a full path to the binary on Windows?
Yes.
OK.
Please keep the current distinction of
program call (ac_prog)
program name (ac_word)
path (path)
even if inkscape is
Am Dienstag, 9. Juni 2015 um 00:31:16, schrieb Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de
Am 04.06.2015 um 18:12 schrieb Georg Baum:
It is forbidden to update layouttranslations in a stable release, and if an
update is done in master it must not be done by hand,
Richard kindly already reverted it.
09.06.2015 16:53, LyX Ticket Tracker пишет:
#9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3
-+-
Reporter: valentin630 | Owner: lasgouttes
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 2.1.4
Component: general
09.06.2015 18:39, LyX Ticket Tracker пишет:
#9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3
-+-
Reporter: valentin630 | Owner: lasgouttes
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 2.1.4
Component: general
09.06.2015 19:57, Jürgen Spitzmüller пишет:
2015-06-09 18:51 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin kuz...@fnal.gov
mailto:kuz...@fnal.gov:
Sorry, I do not have a spellchecker in Lyx stil
Did you reconfigure LyX after you installed libhunspell-dev? If so,
could you please post the configure.log?
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Valentin A. Kuzmin kuz...@fnal.gov wrote:
09.06.2015 19:01, Jürgen Spitzmüller пишет:
2015-06-09 17:56 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin kuz...@fnal.gov:
I had installed hunspell:
[maxt ~] $ sudo apt-get install hunspell
Reading package lists... Done
Building
2015-06-09 18:09 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin kuz...@fnal.gov:
Couldn't you list pakages
which I should install to have spellchecker?
I do not use *buntu myself, but I googled it for you:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/maverick/i386/libhunspell-dev
Jürgen
Is it possible in 10.10?
09.06.2015 19:16, Jürgen Spitzmüller пишет:
2015-06-09 18:09 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin kuz...@fnal.gov
mailto:kuz...@fnal.gov:
Couldn't you list pakages
which I should install to have spellchecker?
I do not use *buntu myself, but I googled it for you:
09.06.2015 19:01, Jürgen Spitzmüller пишет:
2015-06-09 17:56 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin kuz...@fnal.gov
mailto:kuz...@fnal.gov:
I had installed hunspell:
[maxt ~] $ sudo apt-get install hunspell
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state
2015-06-09 19:01 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin kuz...@fnal.gov:
I do not understand exactly reconfigure LyX. Does it means that I should
repeat:
./configue
make
make install
Yes.
Jürgen
?
Am Dienstag, 9. Juni 2015 um 18:16:43, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
sp...@lyx.org
2015-06-09 18:09 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin kuz...@fnal.gov:
Couldn't you list pakages
which I should install to have spellchecker?
I do not use *buntu myself, but I googled it for you:
2015-06-09 17:56 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin kuz...@fnal.gov:
I had installed hunspell:
[maxt ~] $ sudo apt-get install hunspell
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
hunspell is already the newest version.
The following packages were
09.06.2015 18:52, LyX Ticket Tracker пишет:
#9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3
-+-
Reporter: valentin630 | Owner: lasgouttes
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: general
2015-06-09 18:51 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin kuz...@fnal.gov:
Sorry, I do not have a spellchecker in Lyx stil
Did you reconfigure LyX after you installed libhunspell-dev? If so, could
you please post the configure.log?
Jürgen
On 06/09/2015 02:31 PM, Georg Baum wrote:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Why do we have a single pt_BR translation in layouttranslations in the
2.1.x branch if a modification is not allowed.
pt_BR is new in branch for LyX 2.1.4 so there was definitely a change of
the file.
No. The last change was at
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Why do we have a single pt_BR translation in layouttranslations in the
2.1.x branch if a modification is not allowed.
pt_BR is new in branch for LyX 2.1.4 so there was definitely a change of
the file.
No. The last change was at bdc1271c3905, which was before the 2.1.0
Thanks a lot
Now it works
Best greetings
Valentin
09.06.2015 20:05, Jürgen Spitzmüller пишет:
2015-06-09 19:01 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin kuz...@fnal.gov
mailto:kuz...@fnal.gov:
I do not understand exactly reconfigure LyX. Does it means that
I should repeat:
./configue
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 04.06.2015 um 18:17 schrieb Georg Baum:
Could some pythionist please review this?
First you need to explain why you use this complicated quoting, and what
problem it solves.
If such a quoting is really needed,
Of course it is necessary otherwise I wouldn't have done
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 02.06.2015 um 20:27 schrieb Georg Baum:
tex2lyx -f -roundtrip test-insets.tex
This command looks good. Again, please answer my question: Did you copy
test-insets.tex somewhere, or did you run this command on the .tex file
in the git tree?
I don't understand what yo
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 31.05.2015 um 22:01 schrieb Georg Baum:
I tested that the old LyX file produced correct .tex results, now I see
that it creates correct .tex results with the new version as well. It did
not occur to me that both hor_pos c and hor_pos l in .lyx would
produce the same
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:29:48PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
commit c668ebf61151e1cdf6b583dc5ecdc8f8a0cfc678
Author: Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org
Date: Sat May 10 23:25:11 2014 +0200
Fix bugs #8546 and #9055, and introduce new separator inset.
This commit seems to have
Using automake 1.15 (though I think I also saw this earlier), I get a
ton of warnings like:
src/tex2lyx/Makefile.am:71: warning: source file '../version.cpp' is in
a subdirectory,
src/tex2lyx/Makefile.am:71: but option 'subdir-objects' is disabled
I'll post all of them below. Anything to
On 06/09/2015 01:07 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote:
Am 04.06.2015 um 02:37 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
Attached is a patch.
No opinions? Should we add support for Pandoc in LyX 2.2 or not?
From a user perspective, that would be nice.
Am Dienstag, 9. Juni 2015 um 00:31:16, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
> Am 04.06.2015 um 18:12 schrieb Georg Baum:
>
> > It is forbidden to update layouttranslations in a stable release, and if an
> > update is done in master it must not be done by hand,
>
> Richard kindly already reverted
On 2015-06-08, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 04.06.2015 um 23:31 schrieb Guenter Milde:
>> Do you really need a full path to the binary on Windows?
> Yes.
OK.
>> Please keep the current distinction of
>>program call (ac_prog)
>>program name (ac_word)
>>path (path)
>> even
On 06/09/2015 01:07 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 04.06.2015 um 02:37 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
Attached is a patch.
No opinions? Should we add support for Pandoc in LyX 2.2 or not?
From a user perspective, that would be nice.
Using automake 1.15 (though I think I also saw this earlier), I get a
ton of warnings like:
src/tex2lyx/Makefile.am:71: warning: source file '../version.cpp' is in
a subdirectory,
src/tex2lyx/Makefile.am:71: but option 'subdir-objects' is disabled
I'll post all of them below. Anything to
09.06.2015 18:39, LyX Ticket Tracker пишет:
#9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3
-+-
Reporter: valentin630 | Owner: lasgouttes
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 2.1.4
Component: general
09.06.2015 16:53, LyX Ticket Tracker пишет:
#9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3
-+-
Reporter: valentin630 | Owner: lasgouttes
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 2.1.4
Component: general
09.06.2015 18:52, LyX Ticket Tracker пишет:
#9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3
-+-
Reporter: valentin630 | Owner: lasgouttes
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: general
2015-06-09 17:56 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin :
> I had installed hunspell:
>
> [maxt ~] $ sudo apt-get install hunspell
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> hunspell is already the newest version.
> The following
09.06.2015 19:01, Jürgen Spitzmüller пишет:
2015-06-09 17:56 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin >:
I had installed hunspell:
[maxt ~] $ sudo apt-get install hunspell
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Valentin A. Kuzmin wrote:
> 09.06.2015 19:01, Jürgen Spitzmüller пишет:
>
> 2015-06-09 17:56 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin :
>>
>> I had installed hunspell:
>>
>> [maxt ~] $ sudo apt-get install hunspell
>> Reading package lists...
2015-06-09 18:09 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin :
>
> Couldn't you list pakages
> which I should install to have spellchecker?
>
I do not use *buntu myself, but I googled it for you:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/maverick/i386/libhunspell-dev
Jürgen
>
> Is it possible in 10.10?
Am Dienstag, 9. Juni 2015 um 18:16:43, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
> 2015-06-09 18:09 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin :
>
> >
> > Couldn't you list pakages
> > which I should install to have spellchecker?
> >
>
> I do not use *buntu myself, but I googled it for you:
09.06.2015 19:16, Jürgen Spitzmüller пишет:
2015-06-09 18:09 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin >:
Couldn't you list pakages
which I should install to have spellchecker?
I do not use *buntu myself, but I googled it for you:
2015-06-09 18:51 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin :
>
> Sorry, I do not have a spellchecker in Lyx stil
>
Did you reconfigure LyX after you installed libhunspell-dev? If so, could
you please post the configure.log?
Jürgen
09.06.2015 19:57, Jürgen Spitzmüller пишет:
2015-06-09 18:51 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin >:
Sorry, I do not have a spellchecker in Lyx stil
Did you reconfigure LyX after you installed libhunspell-dev? If so,
could you please post the
2015-06-09 19:01 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin :
> I do not understand exactly "reconfigure LyX". Does it means that I should
> repeat:
>
> ./configue
> make
> make install
>
Yes.
Jürgen
>
> ?
>
>
Thanks a lot
Now it works
Best greetings
Valentin
09.06.2015 20:05, Jürgen Spitzmüller пишет:
2015-06-09 19:01 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin >:
I do not understand exactly "reconfigure LyX". Does it means that
I should repeat:
./configue
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Why do we have a single pt_BR translation in layouttranslations in the
> 2.1.x branch if a modification is not allowed.
> pt_BR is new in branch for LyX 2.1.4 so there was definitely a change of
> the file.
No. The last change was at bdc1271c3905, which was before the 2.1.0
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 04.06.2015 um 18:17 schrieb Georg Baum:
>
>>> Could some pythionist please review this?
>>
>> First you need to explain why you use this complicated quoting, and what
>> problem it solves.
>> If such a quoting is really needed,
>
> Of course it is necessary otherwise I
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 02.06.2015 um 20:27 schrieb Georg Baum:
>
>>> tex2lyx -f -roundtrip test-insets.tex
>>
>> This command looks good. Again, please answer my question: Did you copy
>> test-insets.tex somewhere, or did you run this command on the .tex file
>> in the git tree?
>
> I don't
On 06/09/2015 02:31 PM, Georg Baum wrote:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Why do we have a single pt_BR translation in layouttranslations in the
2.1.x branch if a modification is not allowed.
pt_BR is new in branch for LyX 2.1.4 so there was definitely a change of
the file.
No. The last change was at
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 31.05.2015 um 22:01 schrieb Georg Baum:
>
>> I tested that the old LyX file produced correct .tex results, now I see
>> that it creates correct .tex results with the new version as well. It did
>> not occur to me that both hor_pos "c" and hor_pos "l" in .lyx would
>>
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:29:48PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> commit c668ebf61151e1cdf6b583dc5ecdc8f8a0cfc678
> Author: Enrico Forestieri
> Date: Sat May 10 23:25:11 2014 +0200
>
> Fix bugs #8546 and #9055, and introduce new separator inset.
This commit seems to
46 matches
Mail list logo