Re: [Patch] Two lyxpak bugs

Am Mittwoch, 1. Juli 2015 um 23:32:01, schrieb Guy Rutenberg guyrutenb...@gmail.com Hi Pavel, On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote: Guy, while you are around, could you please check translation of the four new strings we introduced for lyx 2.1, they are

Ubuntu Trusty testers needed

Dear all, Ubuntu trusty 14.04, the long term support version, currently only has LyX 2.0.6. While it is not possible in a LTS version to upgrade to the latest LyX version[*], it has been decided to update to the latest 2.0.x version, that is 2.0.8.1. This is now accessible in the proposed

Re: Ubuntu Trusty testers needed

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: Dear all, Ubuntu trusty 14.04, the long term support version, currently only has LyX 2.0.6. While it is not possible in a LTS version to upgrade to the latest LyX version[*], it has been decided to update to the

Re: Ubuntu Trusty testers needed

Just curious, why are we testing old versions of an application with known catastrophic bugs? Wasn't the uncorrupted save feature implemented in the 2.1 branch? Also, I have been using the 2.1.3 exclusively for a long time and I admit that I am a power user. It is stable as anything I use and when

Re: false positive in test for unencodable preamble

On 2015-06-30, Georg Baum wrote: Guenter Milde wrote: On 2015-06-26, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: 2015-06-26 16:44 GMT+02:00 Guenter Milde mi...@users.sf.net: Please don't check for unencodable characters in comments. It's still invalid encoding, since the output file contains invalid glyphs

Re: Ubuntu Trusty testers needed

On 07/02/2015 03:24 PM, Benedict Holland wrote: Just curious, why are we testing old versions of an application with known catastrophic bugs? Wasn't the uncorrupted save feature implemented in the 2.1 branch? Also, I have been using the 2.1.3 exclusively for a long time and I admit that I am a

Ubuntu Trusty testers needed

Dear all, Ubuntu trusty 14.04, the long term support version, currently only has LyX 2.0.6. While it is not possible in a LTS version to upgrade to the latest LyX version[*], it has been decided to update to the latest 2.0.x version, that is 2.0.8.1. This is now accessible in the proposed

Re: [Patch] Two lyxpak bugs

Am Mittwoch, 1. Juli 2015 um 23:32:01, schrieb Guy Rutenberg > Hi Pavel, > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > Guy, > > while you are around, could you please check translation of the four new > > strings > > we introduced for

Re: Ubuntu Trusty testers needed

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Dear all, > > Ubuntu trusty 14.04, the long term support version, currently only has LyX > 2.0.6. While it is not possible in a LTS version to upgrade to the latest > LyX version[*], it has been decided to update

Re: Ubuntu Trusty testers needed

Just curious, why are we testing old versions of an application with known catastrophic bugs? Wasn't the uncorrupted save feature implemented in the 2.1 branch? Also, I have been using the 2.1.3 exclusively for a long time and I admit that I am a power user. It is stable as anything I use and when

Re: false positive in test for unencodable preamble

On 2015-06-30, Georg Baum wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: >> On 2015-06-26, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >>> 2015-06-26 16:44 GMT+02:00 Guenter Milde : Please don't check for unencodable characters in comments. >>> It's still invalid encoding, since the output file contains

Re: Ubuntu Trusty testers needed

On 07/02/2015 03:24 PM, Benedict Holland wrote: Just curious, why are we testing old versions of an application with known catastrophic bugs? Wasn't the uncorrupted save feature implemented in the 2.1 branch? Also, I have been using the 2.1.3 exclusively for a long time and I admit that I am a