Re: [patch] Display the correct horizontal alignment in AMS environments

Le 06/01/2016 20:51, Georg Baum a écrit : Guillaume Munch wrote: Le 03/01/2016 11:04, Georg Baum a écrit : Really? The amount of code changes is big, and I cannot see from the patch that it has no influence on the .tex input/output or mathml/xhtml output. If it can not be 100% guaranteed

Re: "Splitting of consecutive environments has been reworked and enhanced"

Le 20/12/2015 17:31, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : Do you mean that you expect the parbreak separator to be used often on purpose, instead of a plain separator, not just as the result of a conversion 2.1 -> 2.2 ? It is annoying repeating again all discussions made at the time those insets were

Re: Status on Mac with El Capitan

Am Samstag, 9. Januar 2016 um 15:02:14, schrieb Kornel Benko > Am Samstag, 9. Januar 2016 um 14:27:46, schrieb Stephan Witt > > Am 08.01.2016 um 10:26 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > > > > > > Le 08/01/2016 10:08, Stephan Witt a écrit : > >

Re: Status on Mac with El Capitan

Le 09/01/16 23:01, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : I do not understand it. I'm fine as long as another developer gives an explicit +1. I see it is in now. It is fine for me. JMarc

Re: [patch] Display the correct horizontal alignment in AMS environments

Guillaume Munch wrote: > I agree that the current situation regarding \output_change and > \tracking_change is bad and should be fixed. I gave what I think is the > proper solution, taking into account the debate that was on the list. > The patch is very simple (see the earlier message: >

Re: [PATCH] compilation fix for libc++ in C++11 mode

Le 08/01/16 22:50, Guillaume Munch a écrit : I tried to look it up. It might work right now but I think we should get rid of this subclassing entirely. It is just used for forward-declaration and defining helper functions. I have a bad feeling about starting to define custom constructors for STL

Re: [patch] origin again

Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 12:44:12AM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: >> >> I am fine with this and you have a +1 from me. However, note that the >> origin handling is currently broken. Indeed, allowing to save the >> document directory in the preferences, after creating

Re: [patch] Display the correct horizontal alignment in AMS environments

Le 08/01/16 23:05, Guillaume Munch a écrit : I agree that the current situation regarding \output_change and \tracking_change is bad and should be fixed. I gave what I think is the proper solution, taking into account the debate that was on the list. The patch is very simple (see the earlier

Re: beta release

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Does any one view an issue as a beta blocker? The current situation regarding \output_changes is not good, so I would see http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9841 as a beta blocker. Fortunately Guillaume implemented a proper solution, so the only thing which is needed is

Re: [PATCH] compilation fix for libc++ in C++11 mode

Le 10/01/2016 20:42, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Le 08/01/16 22:50, Guillaume Munch a écrit : I tried to look it up. It might work right now but I think we should get rid of this subclassing entirely. It is just used for forward-declaration and defining helper functions. I have a bad feeling

Re: [PATCH] compilation fix for libc++ in C++11 mode

Le 10/01/16 22:17, Guillaume Munch a écrit : Since you have gotten a +1 from somebody else, sure. I was not so sure myself, so I wanted to offer an alternative that was sure to be safe. I think this will have to be done nevertheless, so I am going to keep it for later. Indeed Georg's comment

Re: [patch] Display the correct horizontal alignment in AMS environments

Le 10/01/2016 19:08, Georg Baum a écrit : > I looked at the patches in http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9841, and I think it is a good implementation of the consensus that has been reached earlier. You have a +1 from me, but because this has been discussed with some strong opinions I suggest that

Re: [PATCH] compilation fix for libc++ in C++11 mode

Le 10/01/2016 21:26, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Le 10/01/16 22:17, Guillaume Munch a écrit : Since you have gotten a +1 from somebody else, sure. I was not so sure myself, so I wanted to offer an alternative that was sure to be safe. I think this will have to be done nevertheless, so I am

Re: [PATCH] compilation fix for libc++ in C++11 mode

Le 10/01/16 22:33, Guillaume Munch a écrit : I imagine that Toc and other classes are being forward-declared in some headers probably for the same speed reason. Toc.h is there to provide an alternative to the forward declarations without sacrificing speed (or maybe my Toc.h already includes too

Re: Status on Mac with El Capitan

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 08/01/2016 10:08, Stephan Witt a écrit : >> Am 08.01.2016 um 09:28 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : >>> Yes, unless somone has a different brilliant idea. > >>> This problem will go away in 2.3. >> >> How? With your fix? Does it fix wrong LyX

Re: #9794: inset-modify tabular commands are incorrectly disabled

Guillaume Munch wrote: > So I can chmod +x all the scripts? This cannot harm, so +1 from me (for every script in development/tools/). Georg

Questions for Uwe once you are back

Hi Uwe, I hope your trip went OK. Do you have an idea of when you will be able to get back to LyX development? It would be nice to know so we can get an idea of when to release beta1. Since we know you are busy, we have aggregated most of our questions for you into one email. The following

Re: Questions for Uwe?

On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 06:03:07PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 11:58:16AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: > > > > > > Am 09.01.2016 um 01:32 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > > >S1. Would it be reasonable to build beta1 installers with both Qt 5.5.1 > > >and 5.6.0beta1? > > >

Re: [patch] Display the correct horizontal alignment in AMS environments

Le 10/01/2016 21:11, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Le 08/01/16 23:05, Guillaume Munch a écrit : I agree that the current situation regarding \output_change and \tracking_change is bad and should be fixed. I gave what I think is the proper solution, taking into account the debate that was on

Re: Questions for Uwe once you are back

Am 10.01.2016 um 22:21 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: I hope your trip went OK. Hi all, a happy new year. I am just back so don't expect too much - I have also a real life. Do you have an idea of when you will be able to get back to LyX development? Tomorrow. It would be nice to know so we