Re: Questions for Uwe once you are back

Am 15.01.2016 um 22:33 schrieb Georg Baum: And these problems do exist. The 2.2 alpha is not the first windows binary that turned out to be built from different sources than originally thought (http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9878). I remember a similar issue from several years ago, might be

Re: [LyX/master] Update LFUNs.lyx to current format

Le 16/01/2016 10:12, Georg Baum a écrit : Guillaume Munch wrote: I believe as well that we should not extend the already long checklist for format changes. Updatedocs could take care of running gen_lfuns and then update it to the latest format. Good idea. I added the generation of LFUNs.lyx,

Re: Questions for Uwe once you are back

Am 15.01.2016 um 22:39 schrieb Georg Baum: Peter Kümmel wrote: I also don't see a problem to build from a clean git repository. Only thing I would ensure is to "sit" on tagged release. I agree that building from a clean git directory is not a problem concerning the resulting build or

Re: Questions for Uwe once you are back

Am 15.01.2016 um 16:19 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am 15.01.2016 um 15:48 schrieb Peter Kümmel : Am 15.01.2016 um 15:01 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am 15.01.2016 um 14:41 schrieb Peter Kümmel : Am 14.01.2016 um 23:32 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: Am 14.01.2016 um

Re: [LyX/master] Prefered use of direct links to ctan, not to a mirror

Am Samstag, 16. Januar 2016 um 12:16:14, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > Am Donnerstag, den 14.01.2016, 00:09 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > commit 51bc75ca2ba3d8fb862bbbad474841327f1d9eb7 > > Author: Kornel Benko > > Date: Thu Jan 14 00:07:57 2016 +0100 > > > >

Re: [LyX/master] Prefered use of direct links to ctan, not to a mirror

On 2016-01-16, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Samstag, 16. Januar 2016 um 12:16:14, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > >> Am Donnerstag, den 14.01.2016, 00:09 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko: >> > commit 51bc75ca2ba3d8fb862bbbad474841327f1d9eb7 >> > Author: Kornel Benko >> > Date:

Re: [LyX/master] Prefered use of direct links to ctan, not to a mirror

Am Donnerstag, den 14.01.2016, 00:09 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko: > commit 51bc75ca2ba3d8fb862bbbad474841327f1d9eb7 > Author: Kornel Benko > Date:   Thu Jan 14 00:07:57 2016 +0100 > > Prefered use of direct links to ctan, not to a mirror Actually, the CTAN team always advices

Re: Beta hopefully soon, only waiting on Windows installer(s)

Am 16. Januar 2016 23:43:12 MEZ, schrieb Scott Kostyshak : >Dear all, > >Hopefully we will release beta1 very soon. As far as I'm concerned, the >only thing we are waiting for is the Windows installer(s). The reason >why we are waiting for this and not just proceeding with the

Re: "Splitting of consecutive environments has been reworked and enhanced"

Le 16/01/2016 22:26, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 06:29:32PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: Le 16/01/2016 17:06, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 07:45:35PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: However, this reveals new ways of creating an "after" cursor

Re: Beta hopefully soon, only waiting on Windows installer(s)

Le 16/01/2016 22:43, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Dear all, Hopefully we will release beta1 very soon. As far as I'm concerned, the only thing we are waiting for is the Windows installer(s). The reason why we are waiting for this and not just proceeding with the other parts of the beta1 release is

Re: "Splitting of consecutive environments has been reworked and enhanced"

Le 16/01/2016 22:26, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : It is somehow better, but it is very strange because the behaviour is not consistent: most of the time it selects the word before, but sometimes it selects the separator (i.e. separator is removed if I type a key). I get the second behaviour if I

Re: "Splitting of consecutive environments has been reworked and enhanced"

On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 03:23:31AM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 16/01/2016 22:31, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : > >On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 07:14:56PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: > > > >>Le 16/01/2016 18:34, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : > >>>On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:15:44PM +0100, Enrico

Re: [LyX/master] Update LFUNs.lyx to current format

Guillaume Munch wrote: > I believe as well that we should not extend the already long checklist > for format changes. Updatedocs could take care of running gen_lfuns and > then update it to the latest format. Good idea. I added the generation of LFUNs.lyx, the version updating did exist

Re: Questions for Uwe once you are back

Am 13.01.2016 um 00:21 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: CMake. As soon as I create a new folder and copy there code, I need to run CMake from scratch and specify about 40 paths (most of them to Qt). If I make a mistake there I get strange builds. Uwe, why do you waste you time with such a msvc2010 fiddling?

Re: [LyX/master] Update LFUNs.lyx to current format

On 2016-01-16, Georg Baum wrote: > Guillaume Munch wrote: >> I believe as well that we should not extend the already long checklist >> for format changes. Updatedocs could take care of running gen_lfuns and >> then update it to the latest format. > Good idea. I added the generation of LFUNs.lyx,

Re: two patches for ctest

Am Samstag, 16. Januar 2016 um 14:47:05, schrieb Guenter Milde > On 2016-01-13, Guenter Milde wrote: > > Dear Scott, > > > maybe it is not the time now, yet there are two more patches for the ctests > > and examples in the pipeline... > > > After applying the second one

Re: Windows: release with Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6?

We could also release both, one as the main and the other as backup. JMarc Le 16 janvier 2016 16:21:15 GMT+01:00, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >We need to figure out the MSVC vs. mingw issue before releasing beta. I >don't think it would be a good idea to release one and then

Re: "Splitting of consecutive environments has been reworked and enhanced"

Le 16/01/2016 17:06, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 07:45:35PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: However, this reveals new ways of creating an "after" cursor position: * A visually-after cursor position appears with Ctrl+Shift+Arrows (LFUN_*_SELECT_WORD of something like

Re: two patches for ctest

On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 04:02:55PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Samstag, 16. Januar 2016 um 14:47:05, schrieb Guenter Milde > > > On 2016-01-13, Guenter Milde wrote: > > > > Dear Scott, > > > > > maybe it is not the time now, yet there are two more patches for the > > >

Re: "Splitting of consecutive environments has been reworked and enhanced"

Le 16/01/2016 15:52, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 07:45:35PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: Le 14/01/2016 20:13, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 03:59:41PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: We might be speaking of two different issues: * If I click on

Re: Questions for Uwe once you are back

On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 12:13:54PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: > > Am 15.01.2016 um 22:33 schrieb Georg Baum: > > > >And these problems do exist. The 2.2 alpha is not the first windows > >binary that turned out to be built from different sources than > >originally thought

Re: "Splitting of consecutive environments has been reworked and enhanced"

Le 16/01/16 18:56, Guillaume Munch a écrit : Ok. What does DEPM stands for? Delete Empty Paragraph Mechanism. It is also the code that removes double spaces. JMarc

Re: two patches for ctest

On 2016-01-13, Guenter Milde wrote: Dear Scott, > maybe it is not the time now, yet there are two more patches for the ctests > and examples in the pipeline... > After applying the second one (aas_sample), I experienced a test failure: > The following tests FAILED: > 1945 -

Re: "Splitting of consecutive environments has been reworked and enhanced"

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 07:45:35PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 14/01/2016 20:13, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : > >On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 03:59:41PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: > >> > >>We might be speaking of two different issues: > >> > >>* If I click on the right-hand half of the

Re: Questions for Uwe once you are back

On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 12:02:52PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: > >Am 13.01.2016 um 00:21 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: > >>CMake. As soon as I create a new folder and copy there code, I need to > >>run CMake from scratch and specify about 40 paths (most of them to Qt). > >>If I make a mistake there I get

Re: "Splitting of consecutive environments has been reworked and enhanced"

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 07:45:35PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: > > However, this reveals new ways of creating an "after" cursor position: > > * A visually-after cursor position appears with Ctrl+Shift+Arrows > (LFUN_*_SELECT_WORD of something like this). It remains a right position > after

Re: "Splitting of consecutive environments has been reworked and enhanced"

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:15:44PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 06:40:21PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: > > > > Maybe ¶ does not grow on you as it did on me, but ultimately it is going > > to be your call. > > Maybe ¶ is also easier to implement and distinguishable

Re: "Splitting of consecutive environments has been reworked and enhanced"

On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 06:29:32PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 16/01/2016 17:06, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : > >On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 07:45:35PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: > >> > >>However, this reveals new ways of creating an "after" cursor position: > >> > >>* A visually-after

Re: "Splitting of consecutive environments has been reworked and enhanced"

On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 07:14:56PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 16/01/2016 18:34, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : > >On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:15:44PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > >>On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 06:40:21PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: > >>> > >>>Maybe ¶ does not grow on you as

Beta hopefully soon, only waiting on Windows installer(s)

Dear all, Hopefully we will release beta1 very soon. As far as I'm concerned, the only thing we are waiting for is the Windows installer(s). The reason why we are waiting for this and not just proceeding with the other parts of the beta1 release is that there might be changes needed to the source

[patch] - GIT - version control for LyX documents not detected

The attached patch fixes the broken detection of GIT version control. It seems so that Qt is caching the file meta data and fools the test of file emptiness. Perhaps this has changed with Qt5 and didn’t happen with Qt4… A proper solution for VCS would move doVCCommandWithOutput to

Re: "Splitting of consecutive environments has been reworked and enhanced"

Le 16/01/2016 18:34, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:15:44PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 06:40:21PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: Maybe ¶ does not grow on you as it did on me, but ultimately it is going to be your call. Maybe ¶ is also

Re: [patch] - GIT - version control for LyX documents not detected

On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 11:13:23PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: > The attached patch fixes the broken detection of GIT version control. > It seems so that Qt is caching the file meta data and fools the test > of file emptiness. Perhaps this has changed with Qt5 and didn’t happen > with Qt4… A proper

Re: "Splitting of consecutive environments has been reworked and enhanced"

Le 16/01/2016 22:31, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 07:14:56PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: Le 16/01/2016 18:34, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:15:44PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 06:40:21PM +, Guillaume Munch

Re: [patch] - GIT - version control for LyX documents not detected

On 01/16/2016 05:27 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 11:13:23PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: Perhaps a better fix is to disable QFileInfo caching or to call fi.refresh() every time in FileName::isFileEmpty()? Is anybody aware of other places having this kind of problem? Yes, I

Re: "Splitting of consecutive environments has been reworked and enhanced"

On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 03:03:20AM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 16/01/2016 22:26, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : > >On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 06:29:32PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: > > > >>Le 16/01/2016 17:06, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : > >>>On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 07:45:35PM +, Guillaume

Re: Beta hopefully soon, only waiting on Windows installer(s)

On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 02:30:06AM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 16/01/2016 22:43, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >Dear all, > > > >Hopefully we will release beta1 very soon. As far as I'm concerned, the > >only thing we are waiting for is the Windows installer(s). The reason > >why we are

Re: Beta hopefully soon, only waiting on Windows installer(s)

On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 03:22:46AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: > Am 16. Januar 2016 23:43:12 MEZ, schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > I would release the beta with the available Windows installer, but would also > mention, that because of men power this time on Windows there will be

Re: Windows: release with Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6?

On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 01:10:06AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 15.01.2016 um 03:39 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > >>Give me another day to test but I think that I am basically ready for beta1. > > > >Sounds good to me. > > I tested it a lot today on different PCs and from my point of view it is >

Re: Windows: release with Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6?

On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 04:56:01PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > We could also release both, one as the main and the other as backup. +1 Uwe, I know you do not have much time but are you willing to make both installers? It seems there is help available for both the MSVC and mingw if you