Re: #9794: inset-modify tabular commands are incorrectly disabled

Le 11/01/2016 18:54, Guillaume Munch a écrit : Attached takes all comments into account. I hope the additional explanations help. OK, let's go through the patches again. I am sorry this is taking so much time. 0001: a few remarks/questions: - I still do not understand why the dialog,

Re: [PATCH] Re: Update boost in 2.1 branch?

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 25/01/2016 10:58, Kornel Benko a écrit : >> Am Montag, 25. Januar 2016 um 10:43:15, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes >> >>> Le 22/01/2016 17:15, Kornel Benko a écrit : >> Even with this patch, I could not compile src/support/ForkedCalls.cpp

Re: [LyX/master] Invert and document test for "longest labeling label" problem.

On 2016-01-25, Kornel Benko wrote: > We need something like 'testcases waiting for solution' (a new directory?). We have this: attachments to Trac tickets. > If solved, the testcase migrates to the autotests directory. This should be done more consistently, maybe also caught up for already

Re: [LyX/master] Invert and document test for "longest labeling label" problem.

Am Montag, 25. Januar 2016 um 20:47:49, schrieb Georg Baum > Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Am Sonntag, 24. Januar 2016 um 22:19:25, schrieb Georg Baum > > > >> > >> See http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/4595 for label insets, there are

Re: [PATCH] Re: Update boost in 2.1 branch?

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 21/01/2016 15:42, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : >> >> Sigh. Now that I can test it with an older compiler (gcc 4.6, Ubuntu >> 12.04) I find that it does not compile in C++98 mode because of >> boost::next/prior. This has been fixed already in master, so I >>

Re: [patch] fix bug 9884

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Is this patch complete? I do not see where NeedLyXFootnoteCode is > required in the source? You are right of course. I stripped too much of the reversion of http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/0bf8b8a1/lyxgit. The attached one is complete. Georgdiff --git

Re: [LyX/master] Invert and document test for "longest labeling label" problem.

Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sonntag, 24. Januar 2016 um 22:19:25, schrieb Georg Baum > >> >> See http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/4595 for label insets, there are >> similar bugs for other insets that expect LaTeX code. Unfortunately this >> behaviour is indeed not

Re: [LyX/master] Invert and document test for "longest labeling label" problem.

Le 25/01/2016 19:47, Georg Baum a écrit : Kornel Benko wrote: Am Sonntag, 24. Januar 2016 um 22:19:25, schrieb Georg Baum See http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/4595 for label insets, there are similar bugs for other insets that expect LaTeX code. Unfortunately

Re: [LyX/master] Invert and document test for "longest labeling label" problem.

On 2016-01-25, Kornel Benko wrote: > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --] > Am Montag, 25. Januar 2016 um 19:00:08, schrieb Guenter Milde > >> On 2016-01-25, Kornel Benko wrote: >> > We need something like 'testcases waiting for solution' (a new

Re: [patch] fix bug 9925

Richard Heck wrote: > On 01/24/2016 08:55 AM, Georg Baum wrote: >> The date inset does currently not produce any output. This is a >> regression of http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/f09a9fe2/lyxgit. Before >> that change it did work only by accident: compare_timestamps() is called >> with two

Re: [LyX/master] Invert and document test for "longest labeling label" problem.

Am Montag, 25. Januar 2016 um 21:07:23, schrieb Guenter Milde > On 2016-01-25, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --] > > > Am Montag, 25. Januar 2016 um 19:00:08, schrieb Guenter Milde > > > >> On 2016-01-25,

Re: [LyX/master] Invert and document test for "longest labeling label" problem.

Am Montag, 25. Januar 2016 um 19:00:08, schrieb Guenter Milde > On 2016-01-25, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > We need something like 'testcases waiting for solution' (a new directory?). > > We have this: attachments to Trac tickets. > > > If solved, the testcase migrates to the

Re: #9794: inset-modify tabular commands are incorrectly disabled

Le 25/01/2016 15:04, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Le 11/01/2016 18:54, Guillaume Munch a écrit : Attached takes all comments into account. I hope the additional explanations help. OK, let's go through the patches again. I am sorry this is taking so much time. 0001: a few remarks/questions:

[patch] Re: ACM-siggraph failing with newest class/style files

Am 24.01.2016 um 19:14 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: Can anyone reproduce? It would be nice to know if we need to update our layout. Yes, I can. The ACM people changes almost everything in the preamble handling with acmsiggraph version 0.92. Some commands have completely been removed and new

Re: [patch] Display the correct horizontal alignment in AMS environments

Am 25.01.2016 um 07:21 schrieb Stephan Witt: I cannot apply your patch. I get the 2 attached errors and the TortoiseGit crashes. It tells me that it cannot find the revision 12e871a for InsetMathGrid.cpp. And indeed this revsion does not exists. Guillaume, can you please send a patch file

Re: ACM-siggraph failing with newest class/style files

On 2016-01-24, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Our ACM-Siggraph LyX template fails to compile (e.g. with pdflatex) > with the newest style/class files. Note that these are not included in > TeX Live and must be installed separately, as noted here: > http://wiki.lyx.org/Examples/AcmSiggraph In this

Re: [LyX/master] Invert and document test for "longest labeling label" problem.

Dear Kornel, On 2016-01-24, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sonntag, 24. Januar 2016 um 21:07:03, schrieb Günter Milde >> +# The "longest label" marker in a labeling must be valid LaTeX (just like >> ERT). >> +# What should we do: >> +# - document this, >> +# - escape special

Re: [PATCH] Re: Update boost in 2.1 branch?

Le 22/01/2016 22:55, Georg Baum a écrit : C++11 does not matter for 2.1 IMHO. Compilers will support C++98 much longer than 2.1 will be relevant, and even if that means to enable it by special command line options users can pass them to configure. I guess the TR1 support is finally biting us

Re: [PATCH] Re: Update boost in 2.1 branch?

Le 22/01/2016 17:15, Kornel Benko a écrit : Even with this patch, I could not compile src/support/ForkedCalls.cpp with gcc-4.8.4. This is in C++11 mode, right? Yes, it is set by checking if the compiler is able to use this mode. With autotools we let C++11 mode be disabled by default in

Re: [PATCH] Re: Update boost in 2.1 branch?

Am Montag, 25. Januar 2016 um 10:43:15, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > Le 22/01/2016 17:15, Kornel Benko a écrit : > >>> Even with this patch, I could not compile src/support/ForkedCalls.cpp > >>> with gcc-4.8.4. > >> > >> This is in C++11 mode, right? > > > > Yes, it is set

Re: [PATCH] Re: Update boost in 2.1 branch?

Le 21/01/2016 15:42, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Le 14/01/2016 19:12, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Le 09/01/2016 00:50, Richard Heck a écrit : On 01/08/2016 05:06 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Currently we use boost 1.53 in 2.1 branch. Would it be a good move to update it to 1.60? I

Re: [patch] fix bug 9884

Le 24/01/2016 21:39, Georg Baum a écrit : The attached patch fixes the regression, but keeps the general support for footmisc (which does not hurt if not used), so if someone wants to use this in a special module it would still be possible. OK to go in? Is this patch complete? I do not see

Re: [PATCH] Re: Update boost in 2.1 branch?

Le 25/01/2016 10:58, Kornel Benko a écrit : Am Montag, 25. Januar 2016 um 10:43:15, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Le 22/01/2016 17:15, Kornel Benko a écrit : Even with this patch, I could not compile src/support/ForkedCalls.cpp with gcc-4.8.4. This is in C++11 mode,

Re: [LyX/master] Invert and document test for "longest labeling label" problem.

Am Montag, 25. Januar 2016 um 09:25:13, schrieb Guenter Milde > Dear Kornel, > > On 2016-01-24, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Sonntag, 24. Januar 2016 um 21:07:03, schrieb Günter Milde > > > > >> +# The "longest label" marker in a labeling must be valid LaTeX