Le 27/01/2016 01:58, Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
commit c1e0b24304e67ede19f30c2ee7498386bfcf6808
Author: Uwe Stöhr
Date: Wed Jan 27 01:58:13 2016 +0100
acmsiggraph.layout: update layout for ACM siggraph 0.92
fileformat change: update fileformat for all files
diff --git
Le 25/01/2016 20:40, Georg Baum a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Is this patch complete? I do not see where NeedLyXFootnoteCode is
required in the source?
You are right of course. I stripped too much of the reversion of
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/0bf8b8a1/lyxgit. The attached one
Le 25/01/2016 21:17, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
I had done this at first but then I thought that the difference in
properties at-point/not-at-point could result in differences. By reading
it again, with hindsight, of course this makes no difference, so I will
be happy to get rid of the trick
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 02:15:53AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 24.01.2016 um 19:14 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>
> >>>Can anyone reproduce? It would be nice to know if we need to update our
> >>>layout.
>
> Yes, I can. The ACM people changes almost everything in the preamble
> handling with
For anyone like me who doesn't know much about High-DPI in general, and
which Qt configurations are available for High-DPI, I think this is a
nice post:
http://blog.qt.io/blog/2016/01/26/high-dpi-support-in-qt-5-6/
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Am 26.01.2016 um 17:58 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
To tell the user that he must update his file further on, I add
via lyx2lyx a red note explaining this.
Good idea. On a quick look at this patch I don't see where this happens.
See in my patch behind this line:
# now add a note that the user
During my review of the scientific journals LyX supports, I noticed that
AGUTeX changed their LaTeX class file a lot. To reflect this, they
changed the class name to "agutex2015.cls".
That means that our existing template and layout file will not be
compilable anymore with the latest AGUTeX
Le 21/01/2016 11:05, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 02:18:33AM -0500, Guillaume Munch wrote:
Le 20/01/2016 14:57, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 02:05:31AM -0500, Guillaume Munch wrote:
Le 19/01/2016 18:42, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 19,