Re: ACM-siggraph failing with newest class/style files

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 09:39:11AM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2016-01-24, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > Our ACM-Siggraph LyX template fails to compile (e.g. with pdflatex) > > with the newest style/class files. Note that these are not included in > > TeX Live and must be installed

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 02:47:35PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 12/01/2016 03:51, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >I wonder if the difference in behavior is due to: > >http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2012-07/msg00023.html > > > >That thread is linked to on the main page: >

Re: ACM-siggraph uncompilable

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 07:07:43AM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2016-01-27, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > The following tests FAILED: > > 772 - INVERTED.MANUALS.TODO_export/doc/es/Customization_dvi3_systemF > > (Failed) > > 777 -

Re: [LyX/master] Always place the cursor before a separator inset when clicking

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 02:14:20PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 09:47:58AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: > > Le 28/01/2016 05:47, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > >On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 02:23:55AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: > > > > > >>As far as I understand, in

Re: why Babel with dvi3 (LuTeX)?

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 08:17:59AM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2016-01-18, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > ... I'm not convinced that most developers think these export tests are > > that important. If that is indeed the case, then I'm not sure we should > > encourage anyone to run the tests. >

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

Am Donnerstag, 28. Januar 2016 um 12:08:20, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 02:47:35PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Le 12/01/2016 03:51, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > >I wonder if the difference in behavior is due to: > >

language nesting test (was: ACM-siggraph uncompilable)

On 2016-01-28, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 28. Januar 2016 um 07:07:43, schrieb Guenter Milde > >> On 2016-01-27, Kornel Benko wrote: >> > The following tests FAILED: >> >772 - INVERTED.MANUALS.TODO_export/doc/es/Customization_dvi3_systemF >> > (Failed) >> >

Re: ACM-siggraph failing with newest class/style files

On 2016-01-28, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 09:39:11AM +, Guenter Milde wrote: >> > Our ACM-Siggraph LyX template fails to compile (e.g. with pdflatex) >> > with the newest style/class files. ... >> If it indeed fails with one version and works with another, >> we may

Re: [LyX/master] Invert and document test for "longest labeling label" problem.

On 2016-01-28, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 28. Januar 2016 um 08:48:48, schrieb Guenter Milde > ... >> back to a place for failing test samples¹. >> Alternatives: >> a) keep them local (this is what most developers currently do). >>+1 simple, good if you

Re: ACM-siggraph uncompilable

Am 27.01.2016 um 23:20 schrieb Kornel Benko: Also many tex2lyx tests fail, but that is another story. I don't see this. I followed strictly the steps in Development.lyx and run all the scripts. What error do you get with acm-siggraph? regards Uwe

Re: ACM-siggraph uncompilable

Am Freitag, 29. Januar 2016 um 00:47:04, schrieb Uwe Stöhr > Am 27.01.2016 um 23:20 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > > Also many tex2lyx tests fail, but that is another story. > > I don't see this. I followed strictly the steps in Development.lyx and > run all the scripts. > > What

Re: [patch] Re: ACM-siggraph failing with newest class/style files

Am 28.01.2016 um 04:54 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: Please always post complete patches. Are you worried about file size when attaching a patch? So you really want to see a patch where more then 300 files where only a number is changed? This way the real part of the patch is hidden. It was

Re: ACM-siggraph failing with newest class/style files

Am 28.01.2016 um 17:31 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: How can the issue be solved if a minimum version is required? I'm guessing the old version will never work. Should the tests assume that the developer running the tests has the newest version of the LaTeX files needed to run the tests? Yes,

[patch] fix bug box changing via context menu (bug 8712)

Attached is a patch to fix bug http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8712. The problem was that if there is no inner box and one executes to remove the outer box (frame) the result is an empty box (no inner AND no outer box). But in this case a makebox must be used. This is already handled in the

Re: why Babel with dvi3 (LuTeX)?

On 2016-01-24, Georg Baum wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: >> On 2016-01-21, Scott Kostyshak wrote: ... >> I agree that there >> should be coordination with the test suite maintainers but no requirement >> to ensure a failure-free test run after patches where there is a >> consensus that they do

Re: why Babel with dvi3 (LuTeX)?

On 2016-01-18, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 03:59:16PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: >> * they require cmake > I do not agree with this. It is easy to have a separate CMake build > directory. Ah, perhaps you mean literally that they require CMake, > meaning that a system has to

Re: ACM-siggraph uncompilable

Am Donnerstag, 28. Januar 2016 um 07:07:43, schrieb Guenter Milde > On 2016-01-27, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > The following tests FAILED: > > 772 - INVERTED.MANUALS.TODO_export/doc/es/Customization_dvi3_systemF > > (Failed) > > 777 -

Re: [LyX/master] Invert and document test for "longest labeling label" problem.

Am Donnerstag, 28. Januar 2016 um 08:48:48, schrieb Guenter Milde > Re: [LyX/master] Invert and document test for "longest labeling label" > problem. > Von: Guenter Milde > An: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org > Datum:Heute 09:48:48 > On 2016-01-25,

Re: [LyX/master] Invert and document test for "longest labeling label" problem.

On 2016-01-25, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am 25. Januar 2016 um 21:07:23, schrieb Guenter Milde >> On 2016-01-25, Kornel Benko wrote: >> >> > Everything in autotests should compile (not inverted), if not ==> >> >> > regression. >> >> Why should we treat "autotests" different

Re: [LyX/master] Always place the cursor before a separator inset when clicking

Le 28/01/2016 05:47, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 02:23:55AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: As far as I understand, in release mode, this bug results in an exception and emergency save, so I think it is best to solve this issue before beta. I am tempted to suggest we

Re: #9794: inset-modify tabular commands are incorrectly disabled

Am Donnerstag, 28. Januar 2016 um 13:03:02, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > Le 27/01/2016 18:55, Guillaume Munch a écrit : > > I have found the motivation to re-do the format increase and the patches > > are now committed. > > Congratulation for your persistence. +1 > JMarc

Re: [LyX/master] New LFUN tabular-feature (#9794)

Le 27/01/2016 18:53, Guillaume Munch a écrit : commit c9f7ce0a7a6d48b9b60af92828654aa7547286b4 Author: Guillaume Munch Date: Fri Dec 11 02:15:52 2015 + New LFUN tabular-feature (#9794) I re-read the patch rapidly and have a couple cleanup remarks. ---

Re: [LyX/master] Always place the cursor before a separator inset when clicking

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 09:47:58AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 28/01/2016 05:47, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 02:23:55AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: > > > >>As far as I understand, in release mode, this bug results in an > >>exception and emergency save, so I think

Re: #9794: inset-modify tabular commands are incorrectly disabled

Le 27/01/2016 18:55, Guillaume Munch a écrit : I have found the motivation to re-do the format increase and the patches are now committed. Congratulation for your persistence. JMarc

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

I would say that parallel building can be a bad idea. The fact that we have added some dependencies in po/Rules-lyx is probably a factor too, but it is not new to 2.2. JMarc Le 28 janvier 2016 18:08:20 GMT+01:00, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 02:47:35PM