Re: beta2?

2016-02-14 Thread Pavel Sanda
Peter Kümmel wrote: Uwe still gets the following errors from the tar I sent to him: D:\LyXGit\LyX22beta3\3rdparty\boost\boost/numeric/conversion/detail/numeric_cast_traits.hpp(12): fatal error C1083: File (Include) cannot be opened:

Re: beta2?

2016-02-14 Thread Pavel Sanda
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Yes, a zip would be fine. I don't think that we need to save a few kB by > using special formats like .xz. For the record .xz is pretty standard in open source releases and it saves 9mb from 20mb gzips (and 21mb from 31 .zip I just experimentally tried). This is not few kb.

Re: 2.2.0beta1 tar balls are available

2016-02-14 Thread Pavel Sanda
Georg Baum wrote: > No, but I believe I know the reason: self made rounding in combination with > optimization (I created the test reference with a debug build). Which > compiler switches do you use? -Wall -Wextra -std=c++11 -g -O2 -Wno-deprecated-declarations > I will have a look at this

Re: [LyX/master] Partial fix for #9740 "XeTeX/LuaTeX with TeX fonts problems".

2016-02-14 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 08:49:26PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > However, I can confirm that the changes are intended. Thanks for checking. Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: beta2?

2016-02-14 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 12:55:47AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 14.02.2016 um 19:44 schrieb Peter Kümmel: > > >So the unzip tool has a problem, maybe because of the long path length. > > > >Maybe we should also distribute a zip file. > > Yes, a zip would be fine. I don't think that we need to

Re: beta2?

2016-02-14 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 14.02.2016 um 19:44 schrieb Peter Kümmel: So the unzip tool has a problem, maybe because of the long path length. Maybe we should also distribute a zip file. Yes, a zip would be fine. I don't think that we need to save a few kB by using special formats like .xz. Scott, could you please

Re: beta2?

2016-02-14 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 14/02/16 19:54, Georg Baum a écrit : Peter Kümmel wrote: Am 14.02.2016 um 19:03 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: Why is numeric_cast_traits_common.hpp not being found? Have you checked if it's part of the tar you send to Uwe? The files I listed above are part of the tar. I will send the tar

Re: [LyX/master] Partial fix for #9740 "XeTeX/LuaTeX with TeX fonts problems".

2016-02-14 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2016-02-14, Georg Baum wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 08:54:57PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: >>> On 2016-02-13, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> > After this commit, when I run the command >>> > lyx -e luatex lib/doc/he/Intro.lyx >>> > it either fails to produce

Re: beta2?

2016-02-14 Thread Peter Kümmel
Am 14.02.2016 um 21:27 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: Le 14/02/16 19:54, Georg Baum a écrit : Peter Kümmel wrote: Am 14.02.2016 um 19:03 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: Why is numeric_cast_traits_common.hpp not being found? Have you checked if it's part of the tar you send to Uwe? The files I

Re: beta2?

2016-02-14 Thread Georg Baum
Peter Kümmel wrote: > Am 14.02.2016 um 19:03 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: Why is numeric_cast_traits_common.hpp not being found? >>> >>> Have you checked if it's part of the tar you send to Uwe? >> >> The files I listed above are part of the tar. I will send the tar to you >> privately.

Re: beta2?

2016-02-14 Thread Peter Kümmel
Am 14.02.2016 um 19:03 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 06:36:15PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: Am 14.02.2016 um 17:17 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 01:44:30PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 01:24:20PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:

Re: beta2?

2016-02-14 Thread Peter Kümmel
Am 14.02.2016 um 19:03 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: Why is numeric_cast_traits_common.hpp not being found? Have you checked if it's part of the tar you send to Uwe? The files I listed above are part of the tar. I will send the tar to you privately. When I unpack with WinRAR it looks like this

Re: beta2?

2016-02-14 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 01:44:30PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 01:24:20PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 07:11:48PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > > Am 13.02.2016 um 18:01 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > > > > > >Thanks for testing, Peter. I'll

Re: [LyX/master] Partial fix for #9740 "XeTeX/LuaTeX with TeX fonts problems".

2016-02-14 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 11:01:06AM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 08:54:57PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > >> On 2016-02-13, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> > >> > After this commit, when I run the command > >> > >> > lyx -e luatex

Re: beta2?

2016-02-14 Thread Peter Kümmel
Am 14.02.2016 um 17:17 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 01:44:30PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 01:24:20PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 07:11:48PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 13.02.2016 um 18:01 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:

Re: beta2?

2016-02-14 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 06:36:15PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: > > > Am 14.02.2016 um 17:17 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > >On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 01:44:30PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >>On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 01:24:20PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >>>On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 07:11:48PM

Re: [LyX/master] Partial fix for #9740 "XeTeX/LuaTeX with TeX fonts problems".

2016-02-14 Thread Georg Baum
Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 08:54:57PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: >> On 2016-02-13, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> >> > After this commit, when I run the command >> >> > lyx -e luatex lib/doc/he/Intro.lyx >> >> > it either fails to produce Intro.tex or (on current master) it