Re: New versions of LyX always hang multiple times. OS X

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 09:18:50PM -0700, Jerry wrote: > > On Feb 23, 2016, at 3:28 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Jerry does this happen even when Flexiglass is not running? > > Yes. The behavior is the same, which is, using a non-new LyX but running > Reconfigure, one

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:43:01AM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > This is the beta2 tar.gz. The versions are whatever Scott used Actually > > I think it was AC 2.69 and am 1.14.1. > > Oh I see, Scott, the following tarball is made with the autotools which I >

Re: New versions of LyX always hang multiple times. OS X

On Feb 23, 2016, at 3:28 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 08:08:27PM -0700, Jerry wrote: >> >> On Feb 18, 2016, at 9:49 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 02:18:51AM -0700, Jerry wrote: *Every*time* I first

Re: #9983: SIGSEVG crash pasting into long table

LyX is really great, thank you. Am 2016-02-23 um 23:10 schrieb LyX Ticket Tracker: #9983: SIGSEVG crash pasting into long table ---+--- Reporter: William71 | Owner: skostysh Type:

ASK

bagaimana saya bisa dapatkan layout tentang buku ajar ya? terimakasih

Re: blockers for 2.2.0?

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 06:10:18PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > what issues others view as critical. Which issues do you view as > > blockers? > > Do we track the issue recently reported by Jerry? > Signalized more general problem to me. We don't have a ticket for it.

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

Am Dienstag, 23. Februar 2016 um 20:06:05, schrieb Guenter Milde > On 2016-02-20, Guenter Milde wrote: > > On 2016-02-20, Kornel Benko wrote: > >> Am Samstag, 20. Februar 2016 um 16:34:50, schrieb Guenter Milde > >> > > Dear Kornel, > > I hope to have

Re: New versions of LyX always hang multiple times. OS X

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 08:08:27PM -0700, Jerry wrote: > > On Feb 18, 2016, at 9:49 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 02:18:51AM -0700, Jerry wrote: > >> *Every*time* I first launch a new version of LyX, something like this > >> happens: > > > > So to

Re: [patch] support Bosnian, Macedonian, Piedmontese and Romansh

Le 23/02/2016 21:06, Georg Baum a écrit : Some developers postpone fun stuff because of the rules and work on boring (but important) bugs instead, others ask for exceptions for their fun stuff. If these exceptions are made it is quite likely that those who postponed their work will be upset

Re: [patch] support Bosnian, Macedonian, Piedmontese and Romansh

Guillaume Munch wrote: > Thank you for your taking time for making these points. So nobody seem > to agree that this is as low risk / high reward as Uwe thinks (I cannot > judge by myself since I am not familiar with this part of LyX; for > instance, I thought that this would provide also

Re: [patch] support Bosnian, Macedonian, Piedmontese and Romansh

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 22.02.2016 um 20:23 schrieb Georg Baum: > >>> Le 21/02/2016 20:52, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 06:06:14PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > I also don't see a reason why this cannot be done now since otherwise > users of than languages would have

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

On 2016-02-20, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2016-02-20, Kornel Benko wrote: >> Am Samstag, 20. Februar 2016 um 16:34:50, schrieb Guenter Milde >> Dear Kornel, I hope to have solved the "XeTeX + Awesome" mystery: >>> >> >> Strange: It works here, both "per hand" and via

Re: [patch] support Bosnian, Macedonian, Piedmontese and Romansh

Hi Uwe, I am offering my own reply since I do not think your messages deserved hostile responses. Le 22/02/2016 23:40, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : Am 22.02.2016 um 20:23 schrieb Georg Baum: Le 21/02/2016 20:52, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 06:06:14PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:

Re: [patch] support Bosnian, Macedonian, Piedmontese and Romansh

Le 22/02/2016 19:23, Georg Baum a écrit : Guillaume Munch wrote: Le 21/02/2016 20:52, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 06:06:14PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: I also don't see a reason why this cannot be done now since otherwise users of than languages would have to wait 2 more

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > This is the beta2 tar.gz. The versions are whatever Scott used Actually I > think it was AC 2.69 and am 1.14.1. Oh I see, Scott, the following tarball is made with the autotools which I reported to work on my machine. Can you check, whether just configure and

Re: [patch] support Bosnian, Macedonian, Piedmontese and Romansh

Le 23/02/2016 01:51, Pavel Sanda a écrit : Guillaume Munch wrote: I would not be shocked if an exception was made. Uwe's point is that it is low risk/high reward and that being delayed until 2.3 is quite significant. I do not remember seeing another patch in this situation. String changes

Re: Fwd: Warnings in preview PS lyx-2.2.0beta2

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 08:56:16PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2016-02-22, Buenas Noticias wrote: > > Hi all: > > > Note that you can still view the PDF despite the reported errors, with > > the "Show Output" button in the LaTeX Errors dialog. > > > Show Output is disabled in my lyx-2.2.0.

Re: Replacement of "long table" by "multi-pages table" in the manuals

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:32:58PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 10/02/2016 00:32, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >>I mean, if there is string freeze, I, as a translator, can be sure that all > >>needed strings are available. > > > >OK I think we are on the same page. > > What is the

Re: clang doesn't like -std=c++11 for Objective C files

Le 22/02/2016 21:49, Stephan Witt a écrit : With first patch applied compiling AppleSpeller.o succeeds. Great. So I have your +1 to apply this first patch? I prefer to go step by step. Yes, +1. Very good. It is in now. Maybe. What I don’t understand, why it isn’t simply working then? Is

Re: [patch] support Bosnian, Macedonian, Piedmontese and Romansh

Le 23/02/2016 00:40, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : Time is not important here. The question is if adding a feature makes sense. This change is of low risk but opens LyX for a wider audience. Ergo a big plus for the marketing. That LyX 2.2 is delayed because Qt 5.6 is still not our and I cannot perform my