Re: [LyX/master] New LFUN lyx-activate to focus LyX window

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 02:38:04PM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > commit 60515b996b2ed3312dffea62cba8288762202b67 > > > Author: Scott Kostyshak > > > Date: Thu Aug 4 01:20:14 2016 -0400 > > > > > > New LFUN lyx-activate

Re: Should the author of a file format change update the file format of docs in master?

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Do others agree with the above paragraph? I do not think it's a smart idea. It makes keeping docs between branch and master harder, add additional burden for devs and add basically junk to git history. Pavel

Re: [LyX/master] Foils.lyx: fix output of author

Le 10 août 2016 23:01:55 UTC+02:00, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >> > Indeed that seems like a lot of effort. What about making the error >a GUI error? >> >> That's probably a good idea. The user may have no idea why the output >> isn't correct. > >OK. I will add this to my TODO

Re: [LyX/master] Foils.lyx: fix output of author

Am Mittwoch, 10. August 2016 um 17:01:55, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 02:58:14PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > > On 08/10/2016 02:14 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 12:11:58PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > > > > > >>> 2. The behavior

Re: [LyX/master] Foils.lyx: fix output of author

On 08/10/2016 05:01 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 02:58:14PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: >> On 08/10/2016 02:14 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 12:11:58PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: >>> > 2. The behavior of what happens seems to depend on the LaTeX

Re: [LyX/master] Some things did not need to be mutable after all

Le 10 août 2016 22:55:51 UTC+02:00, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >I'm curious, is there any situation where if the mutable keyword is >removed and compilation succeeds we want to keep the mutable keyword? I >suppose only if we want to allow for future const member functions to

Re: [LyX/master] Foils.lyx: fix output of author

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 02:58:14PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > On 08/10/2016 02:14 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 12:11:58PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > > > >>> 2. The behavior of what happens seems to depend on the LaTeX class. I'm > >>> not sure about this, but in some

Re: [patch] Fix lyx-2.3dev build failure in FreeBSD

On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 02:30:42AM +0200, Shankar Giri Venkita Giri wrote: > Thanks Pavel. > > I'll try to produce a patch for #1. Then both #1 and #2, after > review, can go into master/branch. I play around in FreeBSD > frequently, so I can help with build issues/regressions in future as >

Re: [LyX/master] Some things did not need to be mutable after all

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 02:34:30PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > commit 2306fca65961f2b25eb8c86ae0c8824582f74cc2 > Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > Date: Mon Jul 18 14:34:08 2016 +0200 > > Some things did not need to be mutable after all I'm curious, is there any

Re: [LyX/master] Foils.lyx: fix output of author

On 08/10/2016 02:14 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 12:11:58PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > >>> 2. The behavior of what happens seems to depend on the LaTeX class. I'm not >>> sure about this, but in some cases, it seems that nothing is wrong with >>> e.g. outputting the

Re: [LyX/master] Foils.lyx: fix output of author

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 12:11:58PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > > 2. The behavior of what happens seems to depend on the LaTeX class. I'm not > > sure about this, but in some cases, it seems that nothing is wrong with > > e.g. outputting the date after making the title. In other cases there is

Re: [LyX/master] Foils.lyx: fix output of author

On 08/09/2016 10:57 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 11:05:21PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: >> Am Dienstag, 9. August 2016 um 18:57:50, schrieb Scott Kostyshak >> >>> commit e7a64949ad0562764a3d1db3698103ee2b91e3ce >>> Author: Scott Kostyshak