Re: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows

Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2018 17:42:41 CEST schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Samstag, den 19.05.2018, 17:37 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2018 12:58:37 CEST schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > i...@lyx.org>: > > > Am Samstag, den 19.05.2018, 12:07 +0200 schrieb Kornel

Re: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows

Am Samstag, den 19.05.2018, 17:37 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2018 12:58:37 CEST schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller i...@lyx.org>: > > Am Samstag, den 19.05.2018, 12:07 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > > No, it does not. For windows it is using > 'development/cmake/lyx.rc'. > > >

Re: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows

Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2018 12:58:37 CEST schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Samstag, den 19.05.2018, 12:07 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > No, it does not. For windows it is using 'development/cmake/lyx.rc'. > > But, for reason I don't > > understand, the icon creation is explicitly

Re: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows

On 05/19/2018 07:09 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 12:10:20PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: >> Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2018 12:07:30 CEST schrieb Kornel Benko : >>> But, for reason I don't >>> understand, the icon creation is explicitly disabled if using mingw. >>

Re: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows

On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 12:10:20PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2018 12:07:30 CEST schrieb Kornel Benko : > > But, for reason I don't > > understand, the icon creation is explicitly disabled if using mingw. > > Probably, because linux does not have 'winres'

Re: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows

Am Samstag, den 19.05.2018, 12:07 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > No, it does not. For windows it is using 'development/cmake/lyx.rc'. > But, for reason I don't > understand, the icon creation is explicitly disabled if using mingw. > See src/CMakeLists.txt:97 > if(WIN32 AND NOT MINGW) >

Re: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows

Am Samstag, den 19.05.2018, 12:10 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2018 12:07:30 CEST schrieb Kornel Benko yx.org>: > > But, for reason I don't > > understand, the icon creation is explicitly disabled if using > mingw. > > Probably, because linux does not have

Re: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows

Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2018 12:07:30 CEST schrieb Kornel Benko : > But, for reason I don't > understand, the icon creation is explicitly disabled if using mingw. Probably, because linux does not have 'winres' command? Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally

Re: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows

Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2018 11:24:19 CEST schrieb Enrico Forestieri : > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 01:12:34PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > > > By the way, do you know how to figure out where Windows is trying to > > find the icon? I've presumably changed something

Re: Windows Installers: TESTING ONLY

On 19/05/2018 8:59 p.m., Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 16/05/2018 à 19:48, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : It seems to me that there are two kinds of issues. One is what (if anything) we install, and the other is what happens after that. I think the "auto-install packages" feature of MiKTeX is

Re: Error messages with lyx2.3

On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 10:46:59AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 18/05/2018 à 22:14, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : > > > preview3.diff looks like the cleanest approach to me. I think it should go > > > in. > > > > Unfortunately, it does not work, as already said. It would have been > >

Re: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 01:12:34PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > By the way, do you know how to figure out where Windows is trying to > find the icon? I've presumably changed something unknowingly about where > it's being put. On Windows, an application icon is provided through a

Re: Windows Installers: TESTING ONLY

Le 16/05/2018 à 19:48, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : It seems to me that there are two kinds of issues. One is what (if anything) we install, and the other is what happens after that. I think the "auto-install packages" feature of MiKTeX is great for people who don't want to get their hands

Re: Error messages with lyx2.3

Le 18/05/2018 à 22:14, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : preview3.diff looks like the cleanest approach to me. I think it should go in. Unfortunately, it does not work, as already said. It would have been surprising if it had worked, though, as the added condition is already catched by