Am Samstag, dem 19.02.2022 um 02:43 +0100 schrieb Thibaut Cuvelier:
> Does it look alright to you? If so, I will push these patches.
So if an entry has "", this will be set empty, and if it has nothing,
it will inherit the former, right? And until now, only "" was allowed,
no missing table
I've been back on this issue. I think that slightly changing the call to
ImageMagick is the best solution, as it will not break things that used to
work and has the potential of enabling preview of images that did not have.
What do you think about this (minimalist) patch?
On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 at
Hi all,
Here is an implementation of the mechanism discussed here. I split the
largest part of the patch into two parts: adding the possibility to store
several characters in CharInfo, then parsing the new lines (with just two
new entries in unicodesymbols). These patches also change the names of
In whatever part of LyX's code that marks a buffer as dirty, should we
assert that the document is not read-only?
If I open the User Guide from the Help menu, editing is disabled. But if I run:
command-sequence inset-forall Caption char-delete-forward; statistics; undo
The buffer is marked as
To reproduce, open the User Guide (make sure it is editable, i.e., not
read only). Then run the following command sequence:
command-sequence inset-forall Caption char-delete-forward; statistics; undo
I get the following assertion:
CursorSlice.cpp (222): can't compare cursor and anchor in
Le 18/02/2022 à 10:31, Kornel Benko a écrit :
Given the string 'ABCD' while 'B' is in deactivated branch.
Now considering the case searching for the word 'ACD'.
Should it be found?
This is a case for change tracking IMO.
JMarc
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
Am Freitag, dem 18.02.2022 um 10:31 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> Given the string 'ABCD' while 'B' is in deactivated branch.
> Now considering the case searching for the word 'ACD'.
> Should it be found?
Don't know.
But if a deactivated branch (or note) contains one or several
paragraphs,
Am Thu, 17 Feb 2022 16:44:18 -0500
schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 03:02:00PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Thu, 17 Feb 2022 07:55:10 -0500
> > schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
> >
> > > In the attached, if I do an advanced find with 2.4.04dev for $\coloneqq$,
> > > it is not
