Re: features/indexmacros

2022-04-21 Thread Thibaut Cuvelier
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 at 13:29, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Dienstag, dem 19.04.2022 um 13:21 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > > This adds native macros for subindexes (!level), |see and |seealso > > and sort keys (sort@key), for that matter. > Code-wise, the design looks really clean! The

Re: Expand debug to contain more than 31 cases

2022-04-21 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 02:53:37PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Do you have a better idea? long long ? Pavel -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: Expand debug to contain more than 31 cases

2022-04-21 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Thu, 21 Apr 2022 14:45:39 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda : > On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 11:12:06AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > I am not sure that we need a verbose level yet. What about > > > -dbg find => FINDSHORT > > > -dbg find --verbose => FIND > > > > > > JMarc > > > > I propose to do it

Re: Expand debug to contain more than 31 cases

2022-04-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 21/04/2022 à 14:45, Pavel Sanda a écrit : Well, not that small change. On some gcc versions you need to include cstdint header to have uint64_t available (AFAIK we don't use uint64_t anywhere else in the code). Right. And including in debug.h which is used everywhere is not great idea.

Re: Expand debug to contain more than 31 cases

2022-04-21 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 11:12:06AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > I am not sure that we need a verbose level yet. What about > > -dbg find => FINDSHORT > > -dbg find --verbose => FIND > > > > JMarc > > I propose to do it as a next step. Better not too many changes at once IMO. make[5]: Entering