Am Sonntag, dem 07.04.2024 um 06:50 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Just doing a bisect.
73678dcde977802d5ff3ae07f0226484041fff48 is the first bad commit
commit 73678dcde977802d5ff3ae07f0226484041fff48
Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Date: Mon Nov 27 15:57:09 2023 +0100
Avoid full
Am Sonntag, dem 07.04.2024 um 00:38 -0400 schrieb Richard Kimberly
Heck:
> I am hoping this is not in 2.4.x and is due to the big inset merge.
> Can you check?
Not in 2.4.x.
Just doing a bisect. I also assured it is not connected with my recent
fix before backporting.
--
Jürgen
--
lyx-devel
On 4/6/24 16:14, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
To reproduce:
1. Open the attached example.
2. Put the cursor just after the Note inset.
3. Press twice.
I get a SIGSEGV with the attached backtrace.
Can anyone else reproduce on current master?
I am hoping this is not in 2.4.x and is due to the big
Am Samstag, dem 06.04.2024 um 16:51 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> I imagine others face the same situation? Is there anything that can
> be done?
No, I think this will be a nightmare to maintain. And then, you really
do not "text master" if you strip the most interesting commits.
--
Jürgen
On 2024-04-07 4:15 AM, lyx-devel-requ...@lists.lyx.org wrote:
On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 04:48:03PM GMT, Allan Chain wrote:
Hi Scott,
I think its a regression in LyX code. Although the Qt version is different,
the code in 2.3.x branch correctly returns the position of the caret in
I've been enjoying testing master, but on the first file format increment, I'll
stop a lot of my testing since they're documents I will want to work on with
other people.
I have a few documents that only I use and for that I'll try to continue to
test master.
I imagine others face the same
To reproduce:
1. Open the attached example.
2. Put the cursor just after the Note inset.
3. Press twice.
I get a SIGSEGV with the attached backtrace.
Can anyone else reproduce on current master?
Scott
example-sigsegv-on-delete-note-inset.23.lyx
Description: application/lyx
Thread 1 "lyx"
On 4/6/24 03:51, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Samstag, dem 06.04.2024 um 07:48 + schrieb Juergen Spitzmueller:
commit 9198ed5965809a1e951d1b721899d0051e619e34
Author: Juergen Spitzmueller
Date: Sat Apr 6 09:47:22 2024 +0200
Fix assertion when pasting paragraph with insets in
On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 11:14:45AM GMT, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> The created pdf looks like I wanted.
I can reproduce (the weird LyX display) on current master and on 2.3.x.
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 04:48:03PM GMT, Allan Chain wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> I think its a regression in LyX code. Although the Qt version is different,
> the code in 2.3.x branch correctly returns the position of the caret in
> `GuiWorkArea::inputMethodQuery`. However in 2.4.x branch, it returns
>
Am Sat, 6 Apr 2024 10:59:42 +0200
schrieb Pavel Sanda :
> On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 10:37:16AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > In this commit I only fixed the the wrong casing of "Qt6Core_Found" to
> > "Qt6Core_FOUND". So this code was there for a long time, but was not
> > working.
>
>
The created pdf looks like I wanted.
Kornel
Funktionstasten.lyx
Description: application/lyx
pgpN4FCuRw8VY.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 10:37:16AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> In this commit I only fixed the the wrong casing of "Qt6Core_Found" to
> "Qt6Core_FOUND".
> So this code was there for a long time, but was not working.
Nevertheless, can we have cmake defaulting to qt5 for 2.4.x? P
--
lyx-devel
Hi Scott,
I think its a regression in LyX code. Although the Qt version is
different, the code in 2.3.x branch correctly returns the position of
the caret in `GuiWorkArea::inputMethodQuery`. However in 2.4.x branch,
it returns `im_cursor_rect_` which is only updated when preedit is enabled.
Am Fri, 5 Apr 2024 17:23:57 -0400
schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck :
> On 4/5/24 03:02, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Thu, 4 Apr 2024 13:39:18 -0400
> > schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck :
> >
> >> On 4/3/24 06:34, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>> Le 03/04/2024 à 12:27, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
>
Am Freitag, dem 05.04.2024 um 16:17 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> What now? Well, testing is welcome when you have time : does
> everything works the same, but faster for big document that were
> annoying?.
I see drawing omissions with change tracking. Select part of a word
with CT on and
Am Freitag, dem 05.04.2024 um 17:23 -0400 schrieb Richard Kimberly
Heck:
> Unless I'm misreading it, commit 993e784a6284a to 2.4.x makes Qt6 the
> default (and that commit is also in 2.4.1-devel).
That's bad. I think our Qt6 implementation still has too many
drawbacks. I would keep it opt-in in
Am Samstag, dem 06.04.2024 um 07:48 + schrieb Juergen Spitzmueller:
> commit 9198ed5965809a1e951d1b721899d0051e619e34
> Author: Juergen Spitzmueller
> Date: Sat Apr 6 09:47:22 2024 +0200
>
> Fix assertion when pasting paragraph with insets in
> lyxrc.ct_markup_copied
>
> This
Am Freitag, dem 05.04.2024 um 23:01 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 11:31:35AM GMT, Allan Chain wrote:
> > Hello, LyX developers!
> >
> > I'm trying out LyX 2.4.0-rc3 (qt6) on KDE6+Wayland, and I'm using
> > fcitx5 to
> > input CJK characters. I found that the candidate
19 matches
Mail list logo
