===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/config/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.86.2.40
diff -u -p -r1.86.2.40 ChangeLog
--- config/ChangeLog18 Feb 2005 17:25:09 - 1.86.2.40
+++ config/ChangeLog22 Feb 2005 05:47:52 -
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2005-02-22 Allan
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/config/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.86.2.40
diff -u -p -r1.86.2.40 ChangeLog
--- config/ChangeLog18 Feb 2005 17:25:09 - 1.86.2.40
+++ config/ChangeLog22 Feb 2005 05:47:52 -
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2005-02-22 Allan
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Jean-Marc == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jean-Marc Thanks for the tip. I'd rather use #include
Jean-Marc support/snprintf.h since this uses our own implementation
Jean-Marc if needed. Can you confirm that it works?
Angus wrote:
This is a gnu make-ism, isn't it? At the moment the XForms frontend
builds with non-gnu makes. I don't think that we should change that.
Automake generates plenty of entries with the %.a: %.b format.
Take a look at your Makefiles. They appear to be libtool related
mostly but
Try this patch instead if you really want to stick to obsoleted rule
types. How nobody else has had a problem is a mystery.
Allan. (ARRae)
Index: Makefile.am
===
RCS file:
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jean-Marc> Thanks for the tip. I'd rather use #include
> Jean-Marc> "support/snprintf.h" since this uses our own implementation
> Jean-Marc> if needed. Can you confirm that
Angus wrote:
> This is a gnu make-ism, isn't it? At the moment the XForms frontend
> builds with non-gnu makes. I don't think that we should change that.
Automake generates plenty of entries with the "%.a: %.b" format.
Take a look at your Makefiles. They appear to be libtool related
mostly but
Try this patch instead if you really want to stick to obsoleted rule
types. How nobody else has had a problem is a mystery.
Allan. (ARRae)
Index: Makefile.am
===
RCS file:
I'm trying to compile lyx-1.3.x cvs and found I need the following
change in order to avoid errors from make-3.79.1 which say it doesn't
know how to make .C files.
BTW, I'm not subscribed so please CC me as I don't get much time to
check the archive. Oh and I've looked at 1.4.0cvs and am very
The recent backported bug fix for bug 1523 breaks compilation because
snprintf() is unknown. Note this is lyx-1.3.x cvs I'm talking about.
I haven't checked 1.4.x because it won't compile on this machine at
all.
Index: lyxlength.C
I'm trying to compile lyx-1.3.x cvs and found I need the following
change in order to avoid errors from make-3.79.1 which say it doesn't
know how to make .C files.
BTW, I'm not subscribed so please CC me as I don't get much time to
check the archive. Oh and I've looked at 1.4.0cvs and am very
The recent backported bug fix for bug 1523 breaks compilation because
snprintf() is unknown. Note this is lyx-1.3.x cvs I'm talking about.
I haven't checked 1.4.x because it won't compile on this machine at
all.
Index: lyxlength.C
I took a look at the lovely new web design at:
http://devedge.netscape.com/
It all works well so long as you have javascript enabled -- turn off
javascript and you have the same problems you're reporting about my
mods.
That said, the javascript they are using is a modified form of one
I took a look at the lovely new web design at:
http://devedge.netscape.com/
It all works well so long as you have javascript enabled -- turn off
javascript and you have the same problems you're reporting about my
mods.
That said, the javascript they are using is a modified form of one
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, John Levon wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 03:17:27PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
How many other pages do you visit that let you change the website
design?
Several. Admittedly they usually require login :)
Are they actually using a cookie then for anything other than
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 03:17:27PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > How many other pages do you visit that let you change the website
> > design?
>
> Several. Admittedly they usually require login :)
Are they actually using a cookie
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, John Levon wrote:
Can you send me a cutdown screenshot please.
http://movementarian.org/pinmenu.png
This should be fixed now.
Allan. (ARRae)
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, John Levon wrote:
I don't have another page I've seen that has this problem
How many other pages do you visit that let you change the website
design?
Do they have cache-control directives in the header?
Like:
meta http-equiv=Cache-Control content=no-cache
(which
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, John Levon wrote:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 05:38:32PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
What is your setting for:
Edit-Preferences-advanced-cache-Compare the page in the
cache to the page on the network
When the page is out of date.
See the other email but I can't even
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, John Levon wrote:
> > Can you send me a cutdown screenshot please.
>
> http://movementarian.org/pinmenu.png
This should be fixed now.
Allan. (ARRae)
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, John Levon wrote:
> I don't have another page I've seen that has this problem
How many other pages do you visit that let you change the website
design?
Do they have cache-control directives in the header?
Like:
(which doesn't mean you can't cache the page BTW)
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 05:38:32PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > What is your setting for:
> >
> > Edit->Preferences->advanced->cache->Compare the page in the
> > cache to the page on the network
>
> Wh
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Well I tried to use 'customize' to get away from your `fancy' black
theme, but it seems that there is no escape. How is it supposed to
work?
JMarc
The only 'themes' that seem to work are the 'simple blue' and
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Garst R. Reese wrote:
For me the Navigate menu is behind the sponsor thank you, and does not
work.
Which browser and version thereof?
If you are using netscape 4 there doesn't seem to be much I do about
this other than limit to one column.
Allan. (ARRae)
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, John Levon wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 08:23:01PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
It could also become cyclic.
It used to be (which explains why there was only one icon there in the
first place) but that's really not good UI (see the list archives)
UI smUI.
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Garst R. Reese wrote:
You guessed it. Mozilla is too bloated for my box = slow.
netscape 6,7+ too ugly for words.
You try Opera6 and I'll try to make time to get my website update
netscape4 friendly.
Allan. (ARRae)
I've made a few small changes to the CSS on my site so that the italic
headings are gone and run all combos through the CSS validator -- I
get colour warnings (color and no background/background-color set and
such) that I'll tweak away sometime.
I have only validated the XHTML of a few pages
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, John Levon wrote:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 03:40:47PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
redraw the arrow as a cycle?
/--\
| |
\--/
(hopefully a little prettier than this nightmare)
Step back a minute. Do you seriously, honestly, think anybody is going
to know what
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, John Levon wrote:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 04:36:33PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
I also changed the default to simple-blue and removed the non-existant
options from site_preferences.php3.
Yay. The pinmenu extends out of the left of the background on my
machine. Laying
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, John Levon wrote:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 04:41:48PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
Most Westernised folks at least will be familiar with the recycle
triangle. It's a small jump to make a similar association here.
But we cannot have just a recycle triangle, users associate
The three-column and the two-column styles use different
padding/margin methods to achieve the same thing. Does one work and
not the other?
In either case they work in Mozilla-1.1 and as far as I can see if
Mozilla-HEAD gets this bit wrong it's a new bug in Mozilla.
I have noticed that
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, John Levon wrote:
But the thing *does* cycle !!
And _your_ problem is?
(...recorded in the mail archives somewhere)
Allan. (ARRae) Cycling environment depth ROCKS!
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, John Levon wrote:
[...]
I don't have another page I've seen that has this problem
Must be our rewriting of a single line that does it.
What is your setting for:
Edit-Preferences-advanced-cache-Compare the page in the
cache to the page on the network
I have every
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > Well I tried to use 'customize' to get away from your `fancy' black
> > theme, but it seems that there is no escape. How is it supposed to
> > work?
> >
> > JMarc
>
> The only 'themes' that seem to work are the
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> For me the Navigate menu is behind the sponsor thank you, and does not
> work.
Which browser and version thereof?
If you are using netscape 4 there doesn't seem to be much I do about
this other than limit to one column.
Allan. (ARRae)
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 08:23:01PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>
> > It could also become cyclic.
>
> It used to be (which explains why there was only one icon there in the
> first place) but that's really not good UI (see the list archives)
UI smUI.
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> You guessed it. Mozilla is too bloated for my box = slow.
> netscape 6,7+ too ugly for words.
You try Opera6 and I'll try to make time to get my website update
netscape4 "friendly."
Allan. (ARRae)
I've made a few small changes to the CSS on my site so that the italic
headings are gone and run all combos through the CSS validator -- I
get colour warnings (color and no background/background-color set and
such) that I'll tweak away sometime.
I have only validated the XHTML of a few pages
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 03:40:47PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > redraw the arrow as a cycle?
> >
> > /->-\
> > | |
> > \-<-/
> >
> > (hopefully a little prettier than this nightmare)
>
> S
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 04:36:33PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> > I also changed the default to simple-blue and removed the non-existant
> > options from site_preferences.php3.
>
> Yay. The pinmenu extends out of the left of the backgr
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 04:41:48PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > Most Westernised folks at least will be familiar with the "recycle"
> > triangle. It's a small jump to make a similar association here.
>
> But we cannot h
The three-column and the two-column styles use different
padding/margin methods to achieve the same thing. Does one work and
not the other?
In either case they work in Mozilla-1.1 and as far as I can see if
Mozilla-HEAD gets this bit wrong it's a new bug in Mozilla.
I have noticed that
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, John Levon wrote:
> But the thing *does* cycle !!
And _your_ problem is?
(...recorded in the mail archives somewhere)
Allan. (ARRae) Cycling environment depth ROCKS!
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, John Levon wrote:
[...]
> I don't have another page I've seen that has this problem
Must be our rewriting of a single line that does it.
What is your setting for:
Edit->Preferences->advanced->cache->Compare the page in the
cache to the page on the network
I have
On 6 Mar 2003, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I have just moved the web pages over to aussie.
[...]
Please report all and any problems to me.
The Customise cookies don't seem to work anymore.
Perhaps you have:
auto_globals = false
(which I admit is a good thing) but our scripts currently
On 6 Mar 2003, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I have just moved the web pages over to aussie.
[...]
> Please report all and any problems to me.
The Customise cookies don't seem to work anymore.
Perhaps you have:
auto_globals = false
(which I admit is a good thing) but our scripts
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 04:09:37PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
As John has noted, these differnet LFUNs are sufficiently similar to make
the thought of collapsing them together attractive.
My question: should I use these switches or should I use
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
I am clearly a brain dead zombie.
Surely, you meant muttonhead?
Allan. (ARRae)
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 04:09:37PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > As John has noted, these differnet LFUNs are sufficiently similar to make
> > the thought of collapsing them together attractive.
> >
> > My question: should I use these switches or
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I am clearly a brain dead zombie.
Surely, you meant muttonhead?
Allan. (ARRae)
On 25 Feb 2003, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Joao Is there someone with a recent tetex that can confirm if the
Joao option --src-specials to latex is enabled?
Note that since LyX generates the LaTeX code by itself, it would not
be too difficult to add src-special by ourselves, for example at
On 26 Feb 2003, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
What has Matthias to do with anything?
(He is not my contact at Trolltech.)
he's the only name we know associated with Trolltech.
Allan. (ARRae)
On 25 Feb 2003, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Joao> Is there someone with a recent tetex that can confirm if the
> Joao> option --src-specials to latex is enabled?
>
> Note that since LyX generates the LaTeX code by itself, it would not
> be too difficult to add src-special by ourselves, for
On 26 Feb 2003, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> What has Matthias to do with anything?
> (He is not my contact at Trolltech.)
he's the only name we know associated with Trolltech.
Allan. (ARRae)
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Allan Rae wrote:
A 20 second scan of the code in LoadQueue.C suggests that push_front()
and pop_front() is the reason your queue is acting like a stack.
Try pushing on one end and popping off the other.
Sorry Allan, I've tried to answer
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > A 20 second scan of the code in LoadQueue.C suggests that push_front()
> > and pop_front() is the reason your queue is acting like a stack.
> >
> > Try pushing on one end and popping off the othe
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
1) I'm still investigating how to solve the startup problem. (images get
loaded in reverse order). Clues welcomed.
A 20 second scan of the code in LoadQueue.C suggests that push_front()
and pop_front() is the reason your queue is acting like a
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> 1) I'm still investigating how to solve the startup problem. (images get
> loaded in reverse order). Clues welcomed.
A 20 second scan of the code in LoadQueue.C suggests that push_front()
and pop_front() is the reason your queue is acting like a
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 02:44:11PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
I think I have just about cleaned up the controllers code so that it is now
transparent. As a result of this clean-up I have managed to replace all
those boost::signals in
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 02:44:11PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > I think I have just about cleaned up the controllers code so that it is now
> > transparent. As a result of this clean-up I have managed to replace all
> > those boost::signals in
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, John Levon wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 02:15:37PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
+2003-01-27 Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+
+ * insetinclude.C (loadIfNeeded): included files might be under
+ VCS control so we need loadLyXFile() not readFile
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Allan Rae wrote:
Yes, but I haven't gotten around to it yet. Will update again and
commit today.
Haven't had time after all. Feel free to make the one line change
yourself.
Allan. (ARRae)
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 02:15:37PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > +2003-01-27 Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > +
> > + * insetinclude.C (loadIfNeeded): included files might be under
> > + VCS control s
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Allan Rae wrote:
> Yes, but I haven't gotten around to it yet. Will update again and
> commit today.
Haven't had time after all. Feel free to make the one line change
yourself.
Allan. (ARRae)
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
John Levon wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 09:08:25AM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Making shorcuts consistent would accelerate user interaction. In fact, I
find a PITA every cleverness in choosing shorcuts. In the
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, John Levon wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:59:28AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
[...]
| I have never been able to use that interface, and it buys us precisely
| nothing, and costs a lot.
Poor John, failed at Emacs but rules with vi. When are you vi guys
going
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 6:41 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Why not move lgt into the top level dir?
I thought about it, but before moving things around in cvs, how would
you
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 08:54, Angus Leeming wrote:
Allan Rae wrote:
What I'd like to know is how did Angus know I have purple on my
desktop (as icon backgrounds and title bars as it happens) as well as
black and gold?
Let's just call
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 3:54 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 03:52:31PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
André, here's a patch to get it to work on this little test case. Else it
get's lost in an infinite loop in handle_opts
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Currently it looks like neither Asger, Angus and John could come if we
insisted June 20th.
Currently I have (5 - ok, 0 - not ok):
I think I'm going to be a 0 for all dates this year unless I win the
lottery. I am however making good progress on my
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 02:14:32PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
I think I'm going to be a 0 for all dates this year unless I win the
lottery.
Is that the price of spending the whole life upside down?
No the price for spending my life upside down
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
My last trip a few weeks ago was Berlin-London for ~50 EUR (one way,
including taxes) with a company called buzz and it was ok. No food on
board (well, there was, but you would have to pay extra) but I really don't
care about that for a two hours
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> John Levon wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 09:08:25AM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> >
> >> Making shorcuts consistent would accelerate user interaction. In fact, I
> >> find a PITA every cleverness in choosing shorcuts. In the
> >>
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:59:28AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
[...]
> > | I have never been able to use that interface, and it buys us precisely
> > | nothing, and costs a lot.
Poor John, failed at Emacs but rules with vi. When are you vi guys
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 February 2003 6:41 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Angus> Why not move lgt into the top level dir?
> >
> > I thought about it, but before moving things around in cvs,
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, José Matos wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 February 2003 08:54, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Allan Rae wrote:
> > > What I'd like to know is how did Angus know I have purple on my
> > > desktop (as icon backgrounds and title bars as it happens) as w
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 February 2003 3:54 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 03:52:31PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > André, here's a patch to get it to work on this little test case. Else it
> > > get's lost in an infinite loop in
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Currently it looks like neither Asger, Angus and John could come if we
> insisted June 20th.
>
> Currently I have (5 - "ok", 0 - "not ok"):
I think I'm going to be a 0 for all dates this year unless I win the
lottery. I am however making good progress
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 02:14:32PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> > I think I'm going to be a 0 for all dates this year unless I win the
> > lottery.
>
> Is that the price of spending the whole life upside down?
No the price for spendin
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> My last trip a few weeks ago was Berlin-London for ~50 EUR (one way,
> including taxes) with a company called "buzz" and it was ok. No food on
> board (well, there was, but you would have to pay extra) but I really don't
> care about that for a two
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, John Levon wrote:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 12:39:32PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
The chosen scheme doesn't seem to be properly persistent. Cookie problem
have even worse problems when using the current LyX website -- try
I do not have any problems with the current LyX
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, [utf-8] José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 18:12, Angus Leeming wrote:
Don't worry. His default colour scheme is _really_ nasty ;-)
It gives a new meaning to dark ages. ;-)
So you don't like black and gold? Or at least black background with
yellow
On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
John Levon wrote:
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 12:28:42AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
Anyway, they're configurable aren't they, so if Martin wants gold with
purple linings he can have that too.
Hey, how about you leave Allan alone now !
Thank you
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, John Levon wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 11:27:22PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
Have I said that I really do not like the dialogs at all?
I'd prefere an application completely without dialogs...
Wouldn't we all ? However, this is not possible.
Menues,
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 12:39:32PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > > The chosen scheme doesn't seem to be properly persistent. Cookie problem
> >
> > have even worse problems when using the current LyX website -- try
>
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, [utf-8] José Matos wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 February 2003 18:12, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >
> > Don't worry. His default colour scheme is _really_ nasty ;-)
>
> It gives a new meaning to dark ages. ;-)
So you don't like black and gold? Or at least black background with
On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
> John Levon wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 12:28:42AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >
> >> Anyway, they're configurable aren't they, so if Martin wants gold with
> >> purple linings he can have that too.
> >
> > Hey, how about you leave Allan alone
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 11:27:22PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
> > Have I said that I really do not like the dialogs at all?
> > I'd prefere an application completely without dialogs...
>
> Wouldn't we all ? However, this is not possible.
Menues,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, John Levon wrote:
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 05:58:31PM +, Jos? Matos wrote:
http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~rae/www-user/
Comments :
The chosen scheme doesn't seem to be properly persistent. Cookie problem
?
Browser problem. As best as I can see from my testing
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Allan Rae wrote:
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, John Levon wrote:
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 05:58:31PM +, Jos? Matos wrote:
http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~rae/www-user/
Comments :
The chosen scheme doesn't seem to be properly persistent. Cookie problem
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 05:58:31PM +, Jos? Matos wrote:
>
> > > http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~rae/www-user/
>
> Comments :
>
> The chosen scheme doesn't seem to be properly persistent. Cookie problem
> ?
Browser problem. As best as I can see from my
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, John Levon wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 05:58:31PM +, Jos? Matos wrote:
> >
> > > > http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~rae/www-user/
> >
> > Comments :
> >
> > The chosen
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, John Levon wrote:
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 03:37:19PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
Does someone want to comment on this bug fix? For example, may I
commit it or not? The bug isn't in Bugzilla as far as I can see
but that doesn't make it any less annoying.
It's too late
and you can see what a mess I've made here:
http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~rae/www-user/
There is still a bit of cleaning up to do in the php code and in the
css but it should all look good in links, lynx, IE, Konq and Mozilla
(and its derivatives). Don't tell me it's broken in Netscape 4
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 03:37:19PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > Does someone want to comment on this bug fix? For example, may I
> > commit it or not? The bug isn't in Bugzilla as far as I can see
> > but that doesn't make it any
and you can see what a mess I've made here:
http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~rae/www-user/
There is still a bit of cleaning up to do in the php code and in the
css but it should all look good in links, lynx, IE, Konq and Mozilla
(and its derivatives). Don't tell me it's broken in Netscape 4
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Allan Rae wrote:
An annoying bug in multipart document support occurs when you use a
VCS like RCS on the documents. Load the master, update DVI to get all
the other parts loaded, now try to edit one of the auto-loaded docs.
You can't because the lyxvc for that document
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Allan Rae wrote:
> An annoying bug in multipart document support occurs when you use a
> VCS like RCS on the documents. Load the master, update DVI to get all
> the other parts loaded, now try to edit one of the auto-loaded docs.
> You can't becau
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=848
I get Error 400 attempting to get to bugzilla.lyx.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
2003 16:23:41 - 1.552
+++ src/insets/ChangeLog30 Jan 2003 04:05:54 -
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2003-01-27 Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+
+ * insetinclude.C (loadIfNeeded): included files might be under
+ VCS control so we need loadLyXFile() not readFile
1 - 100 of 3117 matches
Mail list logo
