On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 12:39:52AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> And as you probably know optional paramters to _all_ latex commands
> has been planned since before then... now at last are we getting the
> proper infrastr
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 01:52:46AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | I'm running lyx-1.1.5fix2. I'm enjoying the new features. Unfortunately, I
> | can't compile my thesis anymore. I get the following error:
>
I'm sure you'll all be happy to hear that it took me only a few hours to
upgrade my thesis style file to a class file, and even getting rid of a
couple bugs in the style file in the process. I'm back in thesis-writing
business again.
If I get the time, I might make a ucthesis layout for LyX. ucth
I'm running lyx-1.1.5fix2. I'm enjoying the new features. Unfortunately, I
can't compile my thesis anymore. I get the following error:
Package babel error: you have used an old interface to call babel
\bblstyerror
You could proceed but don't complain if you run into errors.
How do I
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 09:30:53AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
[snip things that actually matter]
> P.S.: I wonder what mail-programs people use and why it is so hard to
> remove personal addresses if you know the one is subscribed to the
> list anyway. Mate isn't it possible to set
Latest CVS (after make clean & recompiling gcc for my new kernel...)
All of my toolbar icons have little yellow help balloons except for Undo.
Why?
Preferences is shaping up nicely, although I was a bit concerned when a bunch
of preferences from last week's CVS weren't understood. But it looks l
OK, totally unrelated to lyx, except that I can't mail the lyx list if my
mail isn't working right.
I upgraded to RH6.2 today. (Yes, I'm a bit behind the times. So sue me.)
Now, whenever I start a new xterm and run vim, my backspaces come out as ^?
instead of backspacing. When I say stty, it says
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 03:44:55PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> - fix space above/below in FprmParagraph
...
Thing to do for 1.2.0:
- create a LaTeX import form which allows you to input all the useful
command line options for reLyX, browse for reLyX syntax file, et al.
It seems
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 03:37:07PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> - the menus can now be defined from a text file (like the toolbar) and
> shows the keyboard bindings associated to commands.
Should this be "which shows"
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 02:56:08PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, John Levon wrote:
>
> > The first in a short series of dumb questions. Hints please !
I haven't been following this very much; it's all over my head. But there is
one thing I was thinking.
> > 4) OK/Apply will app
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 06:27:08PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Amir Karger wrote:
>
> > IMO, this is a major change in interface, and I don't know if it's worth it.
>
> maybe it should be a config option.
Possible, but remember that every config
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 04:42:39PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>
> The attached patch makes
>
> Up/Down/Space/BackSpace navigate around read-only documents
> in the same way as netscape.
>
> Personally I think this is way more convenient than navigating with the
> cursor, or stretching all the way
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 02:43:25PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
[problem snipped]
>
> The net result being that when you start lyx you get a warning about not
> being able to find textclasslist and then when you open a document you get
> a segfault because there are no loaded textclasses.
It seems
On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 11:27:05PM +0200, Charles de Miramon wrote:
> Hello,
>
> While trying to understand who to translate unicode characters in Lyx, I've
> found these LateX codes that are not correctly translated by RelyX :
>
> 1) Latex code \i (dotless i ) is translated in \i when it shou
On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 04:03:56PM -0400, hawk wrote:
> amir added,
>
> > On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 01:13:22PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Huh? vi has insert mode! It's entered by commands like i,a,o,s,c, and their
> > corresponding capitals. I'm not sure whether vi admits to replace mod
the beginning of
your file that's confusing reLyX; it never even gets to most of the
translating part.)
-Amir Karger
On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 02:41:03PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Amir Karger wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 01:48:42PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> > >
> > > I have modified GNU diff to be able to emulate `cvs diff`. This allows
> &g
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 01:13:22PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> the vi pervert Andre audiated
>
> >The problem is that there are quite a few things missing from the
> >LyX kernel to make such a thing viable. I don't think it is possible
> >at all to simulate vi's modes by fiddling with
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 05:27:04PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> We could have "Insert->Inline equation and "Insert->Displayed
> equation". Then we'd need a t
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 02:47:52PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Amir> I want
> Amir> *all* of my shortcuts to be Alt. Why? Because it's *much* easier
> Amir> to
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 01:48:42PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> On 13 Sep 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> I have modified GNU diff to be able to emulate `cvs diff`. This allows
> anyone with two copies of a cvs snapshot to modify one and generate a
> diff between the two that is the equivalent
Happy Friday! We haven't had a holy war in a long time.
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 12:04:07PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, hawk wrote:
>
> > vile heretics, all :)
>
> C-c C-m Two keystrokes(4 keys)
> C-c m again two keystrokes (3 keys)
>
> How often would you do t
OK, maybe it's late for me to be getting into this discussion. But I just
tried to play with the new LyX (now that I can compile it) and realized how
annoying it was not to have the math bindings any more.
I'll also note that noone created the layout.bind that Lars suggested, so
the paragraph lay
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 01:27:11PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Amir Karger wrote:
>
> > OK, so I finally downloaded gcc-2.95.2, so that I could compile the new LyX.
> > I assume someone has noted in the requirements that 2.95 no longer works?
>
> H
OK, so I finally downloaded gcc-2.95.2, so that I could compile the new LyX.
I assume someone has noted in the requirements that 2.95 no longer works?
Anyway, I got like 8 million of these:
-
In file included from
/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/2.95.2/../../../../include/g++
http://www.showmelinux.com/092000/inreview.html
Note: the last paragraph says you can't paste from LyX into other apps.
Hasn't that been changed lately? If not, are there projections for changing
it soon?
-Amir
I found he_Intro.lyx in my lyxdoc directory. But it's not in
CVS. Did someone send it to me to check in, only I forgot to? Or did someone
send it to me to look at, but it's not finished yet.
Apologies for being an idiot. But hey, it's Friday, so if noone else is
going to insult me, I'll just insu
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 05:55:43PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "obR" == R Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> obR> 3) An automatic conversion from Latex comments into LyX comments
> obR> and vice versa would be a nice feature.
>
> Yes.
This would be really nice. It should be r
Confirmed: link doesn't work. Can someone tell me if it's a typo or the link
has changed or died? Joacim?
-Amir
- Forwarded message from Helgi Örn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Helgi Örn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Worthless link!
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2000 12:19:45 +02
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 12:48:17PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I managed to convert your file to TeX using the wv product from CVS.
> It can be found at www.abisource.com and is pretty good especially
> for visually formatted docs. I attach the LaTeX output.
>
> LyX imports it (using
On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 02:29:05PM +0200, Jos van den Oever wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I import a latex file with floating figures, the figure is place outside of the
>float. Below I give the latex input file, then the resulting lyx file and then what
>the lyx file should be.
Hey Kayvan! I took a l
On Sun, Aug 20, 2000 at 03:02:28PM +0200, Michael Hartje wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am new to this list (reading now for 2 weeks) and new to lyx.
>
> I tried to translate a letter form word to lyx.
> This leads me to a bug which I like to report to you.
>
>
> 1. I converted the document with "word2
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 08:53:46AM +0100, Yann MORERE wrote:
>
> I write my thesis now. I have a lot of equations with lots of [] {} ()
> and so on...
> I would be nice if
>
> -- the left clic on the desired delimiter select left delimiter
> -- the right clic on the desired delimiter select righ
On Sun, Aug 20, 2000 at 04:28:40PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Form the CVS ChangeLog
> * src/frontends/xforms/ButtonController.h (Ok): renamed from
> Okay()
> (setOk): renamed from setOkay()
> The proper spelling of okay is either okay or OK *not* Ok. In most fonts
> Ok can be
On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 12:04:41PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> If we want to get 1.1.6 out before Christmas you should not do that...
> And if we decide to skip 1.1.6 and go directly at 1.2.0 we should make
> that decision now, then we need to enable NEW_INSETS too.
>
> Actually I am n
On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 04:51:12PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Ever wondered why 2.95.x is released: Bugfixes!
Hm. You may have a point there.
> Can you check if it is the std:: that the 2.95 have problems with.
>
&
On Mon, Aug 07, 2000 at 04:20:58PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Downloaded the latest CVS just now, reran autogen.sh; configure; make. It
> | still breaks with the attached errors (which I think are exactly the same).
> |
Downloaded the latest CVS just now, reran autogen.sh; configure; make. It
still breaks with the attached errors (which I think are exactly the same).
(I assume it makes no difference that I'm configure with
--prefix=/home/karger)
gcc is still gcc version 2.95 19990728 (release)
Sorry to be crea
On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 05:37:41PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Amir> I was hoping that Angus' patch would magically fix my problem, but it
> Amir> hasn't. Angus, do you have any ideas about what's causing my compile
> Amir> problem?
>
> Sorry Amir, can't really help. I know nothing about this c
I was hoping that Angus' patch would magically fix my problem, but it
hasn't. Angus, do you have any ideas about what's causing my compile
problem?
In file included from insetgraphicsParams.C:19:
../../src/support/translator.h: In method `const T2 &
Translator::find(const T1 &) const':
../../src/
gcc version 2.95 19990728 (release)
CVS updated just now
Apologies if someone else has already reported this (I get lyx-devel as a
digest).
-Amir
Making all in insets
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/karger/lyx/CVS/lyx-devel/src/insets'
/bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 02:40:13PM +0200, Jos van den Oever wrote:
> LS,
>
> When I import the attached file lyx1.1.5fix1 all is well, until I choode File->View
>Postscript.
Actually, all is not well. At least, when I load it into 1.1.6cvs, I get
things like:
Line ~27: Math parse error: Mi
On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 03:15:36PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Amir> (2) I'll note that I haven't updated since Jun 6, so I can't
> Amir> guarantee that this probl
Jean-Marc, the new system looks pretty impressive. I guess I've found a
couple bugs, though. Apologies if they've already been mentioned and I
didn't notice because I didn't get the latest update yet.
(1) I added Icon "buffer-export latex" to my .lyx/ui/my.ui file. I got a
core dump. So I change
cvs updated 3 hours ago (9:30 am EDT). Gets through a bunch of stuff but
then:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src -I./../ -I../.. -I../.. -isystem
/usr/X11R6/include -g -O -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -ansi -W -Wall
-Wno-return-type -pedantic -Wp,-MD,.deps/insetinclude.pp -c insetinclude.C
-o i
Wasn't there supposed to be a lyx.stable.gz or lyx.latest.gz link on the ftp
site that links to the latest stable tar? Speaking of which, the web site
should be linking to 1.1.5fix1 right now.
Actually, I think we should set up index.php3 to automatically link to the
latest version (and mention w
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 10:30:12AM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> Amir Karger wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 22, 2000 at 02:45:29AM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> > >
> > > /my/dir/my_file.tex: import failed. (buffer-import latex: [M-fil])
> > >
> > > Is this
On Sat, Jul 22, 2000 at 02:45:29AM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
>
> I've exported my paper as LaTeX and then tried to
> import this LaTeX output into LyX; just for fun.
> (I've renamed the LaTeX file, to avoid name overlaps!).
>
> /my/dir/my_file.tex: import failed. (buffer-import latex: [M-fil])
>
On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 09:20:51AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 19-Jul-2000 Amir Karger wrote:
> >
> > I think I complained about this like a year ago. Someone had an explanation
> > for why we weren't allowed to get rid of it, but I don't know what it
On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 04:08:07PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Serge" == Serge Winitzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Serge> There are certain problems with submitting RevTeX articles:
>
> We cannot do much about broken software... Using \(\) and \[\] is the
> correct latex syn
On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 05:36:35PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | How come you can only print one line in the RCS checkin message from LyX?
> | RCS lets your write a bunch of lines. (Or is there an escape for
> | \n?)
>
Speaking of menu-fixing, I'm remembering that several people suggested a
"Paste as LaTeX" command -- probably a couple of years ago by now. The thing
is, we have the technology. All you have to do is:
(1) copy the text you're pasting into /tmp/foo.tex
(2) reLyX -p -c Class /tmp/foo.tex
(Class
Hooray! The new version of mutt allows me to Reply to a message within the
lyx-devel digest! That means I'll be even more verbose from now on. (I know
that's just what people were waiting for.)
On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 05:00:13PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
>
> I now realize that part of the confusio
How come you can only print one line in the RCS checkin message from LyX?
RCS lets your write a bunch of lines. (Or is there an escape for \n?)
-Amir
OK, I'm using lyx1.1.6cvs from June 6, so maybe this was fixed. But I don't
think I remember this bug being mentioned.
When I check a file in via RCS and then immediately check it out again for
edit, the little "dial" in the scroll bar fills the entire scroll bar, so
I'm not able to scroll by dra
It seems to me that a new LDN would be a great idea.
First, the fact that LyX has taken its first step towards compatibility with
Gnome will probably excite lots of people, even if that step is small and
is running into some complications.
Second, it seems like JÜrgen has been working like crazy
revtex4 isn't listed in my LaTeX Configuration file (from the help menu). In
fact, it's more important to list that than revtex, which is revtex3, which
is basically obsolete. In fact, I would change the revtex entry to "This
layout is obsolete; please use revtex4 layout with RevTeX version 4 inst
So I just realized that in the last couple months, two new top-level menus
have been created. Has this been discussed? Are we sure it's a good idea?
I suspect that a large number of people will use LyX a lot, but never use
the Refs menu. Besides which, nearly all of the functionality in the refs
fermi2:~/lyx/CVS/lyxdoc>lyx es_Intro.lyx
LyX: Unknown argument `spanish' [around line 20 of file es_Intro.lyx]
Can someone who knows Spanish fix this to be the correct kind of quotes?
(I.e., change layout->quotes)
-Amir
Mate: I basically think of a daemon as a program that waits for input and
returns output. Which is to say, any program at all is really a daemon :)
More specifically, a program that is specifically designed to always be on
in the background, and to do something interesting when it receives
request
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 08:33:00PM +0200, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> As far as I can see, the conclusion is that the numbering
> scheme as such is not that important.
> The main thing is to communicate which ever system is used.
>
I thought Lars and even one or two others agreed on a slig
OK. try http://www.lyx.org/~karger/www-user/internet/mailing.php3 for the
latest version. I can't tell whether it makes any more sense than the
original, but at least I got rid of the dreaded lyx-foo. Let me know what
you think.
Incidentally, a totally radical option would be to create a bunch of
JMarc said:
#5: have 3 identical pages for the lists, parameterized via php, where
only the relevant data changes. So there should be a main page (with
maybe the truly generic information) with three links to
list-specific pages.
Problem with that is that for lyx-announce
Several options:
(1) Point out on the website that there's no such address as lyx-foo.
(Apparently the word "hypothetical" is either not understood by some people
or being ignored.)
(2) Change the website to use lyx-users for everything first, and then say,
"there's also a lyx-devel and lyx-anno
(Sorry that my digest reading means I don't use the In-Reply-To field &
stuff)
From: Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It's just another encoding of version numbers. With the "new" scheme
I think you're thinking too much like a Mathematician.
> old:"new"
> 1.1.5cvs
I really don't think we have to follow the linux kernel numbering system.
There are a gazillion packages out there, each of which has its own system.
I think as long as the website & docs stay consistent, we can have whatever
scheme we would like. (The only important thing, IMO, is the 1.0 label,
Congratulations to all the developers! It sounds like you guys got a
tremendous amount done, despite doing your best to kill lots of brain cells.
I guess that Asger is like a small child; you know you really have to worry
when he's being quiet.
Are we going to release 1.1.6 today?
-Amir
Hey, guys, have a great time at the FILM! (Will next year's meeting also be
called FILM?) It's not too late if anyone wants to send me two free tickest
to Norway. I'm sure my wife would love to see the scenery while I hacked.
The FILM would be a great excuse to write up another LDN, don't you th
OK. I haven't touched reLyX in months, and I haven't been latexing either.
And I don't have the energy to look through the reLyX source. So I'm not
entirely sure whether there this is the right thing to do. However, I've
fixed what might be a bug.
--- ../CVS/lyx-devel/lib/reLyX/LastLyX.pm
t supported. I won't
guarantee that anything will be changed, since I've dropped reLyX
development and the person who picked it up is pretty busy. But we can maybe
put it on the TODO list.
-Amir Karger
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 12:24:07AM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 04:38:53PM +0100, Ben Cazzolato wrote:
>
> If it wasn't mentioned before, LyX has the following feature:
> If you use the Insert Reference dialog in a document that includes other
> documents, LyX will automatic
Ben Cazzolato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
[Chris Eliasmith suggestes cross-referencing between documents]
> This is already possible. You can cross reference labels in other docs
> cause I needed to do this with my thesis (split into chapters). The trick
> is to open the two (or more docs you
Anyone know where it went? I can't get to mx.lyx.org at all.
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 12:44:27PM +0200, Roberto Alcázar Calzada wrote:
> I`m trying to access the Web page with the spanish version of Lyx but i
> can´t!!
> The link is in the About section (Non-English subsection) and is the
> spanis
IMO, there shouldn't be lots of different ways of looking at the TOC. Seems
like overkill and too many features. Why have a separate menu of the TOC
when you can get it with keys, mouseclick, or menu selection?
-Amir
Allan, are you trying to goad me into suggesting replacing your conv.sh with
perl? For example, you'd then have a simple interface with gtkconvert, which
is already in perl. But also, I have to imagine the things that you're
finding tough will become easier. (Maybe not a lot easier, if you don't k
FWIW, as someone who's not contributing to lyx at all right now, let me come
down on the side of opposing red dots except when absolutely necessary.
Each thing you add to LyX makes it that much more confusing for new users,
in addition to becoming more cluttered for experienced users.
For languag
OK. I checked the new TOC.lyx in. Hopefully Mike won't get angry. But hey,
it's almost Friday anyway. I also checked in Doc_toc.pl, which is the
(slightly more than 5-line) script that creates TOC.lyx.
Lars, all you need to do is "Doc_toc.pl > TOC.lyx" before you move the
lyxdoc module into lyx-
Sorry I'm not replying to the actual message, but that's more complicated to
do when you're reading messages via the digest.
Anyway, JMarc, the master TOC will on the contrary be very useful when you
haven't printed out the docs, because the section numbers are listed.
Frankly, I find it hard to
I didn't get any mail about Mike's lyxdoc CVS checkins. In fact, I think I
may not have gotten a couple previous ones either. Is there no cvslog
equivalent for lyxdoc?
-Amir
> I've commited a Master Table of Contents to the lyxdoc repository
> (TOC.lyx) along with the shell script that got me 98% of the way there.
> (As an exercize for Amir, rewrite it with 5 lines of Perl code ...). Let
> me know if you like it.
I don't really understand why you used that instead o
JMarc, my point is that a 1.1.4 plus the two patches is more stable than
plain 1.1.4, so there should be somewhere that a person can download the
patched sources from! Remember, we're trying to keep LyX stable during
development. Most people won't have the energy to download 1.1.4 and the
patches
Should the lyx.org link to "stable sources" (e.g. on the main page; I guess
also on the download page) link to the fix* sources?
-Amir
OK, in response to everyone's reassurances, consider my feathers unruffled.
I'm not averse to using a completely different program in the long run; I
just wanted to make sure people are aware that there are no easy fixes, and
any attempt to write a new reLyX (rereLyX?) will take a lot of work and
Kayvan said:
> Doing some searches on the net, I found a very interesting piece of
> software at http://www.nist.gov/sc4/editing/latex/programs/ltx2x/
>
> I am thinking of using it as the basis for a C-based reLyX replacement.
>
> Amir, can you take a look and tell me what you think?
Wow.
I've got a bit more faith in Andre's tex2lyx converter. Using LaTeX to
translate LaTeX isn't just a cool hack---it happens to be the best way
to read LaTeX. That is, we know that LaTeX won't have any trouble reading
LaTeX input, even if it isn't "well-behaved".
What that means is that you won't b
On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 09:03:32AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I'm only doing this because I figure I spend more time responding to FAQs
> individually than I would spend writing a FAQ document (famous last
> words), so I stupid enough to try to find out. Just don't hold your breath
> wai
Hi Mike. Congrats on taking this courageous step.
Last I knew, Jose M. had the FAQ. Of course, that was around the release of
0.12.0...
-Amir
ps it's good to hear you've got so much free time right now. Would you like
to type up a few sections of my thesis?
www.lyx.org/news currently points to the March 1 LDN!
-Amir
Now that I'm writing my thesis, I actually need to use LyX heavily. So I
suspect I'm going to be learning a lot about it. The bad news (for you) is
that I'll probably come up with a bunch of feature requests.
For now, it's a pretty simple one. You know how LyX 1.0.4 and on puts
citations from a b
> From: "Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: hollywood ok
> To: Lyx Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2000 23:56:41 -0400
>
> I downloaded the patch for ScriptWriter to abiWord. They have a long way
> to go before they catch up with LyX :), but Larry is right about i
Finally got a few minutes free to try compiling lyx-devel. (My current
version is 1.0.4pre1.) So I may have some errors to let you know about.
autogen.sh should test automake's version. 1.3 doesn't understand the "-c"
option, so it fails saying it didn't find automake.
-Amir
Allan:
>
> news.inc => news/news.inc
> should either be split into [half-]year long archives
> or we make a news/news.php3 that lets you "scroll" through the
> list (news/news.php3?2 to get the news from the second pageful
> of news_items)
Sure. Naming things news_1999.ph
On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 11:59:12AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> I don't know. How can reLyX tell that it's a \protect that LyX put
> >> in, and not one that the coder put in?
>
> Andre> Urmh... would the following work?
>
On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 11:59:12AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Or decide that \protect should disappear in constructs like \protect\[
> and \protect\], since LyX should add them back. Can reLyX do it, or is
> it out of reach?
On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 05:16:26PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Amir> That's a great idea. It could also include some of the more
> Amir> popular reLyX bugs and lacking featu
On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 06:08:07PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Then the man page should be turned into a manual, or better be
> included in Extended.lyx in some form...
We had ta
On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 05:42:51PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > reLyX man page, the current reLyX BUGS page, or the reLyX section of the
> > User's Guide (which is currently very small). The last seems like the place
> > most likely to be read by people who have a problem. The bad news, as I
>
On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 04:39:08PM +0100, Michael Creel wrote:
>
>Rather than modify reLyX, maybe the best solution would to create a
>document that explains this sort thing so that people would know how to
>modify their TeX documents before applying reLyX. I only found my
>soluti
eople come up with different ways to write the same thing, which
makes reading them all very tough. So for example, I've never used $$, and
I'd be happy to just get rid of the '$$' token, so that $$ would always be
interpreted as two '$' tokens next to each other. But other people may use $$
all the time, and they'd be pretty unhappy if I "broke" reLyX by making this
fix.
-Amir Karger
Allan queried:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>>
>> Just remember, wherever you go, there you are.
>> -- Buckaroo Bonzai
>Have you seen this movie? Did it make much sense to anyone? I saw it not
>long after it came out (quite young then) and it didn't make a lot o
101 - 200 of 688 matches
Mail list logo
